RegionBranchOpInterface did not allow the operation with regions to
specify itself as successors. Therefore, this implied that the control
is always transferred to a region before being transferred back to the
parent op. Since the region can only transfer the control back to the
parent op from a terminator, this transitively implied that the first
block of any region with a RegionBranchOpInterface is always executed
until the terminator can transfer the control flow back. This is
trivially false for any conditional-like operation that may or may not
execute the region, as well as for loop-like operations that may not
execute the body.
Remove the restriction from the interface description and update the
only transform that relied on it.
See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-region-control-flow-interfaces-should-encode-region-not-executed-correctly/72103.
Depends On: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155757
Reviewed By: Mogball, springerm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155822
If an op is unknown to the analysis, it must be treated conservatively: assume that every operand aliases with every result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150546
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional. This patch changes the way mlir-tblgen generates .inc
files, and modifies tests and documentation appropriately. It is a "no
compromises" patch, and doesn't leave the user with an unpleasant mix of
llvm::Optional and std::optional.
A non-trivial change has been made to ControlFlowInterfaces to split one
constructor into two, relating to a build failure on Windows.
See also: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <r@artagnon.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138934
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
It's only used from there, and this lets us remove the dependency from Analysis
to the Arith dialect.
Reviewed By: springerm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132928
