This reverts commit 1f3dd83cc1f2b8f72b9d59e2b4221b12fb7f9a95, reapplying
commit bb1b0bc4e57428ce364d3d6c075ff03cb8973462.
The original commit failed on some builds seemingly due to the use of a
bracketed constructor with an std::array, i.e. `std::array<> arr({...})`.
Previously, LLVM had no functional way of performing casts inside of a
DIExpression(), which made salvaging cast instructions other than Noop
casts impossible. This patch enables the salvaging of casts by using the
DW_OP_LLVM_convert operator for SExt and Trunc instructions.
There is another issue which is exposed by this fix, in which fragment
DIExpressions (which are preserved more readily by this patch) for
values that must be split across registers in ISel trigger an assertion,
as the 'split' fragments extend beyond the bounds of the fragment
DIExpression causing an error. This patch also fixes this issue by
checking the fragment status of DIExpressions which are to be split, and
dropping fragments that are invalid.
Summary:
r347747 added support for clustering mem ops with FI base operands
including support for fixed stack objects in shouldClusterFI, but
apparently this was never tested.
This patch fixes shouldClusterFI to work with scaled as well as
unscaled load/store instructions, and fixes the ordering of memory ops
in MemOpInfo::operator< to ensure that memory addresses always
increase, regardless of which direction the stack grows.
Subscribers: MatzeB, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, javed.absar, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71334
Add an extra parameter so alignment can be taken under
consideration in gather/scatter legalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71610
Summary: Add calculation for elements in structures in getting uniform
base for the Gather/Scatter intrinsic.
Reviewers: craig.topper, c-rhodes, RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, annita.zhang, LuoYuanke
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71442
The caller will assert for nodes with more than 2 results unless
we return a null SDValue.
I tried to test this by copying an AArch64 test for ScalarizeVecOp_FP_ROUND.
While it did hit the assert and this commited fixed that. It also
hit a later problem that couldn't be fixed without adding strict
FP support to AArch64.
This started with adding a test to support get code coverage on
ScalarizeVecOp_UnaryOp_StrictFP by copying an existing AArch64 test
and using constrained sitofp/uitofp intrinsics.
This found 3 separate issues:
-ScalarizeVecOp_UnaryOp_StrictFP needs to do its own replacement
because the caller can't handle replacing multiple results.
-Missing integer promotion support for sitofp/uitofp
-Chain result not always assigned in ExpandLegalINT_TO_FP.
Committing them together so I can add the test case.
added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission."
This was reverted in caa412090666c10f854322cdc701c1cbf8ed726e,
since it was causing an assertion failure on Windows bots.
This revision is revised to fix that.
Original commit message -
[DebugInfo] Refactored macro related generation, added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, jini.susan.george
Tags: #debug-info #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71008
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets to show the problem more
generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some value is free to negate,
but that use count can change as we rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression().
So something that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation phase becomes
not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or the inverse - something that was not
free becomes free). This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that everything
in an expression that is negatible to be handled in the corresponding code within
getNegatedExpression().
This patch adds a hack to work-around the case where we probably no longer detect
that either multiply operand of an FMA isNegatibleForFree which is assumed to be
true when we started rewriting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets to show the problem more
generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some value is free to negate,
but that use count can change as we rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression().
So something that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation phase becomes
not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or the inverse - something that was not
free becomes free). This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that everything
in an expression that is negatible to be handled in the corresponding code within
getNegatedExpression().
This patch adds a hack to work-around the case where we probably no longer detect
that either multiply operand of an FMA isNegatibleForFree which is assumed to be
true when we started rewriting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
Summary:
Right now, DAGCombiner process the nodes in an iplementation defined order. This tends to be fragile as optimisation may or may not kick in depending on the traversal order.
This is part of a larger effort to get the DAGCombiner to process its node in topological order.
Reviewers: craig.topper, efriedma, RKSimon, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70921
This reverts commit aa5ee8f244441a8ea103a7e0ed8b6f3e74454516.
This change broke the sanitizer buildbots. See comments at the patchset
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D71360) for more information.
of integers to floating point.
This includes some of Craig Topper's changes for promotion support from
D71130.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69275
Summary:
This is a resubmit of D71473.
This patch introduces a set of functions to enable deprecation of IRBuilder functions without breaking out of tree clients.
Functions will be deprecated one by one and as in tree code is cleaned up.
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71547
Summary:
With DWARF5 it is no longer possible to distinguish normal methods and methods with `__attribute__((objc_direct))` by just looking at the debug information
as they are both now children of the of the DW_TAG_structure_type that defines them (before only the `__attribute__((objc_direct))` methods were children).
This means that in LLDB we are no longer able to create a correct Clang AST of a module by just looking at the debug information. Instead we would
need to call the Objective-C runtime to see which of the methods have a `__attribute__((objc_direct))` and then add the attribute to our own Clang AST
depending on what the runtime returns. This would mean that we either let the module AST be dependent on the Objective-C runtime (which doesn't
seem right) or we retroactively add the missing attribute to the imported AST in our expressions.
A third option is to annotate methods with `__attribute__((objc_direct))` as `DW_AT_APPLE_objc_direct` which is what this patch implements. This way
LLDB doesn't have to call the runtime for any `__attribute__((objc_direct))` method and the AST in our module will already be correct when we create it.
Reviewers: aprantl, SouraVX
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71201
It doesn't seem to do anything that SplitVecRes_StrictFPOp can't
do. SplitVecRes_StrictFPOp already handles nodes with a variable
number of arguments and a mix of scalar and vector arguments.
This patch makes it so that cases where multiple instructions that
differ only in their ConstantInt or ConstantFP MachineOperand values no
longer collide. For instance:
%0:_(s1) = G_CONSTANT i1 true
%1:_(s1) = G_CONSTANT i1 false
%2:_(s32) = G_FCONSTANT float 1.0
%3:_(s32) = G_FCONSTANT float 0.0
Prior to this patch the first two instructions would collide together.
Also, the last two G_FCONSTANT instructions would also collide. Now they
will no longer collide.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71558
Currently -fuse-init-array option is not effective when target triple
does not specify os, on x86,x86_64.
i.e.
// -fuse-init-array is not honored.
$ clang -target i386 -fuse-init-array test.c -S
// -fuse-init-array is honored.
$ clang -target i386-linux -fuse-init-array test.c -S
This patch fixes first case.
And does cleanup.
Reviewers: rnk, craig.topper, fhahn, echristo
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71360
Summary:
This patch introduces a set of functions to enable deprecation of IRBuilder functions without breaking out of tree clients.
Functions will be deprecated one by one and as in tree code is cleaned up.
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71473
Summary:
Guard against a potential crash observed in https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/32994#issuecomment-524249628
If two branches are collapsed we can encounter a degenerate conditional branch `TBB==FBB`.
The subsequent code assumes that they differ, so we exit out early.
Reviewers: ributzka, spatel
Subscribers: loladiro, dexonsmith, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66657
This refactors the if-statements handling the hashing of various
MachineOperand types into a switch-statement. The purpose is to cover
all the basis for all MachineOperand types while being very deliberate
about which MachineOperand types we are not handling and why (better
added comments). This patch is a NFC redo of https://reviews.llvm.org/D71396.
Much of the changes present in D71396 will come in smaller follow-up patches
that will add support for hashing the MachineOperand types that aren't
covered piece-meal with tests for each new case.
Legalization algorithm is complicated by two facts:
1) While regular instructions should be possible to legalize in
an isolated, per-instruction, context-free manner, legalization
artifacts can only be eliminated in pairs, which could be deeply, and
ultimately arbitrary nested: { [ () ] }, where which paranthesis kind
depicts an artifact kind, like extend, unmerge, etc. Such structure
can only be fully eliminated by simple local combines if they are
attempted in a particular order (inside out), or alternatively by
repeated scans each eliminating only one innermost pair, resulting in
O(n^2) complexity.
2) Some artifacts might in fact be regular instructions that could (and
sometimes should) be legalized by the target-specific rules. Which
means failure to eliminate all artifacts on the first iteration is
not a failure, they need to be tried as instructions, which may
produce more artifacts, including the ones that are in fact regular
instructions, resulting in a non-constant number of iterations
required to finish the process.
I trust the recently introduced termination condition (no new artifacts
were created during as-a-regular-instruction-retrial of artifacts not
eliminated on the previous iteration) to be efficient in providing
termination, but only performing the legalization in full if and only if
at each step such chains of artifacts are successfully eliminated in
full as well.
Which is currently not guaranteed, as the artifact combines are applied
only once and in an arbitrary order that has to do with the order of
creation or insertion of artifacts into their worklist, which is a no
particular order.
In this patch I make a small change to the artifact combiner, making it
to re-insert into the worklist immediate (modulo a look-through copies)
artifact users of each vreg that changes its definition due to an
artifact combine.
Here the first scan through the artifacts worklist, while not
being done in any guaranteed order, only needs to find the innermost
pair(s) of artifacts that could be immediately combined out. After that
the process follows def-use chains, making them shorter at each step, thus
combining everything that can be combined in O(n) time.
Reviewers: volkan, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, paquette, aemerson, dsanders
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar, paquette
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71448
and introducing new unittests/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerTest.cpp
relying on it to unit test the entire legalizer algorithm (including the
top-level main loop).
See also https://reviews.llvm.org/D71448
Summary:
To find potential opportunities to use getMemBasePlusOffset() I looked at
all ISD::ADD uses found with the regex getNode\(ISD::ADD,.+,.+Ptr
in lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG. If this patch is accepted I will convert
the files in the individual backends too.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71207
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
In order to make this change, getMemBasePlusOffset() has been extended to
also take a SDNodeFlags parameter.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71206
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
Currently the function only allows integer constants offsets, but there
are cases where we can use an existing SDValue parameter.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel, craig.topper
Subscribers: craig.topper, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71205
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
Currently the function only allows positive offsets, but there are cases
where we want to subtract an offset from an existing pointer.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71204
The initial attempt (rG89633320) botched the logic by reversing
the source/dest types. Added x86 tests for additional coverage.
The vector tests show a potential improvement (fold vector load
instead of broadcasting), but that's a known/existing problem.
This fold is done in IR by instcombine, and we have a special
form of it already here in DAGCombiner, but we want the more
general transform too:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/3jZm
Name: general
Pre: (C1 + zext(C2) < 64)
%s = lshr i64 %x, C1
%t = trunc i64 %s to i16
%r = lshr i16 %t, C2
=>
%s2 = lshr i64 %x, C1 + zext(C2)
%a = and i64 %s2, zext((1 << (16 - C2)) - 1)
%r = trunc %a to i16
Name: special
Pre: C1 == 48
%s = lshr i64 %x, C1
%t = trunc i64 %s to i16
%r = lshr i16 %t, C2
=>
%s2 = lshr i64 %x, C1 + zext(C2)
%r = trunc %s2 to i16
...because D58017 exposes a regression without this fold.
GEP index size can be specified in the DataLayout, introduced in D42123. However, there were still places
in which getIndexSizeInBits was used interchangeably with getPointerSizeInBits. This notably caused issues
with Instcombine's visitPtrToInt; but the unit tests was incorrect, so this remained undiscovered.
This fixes the buildbot failures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68328
Patch by Joseph Faulls!
Summary:
The use of a boolean isInteger flag (generally initialized using
VT.isInteger()) caused errors in our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project).
In our backend, pointers use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR) and therefore
.isInteger() returns false. This meant that getSetCCInverse() was using the
floating-point variant and generated incorrect code for us:
`(void *)0x12033091e < (void *)0xffffffffffffffff` would return false.
Committing this change will significantly reduce our merge conflicts
for each upstream merge.
Reviewers: spatel, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: wuzish, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70917
Updated pred_load patterns added to AArch64SVEInstrInfo.td by this patch
to use reg + imm non-temporal loads to fix previous test failures.
Original commit message:
Adds the following intrinsics:
- llvm.aarch64.sve.ldnt1
- llvm.aarch64.sve.stnt1
This patch creates masked loads and stores with the
MONonTemporal flag set when used with the intrinsics above.
Summary:
This is a quickfix for PR44275. An assertion that checks that the
DIExpression is valid failed due to attempting to create an entry value
for an indirect parameter. This started appearing after D69028, as the
indirect parameter started being represented using an DW_OP_deref,
rather than with the DBG_VALUE's second operand, meaning that the
isIndirectDebugValue() check in LiveDebugValues did not exclude such
parameters. A DIExpression that has an entry value operation can
currently not have any other operation, leading to the failed isValid()
check.
This patch simply makes us stop considering emitting entry values
for such parameters. To support such cases I think we at least need
to do the following changes:
* In DIExpression::isValid(): Remove the limitation that a
DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value operation can be the only operation in a
DIExpression.
* In LiveDebugValues::emitEntryValues(): Create an entry value of size
1, so that it only wraps the register operand, and not the whole
pre-existing expression (the DW_OP_deref).
* In LiveDebugValues::removeEntryValue(): Check that the new debug
value has the same debug expression as the original, rather than
checking that the debug expression is empty.
* In DwarfExpression::addMachineRegExpression(): Modify the logic so
that a DW_OP_reg* expression is emitted for the entry value.
That is how GCC emits entry values for indirect parameters. That will
currently not happen to due the DW_OP_deref causing the
!HasComplexExpression to fail. The LocationKind needs to be changed
also, rather than always emitting a DW_OP_stack_value for entry values.
There are probably more things I have missed, but that could hopefully
be a good starting point for emitting such entry values.
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, jmorse, vsk
Reviewed By: aprantl, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71416
I believe this is a leftover from when fp128 was softened to fp128
on X86-64. In that case type legalization must have been able to
create a load that was the same as N which would make this
replacement fail or assert. Since we no longer do that, this
check should be unneeded.
(except for v4 loclists, which are sufficiently different to not fit
well in this generic implementation)
In subsequent patches I intend to refactor the DebugLoc and ranges data
structures to be more similar so I can common more of the implementation
here.
Summary:
Support alloca-referencing dbg.value in hwasan instrumentation.
Update AsmPrinter to emit DW_AT_LLVM_tag_offset when location is in
loclist format.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: srhines, aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70753
