When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.
llvm-svn: 315251
As reported on cfe-commits, r314262 resulted in tentatively-defined
variables not being excluded for the warning.
Patch By: Elizabeth Andrews
llvm-svn: 314939
We were injecting the function into the wrong semantic context, resulting in it
failing to be registered as a global for redeclaration lookup. As a
consequence, we accepted invalid code since r310616.
Fixing that resulted in the "out-of-scope declaration" diagnostic firing a lot
more often. It turned out that warning codepath was non-conforming, because it
did not cause us to inject the implicitly-declared function into the enclosing
block scope. We now only warn if the type of the out-of-scope declaration
doesn't match the type of an implicitly-declared function; in all other cases,
we produce the normal warning for an implicitly-declared function.
llvm-svn: 314871
This patch relates to: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33666 This adds support
for template parameters to be passed to the address_space attribute.
The main goal is to add further flexibility to the attribute and allow
for it to be used easily with templates.
The main additions are a new type (DependentAddressSpaceType) alongside
its TypeLoc and its mangling. As well as the logic required to support
dependent address spaces which mainly resides in TreeTransform.h and
SemaType.cpp.
llvm-svn: 314649
Currently, if _attribute_((section())) is used for extern variables,
section information is not emitted in generated IR when the variables are used.
This is expected since sections are not generated for external linkage objects.
However NiosII requires this information as it uses special GP-relative accesses
for any objects that use attribute section (.sdata). GCC keeps this attribute in
middle-end.
This change emits the section information for all targets.
Patch By: Elizabeth Andrews
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D36487
llvm-svn: 314262
I've been unable to find any cases whose behavior is actually changed by this,
but only because an implicitly deleted destructor also results in it being
impossible to have a trivial (non-deleted) copy constructor, which the place
where this really matters (choosing whether to pass a class in registers)
happens to also check.
llvm-svn: 313948
Fix for too aggressive error err_type_defined_in_enum introduced in
r313386. Defining tags inside enumerations is prohibited in C++ but
allowed in C.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rnk, doug.gregor
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: alberto_magni, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38109
llvm-svn: 313894
If a function or variable has a type with no linkage (and is not extern "C"),
any use of it requires a definition within the same translation unit; the idea
is that it is not possible to define the entity elsewhere, so any such use is
necessarily an error.
There is an exception, though: some types formally have no linkage but
nonetheless can be referenced from other translation units (for example, this
happens to anonymous structures defined within inline functions). For entities
with those types, we suppress the diagnostic except under -pedantic.
llvm-svn: 313729
This fixes PR28903 by avoiding access check for inner enum constant. We
are performing access check because one enum constant references another
and because enum is defined in CXXRecordDecl. But access check doesn't
work because FindDeclaringClass doesn't expect more than one EnumDecl
and because inner enum has access AS_none due to not being an immediate
child of a record.
The change detects an enum is defined in wrong place and allows to skip
parsing its body. Access check is skipped together with body parsing.
There was no crash in C, added test case to cover the new error.
rdar://problem/28530809
Reviewers: rnk, doug.gregor, rsmith
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37089
llvm-svn: 313386
This is a recommit of r312781; in some build configurations
variable names are omitted, so changed the new regression
test accordingly.
llvm-svn: 312794
This adds _Float16 as a source language type, which is a 16-bit floating point
type defined in C11 extension ISO/IEC TS 18661-3.
In follow up patches documentation and more tests will be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33719
llvm-svn: 312781
This follows the scheme agreed with Nathan Sidwell, which can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-modules?action=AttachFile
This will be proposed to the itanium-cxx-abi list once we have some experience
with how well it works; the ABI for this TS should be considered unstable until
it is part of the Itanium C++ ABI.
llvm-svn: 312467
the class becoming complete and its inline methods being parsed.
This replaces the hack of using the "late parsed template" flag to track member
functions with bodies we've not parsed yet; instead we now use the "will have
body" flag, which carries the desired implication that the function declaration
*is* a definition, and that we've just not parsed its body yet.
llvm-svn: 310776
declarations that are made visible after the dummy is parsed and ODR verified
Prior to this commit the
"(getContainingDC(DC) == CurContext && "The next DeclContext should be lexically contained in the current one."),"
assertion failure was triggered during semantic analysis of the dummy
tag declaration that was declared in another tag declaration because its
lexical context did not point to the outer tag decl.
rdar://32292196
llvm-svn: 310706
Such implicitly declared functions behave as if the enclosing block
contained the declaration extern int name() (C90, 6.3.3.2 Function calls),
thus their names should have block scope (C90, 6.1.2.1 Scope of identifiers).
This patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676
llvm-svn: 310616
Summary:
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR33947.
https://godbolt.org/g/54XRMT
void f(int a) {
struct A {
void g(int a) {}
A() { int a; }
};
}
3 : <source>:3:16: warning: declaration shadows a local variable [-Wshadow]
void g(int a) {}
^
1 : <source>:1:12: note: previous declaration is here
void f(int a) {
^
4 : <source>:4:15: warning: declaration shadows a local variable [-Wshadow]
A() { int a; }
^
1 : <source>:1:12: note: previous declaration is here
void f(int a) {
^
2 warnings generated.
The local variable `a` of the function `f` can't be accessed from a method of
the function-local class A, thus no shadowing occurs and no diagnostic is
needed.
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith, arphaman, Quuxplusone
Reviewed By: rnk, Quuxplusone
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35941
llvm-svn: 309569
In C mode clang fails to merge the textually included definition with the one imported from a module. The C lookup rules fail to find the imported definition because its linkage is internal in non C++ mode.
This patch reinstates some of the ODR merging rules for typedefs of anonymous tags for languages other than C++.
Patch by Raphael Isemann and me (D34510).
llvm-svn: 306964
Allow ODR for ObjC/C in the sense that we won't keep more that
one definition around (merge them). However, ensure the decl
pass the structural compatibility check in C11 6.2.7/1, for that,
reuse the structural equivalence checks used by the ASTImporter.
Few other considerations:
- Create error diagnostics for tag types mismatches and thread
them into the structural equivalence checks.
- Note that by doing this we only support redefinition between types
that are considered "compatible types" by C.
This is mixed approach of the suggestions discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-March/053257.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31778
rdar://problem/31909368
llvm-svn: 306918
This patch extends the `overloadable` attribute to allow for one
function with a given name to not be marked with the `overloadable`
attribute. The overload without the `overloadable` attribute will not
have its name mangled.
So, the following code is now legal:
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable));
void foo(int);
void foo(float) __attribute__((overloadable));
In addition, this patch fixes a bug where we'd accept code with
`__attribute__((overloadable))` inconsistently applied. In other words,
we used to accept:
void foo(void);
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable));
But we will do this no longer, since it defeats the original purpose of
requiring `__attribute__((overloadable))` on all redeclarations of a
function.
This breakage seems to not be an issue in practice, since the only code
I could find that had this pattern often looked like:
void foo(void);
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable)) __asm__("foo");
void foo(int) __attribute__((overloadable));
...Which can now be simplified by simply removing the asm label and
overloadable attribute from the redeclaration of `void foo(void);`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32332
llvm-svn: 306467
definition or non-reference class type.
The crash occurs when there is a template parameter list in a class that
is missing the closing angle bracket followed by a definition of a
struct. For example:
class C0 {
public:
template<typename T, typename T1 = T // missing closing angle bracket
struct S0 {};
C0() : m(new S0<int>) {}
S0<int> *m;
};
This happens because the parsed struct is added to the scope of the
enclosing class without having its access specifier set, which results
in an assertion failure in SemaAccess.cpp later.
This commit fixes the crash by adding the parsed struct to the enclosing
file scope and marking structs as invalid if they are defined in
template parameter lists.
rdar://problem/31783961
rdar://problem/19570630
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33606
llvm-svn: 306317
declarations that are owned but unconditionally visible.
This allows us to set declarations as visible even if they have a local owning
module, without losing information. In turn, that means that our Objective-C
support can keep on incorrectly assuming the "hidden" bit on the declaration is
the whole story with regard to name visibility. This will also be useful once
we support the C++ Modules TS export semantics.
Objective-C name visibility is still incorrect in any case where the "hidden"
bit is not the complete story: for instance, in Objective-C++ the set of
visible categories will be wrong during template instantiation, and with local
submodule visibility enabled it will be wrong when building modules. Fixing that
will require a major overhaul of how visibility is handled for Objective-C (and
particularly for categories).
llvm-svn: 306075
While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered
as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to
incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785:
```
template<typename T> struct Somewhat {
void internal() const {}
friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {}
};
void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); }
```
When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type
of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It
instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for
redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration
of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet.
To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers
a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set.
This change fixes PR14785.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375
This is a recommit of 305379, reverted in 305381, with small changes.
llvm-svn: 305903
Produce an error if variables qualified with a local or
a constant address space are not declared in the outermost
scope of a kernel.
Patch by Simon Perretta.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34024
llvm-svn: 305798
While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered
as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to
incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785:
```
template<typename T> struct Somewhat {
void internal() const {}
friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {}
};
void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); }
```
When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type
of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It
instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for
redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration
of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet.
To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers
a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set.
This change fixes PR14785.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375
llvm-svn: 305379
This patch provides a means to specify section-names for global variables,
functions and static variables, using #pragma directives.
This feature is only defined to work sensibly for ELF targets.
One can specify section names as:
#pragma clang section bss="myBSS" data="myData" rodata="myRodata" text="myText"
One can "unspecify" a section name with empty string e.g.
#pragma clang section bss="" data="" text="" rodata=""
Reviewers: Roger Ferrer, Jonathan Roelofs, Reid Kleckner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33412
llvm-svn: 304705
Print "this block declaration is not a prototype" for non-prototype
declarations of blocks instead of "this function declaration ...".
rdar://problem/32461723
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33739
llvm-svn: 304507
Summary:
This hooks up the detailed diagnostics of why constant initialization was
not possible if require_constant_initialization reports an error.
I have updated the test to account for the new notes.
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24371
llvm-svn: 304451
Summary:
This patch fixes a number of issues with the analysis warnings emitted when a coroutine may reach the end of the function w/o returning.
* Fix bug where coroutines with `return_value` are incorrectly diagnosed as missing `co_return`'s.
* Rework diagnostic message to no longer say "non-void coroutine", because that implies the coroutine doesn't have a void return type, which it might. In this case a non-void coroutine is one who's promise type does not contain `return_void()`
As a side-effect of this patch, coroutine bodies that contain an invalid coroutine promise objects are marked as invalid.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith, aaron.ballman, majnemer
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33532
llvm-svn: 303831
If the variable is marked as TLS variable and target device does not
support TLS, the error is emitted for the variable even if it is not
used in target regions. Patch fixes this and allows to use the values of
the TLS variables in target regions.
llvm-svn: 303768
We currenltly assert when want to diagnose a missing import and the decl
in question is already visible. It turns out that the decl in question
might be visible because another decl from the same module actually made
the module visible in a previous error diagnostic.
Remove the assertion and avoid re-exporting the module if it's already
visible.
rdar://problem/27975402
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32828
llvm-svn: 303705
specification and the TU to the new module.
This is necessary to get the module ownership correct for entities that we
temporarily hang off the TranslationUnitDecl, such as template parameters and
function parameters.
llvm-svn: 303373
Alloca always returns a pointer in alloca address space, which may
be different from the type defined by the language. For example,
in C++ the auto variables are in the default address space. Therefore
cast alloca to the expected address space when necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32248
llvm-svn: 303370
