If the loaded memory size was smaller than the result size, this would
produce out of bounds memory accesses. I'm wondering if we need a
distinct narrow memory legalize action type, since a case I care about
is decomposing a 4-byte unaligned access into 4 extending loads, which
would leave the original result register type. I'm currently awkwardly
using narrowScalar to handle unaligned accesses that need to be split.
Summary:
This patch extends the TargetMachine to let targets specify the integer size
used by the sjljehprepare pass. This is 64bit for the VE target and otherwise
defaults to 32bit for all targets, which was hard-wired before.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71337
When hashing on MachineOperand::MO_ConstantPoolIndex, now MIR-Canon and
MIRVRegNamer will no longer result in a hash collision.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74449
This allows Spiller.h to be used and included outside of
the lib/CodeGen directory. For example to be used in the
lib/Target directory or other places.
This reverts commit 5583c2f2fba5be1df60f00cbc34a5098b5a49909.
The lldb bot failure was a test that was fragile and sensitive to irrelevant
changes in instruction ordering. Re-committing this as the test should have
been skipped for AArch64 now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75555
Handle LinkOnceODRLinkage;
Handle AppendingLinkage type for llvm.global_ctors/dtors static init global arrays;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75305
As noted on D75114, if both arguments of a funnel shift are consecutive loads we are missing the opportunity to combine them into a single load.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75624
Summary:
This performs better for sample PGO.
NFC as PGSOColdCodeOnlyForSamplePGO is still true.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75550
PowerPC hits an assertion due to somewhat the same reason as https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975.
Though there are already some hack, it still failed with some case, when the operand 0 is NOT
a const fp, it is another fma that with const fp. And that const fp is negated which result in multi-uses.
A better fix is to check the uses of the negated const fp. If there are already use of its negated
value, we will have benefit as no extra Node is added.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75501
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42848 only handled CFA related cfi directives but
didn't handle CSR related cfi. The patch adds the CSR part. Basically it reuses
the framework created in D42848. For each basicblock, the patch tracks which
CSR set have been saved at its CFG predecessors's exits, and compare the CSR
set with the set at its previous basicblock's exit (The previous block is the
block laid before the current block). If the saved CSR set at its previous
basicblock's exit is larger, .cfi_restore will be inserted.
The patch also generates proper .cfi_restore in epilogue to make sure the
saved CSR set is consistent for the incoming edges of each block.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74303
As the test case shows if there is an ExtractValueInst in the Ret block, function dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts can't duplicate it into the block containing call. So later no tail call is generated in CodeGen.
This patch adds the ExtractValueInst handling code in function dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts and FoldReturnIntoUncondBranch, and later tail call can be generated for this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74242
Spin-off from D75407. As described there, ConstantFoldConstant()
currently returns null for non-ConstantExpr/ConstantVector inputs,
but otherwise always returns non-null, independently of whether
any folding has happened or not.
This is confusing and makes consumer code more complicated.
I would expect either that ConstantFoldConstant() returns only if
it actually folded something, or that it always returns non-null.
I'm going to the latter possibility here, which appears to be more
useful considering existing usage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75543
As discussed in the commit thread for rGa253a2a and D73978, we can do more undef folding for FP ops.
The nnan and ninf fast-math-flags specify that if an operand is the disallowed value, the result is
poison, so we can produce an undef result.
But this doesn't work as expected (the undef operand cases remain) because of a Flags propagation
problem in SelectionDAGBuilder.
I've added DAGCombiner calls to enable these for the other cases because we've shown in other
patches that (because of the limited way that SDAG iterates), it is possible to miss simplifications
like this if they are done only at node creation time.
Several potential follow-ups to expand on this patch are possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75576
This changes the localizer to attempt intra-block localizer of instructions
that have local uses. This is useful because sometimes the entry block itself
has many uses of constant-like instructions, which would benefit from shortening
live ranges. Previously if an inst had no non-local uses, we wouldn't add it to
the list of instructions to attempt further intra-block localization.
This gives a 0.7% geomean code size improvement on CTMark.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75555
Summary:
This change checks for the return type in the frontend and adds a flag
to the DISubroutineType to indicate that the option should be added in
CodeViewDebug.
Previously function types sometimes appeared twice in the PDB: once with
"returns cxx udt" and once without.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44785.
Reviewers: rnk, asmith
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75215
This fixes a miscompile that happened because a DBG_VALUE interfered
with the MachineOutliner's liveness analysis.
Inserting a DBG_VALUE after a terminator breaks predicates on MBB such
as isReturnBlock(). And the resulting DBG_VALUE cannot be "live".
I plan to introduce a MachineVerifier check for this situation in a
follow up.
rdar://59859175
Testing: check-llvm, LNT build with a stage2 compiler & entry values
enabled
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75548
```
// clang -c -gdwarf-5 a.s -o a.o
.section .init; ret
.text; ret
```
.debug_info contains DW_AT_ranges and llvm-dwarfdump will report
a verification error because .debug_rnglists does not exist (not
implemented).
This patch generates .debug_rnglists for assembly files.
emitListsTableHeaderStart() in DwarfDebug.cpp can be shared with
MCDwarf.cpp. Because CodeGen depends on MC, I move the function to
MCDwarf.cpp
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75375
Summary:
Follow up from D75377. If the subvector is byte sized and the
index is aligned to the subvector size, we can shrink the load.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: dbabokin, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75434
Use MIOperand in collectLocalKilledOperands to make the search
global, as we already have to search for global uses too. This
allows us to delete more dead code when tail predicating.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75167
In RDA, check against the already decided dead instructions when
looking at users. This allows an instruction to be removed if it
has multiple users, but they're all dead.
This means that IT instructions can be considered killed once all
the itstate using instructions are dead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75245
This patch adds support for dwarf emission/dumping part of debuginfo
generation for defaulted parameters.
Reviewers: probinson, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: aprantl, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73462
Make it a compile-time error to pass an int/unsigned/etc to
fromRawInteger.
Hopefully this prevents errors of the form:
```
for (unsigned ID : getVarLocs()) {
auto VL = LocMap[LocIndex::fromRawInteger(ID)];
...
```
I expect that the isCondCodeLegal checks should match that CC of
the node that we're going to create.
Rewriting to a switch to minimize repeated mentions of the same
constants.
This is needed for D74873, AMDGPU going to have 16 bit subregs
and the largest tuple is 32 VGPRs, which results in 64 lanes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75378
We should be careful to allow count of re-materialization of operands to be less
then number of physical registers.
STATEPOINT instruction has a variable number of operands and potentially very big.
So re-materialization for all operands is disabled at the moment if restrict-statepoint-remat is true.
The patch relaxes the re-materialization restriction for STATEPOINT instruction allowing it for
fixed operands. Specifically it is about call target.
Reviewers: reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits, qcolombet, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75335
The address calculation for the offset assumes that you can calculate the offset by multiplying the index by the store size of the element. But that only works if the element's store size is exactly its real size since we store vectors tightly packed in memory. There are improvements we could make to this like special casing extracting element 0. I think we could also handle cases where the extracted VT is byte sized and the index is aligned with the extract element count.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75377
Select_cc isn't used by all targets. X86 doesn't have optimizations
for it.
Since we already know the input to the sint_to_fp/uint_to_fp is
a setcc we can just emit a plain select using that setcc as the
condition. Other DAG combines can turn that into a select_cc on
targets that support it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75415
We get the simple cases of this via demanded elements and other folds,
but that doesn't work if the values have >1 use, so add a dedicated
match for the pattern.
We already have this transform in IR, but it doesn't help the
motivating x86 tests (based on PR42024) because the shuffles don't
exist until after legalization and other combines have happened.
The AArch64 test shows a minimal IR example of the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75348
