They are currently implicit because TargetMachine::shouldAssumeDSOLocal implies
dso_local.
For such function declarations, clang -fno-pic emits the dso_local specifier.
Adding explicit dso_local makes these tests align with the clang behavior and
helps implementing an option to use GOT indirection when taking the address of a
function symbol in -fno-pic (to avoid a canonical PLT entry (SHN_UNDEF with
non-zero st_value)).
This reapplies 36c64af9d7f97414d48681b74352c9684077259b in updated
form.
Emit the xdata for each function at .seh_endproc. This keeps the
exact same output header order for most code generated by the LLVM
CodeGen layer. (Sections still change order for code built from
assembly where functions lack an explicit .seh_handlerdata
directive, and functions with chained unwind info.)
The practical effect should be that assembly output lacks
superfluous ".seh_handlerdata; .text" pairs at the end of functions
that don't handle exceptions, which allows such functions to use
the AArch64 packed unwind format again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87448
I had manually removed unused prefixes from CodeGen/X86 directory for more than 100 tests.
I checked the change history for each of them at the beginning, and then I mainly focused on the format since I found all of the unused prefixes were result from either insensible copy or residuum after functional update.
I think it's OK to remove the remaining X86 tests by script now. I wrote a rough script which works for me in most tests. I put it in llvm/utils temporarily for review and hope it may help other components owners.
The tests in this patch are all generated by the tool and checked by update tool for the autogenerated tests. I skimmed them and checked about 30 tests and didn't find any unexpected changes.
Reviewed By: mtrofin, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91496
This caused an explosion in ICF times during linking on Windows when libfuzzer
instrumentation is enabled. For a small binary we see ICF time go from ~0 to
~10 s. For a large binary it goes from ~1 s to forevert (I gave up after 30
minutes).
See comment on the code review.
> If we are going to write handler data (that is written as variable
> length data following after the unwind info in .xdata), we need to
> emit the handler data immediately, but for cases where no such
> info is going to be written, skip emitting it right away. (Unwind
> info for all remaining functions that hasn't gotten it emitted
> directly is emitted at the end.)
>
> This does slightly change the ordering of sections (triggering a
> bunch of updates to DebugInfo/COFF tests), but the change should be
> benign.
>
> This also matches GCC's assembly output, which doesn't output
> .seh_handlerdata unless it actually is needed.
>
> For ARM64, the unwind info can be packed into the runtime function
> entry itself (leaving no data in the .xdata section at all), but
> that can only be done if there's no follow-on data in the .xdata
> section. If emission of the unwind info is triggered via
> EmitWinEHHandlerData (or the .seh_handlerdata directive), which
> implicitly switches to the .xdata section, there's a chance of the
> caller wanting to pass further data there, so the packed format
> can't be used in that case.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87448
This reverts commit 36c64af9d7f97414d48681b74352c9684077259b.
If we are going to write handler data (that is written as variable
length data following after the unwind info in .xdata), we need to
emit the handler data immediately, but for cases where no such
info is going to be written, skip emitting it right away. (Unwind
info for all remaining functions that hasn't gotten it emitted
directly is emitted at the end.)
This does slightly change the ordering of sections (triggering a
bunch of updates to DebugInfo/COFF tests), but the change should be
benign.
This also matches GCC's assembly output, which doesn't output
.seh_handlerdata unless it actually is needed.
For ARM64, the unwind info can be packed into the runtime function
entry itself (leaving no data in the .xdata section at all), but
that can only be done if there's no follow-on data in the .xdata
section. If emission of the unwind info is triggered via
EmitWinEHHandlerData (or the .seh_handlerdata directive), which
implicitly switches to the .xdata section, there's a chance of the
caller wanting to pass further data there, so the packed format
can't be used in that case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87448
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
Also improve assembler parser register validation for .seh_ directives.
This requires moving X86-specific seh directive handling into the x86
backend, which addresses some assembler FIXMEs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66625
llvm-svn: 370533
This reverts r369664 (git commit 51f48295cbe8fa3a44db263b528dd9f7bae7bf9a)
It causes many benchmark regressions, internally and in llvm's benchmark suite.
llvm-svn: 370398
Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 369664
It caused assertions to fire when building Chromium:
lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:331: bool
{anonymous}::LiveDebugValues::OpenRangesSet::empty() const: Assertion
`Vars.empty() == VarLocs.empty() && "open ranges are inconsistent"' failed.
See https://crbug.com/992871#c3 for how to reproduce.
> Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
>
> To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 368579
Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 368339
Current findBestLoopTop can find and move one kind of block to top, a latch block has one successor. Another common case is:
* a latch block
* it has two successors, one is loop header, another is exit
* it has more than one predecessors
If it is below one of its predecessors P, only P can fall through to it, all other predecessors need a jump to it, and another conditional jump to loop header. If it is moved before loop header, all its predecessors jump to it, then fall through to loop header. So all its predecessors except P can reduce one taken branch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256
llvm-svn: 363471
Summary:
I found the following case having tail blocks with no successors merging opportunities after block placement.
Before block placement:
bb0:
...
bne a0, 0, bb2:
bb1:
mv a0, 1
ret
bb2:
...
bb3:
mv a0, 1
ret
bb4:
mv a0, -1
ret
The conditional branch bne in bb0 is opposite to beq.
After block placement:
bb0:
...
beq a0, 0, bb1
bb2:
...
bb4:
mv a0, -1
ret
bb1:
mv a0, 1
ret
bb3:
mv a0, 1
ret
After block placement, that appears new tail merging opportunity, bb1 and bb3 can be merged as one block. So the conditional constraint for merging tail blocks with no successors should be removed. In my experiment for RISC-V, it decreases code size.
Author of original patch: Jim Lin
Reviewers: haicheng, aheejin, craig.topper, rnk, RKSimon, Jim, dmgreen
Reviewed By: Jim, dmgreen
Subscribers: xbolva00, dschuff, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kito-cheng, dmgreen, PkmX, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54411
llvm-svn: 363284
The original commit was reverted in r283329 due to a miscompile in
Chromium. That turned out to be the same issue as PR31257, which was
fixed in r295262.
llvm-svn: 295357
This reverts r294348, which removed support for conditional tail calls
due to the PR above. It fixes the PR by marking live registers as
implicitly used and defined by the now predicated tailcall. This is
similar to how IfConversion predicates instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29856
llvm-svn: 295262
They are currently modelled incorrectly (as calls, which clobber
registers, confusing e.g. Machine Copy Propagation).
Reverting until we figure out the proper solution.
llvm-svn: 294348
We can't use Jcc to leave a Win64 function in general, because that
confuses the unwinder. However, for "leaf" functions, that is, functions
where the return address is always on top of the stack and which don't
have unwind info, it's OK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24836
llvm-svn: 282920
That confuses e.g. machine basic block placement, which then doesn't
realize that control can fall through a block that ends with a conditional
tail call. Instead, isBranch=1 should be set.
Also, mark EFLAGS as used by these instructions.
llvm-svn: 281281
This extends the optimization in r280832 to also work for 64-bit. The only
quirk is that we can't do this for 64-bit Windows (yet).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24423
llvm-svn: 281113
When branching to a block that immediately tail calls, it is possible to fold
the call directly into the branch if the call is direct and there is no stack
adjustment, saving one byte.
Example:
define void @f(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
entry:
%p = icmp eq i32 %x, %y
br i1 %p, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
tail call void @foo()
ret void
bb2:
tail call void @bar()
ret void
}
before:
f:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
cmpl 8(%esp), %eax
jne .LBB0_2
jmp foo
.LBB0_2:
jmp bar
after:
f:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
cmpl 8(%esp), %eax
jne bar
.LBB0_1:
jmp foo
I don't expect any significant size savings from this (on a Clang bootstrap I
saw 288 bytes), but it does make the code a little tighter.
This patch only does 32-bit, but 64-bit would work similarly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24108
llvm-svn: 280832
