Change waitcnt insertion to check the memory operand tokens to see if
flat memory operations access VMEM in the same way it does to check if
accessing LDS. This avoids adding waitcnt for counters for address
spaces that are not accessed.
In addition, only generate the pessimistic waitcnt 0 if a flat memory
operation appears to access both VMEM and LDS.
This benefits flat memory operations that explicitly specify the
address space as GLOBAL or LOCAL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89618
This reverts commit ca907bfb57d8ad3ec3bcc2cff2abab7b1b933af6.
According to michel.daenzer,
> This completely broke the Mesa radeonsi driver on Navi 14. Xorg +
> xterm come up with major corruption & psychedelic colours.
When memory operations are outstanding on function calls, either the
caller or the callee can insert a waitcnt to ensure that all reads are
finished.
Calls need some time to be executed, so if the callee inserts the
waitcnt, filling the instruction buffer and waiting for memory will be
interleaved, hiding some latency. This comes at the cost of having a
waitcnt inside functions that may not be needed as no memory operations
are outstanding.
For function calls, this is already implemented. The same principal
applies to returns: If the caller inserts a waitcnt after the call, the
callee does not have to wait and the return and memory operation can be
run in parallel.
This commit implements waiting in the caller after returning from a
function call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87674
I never completed the work on the patches referenced by
f8bf7d7f42f28fa18144091022236208e199f331, but this was intended to
avoid folding immediate writes into m0 which the coalescer doesn't
understand very well. Relax this to allow simple SGPR immediates to
fold directly into VGPR copies. This pattern shows up routinely in
current GlobalISel code since nothing is smart enough to emit VGPR
constants yet.
tryLatency compares two sched candidates. For the top zone it prefers
the one with lesser depth, but only if that depth is greater than the
total latency of the instructions we've already scheduled -- otherwise
its latency would be hidden and there would be no stall.
Unfortunately it only tests the depth of one of the candidates. This can
lead to situations where the TopDepthReduce heuristic does not kick in,
but a lower priority heuristic chooses the other candidate, whose depth
*is* greater than the already scheduled latency, which causes a stall.
The fix is to apply the heuristic if the depth of *either* candidate is
greater than the already scheduled latency.
All this also applies to the BotHeightReduce heuristic in the bottom
zone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72392
Summary:
Combine unmerge(trunc) to enable other merge combines.
Without this combine, the scalar unmerge(trunc(merge))
pattern cannot be combined and easily lead to
hard-to-legalize merge/unmerge artifacts.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79567
We generally only combine starting from users to defs in the artifact combiner,
but this doesn't catch cases where at the point of combining a G_UNMERGE we don't
yet have the opposite G_MERGE on input yet since we haven't legalized that far.
This change adds the users of a G_MERGE to the artifact combiner worklist if one
of the uses is a G_UNMERGE or G_TRUNC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77931
Summary:
The combine for unmerge(cast(merge)) is only valid for vectors, but was
missing a corresponding check. Add a check that the operands are vectors
to avoid an invalid combine.
Without this check, the combiner would emit incorrect code for scalars
and pointers because the artifact cast (trunc/ext) only affects bits at
the end of the type, while this combine assumes that the casted bits
appear between meaningful bits.
This also uncovered a segmentation fault in the AMDGPU
InstructionSelector. The tests triggering this bug have been moved to
their own file and a check for the segmentation fault has been added.
Reviewers: arsenm, dsanders, aemerson, paquette, aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: tpr, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78191
Selection would fail after the post legalize combiner put an illegal
zextload back together.
The base combiner has parameter to only allow legal operations, but
they appear to not be used. I also don't see a nice way to remove a
single entry from all_combines, so just hack around this.
