DBG_VALUES placed between memory instructions would change
codegen. Skip over these and re-insert them after the bundle instead
of giving up on bundling.
This would assert with amdgpu-spill-sgpr-to-vgpr disabled when trying to
spill the FP.
Fixes: SWDEV-262704
Reviewed By: RamNalamothu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95768
With a context instruction, this would produce a context
error. However, it would continue on and do an out of bounds access of
the empty allocation order array.
SCC was not correctly preserved when entering WWM.
Current lit test was unable to detect this as entry block is
handled differently.
Additionally fix an issue where SCC was unnecessarily preserved
when exiting from WWM to Exact mode.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95500
V_SET_INACTIVE is implemented with S_NOT which clobbers SCC.
Mark sure it is marked appropriately.
Reviewed By: piotr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95509
These are widened to a wider UADDE/USUBE, with the overflow value
unused, and with the same synthesis of a new overflow value as for the
O operations.
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95326
Look throught G_PTRTOINT and G_PTR_ADD nodes when looking for constant
offset for buffer stores. This also helps with merging of these instructions
later on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95242
Before the patch it was possible to trigger a constant bus
violation when folding immediates into a shrunk instruction.
The patch adds a check to enforce the legality of the new operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95527
We cannot call LRM::unassign() if LRM::assign() was never called
before, these are symmetrical calls. There are two ways of
assigning a physical register to virtual, via LRM::assign() and
via VRM::assignVirt2Phys(). LRM::assign() will call the VRM to
assign the register and then update LiveIntervalUnion. Inline
spiller calls VRM directly and thus LiveIntervalUnion never gets
updated. A call to LRM::unassign() then asserts about inconsistent
liveness.
We have to note that not all callers of the InlineSpiller even
have LRM to pass, RegAllocPBQP does not have it, so we cannot
always pass LRM into the spiller.
The only way to get into that spiller LRE_DidCloneVirtReg() call
is from LiveRangeEdit::eliminateDeadDefs if we split an LI.
This patch refuses to reassign a LiveInterval created by a split
to workaround the problem. In fact we cannot reassign a spill
anyway as all registers of the needed class are occupied and we
are spilling.
Fixes: SWDEV-267996
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95489
Just use the existing `Known.sextInReg` implementation.
- Update KnownBitsTest.cpp.
- Update combine-redundant-and.mir for a more concrete example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95484
Support for XNACK and SRAMECC is not static on some GPUs. We must be able
to differentiate between different scenarios for these dynamic subtarget
features.
The possible settings are:
- Unsupported: The GPU has no support for XNACK/SRAMECC.
- Any: Preference is unspecified. Use conservative settings that can run anywhere.
- Off: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC Off
- On: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC On
GCNSubtarget will track the four options based on the following criteria. If
the subtarget does not support XNACK/SRAMECC we say the setting is
"Unsupported". If no subtarget features for XNACK/SRAMECC are requested we
must support "Any" mode. If the subtarget features XNACK/SRAMECC exist in the
feature string when initializing the subtarget, the settings are "On/Off".
The defaults are updated to be conservatively correct, meaning if no setting
for XNACK or SRAMECC is explicitly requested, defaults will be used which
generate code that can be run anywhere. This corresponds to the "Any" setting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85882
If a function has stack objects, and a call, we require an FP. If we
did not initially have any stack objects, and only introduced them
during PrologEpilogInserter for CSR VGPR spills, SILowerSGPRSpills
would end up spilling the FP register as if it were a normal
register. This would result in an assert in a debug build, or
redundant handling of the FP register in a release build.
Try to predict that we will have an FP later, although this is ugly.
This reverts commit dd8ae42674b494e46ec40a22f40068db2b4a8b60.
This commit causes infinite loop when compiling rocThrust and hipCUB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95389
Frame-base materialization may insert vector instructions before EXEC is initialised.
Fix this by moving lowering of llvm.amdgcn.init.exec later in backend.
Also remove SI_INIT_EXEC_LO pseudo as this is not necessary.
Reviewed By: ruiling
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94645
In RISC-V there is a single addressing mode of the form imm(reg) where
imm is a signed integer of 12-bit with a range of [-2048..2047] bytes
from reg.
The test MultiSource/UnitTests/C++11/frame_layout of the LLVM test-suite
exercises several scenarios with the stack, including function calls
where the stack will need to be realigned to to a local variable having
a large alignment of 4096 bytes.
In situations of large stacks, the RISC-V backend (in
RISCVFrameLowering) reserves an extra emergency spill slot which can be
used (if no free register is found) by the register scavenger after the
frame indexes have been eliminated. PrologEpilogInserter already takes
care of keeping the emergency spill slots as close as possible to the
stack pointer or frame pointer (depending on what the function will
use). However there is a final alignment step to honour the maximum
alignment of the stack that, when using the stack pointer to access the
emergency spill slots, has the side effect of setting them farther from
the stack pointer.
In the case of the frame_layout testcase, the net result is that we do
have an emergency spill slot but it is so far from the stack pointer
(more than 2048 bytes due to the extra alignment of a variable to 4096
bytes) that it becomes unreachable via any immediate offset.
During elimination of the frame index, many (regular) offsets of the
stack may be immediately unreachable already. Their address needs to be
computed using a register. A virtual register is created and later
RegisterScavenger should be able to find an unused (physical) register.
However if no register is available, RegisterScavenger will pick a
physical register and spill it onto an emergency stack slot, while we
compute the offset (restoring the chosen register after all this). This
assumes that the emergency stack slot is easily reachable (this is,
without requiring another register!).
This is the assumption we seem to break when we perform the extra
alignment in PrologEpilogInserter.
We can "float" the emergency spill slots by increasing (in absolute
value) their offsets from the incoming stack pointer. This way the
emergency spill slots will remain close to the stack pointer (once the
function has allocated storage for the stack, including the needed
realignment). The new size computed in PrologEpilogInserter is padding
so it should be OK to move the emergency spill slots there. Also because
we're increasing the alignment, the new location should stay aligned for
the purpose of the emergency spill slots.
Note that this change also impacts other backends as shown by the tests.
Changes are minor adjustments to the emergency stack slot offset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89239
The widenScalar implementation for signed and unsigned overflowing
operations were very similar: both are checked by truncating the result
and then re-sign/zero-extending it and checking that it matches the
computed operation.
Using a truncate + zero-extend for the unsigned case instead of manually
producing the AND instruction like before leads to an extra copy
instruction during legalization, but this should be harmless.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95035
Allow parsing generated mir with custom pseudo source value tokens.
Also rename pseudo source values to have more meaningful names.
Relands ba7dcd8542ab, which had memory leaks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95215
During instruction selection, there is an inconsistency in choosing
the initial soffset value. With certain early passes, this value is
getting modified and that brought additional fixup during
eliminateFrameIndex to work for all cases. This whole transformation
looks trivial and can be handled better.
This patch clearly defines the initial value for soffset and keeps it
unchanged before eliminateFrameIndex. The initial value must be zero
for MUBUF with a frame index. The non-frame index MUBUF forms that
use a raw offset from SP will have the stack register for soffset.
During frame elimination, the soffset remains zero for entry functions
with zero dynamic allocas and no callsites, or else is updated to the
appropriate frame/stack register.
Also, did some code clean up and made all asserts around soffset
stricter to match.
Reviewed By: scott.linder
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95071
Having a custom inliner doesn't really fit in with the new PM's
pipeline. It's also extra technical debt.
amdgpu-inline only does a couple of custom things compared to the normal
inliner:
1) It disables inlining if the number of BBs in a function would exceed
some limit
2) It increases the threshold if there are pointers to private arrays(?)
These can all be handled as TTI inliner hooks.
There already exists a hook for backends to multiply the inlining
threshold.
This way we can remove the custom amdgpu-inline pass.
This caused inline-hint.ll to fail, and after some investigation, it
looks like getInliningThresholdMultiplier() was previously getting
applied twice in amdgpu-inline (https://reviews.llvm.org/D62707 fixed it
not applying at all, so some later inliner change must have fixed
something), so I had to change the threshold in the test.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94153
This test case demonstrates that the Call Frame Information generation is
totally biased towards whether exceptions are enabled or not. Currently
LLVM does not generate CFI i.e. a .debug_frame for debug purpose even
if --force-dwarf-frame-section is enabled unless exceptions are enabled.
Reviewed By: scott.linder
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94801
If a function doesn't contain loops and does not call non-willreturn
functions, then it is willreturn. Loops are detected by checking
for backedges in the function. We don't attempt to handle finite
loops at this point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94633
This pass is required to get correct codegen for image instructions with
the tfe or lwe bits set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95132
Allow parsing generated mir with custom pseudo source value tokens.
Also rename pseudo source values to have more meaningful names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94768
Add DemandedElts support inside the TRUNCATE analysis.
REAPPLIED - this was reverted by @hans at rGa51226057fc3 due to an issue with vector shift amount types, which was fixed in rG935bacd3a724 and an additional test case added at rG0ca81b90d19d
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56387
In case of indirect calls or address taken functions,
skip propagating any attributes to them. We just
propagate features to such functions.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94585
It caused "Vector shift amounts must be in the same as their first arg"
asserts in Chromium builds. See the code review for repro instructions.
> Add DemandedElts support inside the TRUNCATE analysis.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56387
This reverts commit cad4275d697c601761e0819863f487def73c67f8.
If constants are hidden behind G_ANYEXT we can treat them same way as G_SEXT.
For that purpose we extend getConstantVRegValWithLookThrough with option
to handle G_ANYEXT same way as G_SEXT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92219
