This essentially reverts the x86-64 side effect of r327198.
For x86-32, @PLT (R_386_PLT32) is not suitable in -fno-pic mode so the
code forces MO_NO_FLAG (like a forced dso_local) (https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=36674#c6).
For x86-64, both `call/jmp foo` and `call/jmp foo@PLT` emit R_X86_64_PLT32
(https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791) so there is no
difference using @PLT. Using @PLT is actually favorable because this drops
a difference with -fpie/-fpic code and makes it possible to avoid a canonical
PLT entry when taking the address of an undefined function symbol.
If the mask input to getV4X86ShuffleImm8 only refers to a single source element (+ undefs) then canonicalize to a full broadcast.
getV4X86ShuffleImm8 defaults to inline values for undefs, which can be useful for shuffle widening/narrowing but does leave SimplifyDemanded* calls thinking the shuffle depends on unnecessary elements.
I'm still investigating what we should do more generally to avoid these undemanded elements, but broadcast cases was a simpler win.
If we have a known non-nan operand, place it in the second operand
of fmin/fmax that is returned if either operand is nan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62448
llvm-svn: 361704
We have the folds for fadd/fsub/fmul already in DAGCombiner,
so it may be possible to remove that code if we can guarantee that
these ops are zapped before they can exist.
llvm-svn: 357029
As noted in PR39973 and D55558:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39973
...this is a partial implementation of a fold that we do as an IR canonicalization in instcombine:
// extelt (binop X, Y), Index --> binop (extelt X, Index), (extelt Y, Index)
We want to have this in the DAG too because as we can see in some of the test diffs (reductions),
the pattern may not be visible in IR.
Given that this is already an IR canonicalization, any backend that would prefer a vector op over
a scalar op is expected to already have the reverse transform in DAG lowering (not sure if that's
a realistic expectation though). The transform is limited with a TLI hook because there's an
existing transform in CodeGenPrepare that tries to do the opposite transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55722
llvm-svn: 350354
