This essentially reverts the x86-64 side effect of r327198.
For x86-32, @PLT (R_386_PLT32) is not suitable in -fno-pic mode so the
code forces MO_NO_FLAG (like a forced dso_local) (https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=36674#c6).
For x86-64, both `call/jmp foo` and `call/jmp foo@PLT` emit R_X86_64_PLT32
(https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791) so there is no
difference using @PLT. Using @PLT is actually favorable because this drops
a difference with -fpie/-fpic code and makes it possible to avoid a canonical
PLT entry when taking the address of an undefined function symbol.
ISD::FROUND is defined to round to nearest with ties rounding
away from 0. This mode isn't supported in hardware on X86.
But as long as we aren't compiling with trapping math, we can
emulate this with floor(X + copysign(nextafter(0.5, 0.0), X)).
We have to use nextafter to avoid some corner cases that adding
0.5 would have. For example, if X is nextafter(0.5, 0.0) it should
round to 0.0, but adding 0.5 would need one extra bit of mantissa
than can be stored so it rounds to 1.0. Adding nextafter(0.5, 0.0)
instead will just increase the exponent by 1 and leave the mantissa
as all 1s. This would be nextafter(1.0, 0.0) which will floor to 0.0.
Techically this requires -fno-trapping-math which isn't our default.
But if we care about exceptions we should be using constrained
intrinsics. Constrained intrinsics would use STRICT_FROUND which
won't go through this code.
Fixes PR42195.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73607
I noticed that we were failing to narrow an x86 ymm math op in a case similar
to the 'madd' test diff. That is because a bitcast is sitting between the math
and the extract subvector and thwarting our pattern matching for narrowing:
t56: v8i32 = add t59, t58
t68: v4i64 = bitcast t56
t73: v2i64 = extract_subvector t68, Constant:i64<2>
t96: v4i32 = bitcast t73
There are a few wins and neutral diffs in the other tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61806
llvm-svn: 360541
If the vector setcc has been legalized then we will need to convert a vector boolean of 0 or -1 to a scalar boolean of 0 or 1.
The added test case previously crashed in 32-bit mode by creating a setcc with an i64 condition that type legalization couldn't expand.
llvm-svn: 358218
Summary:
Nodes that have no uses are eventually pruned when they are selected
from the worklist. Record nodes newly added to the worklist or DAG and
perform pruning after every combine attempt.
Reviewers: efriedma, RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, jyknight
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: jdoerfert, jyknight, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58070
llvm-svn: 357283
A fuzzer found the crasher:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=13700
The bug was introduced recently here:
rL355741
This is the quick fix. If we need to do this transform
later, then we'd have to extend/truncate the vector setcc
element type to the scalar setcc type (i8).
llvm-svn: 356053
An extension of D58282 noted in PR39665:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39665
This doesn't answer the request to use movmsk, but that's an
independent problem. We need this and probably still need
scalarization of FP selects because we can't do that as a
target-independent transform (although it seems likely that
targets besides x86 should have this transform).
llvm-svn: 355741
This is another step towards ensuring that we produce the optimal code for reductions,
but there are other potential benefits as seen in the tests diffs:
1. Memory loads may get scalarized resulting in more efficient code.
2. Memory stores may get scalarized resulting in more efficient code.
3. Complex ops like fdiv/sqrt get scalarized which may be faster instructions depending on uarch.
4. Even simple ops like addss/subss/mulss/roundss may result in faster operation/less frequency throttling when scalarized depending on uarch.
The TODO comment suggests 1 or more follow-ups for opcodes that can currently result in regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58282
llvm-svn: 355130
