clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule sets dso_local on applicable function declarations,
we don't need to duplicate the work in TargetMachine:shouldAssumeDSOLocal.
(Actually the long-term goal (started by r324535) is to drop TargetMachine::shouldAssumeDSOLocal.)
By not implying dso_local, we will respect dso_local/dso_preemptable specifiers
set by the frontend. This allows the proposed -fno-direct-access-external-data
option to work with -fno-pic and prevent a canonical PLT entry (SHN_UNDEF with non-zero st_value)
when taking the address of a function symbol.
This patch should be NFC in terms of the Clang emitted assembly because the case
we don't set dso_local is a case Clang sets dso_local. However, some tests don't
set dso_local on some function declarations and expose some differences. Most
tests have been fixed to be more robust in the previous commit.
This reapplies 36c64af9d7f97414d48681b74352c9684077259b in updated
form.
Emit the xdata for each function at .seh_endproc. This keeps the
exact same output header order for most code generated by the LLVM
CodeGen layer. (Sections still change order for code built from
assembly where functions lack an explicit .seh_handlerdata
directive, and functions with chained unwind info.)
The practical effect should be that assembly output lacks
superfluous ".seh_handlerdata; .text" pairs at the end of functions
that don't handle exceptions, which allows such functions to use
the AArch64 packed unwind format again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87448
I had manually removed unused prefixes from CodeGen/X86 directory for more than 100 tests.
I checked the change history for each of them at the beginning, and then I mainly focused on the format since I found all of the unused prefixes were result from either insensible copy or residuum after functional update.
I think it's OK to remove the remaining X86 tests by script now. I wrote a rough script which works for me in most tests. I put it in llvm/utils temporarily for review and hope it may help other components owners.
The tests in this patch are all generated by the tool and checked by update tool for the autogenerated tests. I skimmed them and checked about 30 tests and didn't find any unexpected changes.
Reviewed By: mtrofin, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91496
This caused an explosion in ICF times during linking on Windows when libfuzzer
instrumentation is enabled. For a small binary we see ICF time go from ~0 to
~10 s. For a large binary it goes from ~1 s to forevert (I gave up after 30
minutes).
See comment on the code review.
> If we are going to write handler data (that is written as variable
> length data following after the unwind info in .xdata), we need to
> emit the handler data immediately, but for cases where no such
> info is going to be written, skip emitting it right away. (Unwind
> info for all remaining functions that hasn't gotten it emitted
> directly is emitted at the end.)
>
> This does slightly change the ordering of sections (triggering a
> bunch of updates to DebugInfo/COFF tests), but the change should be
> benign.
>
> This also matches GCC's assembly output, which doesn't output
> .seh_handlerdata unless it actually is needed.
>
> For ARM64, the unwind info can be packed into the runtime function
> entry itself (leaving no data in the .xdata section at all), but
> that can only be done if there's no follow-on data in the .xdata
> section. If emission of the unwind info is triggered via
> EmitWinEHHandlerData (or the .seh_handlerdata directive), which
> implicitly switches to the .xdata section, there's a chance of the
> caller wanting to pass further data there, so the packed format
> can't be used in that case.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87448
This reverts commit 36c64af9d7f97414d48681b74352c9684077259b.
If we are going to write handler data (that is written as variable
length data following after the unwind info in .xdata), we need to
emit the handler data immediately, but for cases where no such
info is going to be written, skip emitting it right away. (Unwind
info for all remaining functions that hasn't gotten it emitted
directly is emitted at the end.)
This does slightly change the ordering of sections (triggering a
bunch of updates to DebugInfo/COFF tests), but the change should be
benign.
This also matches GCC's assembly output, which doesn't output
.seh_handlerdata unless it actually is needed.
For ARM64, the unwind info can be packed into the runtime function
entry itself (leaving no data in the .xdata section at all), but
that can only be done if there's no follow-on data in the .xdata
section. If emission of the unwind info is triggered via
EmitWinEHHandlerData (or the .seh_handlerdata directive), which
implicitly switches to the .xdata section, there's a chance of the
caller wanting to pass further data there, so the packed format
can't be used in that case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87448
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
