This adds a G_ASSERT_SEXT opcode, similar to G_ASSERT_ZEXT. This instruction
signifies that an operation was already sign extended from a smaller type.
This is useful for functions with sign-extended parameters.
E.g.
```
define void @foo(i16 signext %x) {
...
}
```
This adds verifier, regbankselect, and instruction selection support for
G_ASSERT_SEXT equivalent to G_ASSERT_ZEXT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96890
To make sure compile-times don't regress, add an option to restrict the number
of instructions considered for sinking as alias analysis can be expensive and
for the same reason also skip large blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96485
This reverts commit 61b4702a408834228c1c139b0e9af98616774db4.
We were seeing some test failures in SPECINT2006 due to this change. Reverting
to investigate.
Similar to D96622, we're better off just promoting uaddsat(x,y) -> umin(add(x,y),c) instead of trying to perform a shifted uaddsat.
I initially tried to just use shifted promotion in cases where we didn't have a legal/custom umin - but we don't appear to have any targets that have uaddsat but not umin, so imo we're better off always using the umin and avoid an untested shifted uaddsat code path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96767
fde24661718c7812a20a10e518cd853e8e060107 added support for
scalable vectors to matchUnaryPredicate by handling SPLAT_VECTOR in
addition to BUILD_VECTOR. This was used to enabled UDIV/SDIV/UREM/SREM
by constant expansion in BuildUDIV/BuildSDIV in TargetLowering.cpp
The caller there expects to call getBuildVector from the match factors.
This leads to a crash right now if there is a SPLAT_VECTOR of
fixed vectors since the number of vectors won't match the number
of elements.
To fix this, this patch updates the callers to check the opcode
instead of whether the type is fixed or scalable. This assumes
that only 3 opcodes are handled by matchUnaryPredicate so
I've added an assertion to the final else to check that opcode.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96174
ICMP & SELECT patterns extracting the sign of a value can be simplified
to OR & ASR (see https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Xx4iZ0).
This does not save any instructions in IR, but it is profitable on
AArch64, because we need at least 2 extra instructions to materialize 1
and -1 for the SELECT.
The improvements result in ~5% speedups on loops of the form
static int sign_of(int x) {
if (x < 0) return -1;
return 1;
}
void foo(const int *x, int *res, int cnt) {
for (int i=0;i<cnt;i++)
res[i] = sign_of(x[i]);
}
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96596
When a literal that cannot fit in the immediate form of the fmov instruction
is used to initialise an SVE vector, an extra unnecessary fmov is currently
generated. This patch adds an extra codegen pattern preventing the extra
instruction from being generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96700
Co-Authored-By: Paul Walker <paul.walker@arm.com>
The API is a bit awkward since you need to index into an array in the
passed struct. I guess an alternative would be to pass all of the
individual fields.
This patch adjusts the placement of the bundle unpacking to just before
code emission. In particular, this means bundle unpacking happens AFTER
the machine outliner. With the previous position, the machine outliner
may outline parts of a bundle, which breaks them up.
This is an issue for BLR_RVMARKER handling, as illustrated by the
rvmarker-pseudo-expansion-and-outlining.mir test case. The machine
outliner should not break up the bundles created during pseudo
expansion.
This should fix PR49082.
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96294
This patch adds a new intrinsic experimental.vector.reduce that takes a single
vector and returns a vector of matching type but with the original lane order
reversed. For example:
```
vector.reverse(<A,B,C,D>) ==> <D,C,B,A>
```
The new intrinsic supports fixed and scalable vectors types.
The fixed-width vector relies on shufflevector to maintain existing behaviour.
Scalable vector uses the new ISD node - VECTOR_REVERSE.
This new intrinsic is one of the named shufflevector intrinsics proposed on the
mailing-list in the RFC at [1].
Patch by Paul Walker (@paulwalker-arm).
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146864.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94883
In the future Windows will enable Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET aka shadow stacks). To protect the path where the context is updated during exception handling, the binary is required to enumerate valid unwind entrypoints in a dedicated section which is validated when the context is being set during exception handling.
This change allows llvm to generate the section that contains the appropriate symbol references in the form expected by the msvc linker.
This feature is enabled through a new module flag, ehcontguard, which was modelled on the cfguard flag.
The change includes a test that when the module flag is enabled the section is correctly generated.
The set of exception continuation information includes returns from exceptional control flow (catchret in llvm).
In order to collect catchret we:
1) Includes an additional flag on machine basic blocks to indicate that the given block is the target of a catchret operation,
2) Introduces a new machine function pass to insert and collect symbols at the start of each block, and
3) Combines these targets with the other EHCont targets that were already being collected.
Change originally authored by Daniel Frampton <dframpto@microsoft.com>
For more details, see MSVC documentation for `/guard:ehcont`
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/guard-enable-eh-continuation-metadata
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94835
As discussed on D96413, as long as the promoted bits of the args are zero we can use the basic ISD::USUBSAT pattern directly, without the shifting like we do for other ops.
I think something similar should be possible for ISD::UADDSAT as well, which I'll look at later.
Also, create a ISD::USUBSAT node directly - this will be expanded back by the legalizer later on if necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96622
This is pretty much just ports `performGlobalAddressCombine` from
AArch64ISelLowering. (AArch64 doesn't use the generic DAG combine for this.)
This adds a pre-legalize combine which looks for this pattern:
```
%g = G_GLOBAL_VALUE @x
%ptr1 = G_PTR_ADD %g, cst1
%ptr2 = G_PTR_ADD %g, cst2
...
%ptrN = G_PTR_ADD %g, cstN
```
And then, if possible, transforms it like so:
```
%g = G_GLOBAL_VALUE @x
%offset_g = G_PTR_ADD %g, -min(cst)
%ptr1 = G_PTR_ADD %offset_g, cst1
%ptr2 = G_PTR_ADD %offset_g, cst2
...
%ptrN = G_PTR_ADD %offset_g, cstN
```
Where min(cst) is the smallest out of the G_PTR_ADD constants.
This means we should save at least one G_PTR_ADD.
This also updates code in the legalizer + selector which assumes that
G_GLOBAL_VALUE will never have an offset and adds/updates relevant tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96624
This combine tries to do inter-block hoisting of extends of G_PHIs, into the
originating blocks of the phi's incoming value. The idea is to expose further
optimization opportunities that are normally obscured by the PHI.
Some basic heuristics, and a target hook for AArch64 is added, to allow tuning.
E.g. if the extend is used by a G_PTR_ADD, it doesn't perform this combine
since it may be folded into the addressing mode during selection.
There are very minor code size improvements on AArch64 -Os, but the real benefit
is that it unlocks optimizations like AArch64 conditional compares on some
benchmarks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95703
Begin transitioning the X86 vector code to recognise sub(umax(a,b) ,b) or sub(a,umin(a,b)) USUBSAT patterns to make it more generic and available to all targets.
This initial patch just moves the basic umin/umax patterns to DAG, removing some vector-only checks on the way - these are some of the patterns that the legalizer will try to expand back to so we can be reasonably relaxed about matching these pre-legalization.
We can handle the trunc(sub(..))) variants as well, which helps with patterns where we were promoting to a wider type to detect overflow/saturation.
The remaining x86 code requires some cleanup first - some of it isn't actually tested etc. I also need to resurrect D25987.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96413
This patch adds a pass to replace calls to vector intrinsics (i.e., LLVM
intrinsics operating on vector operands) with calls to a vector library.
Currently, calls to LLVM intrinsics are only replaced with calls to vector
libraries when scalar calls to intrinsics are vectorized by the Loop- or
SLP-Vectorizer.
With this pass, it is now possible to replace calls to LLVM intrinsics
already operating on vector operands, e.g., if such code was generated
by MLIR. For the replacement, information from the TargetLibraryInfo,
e.g., as specified via -vector-library is used.
This is a re-try of the original commit 2303e93e66 that was reverted
due to pass manager problems. Other minor changes have also been made.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95373
explicitly emitting retainRV or claimRV calls in the IR
Background:
This fixes a longstanding problem where llvm breaks ARC's autorelease
optimization (see the link below) by separating calls from the marker
instructions or retainRV/claimRV calls. The backend changes are in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92569.
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#arc-runtime-objc-autoreleasereturnvalue
What this patch does to fix the problem:
- The front-end adds operand bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall" to calls,
which indicates the call is implicitly followed by a marker
instruction and an implicit retainRV/claimRV call that consumes the
call result. In addition, it emits a call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which consumes the call result, to
prevent the middle-end passes from changing the return type of the
called function. This is currently done only when the target is arm64
and the optimization level is higher than -O0.
- ARC optimizer temporarily emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the calls
with the operand bundle in the IR and removes the inserted calls after
processing the function.
- ARC contract pass emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the call with the
operand bundle. It doesn't remove the operand bundle on the call since
the backend needs it to emit the marker instruction. The retainRV and
claimRV calls are emitted late in the pipeline to prevent optimization
passes from transforming the IR in a way that makes it harder for the
ARC middle-end passes to figure out the def-use relationship between
the call and the retainRV/claimRV calls (which is the cause of
PR31925).
- The function inliner removes an autoreleaseRV call in the callee if
nothing in the callee prevents it from being paired up with the
retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. It then inserts a release call if
claimRV is attached to the call since autoreleaseRV+claimRV is
equivalent to a release. If it cannot find an autoreleaseRV call, it
tries to transfer the operand bundle to a function call in the callee.
This is important since the ARC optimizer can remove the autoreleaseRV
returning the callee result, which makes it impossible to pair it up
with the retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. If that fails, it simply
emits a retain call in the IR if retainRV is attached to the call and
does nothing if claimRV is attached to it.
- SCCP refrains from replacing the return value of a call with a
constant value if the call has the operand bundle. This ensures the
call always has at least one user (the call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use).
- This patch also fixes a bug in replaceUsesOfNonProtoConstant where
multiple operand bundles of the same kind were being added to a call.
Future work:
- Use the operand bundle on x86-64.
- Fix the auto upgrader to convert call+retainRV/claimRV pairs into
calls with the operand bundles.
rdar://71443534
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808
The builder was using the extend user as the insertion point, which meant that
we were incorrectly "moving" the load from its original position, and therefore
could violate memory operation ordering.
If we wait until the type is legalized, we'll lose information
about the orginal type and need to use larger magic constants.
This gets especially bad on RISCV64 where i64 is the only legal
type.
I've limited this to simple scalar types so it only works for
i8/i16/i32 which are most likely to occur. For more odd types
we might want to do a small promotion to a type where MULH is legal
instead.
Unfortunately, this does prevent some urem/srem+seteq matching since
that still require legal types.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96210
As for SETCC, use a less expensive condition code when generating
STRICT_FSETCC if the node is known not to have Nan.
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91972
A G_MUL + G_PTR_ADD can also be folded into a madd. So, conservatively, we
shouldn't combine when the G_MUL is used by a G_PTR_ADD either.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96457
GlobalISel was only doing this with minsize. SDAG does this with optsize.
(See: `SelectionDAG::shouldOptForSize()`)
This is a 0.3% code size improvement for CTMark at -Os.
(Best: 1.1% improvements on lencod + pairlocalalign)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96451
When we have a G_ADD which is fed by a G_ICMP on one side, we can fold it into
the cset for the G_ICMP.
e.g. Given
```
%cmp = G_ICMP ... %x, %y
%add = G_ADD %cmp, %z
```
We would normally emit a cmp, cset, and add.
However, `%add` is either `%z` or `%z + 1`. So, we can just use `%z` as the
source of the cset rather than wzr, saving an instruction.
This would probably be cleaner in AArch64PostLegalizerLowering, but we'd need
to change the way we represent G_ICMP to do that, I think. For now, it's
easiest to implement in selection.
This is a 0.1% code size improvement on CTMark/pairlocalalign at -Os.
Example: https://godbolt.org/z/7KdrP8
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96388
Avoid doing the following combine for vector types:
```
copysign(x, fp_extend(y)) -> copysign(x, y)
copysign(x, fp_round(y)) -> copysign(x, y)
```
That combine seemed to impede the selection of vector instruction and cause
a mess in some circumstances.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96037
Similar to the case for G_ADD.
There was a function in CTMark/pairlocalalign which was missing this case,
causing GlobalISel to emit a add + csel when a csinc is all that is necessary.
https://godbolt.org/z/ax69E9
Minor code size improvements on CTMark at -Os.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96390
This reverts commit 4a64d8fe392449b205e59031aad5424968cf7446.
Makes clang crash when buildling trivial iOS programs, see comment
after https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808#2551401
As for SETCC, use a less expensive condition code when generating
STRICT_FSETCC if the node is known not to have Nan.
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91972
On AArch64 (which seems to be the only target that supports it), this
attribute allows codegen to avoid saving/restoring the value in x0
across a call.
Gives a 0.1% geomean -Os code size improvement on CTMark.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96099
As the actual MSVC toolset doesn't use the GAS-style assembly that
Clang/LLVM produces and consumes, there's no reference for what
string to use for e.g. comments when building with a MSVC triple.
This frees up the use of semicolon as separator string, just like
was done for GNU targets in 23413195649d0cf6f3860ae8b5fb115b35032075.
(Previously, both the separator and comment strings were set to
the same, a semicolon.)
Compiler-rt extensively uses separator chars in its assembly,
and that assembly should be buildable with clang-cl for MSVC too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96259
More MachO madness for everyone. MachO relocations are only 32-bits, which
means the ARM64_RELOC_ADDEND one only actually has 24 (signed) bits for the
actual addend. This is a problem when calculating the address of a basic block;
because it has no symbol of its own, the sequence
adrp x0, Ltmp0@PAGE
add x0, x0, x0 Ltmp0@PAGEOFF
is represented by relocation with an addend that contains the offset from the
function start to Ltmp, and so the largest function where this is guaranteed to
work is 8MB. That's not quite big enough that we can call it user error (IMO).
So this patch puts the any blockaddress into a constant-pool, where the addend
is instead stored in the (x)word being relocated, which is obviously big enough
for any function.
Different targets might handle branch performance differently, so this patch allows for
targets to specify the TailDuplicateSize threshold. Said threshold defines how small a branch
can be and still be duplicated to generate straight-line code instead.
This patch also specifies said override values for the AArch64 subtarget.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95631
This matches GCC behavior when the configure-time binutils is new. GNU ld<2.36
did not support mixed SHF_LINK_ORDER and non-SHF_LINK_ORDER sections in an
output section, so we conservatively disable SHF_LINK_ORDER for <2.36.
This patch adds a pass to replace calls to vector intrinsics
(i.e., LLVM intrinsics operating on vector operands) with
calls to a vector library.
Currently, calls to LLVM intrinsics are only replaced with
calls to vector libraries when scalar calls to intrinsics are
vectorized by the Loop- or SLP-Vectorizer.
With this pass, it is now possible to replace calls to LLVM
intrinsics already operating on vector operands, e.g., if
such code was generated by MLIR. For the replacement,
information from the TargetLibraryInfo, e.g., as specified
via -vector-library is used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95373
Make sure scalable property is preserved by using getVectorElementCount().
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95967
emitting retainRV or claimRV calls in the IR
This reapplies 3fe3946d9a958b7af6130241996d9cfcecf559d4 without the
changes made to lib/IR/AutoUpgrade.cpp, which was violating layering.
Original commit message:
Background:
This patch makes changes to the front-end and middle-end that are
needed to fix a longstanding problem where llvm breaks ARC's autorelease
optimization (see the link below) by separating calls from the marker
instructions or retainRV/claimRV calls. The backend changes are in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92569.
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#arc-runtime-objc-autoreleasereturnvalue
What this patch does to fix the problem:
- The front-end adds operand bundle "clang.arc.rv" to calls, which
indicates the call is implicitly followed by a marker instruction and
an implicit retainRV/claimRV call that consumes the call result. In
addition, it emits a call to @llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which
consumes the call result, to prevent the middle-end passes from changing
the return type of the called function. This is currently done only when
the target is arm64 and the optimization level is higher than -O0.
- ARC optimizer temporarily emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the calls
with the operand bundle in the IR and removes the inserted calls after
processing the function.
- ARC contract pass emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the call with the
operand bundle. It doesn't remove the operand bundle on the call since
the backend needs it to emit the marker instruction. The retainRV and
claimRV calls are emitted late in the pipeline to prevent optimization
passes from transforming the IR in a way that makes it harder for the
ARC middle-end passes to figure out the def-use relationship between
the call and the retainRV/claimRV calls (which is the cause of
PR31925).
- The function inliner removes an autoreleaseRV call in the callee if
nothing in the callee prevents it from being paired up with the
retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. It then inserts a release call if
the call is annotated with claimRV since autoreleaseRV+claimRV is
equivalent to a release. If it cannot find an autoreleaseRV call, it
tries to transfer the operand bundle to a function call in the callee.
This is important since ARC optimizer can remove the autoreleaseRV
returning the callee result, which makes it impossible to pair it up
with the retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. If that fails, it simply
emits a retain call in the IR if the implicit call is a call to
retainRV and does nothing if it's a call to claimRV.
Future work:
- Use the operand bundle on x86-64.
- Fix the auto upgrader to convert call+retainRV/claimRV pairs into
calls annotated with the operand bundles.
rdar://71443534
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808
This reverts commit 3fe3946d9a958b7af6130241996d9cfcecf559d4.
The commit violates layering by including a header from Analysis in
lib/IR/AutoUpgrade.cpp.
emitting retainRV or claimRV calls in the IR
Background:
This patch makes changes to the front-end and middle-end that are
needed to fix a longstanding problem where llvm breaks ARC's autorelease
optimization (see the link below) by separating calls from the marker
instructions or retainRV/claimRV calls. The backend changes are in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92569.
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#arc-runtime-objc-autoreleasereturnvalue
What this patch does to fix the problem:
- The front-end adds operand bundle "clang.arc.rv" to calls, which
indicates the call is implicitly followed by a marker instruction and
an implicit retainRV/claimRV call that consumes the call result. In
addition, it emits a call to @llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which
consumes the call result, to prevent the middle-end passes from changing
the return type of the called function. This is currently done only when
the target is arm64 and the optimization level is higher than -O0.
- ARC optimizer temporarily emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the calls
with the operand bundle in the IR and removes the inserted calls after
processing the function.
- ARC contract pass emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the call with the
operand bundle. It doesn't remove the operand bundle on the call since
the backend needs it to emit the marker instruction. The retainRV and
claimRV calls are emitted late in the pipeline to prevent optimization
passes from transforming the IR in a way that makes it harder for the
ARC middle-end passes to figure out the def-use relationship between
the call and the retainRV/claimRV calls (which is the cause of
PR31925).
- The function inliner removes an autoreleaseRV call in the callee if
nothing in the callee prevents it from being paired up with the
retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. It then inserts a release call if
the call is annotated with claimRV since autoreleaseRV+claimRV is
equivalent to a release. If it cannot find an autoreleaseRV call, it
tries to transfer the operand bundle to a function call in the callee.
This is important since ARC optimizer can remove the autoreleaseRV
returning the callee result, which makes it impossible to pair it up
with the retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. If that fails, it simply
emits a retain call in the IR if the implicit call is a call to
retainRV and does nothing if it's a call to claimRV.
Future work:
- Use the operand bundle on x86-64.
- Fix the auto upgrader to convert call+retainRV/claimRV pairs into
calls annotated with the operand bundles.
rdar://71443534
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808
It is possible to eliminate redundant calls to the SVE ptrue intrinsic.
For example: suppose that we have two SVE ptrue intrinsic calls P1 and
P2. If P1 is at least as wide as P2, then P2 can be written as a
reinterpret P1 using the SVE reinterpret intrinsics.
Coalescing ptrue intrinsics can result in fewer ptrue instructions in
the codegen, and is conducive to better analysis further down the line.
This commit extends the aarch64-sve-intrinsic-opts pass to support
coalescing ptrue intrisic calls.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94230
Similar to the G_PTR_ADD + G_LOAD twiddling we do in `preISelLower`.
The imported patterns expect scalars only, so they can't handle things like
```
G_STORE %ptr1, %ptr2
```
To get around this, use s64 instead.
(This probably makes a good portion of the manual selection code for G_STORE
dead.)
This is a 0.2% geomean code size improvement on CTMark at -Os.
(Best is consumer-typeset @ -0.7%)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95908
When we have a zeroext parameter coming in on the stack, build
```
%x = G_LOAD ...
%x_assert_zext = G_ASSERT_ZEXT %x, narrow_size
%trunc = G_TRUNC %x_assert_zext
```
Rather than just loading into the truncated type.
This allows us to optimize cases like this: https://godbolt.org/z/vfjhW8
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95805
