Add the types for the RISC-V V extension builtins.
These types will be used by the RISC-V V intrinsics which require
types of the form <vscale x 1 x i64>(LMUL=1 element size=64) or
<vscale x 4 x i32>(LMUL=2 element size=32), etc. The vector_size
attribute does not work for us as it doesn't create a scalable
vector type. We want these types to be opaque and have no operators
defined for them. We want them to be sizeless. This makes them
similar to the ARM SVE builtin types. But we will have quite a bit
more types. This patch adds around 60. Later patches will add
another 230 or so types representing tuples of these types similar
to the x2/x3/x4 types in ARM SVE. But with extra complexity that
these types are combined with the LMUL concept that is unique to
RISCV.
For more background see this RFC
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-October/145850.html
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <roger.ferrer@bsc.es>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92715
if E is merely instantiation-dependent."
This change leaves us unable to distinguish between different function
templates that differ in only instantiation-dependent ways, for example
template<typename T> decltype(int(T())) f();
template<typename T> decltype(int(T(0))) f();
We'll need substantially better support for types that are
instantiation-dependent but not dependent before we can go ahead with
this change.
This reverts commit e3065ce238475ec202c707f4c58d90df171626ca.
if E is merely instantiation-dependent.
Previously reverted in 34e72a146111dd986889a0f0ec8767b2ca6b2913;
re-committed with a fix to an issue that caused name mangling to assert.
The `-Wpointer-sign` warning text is inappropriate for describing the
incompatible pointer conversion between plain `char` and explicitly
`signed`/`unsigned` `char` (whichever plain `char` has the same range
as) and vice versa.
Specifically, in part, it reads "converts between pointers to integer
types with different sign". This patch changes that portion to read
instead as "converts between pointers to integer types where one is of
the unique plain 'char' type and the other is not" when one of the types
is plain `char`.
C17 subclause 6.5.16.1 indicates that the conversions resulting in
`-Wpointer-sign` warnings in assignment-like contexts are constraint
violations. This means that strict conformance requires a diagnostic for
the case where the message text is wrong before this patch. The lack of
an even more specialized warning group is consistent with GCC.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93999
Introduce a function attribute 'enforce_tcb' that prevents the function
from calling other functions without the same attribute. This allows
isolating code that's considered to be somehow privileged so that it could not
use its privileges to exhibit arbitrary behavior.
Introduce an on-by-default warning '-Wtcb-enforcement' that warns
about violations of the above rule.
Introduce a function attribute 'enforce_tcb_leaf' that suppresses
the new warning within the function it is attached to. Such leaf functions
may implement common functionality between the trusted and the untrusted code
but they require extra careful audit with respect to their capabilities.
Fixes after a revert in 419ef38a50293c58078f830517f5e305068dbee6:
Fix a test.
Add workaround for GCC bug (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67274).
Attribute the patch appropriately!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91898
Introduce a function attribute 'enforce_tcb' that prevents the function
from calling other functions without the same attribute. This allows
isolating code that's considered to be somehow privileged so that it could not
use its privileges to exhibit arbitrary behavior.
Introduce an on-by-default warning '-Wtcb-enforcement' that warns
about violations of the above rule.
Introduce a function attribute 'enforce_tcb_leaf' that suppresses
the new warning within the function it is attached to. Such leaf functions
may implement common functionality between the trusted and the untrusted code
but they require extra careful audit with respect to their capabilities.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91898
This patch renames PackStack and related variable names to also contain align across Clang.
As it is right now, Clang already uses one stack to record the information from both #pragma
align and #pragma pack. Leaving it as PackStack is confusing, and could cause people to
ignore #pragma align when developing code that interacts with PackStack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93901
We supports SjLj exception handling in the backend, so changing
clang to allow lowering using SjLj exceptions. Update a regression
test also.
Reviewed By: simoll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94076
This reverts commit 638867afd4bce4a2c56dea041299428af3727d61.
This is part of 5 commits being reverted due to https://crbug.com/1161059. See bug for repro.
We currently reject this valid C construct by claiming it declares a
non-local variable: for (struct { int i; } s={0}; s.i != 0; s.i--) ;
We expected all declaration in the clause-1 declaration statement to be
a local VarDecl, but there can be other declarations involved such as a
tag declaration. This fixes PR35757.
On PPC, the vector pair instructions are independent from MMA.
This patch renames the vector pair LLVM intrinsics and Clang builtins to replace the _mma_ prefix by _vsx_ in their names.
We also move the vector pair type/intrinsic/builtin tests to their own files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91974
If two variables are declared with __attribute__((section(name))) and
the implicit section types (e.g. read only vs writeable) conflict, an
error is raised. Extend this mechanism so that an error is raised if the
section type implied by a function's __attribute__((section)) conflicts
with that of another variable.
The `assume` attribute is a way to provide additional, arbitrary
information to the optimizer. For now, assumptions are restricted to
strings which will be accumulated for a function and emitted as comma
separated string function attribute. The key of the LLVM-IR function
attribute is `llvm.assume`. Similar to `llvm.assume` and
`__builtin_assume`, the `assume` attribute provides a user defined
assumption to the compiler.
A follow up patch will introduce an LLVM-core API to query the
assumptions attached to a function. We also expect to add more options,
e.g., expression arguments, to the `assume` attribute later on.
The `omp [begin] asssumes` pragma will leverage this attribute and
expose the functionality in the absence of OpenMP.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91979
... and give more guidance to users.
If specifying -msve-vector-bits on a non-SVE target, clang would say:
error: '-msve-vector-bits' is not supported without SVE enabled
1. The driver lacks logic for "implied features".
This would result in this error being raised for -march=...+sve2,
even though +sve2 implies +sve.
2. Feature implication is well modelled in LLVM, so push the error down
the stack.
3. Hint to the user what flag they need to consider setting.
Now clang fails later, when the feature is used, saying:
aarch64-sve-vector-bits.c:42:41: error: 'arm_sve_vector_bits' attribute is not supported on targets missing 'sve'; specify an appropriate -march= or -mcpu=
typedef svint32_t noflag __attribute__((arm_sve_vector_bits(256)));
Move clang/test/Sema/{neon => arm}-vector-types-support.c and put tests for
this warning together in one place.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92487
552c6c2 removed support for promoting VLAs to constant arrays when the bounds
isn't an ICE, since this can result in miscompiling a conforming program that
assumes that the array is a VLA. Promoting VLAs for fields is still supported,
since clang doesn't support VLAs in fields, so no conforming program could have
a field VLA.
This change is really disruptive, so this commit carves out two more cases
where we promote VLAs which can't miscompile a conforming program:
- When the VLA appears in an ivar -- this seems like a corollary to the field thing
- When the VLA has an initializer -- VLAs can't have an initializer
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90871
Similar to Windows Itanium, PS4 is also an Itanium C++ ABI variant
which shares the goal of semantic compatibility with Microsoft C++
code that uses dllimport/export.
This change introduces a new function to determine from the triple
if an environment aims for compatibility with MS C++ code w.r.t to
these attributes and guards the relevant code paths using that
function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90299
This patch adds tests for things that happened to be fixed by previous
patches, but that should continue working if we do decide to treat
sizeless types as incomplete types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79584
Previously, lax conversions were only allowed between SVE vector-length
agnostic types and vector-length specific types. This meant that code
such as the following:
#include <arm_sve.h>
#define N __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS
#define FIXED_ATTR __attribute__ ((vector_size (N/8)))
typedef float fixed_float32_t FIXED_ATTR;
void foo() {
fixed_float32_t fs32;
svfloat64_t s64;
fs32 = s64;
}
was not allowed.
This patch makes a minor change to areLaxCompatibleSveTypes to allow for
lax conversions to be performed between SVE vector-length agnostic types
and GNU vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91696
The dependency mechanism for C has been implemented, and we have rolled out
this to all internal users, didn't see crashy issues, we consider it is stable
enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89046
This patch allows C-style casting between fixed-size and scalable
vectors. This kind of cast was previously blocked by the compiler, but
it should be allowed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91262
Lax vector conversions was behaving incorrectly for implicit casts
between scalable and fixed-length vector types. For example, this:
#include <arm_sve.h>
#define N __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS
#define FIXED_ATTR __attribute__((arm_sve_vector_bits(N)))
typedef svfloat32_t fixed_float32_t FIXED_ATTR;
void allowed_depending() {
fixed_float32_t fs32;
svfloat64_t s64;
fs32 = s64;
}
... would fail because the vectors have differing lane sizes. This patch
implements the correct behaviour for
-flax-vector-conversions={none,all,integer}. Specifically:
- -flax-vector-conversions=none prevents all lax vector conversions
between scalable and fixed-sized vectors.
- -flax-vector-conversions=integer allows lax vector conversions between
scalable and fixed-size vectors whose element types are integers.
- -flax-vector-conversions=all allows all lax vector conversions between
scalable and fixed-size vectors (including those with floating point
element types).
The implicit conversions are implemented as bitcasts.
Reviewed By: fpetrogalli
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91067
Adapt the declarations of `svpattern` and `svprfop` to the most recent
one defined in section "5. Enum declarations" of the SVE ACLE
specifications [1].
The signature of the intrinsics using these enums have been changed
accordingly.
A test has been added to make sure that `svpattern` and `svprfop` are
not typedefs.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100987/latest, version
00bet6
Reviewed By: joechrisellis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91333
As Richard Smith pointed out in the review of D90123, both the C and C++
standard call it lvalue and rvalue, so let's stick to the same spelling
in Clang.
The use of the new types introduced for PowerPC MMA instructions needs to be restricted.
We add a PowerPC function checking that the given type is valid in a context in which we don't allow MMA types.
This function is called from various places in Sema where we want to prevent the use of these types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82035
This patch adds tests and support for operations on SVE vectors created
by the 'arm_sve_vector_bits' attribute, described by the Arm C Language
Extensions (ACLE, version 00bet6, section 3.7.3.3) for SVE [1].
This covers the following:
* VLSTs support the same forms of element-wise initialization as GNU
vectors.
* VLSTs support the same built-in C and C++ operators as GNU vectors.
* Conditional and binary expressions containing GNU and SVE vectors
(fixed or sizeless) are invalid since the ambiguity around the result
type affects the ABI.
No functional changes were required to support vector initialization and
operators. The functional changes are to address unsupported conditional and
binary expressions.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100987/latest
Reviewed By: fpetrogalli
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88233
Checks to make sure that stdlib's (std::)free is being appropriately
used. Presently checks for the following misuses:
- free(&stack_object)
- free(stack_array)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89988
This allows using annotation in a much more contexts than it currently has.
especially when annotation with template or constexpr.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88645
for which it matters.
This is a step towards separating checking for a constant initializer
(in which std::is_constant_evaluated returns true) and any other
evaluation of a variable initializer (in which it returns false).
Old GCC used to aggressively fold VLAs to constant-bound arrays at block
scope in GNU mode. That's non-conforming, and more modern versions of
GCC only do this at file scope. Update Clang to do the same.
Also promote the warning for this from off-by-default to on-by-default
in all cases; more recent versions of GCC likewise warn on this by
default.
This is still slightly more permissive than GCC, as pointed out in
PR44406, as we still fold VLAs to constant arrays in structs, but that
seems justifiable given that we don't support VLA-in-struct (and don't
intend to ever support it), but GCC does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89523
This addresses a regression where pretty much all C++ compilations using
-frounding-math now fail, due to rounding being performed in constexpr
function definitions in the standard library.
This follows the "manifestly constant evaluated" approach described in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D87528#2270676 -- evaluations that are required
to succeed at compile time are permitted even in regions with dynamic
rounding modes, as are (unfortunately) the evaluation of the
initializers of local variables of const integral types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89360
callee in constant evaluation.
We previously made a deep copy of function parameters of class type when
passing them, resulting in the destructor for the parameter applying to
the original argument value, ignoring any modifications made in the
function body. This also meant that the 'this' pointer of the function
parameter could be observed changing between the caller and the callee.
This change completely reimplements how we model function parameters
during constant evaluation. We now model them roughly as if they were
variables living in the caller, albeit with an artificially reduced
scope that covers only the duration of the function call, instead of
modeling them as temporaries in the caller that we partially "reparent"
into the callee at the point of the call. This brings some minor
diagnostic improvements, as well as significantly reduced stack usage
during constant evaluation.
