Introduced the convergent equivalent of the existing G_INTRINSIC opcodes:
- G_INTRINSIC_CONVERGENT
- G_INTRINSIC_CONVERGENT_W_SIDE_EFFECTS
Out of the targets that currently have some support for GlobalISel, the patch
assumes that the convergent intrinsics only relevant to SPIRV and AMDGPU.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154766
Some opcodes in generic MIR represent calls to intrinsics, where the intrinsic
ID is the first non-def operand to the instruction. These are now represented as
a subclass of GenericMachineInstr, and the method MachineInstr::getIntrinsicID()
is now moved to this subclass GIntrinsic.
Some target-defined instructions behave like GMIR intrinsics, and have an
Intrinsic::ID operand. But they should not be recognized as generic intrinsics,
and should not use GIntrinsic::getIntrinsicID(). Separated these out by
introducing a new AMDGPU::getIntrinsicID().
Reviewed By: arsenm, Pierre-vh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155556
This restores commit baa3386edb11a2f9bcadda8cf58d56f3707c39fa.
Originally reverted in d0f7850b01cf17e50a4f4b00e3b84dded94df6b8.
This reverts commit baa3386edb11a2f9bcadda8cf58d56f3707c39fa.
The changes did not cover all occurrences of the deteleted function
MachineInstr::getIntrinsicID().
Some opcodes in generic MIR represent calls to intrinsics, where the intrinsic
ID is the first non-def operand to the instruction. These are now represented as
a subclass of GenericMachineInstr, and the method MachineInstr::getIntrinsicID()
is now moved to this subclass GIntrinsic.
Some target-defined instructions behave like GMIR intrinsics, and have an
Intrinsic::ID operand. But they should not be recognized as generic intrinsics,
and should not use GIntrinsic::getIntrinsicID(). Separated these out by
introducing a new AMDGPU::getIntrinsicID().
Reviewed By: arsenm, Pierre-vh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155556
Use the new matchtable-based combiner backend for all AMDGPU combiners.
This drop-in from the user's perspective; there are no test changes, the new combiner behaves exactly like the old one.
Depends on D153757
NOTE: This would land iff D153757 (RFC) lands too.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153758
Currently, raw_buffer_load_{i8,i16} and struct_buffer_load_{i8,i16}
intrinsics are lowered as buffer_load_{u8,u16}. This patch combines
buffer_load_{u8,u16} and sign extension instructions in order to
generate buffer_load_{i8,i16} instructions.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144313
This is NFC as it stands, since other combines will effectively
prevent this from being reachable. This will avoid regressions in a
future change which tries to make better use of select source
modifiers.
Didn't bother with the GlobalISel part for now, since the baseline
combine doesn't seem to work on the existing test.
Small QoL change to allow Predicates to be used in GICombineRule.
Currently only one combine in the AMDGPU backend makes use of it.
The implementation is pretty simple to get started but of course we can expand this later on and optimize predicate checking better if needed.
Reviewed By: dsanders
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136681
Typically when you match something, you want to check the result.
Fix a couple warnings in the AMDGPUPostLegalizerCombiner which appear as a
result of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135491
Before, the isPreLegalize() query in CombinerHelper only checked for the
presence of a LegalizerInfo object. This is problematic when we want to have
a combine actually check for legality in a pre-legalizer combine pass, since
if we pass a LegalizerInfo object to the constructor it causes the combines to
think that we're running *post* legalizer, which isn't true.
This change fixes it to instead check an explicit bool that passes to signal
whether the pass will be run before or after legalization.
Doing so exposed a bug in the extending loads combine, which tried to check for
legality of candidate extending loads if LegalizerInfo was present. Since we
only ran it pre-legalizer and therefore with a null LegalizerInfo, it never
actually ran. Also fixes the legality checks to keep the tests passing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135044
If possible fold fneg into instruction above if users cannot fold mods and we
know it will decrease instruction count.
Follows same logic as SDAG combiner in choosing opportunities to combine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112827
Add basic version of isCanonicalized for global-isel. Copied from sdag.
Add post legalizer combine that deletes G_FCANONICALIZE when its input
is already Canonicalized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96605
Change match/apply functions into methods of new target specific combiner
helper class. Use reference to MachineIRBuilder from helper instead of
constructing new MachineIRBuilder each time new instruction needs to made.
Allows correct tracking of newly created instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90623
Summary:
Adds the ability to add members to a generated combiner via
a State base class. In the current AArch64PreLegalizerCombiner
this is used to make Helper available without having to
provide it to every call.
As part of this, split the command line processing into a
separate object so that it still only runs once even though
the generated combiner is constructed more frequently.
Depends on D81862
Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, bogner, volkan, aemerson, paquette, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81863
Ports the existing DAG combines, minus the simplify demanded bits
which seems to have no equivalent now. Without these, this isn't
particularly helpful in most of the IR sample cases.
The current set of custom combines are only really useful after
legalization, so move them there. There is a lot of overlap in the
boilerplate here, but I think we do want a pretty different set of
combines before and after legalize. I think we will want a lot of
overlap between the post-legalize and a post-regbankselect combiner.
