I doubt anyone actually uses it, and I'm not even entirely convinced it exists
myself; but it is our default for "clang -arch armv6". Functionally, if it does
exist it's identical to the arm1176jz-f from LLVM's point of view (the
difference is apparently in the "Security Extensions").
llvm-svn: 301962
Fix a crash when trying to extend a value passed as a sign- or
zero-extended stack parameter. The cause of the crash was that we were
setting the size of the loaded value to 32 bits, and then tyring to
extend again to 32 bits.
This patch addresses the issue by also introducing a G_TRUNC after the
load. This will leave the unused bits to their original values set by
the caller, while being consistent about the types. For values that are
not extended, we just use a smaller load.
llvm-svn: 301531
Besides better codegen, the motivation is to be able to canonicalize this pattern
in IR (currently we don't) knowing that the backend is prepared for that.
This may also allow removing code for special constant cases in
DAGCombiner::foldSelectOfConstants() that was added in D30180.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31944
llvm-svn: 301457
For targets that don't have ISD::MULHS or ISD::SMUL_LOHI for the type
and the double width type is illegal, then the two operands are
sign extended to twice their size then multiplied to check for overflow.
The extended upper halves were mismatched causing an incorrect result.
This fixes the mismatch.
A test was added for ARM V6-M where the bug was detected.
Patch by James Duley.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31807
llvm-svn: 301404
I'm proposing a fold for increment-of-sexted-bool in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31944
...so we need to know what happens in more cases like these.
llvm-svn: 301269
We have to widen the operands to 32 bits and then we can either use
hardware division if it is available or lower to a libcall otherwise.
At the moment it is not enough to set the Legalizer action to
WidenScalar, since for libcalls it won't know what to do (it won't be
able to find what size to widen to, because it will find Libcall and not
Legal for 32 bits). To hack around this limitation, we request Custom
lowering, and as part of that we widen first and then we run another
legalizeInstrStep on the widened DIV.
llvm-svn: 301166
Add support for both targets with hardware division and without. For
hardware division we have to add support throughout the pipeline
(legalizer, reg bank select, instruction select). For targets without
hardware division, we only need to mark it as a libcall.
llvm-svn: 301164
When selecting a G_CONSTANT to a MOVi, we need the value to be an Imm
operand. We used to just leave the G_CONSTANT operand unchanged, which
works in some cases (such as the GEP offsets that we create when
referring to stack slots). However, in many other places the G_CONSTANTs
are created with CImm operands. This patch makes sure to handle those as
well, and to error out gracefully if in the end we don't end up with an
Imm operand.
Thanks to Oliver Stannard for reporting this issue.
llvm-svn: 301162
Otherwise there's some mismatch, and we'll either form an illegal type or an
illegal node.
Thanks to Eli Friedman for pointing out the problem with my original solution.
llvm-svn: 301036
DAG combine was mistakenly assuming that the step-up it was looking at was
always a doubling, but it can sometimes be a larger extension in which case
we'd crash.
llvm-svn: 301002
Select them as copies. We only select if both the source and the
destination are on the same register bank, so this shouldn't cause any
trouble.
llvm-svn: 300971
The condition in isSupportedType didn't handle struct/array arguments
properly. Fix the check and add a test to make sure we use the fallback
path in this kind of situation. The test deals with some common cases
where the call lowering should error out. There are still some issues
here that need to be addressed (tail calls come to mind), but they can
be addressed in other patches.
llvm-svn: 300967
Single-threaded fences aren't required to provide any synchronization with
other processing elements so there's no need for a DMB. They should still be a
barrier for compiler optimizations though.
llvm-svn: 300904
Before, we assumed that any ConstantInt offset was precisely the access width,
so we could use the "[rN]!" form. ISelLowering only ever created that kind, but
further simplification during combining could lead to unexpected constants and
incorrect codegen.
Should fix PR32658.
llvm-svn: 300878
This allows forming more 'not' ops, so we get improvements for ISAs that have and-not.
Follow-up to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300725
llvm-svn: 300763
Re-commit after revert in r300668. Changed getMaxFPOffset() to a
more conservative heuristic instead of trying to be clever and missing
for some exotic calling conventions.
We need to reserve an emergency spill slot in cases with large argument
types that could overflow immediate offsets for FP relative address
calculations.
rdar://31317893
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31643
llvm-svn: 300761
Support G_MUL, very similar to G_ADD and G_SUB. The only difference is
in the instruction selector, where we have to select either MUL or MULv5
depending on the target.
llvm-svn: 300665
We need to reserve an emergency spill slot in cases with large argument
types that could overflow immediate offsets for FP relative address
calculations.
rdar://31317893
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31643
llvm-svn: 300639
In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target
selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's
behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the
hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe
ABI compatibility.
This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to
ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and
code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a
MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to
check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in
ARMSubtarget.
If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute
directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same
.eabi_attribute is specified twice.
This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when
parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at
the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object
file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly
block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid.
The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just
re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now
emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted:
Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812
llvm-svn: 300547
For subtargets that use the custom lowering for divmod, e.g. gnueabi,
we used to check if the subtarget has hardware divide and then lower to
a div-mul-sub sequence if true, or to a libcall if false.
However, judging by the usage of hasDivide vs hasDivideInARMMode, it
seems that hasDivide only refers to Thumb. For instance, in the
ARMTargetLowering constructor, the code that specifies whether to use
libcalls for (S|U)DIV looks like this:
bool hasDivide = Subtarget->isThumb() ? Subtarget->hasDivide()
: Subtarget->hasDivideInARMMode();
In the case of divmod for arm-gnueabi, using only hasDivide() to
determine what to do means that instead of lowering to __aeabi_idivmod
to get the remainder, we lower to div-mul-sub and then further lower the
div to __aeabi_idiv. Even worse, if we have hardware divide in ARM but
not in Thumb, we generate a libcall instead of using it (this is not an
issue in practice since AFAICT none of the cores that we support have
hardware divide in ARM but not Thumb).
This patch fixes the code dealing with custom lowering to take into
account the mode (Thumb or ARM) when deciding whether or not hardware
division is available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32005
llvm-svn: 300536
Use the same handling in the generic legalizer code as for the other
libcalls (G_FREM, G_FPOW).
Enable it on ARM for float and double so we can test it.
llvm-svn: 299931
A fix for the bug reported in PR30911.
The issue arises when multiple CALLSEQ_BEGIN nodes are unscheduled as
the last node to be unscheduled will gain access to the CallResource
register. But when a node is being picked, only CALLSEQ_END nodes are
checked against the CallResource and have their chains evaluated.
This then means that other CALLSEQ_BEGIN nodes can be scheduled
before the existing call sequence has been finalised. This patch adds
a check against the FrameSetup nodes in DelayForLiveRegs to prevent
this from happening.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31536
llvm-svn: 299926
BIC is generally faster, and it can put the output in a different
register from the input.
We already do this in Thumb2 mode; not sure why the equivalent fix
never got applied to ARM mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31797
llvm-svn: 299803
It turns out -float-abi=hard doesn't set the hard float calling
convention for libcalls. We need to use a hard float triple instead
(e.g. gnueabihf).
llvm-svn: 299761
Legalize to a libcall.
On this occasion, also start allowing soft float subtargets. For the
moment G_FREM is the only legal floating point operation for them.
llvm-svn: 299753
The new codepath has been in the tree for years, and there isn't any
reason to use two codepaths here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30596
llvm-svn: 299723
In LowerMUL, the chain information is not preserved for the new
created Load SDNode.
For example, if a Store alias with one of the operand of Mul.
The Load for that operand need to be scheduled before the Store.
The dependence is recorded in the chain of Store, in TokenFactor.
However, when lowering MUL, the SDNodes for the new Loads for
VMULL are not updated in the TokenFactor for the Store. Thus the
chain is not preserved for the lowered VMULL.
llvm-svn: 299701
Summary:
Host CPU detection now supports Kryo, so we need to recognize it in ARM
target.
Reviewers: mcrosier, t.p.northover, rengolin, echristo, srhines
Reviewed By: t.p.northover, echristo
Subscribers: aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31775
llvm-svn: 299674
This is a generic combine enabled via target hook to reduce icmp logic as discussed in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32401
It's likely that other targets will want to enable this hook for scalar transforms,
and there are probably other patterns that can use bitwise logic to reduce comparisons.
Note that we are missing an IR canonicalization for these patterns, and we will probably
prefer the pair-of-compares form in IR (shorter, more likely to fold).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31483
llvm-svn: 299542
This patch enables schedulers to specify instructions that
cannot be issued with any other instructions.
It also fixes BeginGroup/EndGroup.
Reviewed by: Andrew Trick
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30744
llvm-svn: 298885
Summary:
The true and false operands for the CMOV are operands 0 and 1.
ARMISelLowering.cpp::computeKnownBits was looking at operands 1 and 2
instead. This can cause CMOV instructions to be incorrectly folded into
BFI if value set by the CMOV is another CMOV, whose known bits are
computed incorrectly.
This patch fixes the issue and adds a test case.
Reviewers: kristof.beyls, jmolloy
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson, srhines, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31265
llvm-svn: 298624
The special case of zero sized values was previously not handled correctly.
This patch handles this by not promoting if the size is zero.
Patch by Tim Neumann.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31116
llvm-svn: 298320
This commit adds a parameter that lets us pass in the calling convention
of the call to CallLowering::lowerCall. This allows us to handle
situations where the calling convetion of the callee is different from
that of the caller.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31039
llvm-svn: 298254
