3929 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
OCHyams
f9dba933c6 [Assignment Tracking] Skip scalable vectors in declare-to-assign pass
Do not convert dbg.declares to dbg.assigns for variables backed by scalable
vector allocas as this isn't yet supported.

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149959
2023-05-05 18:07:05 +01:00
Ilya Kuklin
c395a84600 [MSP430] Get the DWARF pointer size from MCAsmInfo instead of DataLayout.
This change will allow to put code pointers in DWARF info fields that are larger than actual pointer size, e.g. 16-bit pointers into 32-bit fields.

The need for this came up while creating support for MSP430 in LLDB. MSP430-GCC already generates DWARF info with 32-bit fields, so this change is necessary for LLDB to maintain compatibility with both GCC and LLVM binaries. Moreover, right now in LLDB there is no support for having DWARF pointer size different from ELF header type, e.g. 16-bit DWARF info within ELF32, and it seems there is no such thing as ELF16.

Since other mainline targets are made to have the same pointer size in both MCAsmInfo and DataLayout, there is no need to change anything there.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148042
2023-05-04 12:37:30 -07:00
Tom Weaver
8bb4943387 Revert "[DebugInfo] add test case for D147506, NFC"
This reverts commit 6a808270e8a9becc07857240ebbf6731743a4485.

This test was added after https://reviews.llvm.org/D147506 was comittted which
has been reverted pending a buildbot fix for:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/247/builds/4125
2023-05-04 11:21:21 +01:00
Tom Weaver
1d8ab713ad Revert "[DebugLine] save one debug line entry for empty prologue"
This reverts commit b48a8233f5e230e46182bf5c523ceb6a04cec8f5.

This change caused https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/247/builds/4125
to start failing, please address the failures before resubmitting.
2023-05-04 11:08:58 +01:00
Chen Zheng
b48a8233f5 [DebugLine] save one debug line entry for empty prologue
Some debuggers like DBX on AIX assume the address in debug line
entries is always incremental. But clang generates two entries (entry
for file scope line and entry for prologue end) with same address if
prologue is empty

And if the prologue is empty, seems the first debug line entry for the
function is unnecessary(i.e. removing the first entry won't impact the
behavior in GDB on Linux), so I implement this for all debuggers.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147506
2023-05-04 04:37:34 +00:00
Chen Zheng
6a808270e8 [DebugInfo] add test case for D147506, NFC
[DebugLine] save one debug line entry for empty prologue
2023-05-04 04:37:27 +00:00
Daniel Paoliello
e48826e016 Emit the correct flags for the PROC CodeView Debug Symbol
The S_LPROC32_ID and S_GPROC32_ID CodeView Debug Symbols have a flags
field which LLVM has had the values for (in the ProcSymFlags enum) but
has never actually set.

These flags are used by Microsoft-internal tooling that leverages debug
information to do binary analysis.

Modified LLVM to set the correct flags:

- ProcSymFlags::HasOptimizedDebugInfo - always set, as this indicates that
debug info is present for optimized builds (if debug info is not emitted
for optimized builds, then LLVM won't emit a debug symbol at all).
- ProcSymFlags::IsNoReturn and ProcSymFlags::IsNoInline - set if the
function has the NoReturn or NoInline attributes respectively.
- ProcSymFlags::HasFP - set if the function requires a frame pointer (per
TargetFrameLowering::hasFP).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148761
2023-05-03 18:20:16 -07:00
Florian Hahn
4e2b4f97a0
[ShrinkWrap] Use underlying object to rule out stack access.
Allow shrink-wrapping past memory accesses that only access globals or
function arguments. This patch uses getUnderlyingObject to try to
identify the accessed object by a given memory operand. If it is a
global or an argument, it does not access the stack of the current
function and should not block shrink wrapping.

Note that the caller's stack may get accessed when passing an argument
via the stack, but not the stack of the current function.

This addresses part of the TODO from D63152.

Reviewed By: thegameg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149668
2023-05-03 09:28:07 +01:00
OCHyams
9391177cbc [Assignment Tracking] Check getTypeSizeInBits result for scalable vector types
Without this patch, in `getAssignmentInfo` the result of `getTypeSizeInBits` is
cast to `uint64_t`, which a) is an operation that will eventually be
unsupported by the API according to the comments, and b) causes an assertion
failure if the type is a scalable vector. Don't cast the `TypeSize` to
`uint64_t` and check `isScalable` before getting the fixed size.

This can result in incorrect variable locations, see llvm.org/PR62346 (but is
better than crashing).

Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149137
2023-04-28 09:10:38 +01:00
Shubham Sandeep Rastogi
7fde0b2fa1 Remove unused attributes from move-dbg-values-imm-test.mir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149355
2023-04-27 09:42:20 -07:00
OCHyams
bd1109307a [DebugInfo][InstCombine] Fix missing source and variable locations after foldOpIntoPhi
Reviewed By: fdeazeve

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149335
2023-04-27 13:56:09 +01:00
Shubham Sandeep Rastogi
710290cecc Emit unwind information in .debug_frame section when .cfi_sections .debug_frame intrinsic is used
The .cfi_sections .debug_frame intrinsic is used to emit .debug_frame
section. This directive tells the assembler to write out a section of
debug frame data. AArch64 is a platform where eh_frame is not needed for
unwind information. Unfortunately, that means that even when the
.cfi_sections .debug_frame intrinsic is used, the compiler skips
emitting the CIE's and FDE's in the debug_frame section. This patch
address that issue by making sure that the emission of CIE's and FDE's
are only skipped if the unwind information does not require a
debug_frame section and is a platform where the eh_frame can be skipped.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147980
2023-04-26 16:19:53 -07:00
Shubham Sandeep Rastogi
fe8eab468e Add tests to verify behavior of .cfi_sections .debug_frame intrinsic.
There was some lacking test coverage for checking when the
.cfi_sections .debug_frame intrinsic is emitted. On x86_64,
with -fno-exceptions there is no .cfi_sections .debug_frame intrinsic
emitted because there is an unwind table attribute.

On AArch64, with -fno-exceptions, there is no unwind table attribute, so
the .cfi_sections .debug_frame intrinsic is emitted correctly.

Alternatively, with -fexceptions, both AArch64 and x86_64 emit an unwind
table and therefore do not emit a .cfi_sections .debug_frame intrinsic

All this work was done in addition to https://reviews.llvm.org/D139663
patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147747
2023-04-26 16:16:33 -07:00
OCHyams
ac6e177ce6 [Assignment Tracking] Remove overly defensive AllocaInst assertion
Remove assert from AssignmentTrackingAnalysis that fires if a local variable
has non-alloca storage. The analysis can emit these locations but the
assignment tracking code in SelectionDAG isn't ready to handle non-alloca
storage for locals yet. The AssignmentTrackingPass (pass that adds assignment
tracking metadata) ignores non-alloca dbg.declares, so the only variables
affected are those who's backing storage is changed from an alloca during
optimisation, and the result is the variables are dropped.

Fixes: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/pigweed/builders/toolchain/
                 toolchain-ci-pigweed-linux/b8783274592206481489/overview

Reviewed By: StephenTozer

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149135
2023-04-26 11:24:31 +01:00
OCHyams
3feea34d77 [DebugInfo] Do not delete debug intrinsics with empty metadata operands
A ValueAsMetadata may be replaced with nullptr for several reasons including
deleting (certain) values and value remapping a use-before-def. In the case of
a MetadataAsValue user, handleChangedOperand intercepts and replaces the
metadata with an empty tuple (!{}).

At the moment, an empty metadata operand in a debug intrinsics signals that it
can be deleted.

Given that we end up with empty metadata operands in circumstances where the
Value has been "lost" the current behaviour can lead to incorrect variable
locations. Instead, we should treat empty metadata as meaning "there is no
location for the variable" (the same as we currently treat undef operands).

This patch removes the deletion logic from wouldInstructionBeTriviallyDead.

Related to https://discourse.llvm.org/t/auto-undef-debug-uses-of-a-deleted-value

Reviewed By: StephenTozer

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140901
2023-04-26 09:58:31 +01:00
OCHyams
2b3c13b716 [DebugInfo] Treat empty metadata operands the same as undef operands in SelectionDAG
Without this patch SelectionDAG silently drops dbg.values using `!{}` operands.

Related to https://discourse.llvm.org/t/auto-undef-debug-uses-of-a-deleted-value

Reviewed By: StephenTozer

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140990
2023-04-26 09:03:07 +01:00
Shubham Sandeep Rastogi
cb2dd94be8 Factor out split-dwarf test in Generic/empty.ll
In llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/empty.ll, there are two RUN lines. The
second one use the option "-split-dwarf-file=foo.dwo"

Since darwin doesn't support split dwarf, there is an assertion when
running the test:

"Assertion failed: (Section && "Cannot switch to a null section!"),
function switchSection, file llvm/lib/MC/MCStreamer.cpp, line 1238"

While there is an XFAIL for darwin in the test, It is not a good
practice to run a test on darwin which causes an assertion. This
patch is a small refactoring of the test so that the split-dwarf test
can be it's own file with an explicit elf triple.

Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149106
2023-04-25 13:17:46 -07:00
OCHyams
72776850ed Revert "[DebugInfo] Print empty MDTuples wrapped in MetadataAsValue inline"
This reverts commit 1e6fe677f8aa98518e05218affa16e468819f5ed (D140900).

Buildbot: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/196/builds/29937
2023-04-25 14:37:25 +01:00
Jeremy Morse
7561f9cd5c [DebugInfo][CSInfo] Avoid crash when defining super-regs
In rare situations involving AVX intrinsics, it seems LLVM can be coaxed
into generating copies to arguments that look like this:

    $xmm0 = VMOVAPSrr $xmm1, implicit-def $ymm0
    CALL64 @something ymm0

This particular form of copy implicitly zeros the upper lanes of ymm0,
hence there's an implicit-def for the register in the copy. The X86
implementation of describeLoadedValue doesn't attempt to describe this sort
of copy which causes the generic implementation in
TargetInstrInfo::describeLoadedValue to fire an assertion saying it
expected the target hook to handle it.

Play it safe in the generic implementation and return the "no location /
value" return value, rather than asserting.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148626
2023-04-25 14:15:33 +01:00
OCHyams
1e6fe677f8 [DebugInfo] Print empty MDTuples wrapped in MetadataAsValue inline
This improves the readability of debugging intrinsics. Instead of:

    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata !2, ...)
    !2 = !{}

We will see:

    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata !{}, ...)
    !2 = !{}

Note that we still get a numbered metadata entry for the node even if it's not
used elsewhere. This is to avoid adding more context to the print functions.

This is already legal IR - LLVM can parse and understand it - so there is no
need to update the parser.

The next patches in this stack will make such empty metadata operands more
common and semantically important.

Related to https://discourse.llvm.org/t/auto-undef-debug-uses-of-a-deleted-value

Reviewed By: StephenTozer

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140900
2023-04-25 14:13:47 +01:00
Shubham Sandeep Rastogi
a971bc38ce Move DBG_VALUE's that depend on loads to after a
load if the load is moved due to the pre register allocation ld/st
optimization pass

The issue here is that there can be a scenario where debug information
is lost because of the pre register allocation load store optimization
pass, where a load who's result describes the debug infomation for a
local variable gets moved below the load and that causes the debug
information for that load to get lost.

Example:

Before the Pre Register Allocation Load Store Pass
inst_a
%2 = ld ...
inst_b
DBG_VALUE %2, "x", ...
%3 = ld ...

After the Pass:
inst_a
inst_b
DBG_VALUE %2, "x", ...
%2 = ld ...
%3 = ld ...

The load has now been moved to after the DBG_VAL that uses its result
and the debug info for "x" has been lost. What we want is:

inst_a
inst_b
%2 = ld ...
DBG_VALUE %2, "x", ...
%3 = ld ...

Which is what this patch addresses

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145168
2023-04-24 16:10:54 -07:00
Serge Pavlov
1d5fa4f88f [symbolizer] Change error message if module not found (recommit)
This is a recommit of 75f1f158812d, reverted in 7a443b1c493d, because
it caused compilation error in
compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/symbolizer/sanitizer_symbolize.cpp.
The error was fixed by Kasimir Georgiev in de4c038c7ba2, but this
commit was reverted in de088dd3a0aa, because the initial commit was
reverted.

This commit reverts both the reverting commits, 7a443b1c493d and
de088dd3a0aa.

Original commit message is below.

If llvm-symbolize did not find module, the error looked like:

    LLVMSymbolizer: error reading file: No such file or directory

This message does not follow common practice: LLVMSymbolizer is not an
utility name. Also the message did not not contain the name of missed file.

With this change the error message looks differently:

    llvm-symbolizer: error: 'abc': No such file or directory

This format is closer to messages produced by other utilities and allow
proper coloring.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148032
2023-04-23 06:35:35 +00:00
Alexander Yermolovich
3ba4d082da [dwarfdump][dwarf] Fix parsing of tu-index
Fixed issue where {tu,cu}-index fixup code for DWARF5 that would report an error when
fixup map is empty. Which is the case when seciton(s) are not over 4GB or
--manaully-generate-unit-index is not specified

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148578
2023-04-20 11:42:24 -07:00
OCHyams
571eaead17 Reapply "[Assignment Tracking] Fix fragment error for some DSE-shortened stores"
This reverts commit 6db6ab4815a44bfcaabfcdd84a0ff458394f6f52 which reverts
D148536.

Build issues addressed in D148698.
2023-04-19 13:36:47 +01:00
OCHyams
6db6ab4815 Revert "[Assignment Tracking] Fix fragment error for some DSE-shortened stores"
This reverts commit fca3e8e024f0015604d21e6f76f3e199345679c5.

Buildbot: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/121/builds/29766
2023-04-19 10:03:33 +01:00
OCHyams
fca3e8e024 [Assignment Tracking] Fix fragment error for some DSE-shortened stores
`shortenAssignment` inserts dbg.assigns with fragments describing the dead part
of a shortened store after each dbg.assign linked to the store.

Without this patch it doesn't take into account that the dead part of a
shortened store may be outside the bounds of a variable of a linked
dbg.assign. It also doesn't correctly account for a non-zero offset in the
address modifying `DIExpression` of the dbg.assign (which is possible for
fragments now even though whole variables currently cannot have a non-zero
offset in their alloca).

Fix this by moving the dead slice into variable-space and performing an
intersect of that adjusted slice with the existing fragment.

This fixes a verifier error reported when building fuchsia with assignment
tracking enabled:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/fuchsia/builders/ci/
        clang_toolchain.ci.core.x64-release/b8784000953022145169/overview

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148536
2023-04-19 09:32:09 +01:00
OCHyams
311260a699 [Assignment Tracking][SelectionDAG] Downgrade dbg.assigns to dbg.values if assignment tracking is not enabled
We shouldn't be able to reach this code path from source code but this provides
a better fail-safe than asserting. The result of the downgrade is a degraded
debugging experience, but it is better than nothing.

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148212
2023-04-18 13:03:45 +01:00
OCHyams
1950cb4b68 [Assignment Tracking] Skip empty-metadata dbg.declares in AssignmentTrackingPass
Debug intrinsics sometimes end up with empty metadata location operands. The
debug intrinsic interfaces return nullptr when retrieving location operand in
this case.

Skip empty-metadata dbg.declares to avoid dereferencing the nullptr. This
doesn't affect the final debug info in any way.

Reviewed By: jryans

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148204
2023-04-18 08:43:54 +01:00
OCHyams
2ccbd19473 [Assignment Tracking][SelectionDAG] Fix dbg.declare location nullptr deref
Debug intrinsics sometimes end up with empty metadata location operands. The
debug intrinsic interfaces return nullptr when retrieving location operand in
this case.

When assignment tracking is not enabled a dbg.declare with a nullptr location
operand is skipped. Do the same when assignment tracking is enabled (a nullptr
address component of a dbg.assign is already handled correctly.

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148203
2023-04-18 08:43:54 +01:00
Serge Pavlov
7a443b1c49 Revert "[symbolizer] Change error message if module not found"
This reverts commit 75f1f158812dabc03e70697b6b9c272230bce63d.
It caused fail on https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot#builders/37/builds/21461
2023-04-14 17:37:25 +07:00
Serge Pavlov
75f1f15881 [symbolizer] Change error message if module not found
If llvm-symbolize did not find module, the error looked like:

    LLVMSymbolizer: error reading file: No such file or directory

This message does not follow common practice: LLVMSymbolizer is not an
utility name. Also the message did not not contain the name of missed file.

With this change the error message looks differently:

    llvm-symbolizer: error: 'abc': No such file or directory

This format is closer to messages produced by other utilities and allow
proper coloring.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148032
2023-04-14 13:03:28 +07:00
Heejin Ahn
d20a1b87f6 [WebAssembly] Handle DebugLoc in DebugValueManager
According to
https://llvm.org/docs/HowToUpdateDebugInfo.html#when-to-preserve-an-instruction-location,
when moving (and in our case cloning) within the same BB, the debug
location is preserved. But when moving / cloning to a different BB, we
preserve the debug location only if the destination BB contains the same
location. Currently we preserve the debug loc unconditionally in all
cases. This CL correctly handles the debug locs in DebugValueManager.

Reviewed By: dschuff

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148115
2023-04-12 23:47:24 -07:00
Shubham Sandeep Rastogi
9bc5e8c87e Revert "Move DBG_VALUE's that depend on loads to after a"
This reverts commit 0aaf634152f25a805563d552e72d89e8202d84f2.

Reverted this because of build failure https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot#builders/245/builds/7035

/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv8-quick/llvm/llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/incorrect-variable-debugloc1.ll:28:12: error: DWARF23: expected string not found in input
; DWARF23: DW_OP_lit13{{$}}
          ^
<stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
-: file format elf32-littlearm
^
<stdin>:19:20: note: possible intended match here
DW_AT_frame_base (DW_OP_reg13 SP)
                  ^
2023-04-12 12:45:53 -07:00
Shubham Sandeep Rastogi
0aaf634152 Move DBG_VALUE's that depend on loads to after a
load if the load is moved due to the pre register allocation ld/st
optimization pass

The issue here is that there can be a scenario where debug information
is lost because of the pre register allocation load store optimization
pass, where a load who's result describes the debug infomation for a
local variable gets moved below the load and that causes the debug
information for that load to get lost.

Example:

Before the Pre Register Allocation Load Store Pass
inst_a
%2 = ld ...
inst_b
DBG_VALUE %2, "x", ...
%3 = ld ...

After the Pass:
inst_a
inst_b
DBG_VALUE %2, "x", ...
%2 = ld ...
%3 = ld ...

The load has now been moved to after the DBG_VAL that uses its result
and the debug info for "x" has been lost. What we want is:

inst_a
inst_b
%2 = ld ...
DBG_VALUE %2, "x", ...
%3 = ld ...

Which is what this patch addresses

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145168
2023-04-12 12:10:58 -07:00
OCHyams
ff11c4f184 [Assignment Tracking] Ignore VLA-backed variables
VLA backed variables currently trip an assertion in SROA with D146987 (enabling
assignment tracking). Disable assignment tracking for VLA variables until that
can be investigated.

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148140
2023-04-12 17:07:48 +01:00
OCHyams
38292f0e14 [Assignment Tracking] Fix assertion in AssignmentTrackingPass::runOnFunction
The assertion exists to ensure all variables passed into `trackAssignments` end
up with dbg.assigns associated with their backing allocas. The assertion
compared the passed-in and tracked variables using `DebugVariable`, which
includes the fragment as part of the variable identity.

It is possible for the backing alloca to be smaller than a variable (see test
case). In this case the input variable `(Var X, no fragment, no InlinedAt)`
isn't equal to the dbg.assign variable `(Var X, some fragment, no
InlinedAt)`. To cover this case the assertion now ignores fragments through the
use of `DebugVariableAggregate`.

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148100
2023-04-12 12:33:52 +01:00
OCHyams
d05b570988 [Assignment Tracking] Trunc fragments for stores to vars smaller than the alloca
In D147777 emitDbgAssign was fixed to discard assignments which touched any
bits outside the bounds of a variable. This patch changes emitDbgAssign to
discard assignments which touch bits only outside the variable bounds, and
creates a truncated fragment expression for stores partially overlapping the
variable. This is necessary because the alloca is interpreted as a store (of
undef), meaning without this patch emitDbgAssign would discard the inital
dbg.assign for a variable that is smaller than the alloca.

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148018
2023-04-11 18:18:11 +01:00
OCHyams
9106960724 [Assignment Tracking][SROA] Don't un-poison dbg.assigns using multiple loc ops
Some dbg.assigns using poison become un-poisoned in SROA. The reason this
happens at all is because dbg.assigns linked to memory intrinsics use poison to
indicate they can't describe the stored value, but the value becomes available
after some optimisations. This needs reworking eventually, but for now we need
to ensure that when it does occur we don't create invalid expressions.

D147312 prevented this occuring when the dbg.assign uses DIArgLists, but that
wasn't a complete fix. We also need to ensure we avoid un-poisoning when the
existing expression uses more than one location operand (DW_OP_arg, n).

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148020
2023-04-11 18:18:11 +01:00
OCHyams
e932d2e626 [Assignment Tracking] Fix fragments for assignments to variables smaller than the alloca
Prior to this patch the trackAssignments function would attribute all stores to
an alloca to all variables linked to the alloca. This is wrong in the case
where the alloca contains variables which are smaller than the alloca, and
caused erroneous fragment information to be generated.

Now stores outside the variable bounds are discarded, and we check whether a
fragment is needed based on whether the store covers the entire variable as
opposed to whether it covers the entire alloca (except for variables of unknown
size).

Note that trackAssignments doesn't yet understand whole variables sitting at
anything other than offset 0 in an alloca - those variables are still tracked
using dbg.declares.

Fixes https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/70/builds/36007

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147777
2023-04-09 09:58:53 +01:00
OCHyams
086635d6b9 [Assignment Tracking][SROA] Fix fragment when slice size equals variable size
Correctly handle the case of splitting an alloca which backs contiguous
distinct variables, where a slice's size equals the size of a backed variable.

We need to ensure that we don't generate fragments expressions with fragments
of the same size as the variable as this is a verifier error.

Prior to this patch a fragment expression would be created in this
situation. e.g. splitting an alloca i64 with two adjacent 32-bit variables into
two 32-bit allocas, the new dbg.assign expressions would contain
(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 32) and (DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 32, 32) even though
those fragments cover each variable entirely.

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147696
2023-04-06 15:29:18 +01:00
Ilia Kuklin
9a9c6b8e75 [MSP430] Add CFI instructions for MSP430.
Implement emission of DWARF CFI instructions for MSP430. This includes descriptions of stack frame layout and location of callee-saved registers that could be used for backtracing.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146966
2023-04-05 15:53:01 -07:00
Daniel Thornburgh
9812948d22 [Object] Refactor build ID parsing into Object lib.
This makes parsing for build IDs in the markup filter slightly more
permissive, in line with fromHex.

It also removes the distinction between missing build ID and empty build
ID; empty build IDs aren't a useful concept, since their purpose is to
uniquely identify a binary. This removes a layer of indirection wherever
build IDs are obtained.

Reviewed By: jhenderson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147485
2023-04-05 11:25:26 -07:00
OCHyams
1a0653a80d [DebugInfo] Update test to use opaque ptrs
The test was added in D99169.
2023-04-05 16:26:07 +01:00
Nikita Popov
3cbdcd6ebf [InstCombine] Remove PromoteCastOfAllocation() fold (NFC)
This fold does not apply to opaque pointers, and as such is no
longer needed.
2023-04-05 15:55:43 +02:00
OCHyams
76740fb40e [Assignment Tracking][SROA] Handle createFragmentExpression failure
createFragmentExpression will fail if it determines that the expression cannot
be split over fragments. Handle this case in SROA. Similarly to D147312 this
should be a rare occurrence as the `dbg.assign` will usually reference the
`Value` being stored without modifying it with a `DIExpression`.

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147431
2023-04-05 11:20:32 +01:00
OCHyams
93c194fc9f [Assignment Tracking] Ignore zero-sized fragments
Such dbg.assigns will occur if you write zero-sized memcpys (see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146987#4240016).

Handle this in AssignmentTrackingAnalysis (back end) rather than
AssignmentTrackingPass (declare-to-assign) in case it is possible to reproduce
this as a result of optimisations.

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147435
2023-04-05 09:31:23 +01:00
Vladimir Radosavljevic
b5e7a4e20f [DebugInfo][flang] Fix linking modules with similar DIStringType
This issue is caused by incomplete implementation of isKeyOf for DIStringType.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147140
2023-04-04 12:48:00 -07:00
OCHyams
01c02cded1 [Assignment Tracking][SROA] Handle DIArgList in migrateDebugInfo
If the to-be-split dbg.assign has a `DIArgList` and a new `Value` has been
requested then use a kill-location for the new dbg.assign. We can't simply
replace the value component (a `DIArgList`) with the new `Value` as that would
leave the `DIExpression` in an invalid state (`DW_OP_LLVM_arg` operands with no
arglist).

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147312
2023-03-31 12:38:47 +01:00
David Blaikie
a73d354024 DWARF: Enable "ranges always" under Split DWARF by default
Given the intent of Split DWARF is to minimize .o file size it seems
like adequate signal that it's worth a minor tradeoff in .dwo size to
significantly reduce .o size (though it doesn't reduce linked executable
size - the cost is mostly in the static relocations resolved by the
linker).
2023-03-29 21:01:38 +00:00
Heejin Ahn
a4e32ae4cd [WebAssembly] Do nothing when sinking to same place
In `DebugValueManager`, if a `Def` is requested to be sunk to the same
place (i.e., `Insert` is right after `Def`, not counting `DBG_VALUE`s)
currently we still do the sink. This can result in unnecessary creation
of `DBG_VALUE $noreg`. See comments for details. This CL detects this
case and do nothing and return, so we don't end up creating unnecessary
undef `DBG_VALUE`s.

Reviewed By: dschuff

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146860
2023-03-29 12:50:39 -07:00