There are several different types of cost that TTI tries to provide
explicit information for: throughput, latency, code size along with
a vague 'intersection of code-size cost and execution cost'.
The vectorizer is a keen user of RecipThroughput and there's at least
'getInstructionThroughput' and 'getArithmeticInstrCost' designed to
help with this cost. The latency cost has a single use and a single
implementation. The intersection cost appears to cover most of the
rest of the API.
getUserCost is explicitly called from within TTI when the user has
been explicit in wanting the code size (also only one use) as well
as a few passes which are concerned with a mixture of size and/or
a relative cost. In many cases these costs are closely related, such
as when multiple instructions are required, but one evident diverging
cost in this function is for div/rem.
This patch adds an argument so that the cost required is explicit,
so that we can make the important distinction when necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78635
All avx512 truncate instructions except vXi64->vXi32 are 2 uops
on port 5. So raise their costs to 2. Except when we have an
earlier faster sequence like pshufb for 128 bit input vectors.
Add a lower cost of 3 v16i16->v16i8 with avx512f where we can
extend to v16i32 then truncate. And a cost of 2 for avx512bw with
and without avx512vl. There we can use vpmovwb with either a ymm
or zmm input. Both of these beat masking, splitting, and using
packuswb which is our avx/avx2 codegen.
We're currently getting this from the default implementation. But
I don't like how the cost model came to this answer and I might
be making some changes there.
If one of caller/callee has disabled ZMM registers due to
prefer-vector-width=256, we were previously
disabling argument promotion as the ABI might be incompatible since
one side will split 512-bit vectors in this case.
But if we can see that the types are all scalar this shouldn't be
a problem.
This patch assumes that pointer element type reflects the type that
the argument will be promoted to.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78770
The API for shuffles and reductions uses generic Type parameters,
instead of VectorType, and so assertions and casts are used a lot.
This patch makes those types explicit, which means that the clients
can't be lazy, but results in less ambiguity, and that can only be a
good thing.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45562
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78357
Summary:
Remove usages of asserting vector getters in Type in preparation for the
VectorType refactor. The existence of these functions complicates the
refactor while adding little value.
Reviewers: craig.topper, sdesmalen, efriedma, RKSimon
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77264
This moves v32i16/v64i8 to a model consistent with how we
treat integer types with avx1.
This does change the ABI for types vXi16/vXi8 vectors larger than
512 bits to pass in multiple zmms instead of multiple ymms. We'd
already hacked some code to make v64i8/v32i16 pass in zmm.
Cost model is still a bit of a mess. In some place I tried to
match existing behavior. But really we need to account for
splitting and concating costs. Cost model for shuffles is
especially pessimistic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76212
If we're inserting into v2i8/v4i8/v8i8/v2i16/v4i16 style sub-128bit vectors ensure we don't use the SK_PermuteTwoSrc cost of the legalized value type - this is a followup to rG12c629ec6c59 which added equivalent sub-128bit shuffle costs
This is similar to what I recently did for getArithmeticReductionCost.
I'm trying to account for the narrowing from 512->256->128 as we go.
I've also added a new helper method getMinMaxCost that tries to
handle the cases where we have native min/max instructions and
fall back to cmp+select when we don't.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76634
v2i8/v4i8/v8i8 + v2i16/v4i16 all show up in vectorizer code and by just using the legalized types (v16i8/v8i16) we're highly exaggerating the actual cost of the shuffle.
Summary:
This allows doing `memcmp(p, q, 7)` with 2 loads instead of a call to
memcmp.
This fixes part of PR45147.
Reviewers: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76133
This patch attempts to more accurately model the reduction of
power of 2 vectors of types we natively support. This takes into
account the narrowing of vectors that occur as we go from 512
bits to 256 bits, to 128 bits. It also takes into account the use
of wider elements in the shuffles for the first 2 steps of a
reduction from 128 bits. And uses a v8i16 shift for the final step
of vXi8 reduction.
The default implementation uses the legalized type for the arithmetic
for all levels. And uses the single source permute cost of the
legalized type for all levels. This penalizes things like
lack of v16i8 pshufb on pre-sse3 targets and the splitting and
joining that needs to be done for integer types on AVX1. We never
need v16i8 shuffle for a reduction and we only need split AVX1 ops
when type the type wide and needs to be split. I think we're still
over costing splits and joins for AVX1, but we're closer now.
I've also removed all pairwise special casing because I don't
think we ever want to generate that on X86. I've also adjusted
the add handling to more accurately account for any type splitting
that occurs before we reach a legal type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76478
Previously we multiplied the cost for the table entries by the number of splits needed. But that implies that each split goes through a reduction to scalar independently. I think what really happens is that the we AND/OR the split pieces until we're down to a single value with a legal type and then do special reduction sequence on that.
So to model that this patch takes the number of splits minus one multiplied by the cost of a AND/OR at the legal element count and adds that on top of the table lookup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76400
Refines the gather/scatter cost model, but also changes the TTI
function getIntrinsicInstrCost to accept an additional parameter
which is needed for the gather/scatter cost evaluation.
This did require trivial changes in some non-ARM backends to
adopt the new parameter.
Extending gathers and truncating scatters are now priced cheaper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75525
This tries to improve the accuracy of extract/insert element costs by accounting for subvector extraction/insertion for >128-bit vectors and the shuffling of elements to/from the 0'th index.
It also adds INSERTPS for f32 types and PINSR/PEXTR costs for integer types (at the moment we assume the same cost as MOVD/MOVQ - which isn't always true).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74976
D74976 will handle larger vector types, but since SLM doesn't support AVX+ then we will always be extracting from 128-bit vectors so don't need to scale the cost.
We seem to be inheriting the cost from sse4.1. But if we have 256-bit registers we should be able to do this with just one extract to split the 16i16 and two v8i16->v8i32 operations so our cost should be 3 not 4.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73646
Summary:
Previously we did this with isel patterns that used garbage in
the widened part of the source. But that's not valid for strictfp.
So now we custom widen and use zeroes for the widened elemens for
strictfp.
This replaces D71864.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, andrew.w.kaylor, pengfei, LiuChen3
Reviewed By: pengfei
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71879
Add an extra parameter so alignment can be taken under
consideration in gather/scatter legalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71610
Soon Intrinsic::ID will be a plain integer, so this overload will not be
possible.
Rename both overloads to ensure that downstream targets observe this as
a build failure instead of a runtime failure.
Split off from D71320
Reviewers: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71381
This attempts to teach the cost model in Arm that code such as:
%s = shl i32 %a, 3
%a = and i32 %s, %b
Can under Arm or Thumb2 become:
and r0, r1, r2, lsl #3
So the cost of the shift can essentially be free. To do this without
trying to artificially adjust the cost of the "and" instruction, it
needs to get the users of the shl and check if they are a type of
instruction that the shift can be folded into. And so it needs to have
access to the actual instruction in getArithmeticInstrCost, which if
available is added as an extra parameter much like getCastInstrCost.
We otherwise limit it to shifts with a single user, which should
hopefully handle most of the cases. The list of instruction that the
shift can be folded into include ADC, ADD, AND, BIC, CMP, EOR, MVN, ORR,
ORN, RSB, SBC and SUB. This translates to Add, Sub, And, Or, Xor and
ICmp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70966
This is a follow-up to D70607 where we made any
extract element on SLM more costly than default. But that is
pessimistic for extract from element 0 because that corresponds
to x86 movd/movq instructions. These generally have >1 cycle
latency, but they are probably implemented as single uop
instructions.
Note that no vectorization tests are affected by this change.
Also, no targets besides SLM are affected because those are
falling through to the default cost of 1 anyway. But this will
become visible/important if we add more specializations via cost
tables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71023
I'm not sure what the effect of this change will be on all of the affected
tests or a larger benchmark, but it fixes the horizontal add/sub problems
noted here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59710?vs=227972&id=228095&whitespace=ignore-most#toc
The costs are based on reciprocal throughput numbers in Agner's tables for
PEXTR*; these appear to be very slow ops on Silvermont.
This is a small step towards the larger motivation discussed in PR43605:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43605
Also, it seems likely that insert/extract is the source of perf regressions on
other CPUs (up to 30%) that were cited as part of the reason to revert D59710,
so maybe we'll extend the table-based approach to other subtargets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70607
This is no longer needed after widening legalization as we
custom legalize v8i8 ourselves.
Added entries to the cost model, but bumped the cost slightly
to account for the truncate shuffle that wasn't costed before.
This better represents the kshift+binop we'd get for each stage
before the final extract. Its likely we'll do even better by
doing a kmov and a cmp with a GPR, but this is a good start.
The default handling was costing a worst case single source
permute shuffle of the vector before the binop. This worst
case assumes the shuffle might have to be emulated with
extracts and inserts. But since we know we're doing a reduction
we can assume we'll get kshift lowering.
There's still some room for improvement here, but this is
much better than it was.
Update TargetTransformInfo to allow AVX1 to use YMM registers for memcmp.
This is a follow up to D68632 which enabled XOR compares which made this possible.
This also updates the memcmp-optsize.ll test unlike the first patch.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69658
Update TargetTransformInfo to allow AVX1 to use YMM registers for memcmp.
This is a follow up to D68632 which enabled XOR compares which made this possible.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69658
Summary:
We don't pattern match pairwise shuffles in SelectionDAG. So we
should only return the optimized costs if its not a pairwise
shuffle.
I think SLP vectorizer gives priority to non pairwise shuffle if
the cost is the same. And the look up for reduction intrinsics
passes false for the pairwise flag. So this probably has no real
effect today.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69083
Add specific scalar costs for CTLZ instructions, we can't discriminate between CTLZ and CTLZ_ZERO_UNDEF so we have to assume the worst. Given how BSR is often a microcoded nightmare on some older targets we might still be underestimating it.
For targets supporting LZCNT (Intel Haswell+ or AMD Fam10+), we provide overrides that assume 1cy costs.
llvm-svn: 374786
Add specific scalar costs for ctpop instructions, these are based on the llvm-mca's SLM throughput numbers (the oldest model we have).
For targets supporting POPCNT, we provide overrides that assume 1cy costs.
llvm-svn: 374775
Add an extra parameter so the backend can take the alignment into
consideration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68400
llvm-svn: 374763
I can't see any notable differences in costs between SSE2 and SSE42 arches for FADD/ADD reduction, so I've lowered the target to just SSE2.
I've also added vXi8 sum reduction costs in line with the PSADBW codegen and discussions on PR42674.
llvm-svn: 374655
