4447 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teresa Johnson
d55d46f43b [WPD] Add an optional checking mode for debugging devirtualization
This adds an internal option -wholeprogramdevirt-check which if enabled
will guard each devirtualization with a runtime check against the
expected target, and an invocation of a debug trap if the check fails.
This is useful for debugging WPD failures involving undefined behavior
(e.g. casting to another class type not in the inheritance chain).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95969
2021-02-17 16:46:15 -08:00
Rong Xu
7397905ab0 [SampleFDO] Third Try: Refactor SampleProfile.cpp
Apply the patch for the third time after fixing buildbot failures.

Refactor SampleProfile.cpp to use the core code in CodeGen.
The main changes are:
(1) Move SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl class to a header file.
(2) Split SampleCoverageTracker to a head file and a cpp file.
(3) Move the common codes (common options and callsiteIsHot())
to the common cpp file.
(4) Add inline keyword to avoid duplicated symbols -- they will
be removed later when the class is changed to a template.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96455
2021-02-17 15:31:50 -08:00
Teresa Johnson
3c4c205060 [WPD][lld] Test handling of vtable definition from shared libraries
Adds a lld test for a case that the handling added for dynamically
exported symbols in 1487747e990ce9f8851f3d92c3006a74134d7518 already
fixes. Because isExportDynamic returns true when the symbol is
SharedKind with default visibility, it will treat as dynamically
exported and block devirtualization when the definition of a vtable
comes from a shared library. This is desireable as it is dangerous to
devirtualize in that case, since there could be hidden overrides in the
shared library. Typically that happens when the shared library header
contains available externally definitions, which applications can
override. An example is std::error_category, which is overridden in LLVM
and causing failures after a self build with WPD enabled, because
libstdc++ contains hidden overrides of the virtual base class methods.

The regular LTO case in the new test already worked, but there are
2 fixes in this patch needed for the index-only case and the hybrid
LTO case. For the index-only case, WPD should not simply ignore
available externally vtables. A follow on fix will be made to clang to
emit type metadata for those vtables, which the new test is modeling.
For the hybrid case, we need to ensure when the module is split that any
llvm.*used globals are cloned to the regular LTO split module so
available externally vtable definitions are not prematurely deleted.

Another follow on fix will add the equivalent gold test, which requires
a small fix to the plugin to treat symbols in dynamic libraries the same
way lld already is.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96721
2021-02-17 12:49:24 -08:00
Vedant Kumar
c28622fbf3 Revert "[SampleFDO] Reapply: Refactor SampleProfile.cpp"
Revert "[SampleFDO] Add missing #includes to unbreak modules build after D96455"

This reverts commit c73cbf218a289029cc0b54183c3cf79454ecc76f.

Revert "[SampleFDO] Fix MSVC "namespace uses itself" warning (NFC)"

This reverts commit a23e6b321ca623b83252f8b1e06a2ad4fc441f89.

Revert "[SampleFDO] Reapply: Refactor SampleProfile.cpp"

This reverts commit 6fd5ccff72eeaffcb3b3ba2696282015aab755bc.

Still seeing link failures when building llc (or other tools), due to
the new SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl.h containing definitions that get
duplicated across multiple TU's.

```
duplicate symbol 'llvm::SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl::findEquivalenceClasses(llvm::Function&)' in:
    tools/llc/CMakeFiles/llc.dir/llc.cpp.o
    lib/libLLVMInstCombine.a(InstCombineVectorOps.cpp.o)
duplicate symbol 'llvm::SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl::buildEdges(llvm::Function&)' in:
    tools/llc/CMakeFiles/llc.dir/llc.cpp.o
    lib/libLLVMInstCombine.a(InstCombineVectorOps.cpp.o)
duplicate symbol 'llvm::SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl::computeDominanceAndLoopInfo(llvm::Function&)' in:
    tools/llc/CMakeFiles/llc.dir/llc.cpp.o
    lib/libLLVMInstCombine.a(InstCombineVectorOps.cpp.o)
duplicate symbol 'llvm::SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl::getFunctionLoc(llvm::Function&)' in:
    tools/llc/CMakeFiles/llc.dir/llc.cpp.o
    lib/libLLVMInstCombine.a(InstCombineVectorOps.cpp.o)
duplicate symbol 'llvm::SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl::getBlockWeight(llvm::BasicBlock const*)' in:
    tools/llc/CMakeFiles/llc.dir/llc.cpp.o
    lib/libLLVMInstCombine.a(InstCombineVectorOps.cpp.o)
duplicate symbol 'llvm::SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl::printBlockWeight(llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::BasicBlock const*) const' in:
    tools/llc/CMakeFiles/llc.dir/llc.cpp.o
    lib/libLLVMInstCombine.a(InstCombineVectorOps.cpp.o)
duplicate symbol 'llvm::SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl::printBlockEquivalence(llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::BasicBlock const*)' in:
    tools/llc/CMakeFiles/llc.dir/llc.cpp.o
    lib/libLLVMInstCombine.a(InstCombineVectorOps.cpp.o)
duplicate symbol 'llvm::SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl::printEdgeWeight(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__1::pair<llvm::BasicBlock const*, llvm::BasicBlock const*>)' in:
    tools/llc/CMakeFiles/llc.dir/llc.cpp.o
    lib/libLLVMInstCombine.a(InstCombineVectorOps.cpp.o)
```
2021-02-17 10:22:24 -08:00
Rong Xu
6fd5ccff72 [SampleFDO] Reapply: Refactor SampleProfile.cpp
Reapply patch after fixing buildbot failure.
Refactor SampleProfile.cpp to use the core code in CodeGen.
The main changes are:
(1) Move SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl class to a header file.
(2) Split SampleCoverageTracker to a head file and a cpp file.
(3) Move the common codes (common options and callsiteIsHot())
to the common cpp file.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96455
2021-02-16 16:43:21 -08:00
Mehdi Amini
c761fe77bd Revert "[SampleFDO][NFC] Refactor SampleProfile.cpp"
This reverts commit 310b35304cdf5a230c042904655583c5532d3e91.
The build is broken with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON :

lib/ProfileData/CMakeFiles/LLVMProfileData.dir/SampleProfileLoaderBaseUtil.cpp.o: In function `llvm::sampleprofutil::callsiteIsHot(llvm::sampleprof::FunctionSamples const*, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*, bool)':
SampleProfileLoaderBaseUtil.cpp:(.text._ZN4llvm14sampleprofutil13callsiteIsHotEPKNS_10sampleprof15FunctionSamplesEPNS_18ProfileSummaryInfoEb+0x1a): undefined reference to `llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo::isColdCount(unsigned long) const'
SampleProfileLoaderBaseUtil.cpp:(.text._ZN4llvm14sampleprofutil13callsiteIsHotEPKNS_10sampleprof15FunctionSamplesEPNS_18ProfileSummaryInfoEb+0x28): undefined reference to `llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo::isHotCount(unsigned long) const'
...
2021-02-16 22:11:42 +00:00
Rong Xu
310b35304c [SampleFDO][NFC] Refactor SampleProfile.cpp
Refactor SampleProfile.cpp to use the core code in CodeGen.
The main changes are:
(1) Move SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl class to a header file.
(2) Split SampleCoverageTracker to a head file and a cpp file.
(3) Move the common codes (common options and callsiteIsHot())
to the common cpp file.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96455
2021-02-16 11:18:21 -08:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
22a52dfddc TransformUtils: Fix metadata handling in CloneModule (and improve CloneFunctionInto)
This commit fixes how metadata is handled in CloneModule to be sound,
and improves how it's handled in CloneFunctionInto (although the latter
is still awkward when called within a module).

Ruiling Song pointed out in PR48841 that CloneModule was changed to
unsoundly use the RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs flag (renamed in
fa35c1f80f0ea080a7cbc581416929b0a654f25c for clarity). This flag papered
over a crash caused by other various changes made to CloneFunctionInto
over the past few years that made it unsound to use cloning between
different modules.

(This commit partially addresses PR48841, fixing the repro from
preprocessed source but not textual IR. MDNodeMapper::mapDistinctNode
became unsound in df763188c9a1ecb1e7e5c4d4ea53a99fbb755903 and this
commit does not address that regression.)

RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs is designed for the IRMover to use,
avoiding unnecessary clones of all referenced metadata when linking
between modules (with IRMover, the source module is discarded after
linking). It never makes sense to use when you're not discarding the
source. This commit drops its incorrect use in CloneModule.

Sadly, the right thing to do with metadata when cloning a function is
complicated, and this patch doesn't totally fix it.

The first problem is that there are two different types of referenceable
metadata and it's not obvious what to with one of them when remapping.

- `!0 = !{!1}` is metadata's version of a constant. Programatically it's
  called "uniqued" (probably a better term would be "constant") because,
  like `ConstantArray`, it's stored in uniquing tables. Once it's
  constructed, it's illegal to change its arguments.
- `!0 = distinct !{!1}` is a bit closer to a global variable. It's legal
  to change the operands after construction.

What should be done with distinct metadata when cloning functions within
the same module?

- Should new, cloned nodes be created?
- Should all references point to the same, old nodes?

The answer depends on whether that metadata is effectively owned by a
function.

And that's the second problem. Referenceable metadata's ownership model
is not clear or explicit. Technically, it's all stored on an
LLVMContext. However, any metadata that is `distinct`, that transitively
references a `distinct` node, or that transitively references a
GlobalValue is specific to a Module and is effectively owned by it. More
specifically, some metadata is effectively owned by a specific Function
within a module.

Effectively function-local metadata was introduced somewhere around
c10d0e5ccd12f049bddb24dcf8bbb7fbbc6c68f2, which made it illegal for two
functions to share a DISubprogram attachment.

When cloning a function within a module, you need to clone the
function-local debug info and suppress cloning of global debug info (the
status quo suppresses cloning some global debug info but not all). When
cloning a function to a new/different module, you need to clone all of
the debug info.

Here's what I think we should do (eventually? soon? not this patch
though):
- Distinguish explicitly (somehow) between pure constant metadata owned
  by the LLVMContext, global metadata owned by the Module, and local
  metadata owned by a GlobalValue (such as a function).
- Update CloneFunctionInto to trigger cloning of all "local" metadata
  (only), perhaps by adding a bit to RemapFlag. Alternatively, split
  out a separate function CloneFunctionMetadataInto to prime the
  metadata map that callers are updated to call ahead of time as
  appropriate.

Here's the somewhat more isolated fix in this patch:
- Converted the `ModuleLevelChanges` parameter to `CloneFunctionInto` to
  an enum called `CloneFunctionChangeType` that is one of
  LocalChangesOnly, GlobalChanges, DifferentModule, and ClonedModule.
- The code maintaining the "functions uniquely own subprograms"
  invariant is now only active in the first two cases, where a function
  is being cloned within a single module. That's necessary because this
  code inhibits cloning of (some) "global" metadata that's effectively
  owned by the module.
- The code maintaining the "all compile units must be explicitly
  referenced by !llvm.dbg.cu" invariant is now only active in the
  DifferentModule case, where a function is being cloned into a new
  module in isolation.
- CoroSplit.cpp's call to CloneFunctionInto in CoroCloner::create
  uses LocalChangeOnly, since fa635d730f74f3285b77cc1537f1692184b8bf5b
  only set `ModuleLevelChanges` to trigger cloning of local metadata.
- CloneModule drops its unsound use of RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs
  and special handling of !llvm.dbg.cu.
- Fixed some outdated header docs and left a couple of FIXMEs.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96531
2021-02-15 11:56:00 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
910e2d1e57 [llvm] Use llvm::is_contained (NFC) 2021-02-14 08:36:20 -08:00
Teresa Johnson
a80232bd5f [LTT] Address post-review comments (NFC)
Implement some post-review cleanup suggestions for D96083.
2021-02-13 15:52:59 -08:00
Hongtao Yu
de40f6d623 [CSSPGO] Process functions in a top-down order on a dynamic call graph.
Functions are currently processed by the sample profiler loader in a top-down order defined by the static call graph. The order is being adjusted to be a top-down order based on the input context-sensitive profile. One benefit is that the processing order of caller and callee in one SCC would follow the context order in the profile to favor more inlining. Another benefit is that the processing order of caller and callee through an indirect call (which is not on the static call graph) can be honored which in turn allows for more inlining.

The profile top-down order for SCC is also extended to support non-CS profiles.

Two switches `-mllvm -use-profile-indirect-call-edges` and `-mllvm -use-profile-top-down-order` are being introduced.

Reviewed By: wmi

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95988
2021-02-11 12:36:59 -08:00
Benjamin Kramer
8fb4a4f7bb [SampleFDO] Silence -Wnon-virtual-dtor warning
There's no polymorphic deletion happening here.
2021-02-10 23:37:15 +01:00
Rong Xu
db0d7d0ba9 [SampleFDO][NFC] Refactor SampleProfileLoader to reuse in CodeGen
Break SampleProfileLoader into to a base and a derived class.
Base class (SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl) includes the common
code for IR and MachineIR (CodeGen) sample loader.
It will be templatelized in the later patch.

Inline and Probe related code will remain in the derived class of
SampleProfileLoader and stays in SampleProfile.cpp.

We need to refactor some functions:
(1) getInstWeight() to enable the code sharing -- put the core into
getInstWeightImpl().
(2) emitAnnotation() and propagateWeights() to carve out the code
specific to SampleProfileLoader.
(3) make getInstWeight() and findFunctionSamples() virtual and override
in SampleProfileLoader as they need to access the fields in the derived
class.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95832
2021-02-10 13:29:15 -08:00
Hongtao Yu
1cb47a063e [CSSPGO] Unblock optimizations with pseudo probe instrumentation.
The IR/MIR pseudo probe intrinsics don't get materialized into real machine instructions and therefore they don't incur runtime cost directly. However, they come with indirect cost by blocking certain optimizations. Some of the blocking are intentional (such as blocking code merge) for better counts quality while the others are accidental. This change unblocks perf-critical optimizations that do not affect counts quality. They include:

1. IR InstCombine, sinking load operation to shorten lifetimes.
2. MIR LiveRangeShrink, similar to #1
3. MIR TwoAddressInstructionPass, i.e, opeq transform
4. MIR function argument copy elision
5. IR stack protection. (though not perf-critical but nice to have).

Reviewed By: wmi

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95982
2021-02-10 12:43:17 -08:00
Johannes Doerfert
81429abd83 [Attributor][FIX] Do not create UB by introducing a noundef undef
This was reported as PR49104. The reproducer uses varargs but the issue
is the same, we know an argument is dead but can't change the signature
for some reason. The PR49104 situation was: We are in an CG-SCC
traversal and we remove all the uses of an argument and proof it thereby
dead. However, if we do not remove the argument, via signature rewrite,
we need to ensure that the `undef` we introduce at the call site doesn't
clash with a `noundef` attribute.
2021-02-09 13:02:38 -06:00
Kazu Hirata
302313a264 [Transforms] Use range-based for loops (NFC) 2021-02-08 22:33:53 -08:00
Teresa Johnson
3a27933ec2 [LTT] Don't attempt to lower type tests used only by assumes
Type tests used only by assumes were original for devirtualization, but
are meant to be kept through the first invocation of LTT so that they
can be used for additional optimization. In the regular LTO case where
the IR is analyzed we may find a resolution for the type test and end up
rewriting the associated vtable global, which can have implications on
section splitting. Simply ignore these type tests.

Fixes PR48245.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96083
2021-02-06 09:02:10 -08:00
Simon Pilgrim
f7d07dbb29 IROutliner.cpp - fix Wdocumentation warning. NFCI.
Remove duplicate param
2021-02-05 11:38:09 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
476b912e7c SampleProfile.cpp - fix Wdocumentation warning. NFCI.
Remove duplicate param
2021-02-05 11:31:17 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
89edda7084 IROutliner.cpp - fix Wdocumentation warnings. NFCI. 2021-02-05 11:21:00 +00:00
Kazu Hirata
be37475897 [Transforms/IPO] Use range-based for loops (NFC) 2021-02-03 20:41:20 -08:00
Rong Xu
b8f13db5b7 [SampleFDO][NFC] Detach SampleProfileLoader from SampleCoverageTracker
This patch detaches SampleProfileLoader from class
SampleCoverageTracker. We plan to move SampleProfileLoader
to a template class. This would remain SampleCoverageTracker
as a class.
Also make callsiteIsHot() as a file static function.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95823
2021-02-03 11:38:04 -08:00
Hongtao Yu
3d89b3cbec [CSSPGO] Introducing distribution factor for pseudo probe.
Sample re-annotation is required in LTO time to achieve a reasonable post-inline profile quality. However, we have seen that such LTO-time re-annotation degrades profile quality. This is mainly caused by preLTO code duplication that is done by passes such as loop unrolling, jump threading, indirect call promotion etc, where samples corresponding to a source location are aggregated multiple times due to the duplicates. In this change we are introducing a concept of distribution factor for pseudo probes so that samples can be distributed for duplicated probes scaled by a factor. We hope that optimizations duplicating code well-maintain the branch frequency information (BFI) based on which probe distribution factors are calculated. Distribution factors are updated at the end of preLTO pipeline to reflect an estimated portion of the real execution count.

This change also introduces a pseudo probe verifier that can be run after each IR passes to detect duplicated pseudo probes.

A saturated distribution factor stands for 1.0. A pesudo probe will carry a factor with the value ranged from 0.0 to 1.0. A 64-bit integral distribution factor field that represents [0.0, 1.0] is associated to each block probe. Unfortunately this cannot be done for callsite probes due to the size limitation of a 32-bit Dwarf discriminator. A 7-bit distribution factor is used instead.

Changes are also needed to the sample profile inliner to deal with prorated callsite counts. Call sites duplicated by PreLTO passes, when later on inlined in LTO time, should have the callees’s probe prorated based on the Prelink-computed distribution factors. The distribution factors should also be taken into account when computing hotness for inline candidates. Also, Indirect call promotion results in multiple callisites. The original samples should be distributed across them. This is fixed by adjusting the callisites' distribution factors.

Reviewed By: wmi

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93264
2021-02-02 11:55:01 -08:00
Wenlei He
1645f465be [CSSPGO] Factor out common part for CSSPGO inline and AFDO inline
Refactoring SampleProfileLoader::inlineHotFunctions to use helpers from CSSPGO inlining and reduce similar code in the inlining loop, plus minor cleanup for AFDO path.

This is resubmit of D95024, with build break and overtighten assertion fixed.

Test Plan:
2021-02-02 07:55:08 -08:00
Adrian Kuegel
48ca6da9d2 Revert "[CSSPGO] Factor out common part for CSSPGO inline and AFDO inline"
This reverts commit 9a03058d6322edb8abc803ba3e436cc62647d979.
2021-02-02 11:51:04 +01:00
Adrian Kuegel
3a65ec4bf9 Revert "Fix build break from D95024"
This reverts commit 09cd849fdef2b2d3de2d0b0a5c512100957e0ef6.
2021-02-02 11:51:04 +01:00
Wenlei He
09cd849fde Fix build break from D95024 2021-02-02 01:01:12 -08:00
Wenlei He
9a03058d63 [CSSPGO] Factor out common part for CSSPGO inline and AFDO inline
Refactoring SampleProfileLoader::inlineHotFunctions to use helpers from CSSPGO inlining and reduce similar code in the inlining loop, plus minor cleanup for AFDO path.

Test Plan:

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95024
2021-02-02 00:34:06 -08:00
Wenlei He
6bae5973c4 [CSSPGO] Call site prioritized inlining for sample PGO
This change implemented call site prioritized BFS profile guided inlining for sample profile loader. The new inlining strategy maximize the benefit of context-sensitive profile as mentioned in the follow up discussion of CSSPGO RFC. The change will not affect today's AutoFDO as it's opt-in. CSSPGO now defaults to the new FDO inliner, but can fall back to today's replay inliner using a switch (`-sample-profile-prioritized-inline=0`).

Motivation

With baseline AutoFDO, the inliner in sample profile loader only replays previous inlining, and the use of profile is only for pruning previous inlining that turned out to be cold. Due to the nature of replay, the FDO inliner is simple with hotness being the only decision factor. It has the following limitations that we're improving now for CSSPGO.
 - It doesn't take inline candidate size into account. Since it's doing replay, the size growth is bounded by previous CGSCC inlining. With context-sensitive profile, FDO inliner is no longer limited by previous inlining, so we need to take size into account to avoid significant size bloat.
 - The way it looks at hotness is not accurate. It uses total samples in an inlinee as proxy for hotness, while what really matters for an inline decision is the call site count. This is an unfortunate fall back because call site count and callee entry count are not reliable due to dwarf based correlation, especially for inlinees. Now paired with pseudo-probe, we have accurate call site count and callee's entry count, so we can use that to gauge hotness more accurately.
 - It treats all call sites from a block as hot as long as there's one call site considered hot. This is normally true, but since total samples is used as hotness proxy, this transitiveness within block magnifies the inacurate hotness heuristic. With pseduo-probe and the change above, this is no longer an issue for CSSPGO.

New FDO Inliner

Putting all the requirement for CSSPGO together, we need a top-down call site prioritized BFS inliner. Here're reasons why each component is needed.
 - Top-down: We need a top-down inliner to better leverage context-sensitive profile, so inlining is driven by accurate context profile, and post-inline is also accurate. This is already implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D70655.
 - Size Cap: For top-down inliner, taking function size into account for inline decision alone isn't sufficient to control size growth. We also need to explicitly cap size growth because with top-down inlining, we can grow inliner size significantly with large number of smaller inlinees even if each individually passes the cost/size check.
 - Prioritize call sites: With size cap, inlining order also becomes important, because if we stop inlining due to size budget limit, we'd want to use budget towards the most beneficial call sites.
 - BFS inline: Same as call site prioritization, if we stop inlining due to size budget limit, we want a balanced inline tree, rather than going deep on one call path.

Note that the new inliner avoids repeatedly evaluating same set of call site, so it should help with compile time too. For this reason, we could transition today's FDO inliner to use a queue with equal priority to avoid wasted reevaluation of same call site (TODO).

Speculative indirect call promotion and inlining is also supported now with CSSPGO just like baseline AutoFDO.

Tunings and knobs

I created tuning knobs for size growth/cap control, and for hot threshold separate from CGSCC inliner. The default values are selected based on initial tuning with CSSPGO.

Results

Evaluated with an internal LLVM fork couple months ago, plus another change to adjust hot-threshold cutoff for context profile (will send up after this one), the new inliner show ~1% geomean perf win on spec2006 with CSSPGO, while reducing code size too. The measurement was done using train-train setup, MonoLTO w/ new pass manager and pseudo-probe. Note that this is just a starting point - we hope that the new inliner will open up more opportunity with CSSPGO, but it will certainly take more time and effort to make it fully calibrated and ready for bigger workloads (we're working on it).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94001
2021-02-01 23:46:34 -08:00
Hongtao Yu
224fee8219 [CSSPGO] Tweaking inlining with pseudo probes.
Fixing up a couple places where `getCallSiteIdentifier` is needed to support pseudo-probe-based callsites.

Also fixing an issue in the extbinary profile reader where the metadata section is not fully scanned based on the number of profiles loaded only for the current module.

Reviewed By: wmi, wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95791
2021-02-01 13:56:40 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
3d1200b9f6 [llvm] Drop unnecessary const from return types (NFC)
Identified with const-return-type.
2021-01-31 10:23:43 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
8ed1636184 [llvm] Use isa instead of dyn_cast (NFC) 2021-01-29 23:23:37 -08:00
Hongtao Yu
7e99bddfea [CSSPGO] Support of CS profiles in extended binary format.
This change brings up support of context-sensitive profiles in the format of extended binary. Existing sample profile reader/writer/merger code is being tweaked to reflect the fact of bracketed input contexts, like (`[...]`). The paired brackets are also needed in extbinary profiles because we don't yet have an otherwise good way to tell calling contexts apart from regular function names since the context delimiter `@` can somehow serve as a part of the C++ mangled names.

Reviewed By: wmi, wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95547
2021-01-27 21:29:46 -08:00
Teresa Johnson
1487747e99 [LTO] Prevent devirtualization for symbols dynamically exported
Identify dynamically exported symbols (--export-dynamic[-symbol=],
--dynamic-list=, or definitions needed to preempt shared objects) and
prevent their LTO visibility from being upgraded.
This helps avoid use of whole program devirtualization when there may
be overrides in dynamic libraries.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91583
2021-01-27 15:54:13 -08:00
Fangrui Song
54fb3ca96e [ThinLTO] Add Visibility bits to GlobalValueSummary::GVFlags
Imported functions and variable get the visibility from the module supplying the
definition.  However, non-imported definitions do not get the visibility from
(ELF) the most constraining visibility among all modules (Mach-O) the visibility
of the prevailing definition.

This patch

* adds visibility bits to GlobalValueSummary::GVFlags
* computes the result visibility and propagates it to all definitions

Protected/hidden can imply dso_local which can enable some optimizations (this
is stronger than GVFlags::DSOLocal because the implied dso_local can be
leveraged for ELF -shared while default visibility dso_local has to be cleared
for ELF -shared).

Note: we don't have summaries for declarations, so for ELF if a declaration has
the most constraining visibility, the result visibility may not be that one.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92900
2021-01-27 10:43:51 -08:00
Bjorn Pettersson
a9bd3d37bd [NewPM] Add ExtraVectorizerPasses support
As it looks like NewPM generally is using SimpleLoopUnswitch
instead of LoopUnswitch, this patch also use SimpleLoopUnswitch
in the ExtraVectorizerPasses sequence (compared with LegacyPM
which use the LoopUnswitch pass).

Reviewed By: aeubanks

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95457
2021-01-26 22:59:10 +01:00
Florian Hahn
35b3989a30
[Passes] Run peeling as part of simple/full loop unrolling.
Loop peeling removes conditions from loop bodies that become invariant
after a small number of iterations. When triggered, this leads to fewer
compares and possibly PHIs in loop bodies, enabling further
optimizations. The current cost-model of loop peeling should be quite
conservative/safe, i.e. only peel if a condition in the loop becomes
known after peeling.

For example, see PR47671, where loop peeling enables vectorization by
removing a PHI the vectorizer does not understand. Granted, the
loop-vectorizer could also be taught about constant PHIs, but loop
peeling is likely to enable other optimizations as well.

This has an impact on quite a few benchmarks from
MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006 on X86 with -O3 -flto, for example

    Same hash: 186 (filtered out)
    Remaining: 51
    Metric: loop-vectorize.LoopsVectorized

    Program                                        base   patch  diff
     test-suite...ve-susan/automotive-susan.test     8.00   9.00 12.5%
     test-suite...nal/skidmarks10/skidmarks.test    35.00  31.00 -11.4%
     test-suite...lications/sqlite3/sqlite3.test    41.00  43.00  4.9%
     test-suite...s/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk.test    25.00  26.00  4.0%
     test-suite...006/450.soplex/450.soplex.test    88.00  89.00  1.1%
     test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test   120.00 119.00 -0.8%
     test-suite.../CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc.test   215.00 216.00  0.5%
     test-suite...006/447.dealII/447.dealII.test   957.00 958.00  0.1%
     test-suite...ternal/HMMER/hmmcalibrate.test    75.00  75.00  0.0%

    Same hash: 186 (filtered out)
    Remaining: 51
    Metric: loop-vectorize.LoopsAnalyzed

    Program                                        base    patch   diff
     test-suite...ks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep.test   440.00  434.00  -1.4%
     test-suite...nal/skidmarks10/skidmarks.test   312.00  308.00  -1.3%
     test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test   6399.00 6323.00 -1.2%
     test-suite...lications/minisat/minisat.test   134.00  135.00   0.7%
     test-suite...rks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft.test   295.00  297.00   0.7%
     test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test   1879.00 1869.00 -0.5%
     test-suite...pplications/treecc/treecc.test   689.00  691.00   0.3%
     test-suite...T2000/300.twolf/300.twolf.test   1593.00 1597.00  0.3%
     test-suite.../Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.test   1394.00 1392.00 -0.1%
     test-suite...ications/JM/ldecod/ldecod.test   1431.00 1429.00 -0.1%
     test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test   2229.00 2230.00  0.0%
     test-suite...lications/sqlite3/sqlite3.test   2590.00 2589.00 -0.0%
     test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test   2732.00 2733.00  0.0%
     test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test   3395.00 3394.00 -0.0%

Note the -11% regression in number of loops vectorized for skidmarks. I
suspect this corresponds to the fact that those loops are gone now (see
the reduction in number of loops analyzed by LV).

Reviewed By: lebedev.ri

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88471
2021-01-26 13:52:30 +00:00
modimo
ce7f9cdb50 [InlineAdvisor] Allow replay of inline decisions for the CGSCC inliner from optimization remarks
This change leverages the work done in D83743 to replay in the SampleProfile inliner to also be used in the CGSCC inliner. NOTE: currently restricted to non-ML advisors only.

The added switch `-cgscc-inline-replay=<remarks file>` will replay the inlining decisions in that file where the remarks file is generated via `-Rpass=inline`. The aim here is to make it easier to analyze changes that would modify inlining heuristics to be separated from this behavior. Doing so allows easier examination of assembly and runtime behavior compared to the baseline rather than trying to dig through the large churn caused by inlining.

In LTO compilation, since inlining is done twice you can separately specify replay by passing the flag to the FE (`-cgscc-inline-replay=`) and to the linker (`-Wl,cgscc-inline-replay=`) with the remarks generated from their respective places.

Testing on mysqld by comparing the inline decisions between base (generates remarks.txt) and diff (replay using identical input/tools with remarks.txt) and examining the inlining sites with `diff` shows 14,000 mismatches out of 247,341 for a ~94% replay accuracy. I believe this gap can be narrowed further though for the general case we may never achieve full accuracy. For my personal use, this is close enough to be representative: I set the baseline as the one generated by the replay on identical input/toolset and compare that to my modified input/toolset using the same replay.

Testing:
ninja check-llvm
newly added test correctly replays CGSCC inlining decisions

Reviewed By: mtrofin, wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94334
2021-01-25 15:38:57 -08:00
Richard Smith
925ae8c790 Revert "[ObjC][ARC] Annotate calls with attributes instead of emitting retainRV"
This reverts commit 53176c168061d6f26dcf3ce4fa59288b7d67255e, which
introduceed a layering violation. LLVM's IR library can't include
headers from Analysis.
2021-01-25 13:53:38 -08:00
Akira Hatanaka
53176c1680 [ObjC][ARC] Annotate calls with attributes instead of emitting retainRV
or claimRV calls in the IR

Background:

This patch makes changes to the front-end and middle-end that are
needed to fix a longstanding problem where llvm breaks ARC's autorelease
optimization (see the link below) by separating calls from the marker
instructions or retainRV/claimRV calls. The backend changes are in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92569.

https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#arc-runtime-objc-autoreleasereturnvalue

What this patch does to fix the problem:

- The front-end annotates calls with attribute "clang.arc.rv"="retain"
  or "clang.arc.rv"="claim", which indicates the call is implicitly
  followed by a marker instruction and a retainRV/claimRV call that
  consumes the call result. This is currently done only when the target
  is arm64 and the optimization level is higher than -O0.

- ARC optimizer temporarily emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the
  annotated calls in the IR and removes the inserted calls after
  processing the function.

- ARC contract pass emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the annotated
  calls. It doesn't remove the attribute on the call since the backend
  needs it to emit the marker instruction. The retainRV/claimRV calls
  are emitted late in the pipeline to prevent optimization passes from
  transforming the IR in a way that makes it harder for the ARC
  middle-end passes to figure out the def-use relationship between the
  call and the retainRV/claimRV calls (which is the cause of PR31925).

- The function inliner removes the autoreleaseRV call in the callee that
  returns the result if nothing in the callee prevents it from being
  paired up with the calls annotated with "clang.arc.rv"="retain/claim"
  in the caller. If the call is annotated with "claim", a release call
  is inserted since autoreleaseRV+claimRV is equivalent to a release. If
  it cannot find an autoreleaseRV call, it tries to transfer the
  attributes to a function call in the callee. This is important since
  ARC optimizer can remove the autoreleaseRV call returning the callee
  result, which makes it impossible to pair it up with the retainRV or
  claimRV call in the caller. If that fails, it simply emits a retain
  call in the IR if the call is annotated with "retain" and does nothing
  if it's annotated with "claim".

- This patch teaches dead argument elimination pass not to change the
  return type of a function if any of the calls to the function are
  annotated with attribute "clang.arc.rv". This is necessary since the
  pass can incorrectly determine nothing in the IR uses the function
  return, which can happen since the front-end no longer explicitly
  emits retainRV/claimRV calls in the IR, and change its return type to
  'void'.

Future work:

- Use the attribute on x86-64.

- Fix the auto upgrader to convert call+retainRV/claimRV pairs into
  calls annotated with the attributes.

rdar://71443534

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808
2021-01-25 11:57:08 -08:00
Wei Mi
c9cd9a0066 [SampleFDO] Report error when reading a bad/incompatible profile instead of
turning off SampleFDO silently.

Currently sample loader pass turns off SampleFDO optimization silently when
it sees error in reading the profile. This behavior will defeat the tests
which could have caught those bad/incompatible profile problems. This patch
change the behavior to report error.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95269
2021-01-25 10:28:23 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
1238378f18 [llvm] Use pop_back_val (NFC) 2021-01-23 10:56:33 -08:00
Xun Li
bd3ca6666d [Inlining] Delete redundant optnone/alwaysinline check
The same check is done in InlineCost: 8b0bd54d0e/llvm/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp (L2537-L2552)
Also, doing a check on the callee here is confusing, because anything that deals with callee should be done in the inner loop where we proecss all calls from the same caller.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95186
2021-01-21 18:38:10 -08:00
Nikita Popov
65fd034b95 [FunctionAttrs] Infer willreturn for functions without loops
If a function doesn't contain loops and does not call non-willreturn
functions, then it is willreturn. Loops are detected by checking
for backedges in the function. We don't attempt to handle finite
loops at this point.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94633
2021-01-21 20:29:33 +01:00
Kazu Hirata
e53472de68 [Transforms] Use llvm::append_range (NFC) 2021-01-20 21:35:54 -08:00
Mircea Trofin
ccec2cf1d9 Reland "[NPM][Inliner] Factor ImportedFunctionStats in the InlineAdvisor"
This reverts commit d97f776be5f8cd3cd446fe73827cd355f6bab4e1.

The original problem was due to build failures in shared lib builds. D95079
moved ImportedFunctionsInliningStatistics under Analysis, unblocking
this.
2021-01-20 13:33:43 -08:00
Mircea Trofin
95ce32c787 [NFC] Move ImportedFunctionsInliningStatistics to Analysis
This is related to D94982. We want to call these APIs from the Analysis
component, so we can't leave them under Transforms.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95079
2021-01-20 13:18:03 -08:00
Mircea Trofin
d97f776be5 Revert "[NPM][Inliner] Factor ImportedFunctionStats in the InlineAdvisor"
This reverts commit e8aec763a57e211420dfceb2a8dc6b88574924f3.
2021-01-20 11:19:34 -08:00
Mircea Trofin
e8aec763a5 [NPM][Inliner] Factor ImportedFunctionStats in the InlineAdvisor
When using 2 InlinePass instances in the same CGSCC - one for other
mandatory inlinings, the other for the heuristic-driven ones - the order
in which the ImportedFunctionStats would be output-ed would depend on
the destruction order of the inline passes, which is not deterministic.

This patch moves the ImportedFunctionStats responsibility to the
InlineAdvisor to address this problem.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94982
2021-01-20 11:07:36 -08:00
David Sherwood
255a507716 [NFC][InstructionCost] Use InstructionCost in lib/Transforms/IPO/IROutliner.cpp
In places where we call a TTI.getXXCost() function I have changed
the code to use InstructionCost instead of unsigned. This is in
preparation for later on when we will change the TTI interfaces
to return InstructionCost.

See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91174
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146408.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94427
2021-01-20 08:33:59 +00:00