50 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Wang, Pengfei
c22dc71b12 [CodeGen][X86] Remove unused trivial check-prefixes from all CodeGen/X86 directory.
I had manually removed unused prefixes from CodeGen/X86 directory for more than 100 tests.
I checked the change history for each of them at the beginning, and then I mainly focused on the format since I found all of the unused prefixes were result from either insensible copy or residuum after functional update.
I think it's OK to remove the remaining X86 tests by script now. I wrote a rough script which works for me in most tests. I put it in llvm/utils temporarily for review and hope it may help other components owners.
The tests in this patch are all generated by the tool and checked by update tool for the autogenerated tests. I skimmed them and checked about 30 tests and didn't find any unexpected changes.

Reviewed By: mtrofin, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91496
2020-11-16 09:45:55 +08:00
Craig Topper
b6e2796114 [X86][TwoAddressInstructionPass] Teach tryInstructionCommute to continue checking for commutable FMA operands in more cases.
Previously we would only check for another commutable operand if the first commute was an aggressive commute.

But if we have two kill operands and neither is tied to the def at the start, we should consider both operands as the one to use as the new def.

This improves the loop in the fma-commute-loop.ll test. This test is derived from a post from discourse here https://llvm.discourse.group/t/unnecessary-vmovapd-instructions-generated-can-you-hint-in-favor-of-vfmadd231pd/582

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75016
2020-03-01 16:38:08 -08:00
Craig Topper
31059ba5eb [X86] Regenerate some tests to show FMA4 comments. NFC 2020-02-23 09:55:53 -08:00
Simon Pilgrim
c96001035d [X86] isNegatibleForFree - allow pre-legalized FMA negation
As long as the FMA operation is legal (which we can proxy for the FMA3/FMA4 variants as well), we don't have to wait for the LegalOperations stage.
2020-02-07 17:04:17 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
6a38474f77 [X86] combineFMA - Convert to use isNegatibleForFree/GetNegatedExpression.
Split off from D67557.

llvm-svn: 374356
2019-10-10 14:14:12 +00:00
Ilya Biryukov
60e5e0b667 Revert r372333: [DAG][X86] Convert isNegatibleForFree/GetNegatedExpression to a target hook (PR42863)
Reason: this caused severe compile time regressions in JAX.
See email thread  of original revision on llvm-commits for details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190923/697042.html

llvm-svn: 372756
2019-09-24 13:48:02 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
af6043557d [DAG][X86] Convert isNegatibleForFree/GetNegatedExpression to a target hook (PR42863)
This patch converts the DAGCombine isNegatibleForFree/GetNegatedExpression into overridable TLI hooks and includes a demonstration X86 implementation.

The intention is to let us extend existing FNEG combines to work more generally with negatible float ops, allowing it work with target specific combines and opcodes (e.g. X86's FMA variants).

Unlike the SimplifyDemandedBits, we can't just handle target nodes through a Target callback, we need to do this as an override to allow targets to handle generic opcodes as well. This does mean that the target implementations has to duplicate some checks (recursion depth etc.).

I've only begun to replace X86's FNEG handling here, handling FMADDSUB/FMSUBADD negation and some low impact codegen changes (some FMA negatation propagation). We can build on this in future patches.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67557

llvm-svn: 372333
2019-09-19 15:02:47 +00:00
Qiu Chaofan
b7fb5d0f6f [DAGCombiner] Improve division estimation of floating points.
Current implementation of estimating divisions loses precision since it
estimates reciprocal first and does multiplication.  This patch is to re-order
arithmetic operations in the last iteration in DAGCombiner to improve the
accuracy.

Reviewed By: Sanjay Patel, Jinsong Ji

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66050

llvm-svn: 371713
2019-09-12 07:51:24 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
5dcec7ce7a [x86] fix fdiv test; NFC
The test was just added with rL369106, but forgot to update the instruction
along with the test name.

llvm-svn: 369107
2019-08-16 13:31:23 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
15fb2a73f9 [x86] add tests for fdiv with variable operands; NFC
D66050 proposes to change the estimate sequence, but we
don't seem to have test coverage for the common case.

llvm-svn: 369106
2019-08-16 13:23:52 +00:00
Andrea Di Biagio
edbf06a767 [AsmPrinter] Remove hidden flag -print-schedule.
This patch removes hidden codegen flag -print-schedule effectively reverting the
logic originally committed as r300311
(https://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=300311).

Flag -print-schedule was originally introduced by r300311 to address PR32216
(https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32216). That bug was about adding "Better
testing of schedule model instruction latencies/throughputs".

These days, we can use llvm-mca to test scheduling models. So there is no longer
a need for flag -print-schedule in LLVM. The main use case for PR32216 is
now addressed by llvm-mca.
Flag -print-schedule is mainly used for debugging purposes, and it is only
actually used by x86 specific tests. We already have extensive (latency and
throughput) tests under "test/tools/llvm-mca" for X86 processor models. That
means, most (if not all) existing -print-schedule tests for X86 are redundant.

When flag -print-schedule was first added to LLVM, several files had to be
modified; a few APIs gained new arguments (see for example method
MCAsmStreamer::EmitInstruction), and MCSubtargetInfo/TargetSubtargetInfo gained
a couple of getSchedInfoStr() methods.

Method getSchedInfoStr() had to originally work for both MCInst and
MachineInstr. The original implmentation of getSchedInfoStr() introduced a
subtle layering violation (reported as PR37160 and then fixed/worked-around by
r330615).
In retrospect, that new API could have been designed more optimally. We can
always query MCSchedModel to get the latency and throughput. More importantly,
the "sched-info" string should not have been generated by the subtarget.
Note, r317782 fixed an issue where "print-schedule" didn't work very well in the
presence of inline assembly. That commit is also reverted by this change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57244

llvm-svn: 353043
2019-02-04 12:51:26 +00:00
Craig Topper
aa5eb2fbaa [X86] Force floating point values in constant pool decoding to print in scientific notation so they can't be confused with integers.
When the floating point constants are whole numbers they have no decimal point so look like integers, but mean something very different in something like an 'and' instruction.

Ideally we would just print a decimal point and a 0, but I couldn't see how to make APFloat::toString do that.

llvm-svn: 345488
2018-10-29 04:52:04 +00:00
Roman Lebedev
a5baf86744 AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
  * All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
  * Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
  They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...

To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!

# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark                                                                                        Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0607         -0.0604           234           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0630         -0.0626           233           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            +0.2581         +0.2587             1             2             1             2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0770         -0.0767           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0767         -0.0763           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            -0.4170         -0.4156             1             0             1             0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0271         -0.0270           463           450           463           450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0093         -0.0093           453           449           453           449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7280         -0.7280            13             4            13             4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0065         -0.0065           569           565           569           565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0077         -0.0077           569           564           569           564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +1.0077         +1.0068             2             5             2             5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0220          0.0199      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0006         +0.0007           312           312           312           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         +0.0031         +0.0032           311           312           311           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7069         -0.7072             4             1             4             1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0015         -0.0015           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0010         -0.0011           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1486         -0.1456             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.6139          0.8766      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0008         -0.0005            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0006         -0.0002            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1467         -0.1390             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0137          0.0137      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0002         +0.0002           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0015         -0.0014           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +3.3687         +3.3587             0             2             0             2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.4041          0.3933      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      +0.0004         +0.0004            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0000         -0.0000            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +0.1947         +0.1995             0             0             0             0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                              0.0074          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                               -0.0092         +0.0074           547           542            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                             -0.0054         +0.0115           544           541            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                             -0.4086         -0.3486             8             5             0             0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.3320          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         +0.0015         +0.0204           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                                       +0.0001         +0.0203           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +0.2259         +0.2023             1             1             0             0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       -0.0209         -0.0179            96            94            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median                                     -0.0182         -0.0155            95            93            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.6164         -0.2703             2             1             2             1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      -0.0098         -0.0098           176           175           176           175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0126         -0.0126           176           174           176           174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +6.9789         +6.9157             0             2             0             2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                 0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                  -0.0237         -0.0238           474           463           474           463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median                -0.0267         -0.0267           473           461           473           461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                +0.7179         +0.7178             3             5             3             5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                   0.6837          0.6554      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean                    -0.0014         -0.0013          1375          1373          1375          1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median                  +0.0018         +0.0019          1371          1374          1371          1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                  -0.7457         -0.7382            11             3            10             3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         -0.0080         -0.0289            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                       -0.0070         -0.0287            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +1.0977         +0.6614             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                       0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                        +0.0132         +0.0967            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                      +0.0132         +0.0956            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                      -0.0407         -0.1695             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       +0.0331         +0.1307            13            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                     +0.0430         +0.1373            12            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.9006         -0.8847             1             0             0             0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                            0.0016          0.0010      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                             -0.0023         -0.0024           395           394           395           394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median                                           -0.0029         -0.0030           395           394           395           393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                           -0.0275         -0.0375             1             1             1             1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0232          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0047         +0.0039           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0050         +0.0037           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.0599         -0.2683             1             1             0             0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                           +0.0206         +0.0207           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                         +0.0204         +0.0205           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                         +0.2155         +0.2212             1             1             1             1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                          -0.0109         -0.0108           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                        -0.0104         -0.0103           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                        -0.4919         -0.4800             0             0             0             0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0149         -0.0147           220           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0173         -0.0169           221           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        +1.0337         +1.0341             1             3             1             3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0001          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0019         -0.0019           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0021         -0.0021           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        -0.4441         -0.4282             0             0             0             0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                0.0000          0.4263      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                 +0.0258         -0.0006            81            83            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                               +0.0235         -0.0011            81            82            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                               +0.1634         +0.1070             1             1             0             0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.

llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-27 20:46:30 +00:00
Roman Lebedev
a51921877a [NFC][X86] Baseline tests for AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Scheduler model
Adding the baseline tests in a preparatory NFC commit,
so that the actual commit shows the *diff*.

Yes, i'm aware that a few of these codegen-based sched tests
are testing wrong instructions, i will fix that afterwards.

For https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345462
2018-10-27 20:36:11 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
ad23f270db [X86] Standardize floating point assembly comments
Consistently try to use APFloat::toString for floating point constant comments to get rid of differences between Constant / ConstantDataSequential values - it should help stop some of the linux-windows buildbot failures matching NaN/INF etc. as well.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52702

llvm-svn: 343562
2018-10-02 09:08:51 +00:00
Clement Courbet
7db69cc08a [X86] Fix skylake server scheduling info.
Summary:
This fixes most of the scheduling info for SKX vector operations.
I had to split a lot of the YMM/ZMM classes into separate classes for YMM and ZMM.

The before/after llvm-exegesis analysis are in the phabricator diff.

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47721

llvm-svn: 334407
2018-06-11 14:37:53 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
ac5d0a31ef [X86] Split WriteFDiv schedule classes to support single/double scalar, XMM and YMM/ZMM instructions.
This removes all InstrRW overrides for these instructions - some x87 overrides remain but most use default (and realistic) values.

llvm-svn: 331643
2018-05-07 16:15:46 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
f3ae50fca2 [X86] Split WriteFRcp/WriteFRsqrt/WriteFSqrt schedule classes
WriteFRcp/WriteFRsqrt are split to support scalar, XMM and YMM/ZMM instructions.

WriteFSqrt is split into single/double/long-double sizes and scalar, XMM, YMM and ZMM instructions.

This removes all InstrRW overrides for these instructions.

NOTE: There were a couple of typos in the Znver1 model - notably a 1cy throughput for SQRT that is highly unlikely and doesn't tally with Agner.

NOTE: I had to add Agner's numbers for several targets for WriteFSqrt80.
llvm-svn: 331629
2018-05-07 11:50:44 +00:00
Craig Topper
cb2abc7977 [X86] Enable reciprocal estimates for v16f32 vectors by using VRCP14PS/VRSQRT14PS
Summary:
The legacy VRCPPS/VRSQRTPS instructions aren't available in 512-bit versions. The new increased precision versions are. So we can use those to implement v16f32 reciprocal estimates.

For KNL CPUs we can probably use VRCP28PS/VRSQRT28PS and avoid the NR step altogether, but I leave that for a future patch.

Reviewers: spatel

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: RKSimon, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46498

llvm-svn: 331606
2018-05-06 17:48:21 +00:00
Craig Topper
b02e3dec4b [X86] Add test cases for reciprocal estimation for v16f32 vectors with AVX512F.
We should be able to use the vrsqrt14ps and vrcp14ps instructions for these cases.

llvm-svn: 331605
2018-05-06 17:45:40 +00:00
Craig Topper
8104f266a4 [X86] Correct the throughput for divide instructions in Sandy Bridge/Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake scheduler models.
Fixes most of PR36898. Still need to fix the 512-bit instructions, but Agner's tables don't have those.

llvm-svn: 328960
2018-04-02 05:33:28 +00:00
Craig Topper
d88204fe1b [X86] Add comments to the end of FMA3 instructions to make the operation clear
Summary:
There are 3 different operand orders for FMA instructions so figuring out the exact operation being performed requires a lot of thought.

This patch adds a comment to the end of the assembly line to print the exact operation.

I think I've got all the instructions in here except the ones with builtin rounding.

I didn't update all tests, but I assume we can get them as we regenerate tests in the future.

Reviewers: spatel, v_klochkov, RKSimon

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44345

llvm-svn: 327225
2018-03-10 21:30:46 +00:00
Craig Topper
391c6f9507 [X86] Fix bad regular expressions in the scheduler models. Question marks should be outside of multicharacter parenthesized expressions
If the question mark is inside the parentheses it only applies to the single character proceeding it.

I had to make a few additional cleanups to fix some duplicate warnings that were exposed by fixing this.

llvm-svn: 320279
2017-12-10 01:24:08 +00:00
Gadi Haber
2cf601f28f [X86][Haswell]: Updating the scheduling information for the Haswell subtarget.
Updated the scheduling information for the Haswell subtarget with the following changes:

Regrouped the instructions after adding appropriate load + store latencies.
Added scheduling for missing instructions such as the GATHER instrs.
The changes were made after revisiting the latencies impact of all memory uOps.

Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, craig.topper, apilipenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40021

Change-Id: Iaf6c1f5169add1552845a8a566af4e5a359217a7
llvm-svn: 320137
2017-12-08 09:48:44 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih
25528d6de7 [CodeGen] Unify MBB reference format in both MIR and debug output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.

The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.

* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422

llvm-svn: 319665
2017-12-04 17:18:51 +00:00
Craig Topper
4e2f53511a [X86] Remove some more RCP and RSQRT patterns from InstrAVX512.td that I missed in r317413.
llvm-svn: 317441
2017-11-05 21:14:05 +00:00
Craig Topper
692c8efe30 [X86] Don't use RCP14 and RSQRT14 for reciprocal estimations or for legacy SSE rcp/rsqrt intrinsics when AVX512 features are enabled.
Summary:
AVX512 added RCP14 and RSQRT instructions which improve accuracy over the legacy RCP and RSQRT instruction, but not enough accuracy to remove the need for a Newton Raphson refinement.

Currently we use these new instructions for the legacy packed SSE instrinics, but not the scalar instrinsics. And we use it for fast math optimization of division and reciprocal sqrt.

I think switching the legacy instrinsics maybe surprising to the user since it changes the answer based on which processor you're using regardless of any fastmath settings. It's also weird that we did something different between scalar and packed.

As far at the reciprocal estimation, I think it creates unnecessary deltas in our output behavior (and prevents EVEX->VEX). A little playing around with gcc and icc and godbolt suggest they don't change which instructions they use here.

This patch adds new X86ISD nodes for the RCP14/RSQRT14 and uses those for the new intrinsics. Leaving the old intrinsics to use the old instructions.

Going forward I think our focus should be on
-Supporting 512-bit vectors, which will have to use the RCP14/RSQRT14.
-Using RSQRT28/RCP28 to remove the Newton Raphson step on processors with AVX512ER
-Supporting double precision.

Reviewers: zvi, DavidKreitzer, RKSimon

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39583

llvm-svn: 317413
2017-11-04 18:26:41 +00:00
Gadi Haber
684944b822 [X86][SKX] Adding the scheduling information for the SKX target.
Adding the scheduling information for the SkylakeServer (SKX) target.

This patch adds the instruction scheduling information for the SkylakeServer (SKX) architecture target by adding the file X86SchedSkylakeServer.td located under the X86 Target.
We used the scheduling information retrieved from the Skylake architects in order to create the file.
The scheduling information includes latency, number of micro-Ops and used ports by each SKL instruction.

The patch continues the scheduling replacement and insertion effort started with the SNB target in r310792, the HSW target in r311879 and the SkylakeClient (SKL) target in rL313613.

Please expect some performance fluctuations due to code alignment effects.

Reviewers: zvi, RKSimon, craig.topper, chandlerc, aymanmu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38443

Change-Id: I5c228fcc09e9e5a99b6116e62b356c4f9b971185
llvm-svn: 315175
2017-10-08 12:52:54 +00:00
Gadi Haber
6f8fbf4b86 [X86][Skylake] Adding the scheduling information for the SkylakeClient target
This patch adds the instruction scheduling information for the SkylakeClient (SKL) architecture target by adding the file X86SchedSkylakeClient.td located under the X86 Target.
We used the scheduling information retrieved from the Skylake architects in order to create the file.
The scheduling information includes latency, number of micro-Ops and used ports by each SKL instruction.
The patch continues the scheduling replacement and insertion effort started with the SNB target in r307529 and r310792 and for HSW in r311879.

Please expect some performance fluctuations due to code alignment effects.

Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi, chandlerc, igorb, aymanmus, RKSimon, delena
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37294

llvm-svn: 313613
2017-09-19 06:19:27 +00:00
Gadi Haber
d76f7b824e [X86][Haswell] Updating HSW instruction scheduling information
This patch completely replaces the instruction scheduling information for the Haswell architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedHaswell.td located under the X86 Target.
We used the scheduling information retrieved from the Haswell architects in order to replace and modify the existing scheduling.
The patch continues the scheduling replacement effort started with the SNB target in r307529 and r310792.
Information includes latency, number of micro-Ops and used ports by each HSW instruction.

Please expect some performance fluctuations due to code alignment effects.

Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, aymanmus, craig.topper, m_zuckerman, igorb, dim, chandlerc, aaboud

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36663

llvm-svn: 311879
2017-08-28 10:04:16 +00:00
Gadi Haber
bed2c50607 [X86][SandyBridge] Additional updates to the SNB instructions scheduling information
This is a continuation patch for commit r307529 which completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target (see also https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019).

In this patch we added the scheduling information of additional SNB instructions that were missing from the patch commit r307529, fixed the scheduling of several resource groups that include only port0 instead of port05 (i.e., port0 OR port5) and fixed several incorrect instructions' scheduling in the r307529 commit.

The patch also includes the X87 instructions which were missing in previous patch commit r307529 as reported in bugzilla bug 34080.

Reviewers: zvi, RKSimon, chandlerc, igorb, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, aymanmus, dim

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36388

llvm-svn: 310792
2017-08-13 13:59:24 +00:00
Andrew V. Tischenko
ae9d6db769 [X86] Model 256-bit AVX instructions in the AMD Jaguar scheduler Part-1 (PR28573).
The new version of the model is definitely faster.

Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35198

llvm-svn: 307552
2017-07-10 16:36:03 +00:00
Gadi Haber
f4d154c089 This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.

Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.

Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.

The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs

For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:

def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];

}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;

Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.

Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb

Differential Revision:  https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691

llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 09:53:16 +00:00
Craig Topper
ad140cfb68 [X86] Add comment string for broadcast loads from the constant pool.
Summary:
When broadcasting from the constant pool its useful to print out the final vector similar to what we do for normal moves from the constant pool.

I changed only a couple tests that were broadcast focused. One of them had been previously hand tweaked after running the script so that it could check the constant pool declaration. But I think this patch makes that unnecessary now since we can check the comment instead.

Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, zvi

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34923

llvm-svn: 307062
2017-07-04 05:46:11 +00:00
Michael Zuckerman
f66840020c Reverting commit 306414 on behalf of @gadi.haber
llvm-svn: 306532
2017-06-28 11:23:31 +00:00
Gadi Haber
13759a7ed6 Updated and extended the information about each instruction in HSW and SNB to include the following data:
•static latency
•number of uOps from which the instructions consists
•all ports used by the instruction

Reviewers: 
 RKSimon 
 zvi  
aymanmus  
m_zuckerman 

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33897
 

llvm-svn: 306414
2017-06-27 15:05:13 +00:00
Andrew V. Tischenko
75745d0c3e This patch closes PR#32216: Better testing of schedule model instruction latencies/throughputs.
The details are here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30941

llvm-svn: 300311
2017-04-14 07:44:23 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
05ac1f70be [X86][SSE] Added extra FMA/NO-FMA reciprocal test cases for D26855
Test for expected codegen for nr reciprocal cases with/without FMA

llvm-svn: 294587
2017-02-09 14:14:06 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
361f8d7869 [X86][SSE] Add target cpu specific reciprocal tests
As discussed on D26855, check individual cpu targets as part of the investigation into moving more combines to MachineCombiner

llvm-svn: 294128
2017-02-05 18:26:17 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
6704059a0d [X86][SSE] Add SSE reciprocal estimate tests
llvm-svn: 287543
2016-11-21 15:28:21 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
bfdbea6481 [Target] move reciprocal estimate settings from TargetOptions to TargetLowering
The motivation for the change is that we can't have pseudo-global settings for
codegen living in TargetOptions because that doesn't work with LTO.

Ideally, these reciprocal attributes will be moved to the instruction-level via
FMF, metadata, or something else. But making them function attributes is at least
an improvement over the current state.

The ingredients of this patch are:

    Remove the reciprocal estimate command-line debug option.
    Add TargetRecip to TargetLowering.
    Remove TargetRecip from TargetOptions.
    Clean up the TargetRecip implementation to work with this new scheme.
    Set the default reciprocal settings in TargetLoweringBase (everything is off).
    Update the PowerPC defaults, users, and tests.
    Update the x86 defaults, users, and tests.

Note that if this patch needs to be reverted, the related clang patch checked in
at r283251 should be reverted too.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24816

llvm-svn: 283252
2016-10-04 20:46:43 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
09b2c890af [x86] set default reciprocal (division and square root) codegen to match GCC
D8982 ( checked in at http://reviews.llvm.org/rL239001 ) added command-line 
options to allow reciprocal estimate instructions to be used in place of
divisions and square roots.

This patch changes the default settings for x86 targets to allow that recip
codegen (except for scalar division because that breaks too much code) when
using -ffast-math or its equivalent. 

This matches GCC behavior for this kind of codegen.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10396

llvm-svn: 240310
2015-06-22 18:29:44 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
667a7e2a0f make reciprocal estimate code generation more flexible by adding command-line options (3rd try)
The first try (r238051) to land this was reverted due to ExecutionEngine build failure;
that was hopefully addressed by r238788.

The second try (r238842) to land this was reverted due to BUILD_SHARED_LIBS failure;
that was hopefully addressed by r238953.

This patch adds a TargetRecip class for processing many recip codegen possibilities.
The class is intended to handle both command-line options to llc as well
as options passed in from a front-end such as clang with the -mrecip option.

The x86 backend is updated to use the new functionality.
Only -mcpu=btver2 with -ffast-math should see a functional change from this patch.
All other x86 CPUs continue to *not* use reciprocal estimates by default with -ffast-math.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8982

llvm-svn: 239001
2015-06-04 01:32:35 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
cf8beece97 Revert "make reciprocal estimate code generation more flexible by adding command-line options (2nd try)"
This reverts commit r238842.

It broke -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON build.

llvm-svn: 238900
2015-06-03 05:32:44 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
6f031d848e make reciprocal estimate code generation more flexible by adding command-line options (2nd try)
The first try (r238051) to land this was reverted due to bot failures
that were hopefully addressed by r238788.

This patch adds a TargetRecip class for processing many recip codegen possibilities.
The class is intended to handle both command-line options to llc as well
as options passed in from a front-end such as clang with the -mrecip option.

The x86 backend is updated to use the new functionality.
Only -mcpu=btver2 with -ffast-math should see a functional change from this patch.
All other x86 CPUs continue to *not* use reciprocal estimates by default with -ffast-math.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8982

llvm-svn: 238842
2015-06-02 15:28:15 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
445712264d Revert "make reciprocal estimate code generation more flexible by adding command-line options"
This reverts commit r238051.

It broke some bots:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc64-linux1/builds/18190

llvm-svn: 238075
2015-05-23 00:22:44 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
ba2ba80302 make reciprocal estimate code generation more flexible by adding command-line options
This patch adds a class for processing many recip codegen possibilities.
The TargetRecip class is intended to handle both command-line options to llc as well
as options passed in from a front-end such as clang with the -mrecip option.

The x86 backend is updated to use the new functionality.
Only -mcpu=btver2 with -ffast-math should see a functional change from this patch.
All other CPUs continue to *not* use reciprocal estimates by default with -ffast-math.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8982

llvm-svn: 238051
2015-05-22 21:10:06 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
0f712d04f2 fixed to test features, not CPU models
llvm-svn: 234413
2015-04-08 16:51:42 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
f6f7d5d1dd Expose the number of Newton-Raphson iterations applied to the hardware's reciprocal estimate as a parameter (x86).
This is a follow-on to r221706 and r221731 and discussed in more detail in PR21385.

This patch also loosens the testcase checking for btver2. We know that the "1.0" will be loaded, but
we can't tell exactly when, so replace the CHECK-NEXT specifiers with plain CHECKs. The CHECK-NEXT
sequence relied on a quirk of post-RA-scheduling that may change independently of anything in these tests.

llvm-svn: 221819
2014-11-12 21:39:01 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
e2e589288f Use rcpss/rcpps (X86) to speed up reciprocal calcs (PR21385).
This is a first step for generating SSE rcp instructions for reciprocal
calcs when fast-math allows it. This is very similar to the rsqrt optimization
enabled in D5658 ( http://reviews.llvm.org/rL220570 ).

For now, be conservative and only enable this for AMD btver2 where performance
improves significantly both in terms of latency and throughput.

We may never enable this codegen for Intel Core* chips because the divider circuits
are just too fast. On SandyBridge, divss can be as fast as 10 cycles versus the 21
cycle critical path for the rcp + mul + sub + mul + add estimate.

Follow-on patches may allow configuration of the number of Newton-Raphson refinement
steps, add AVX512 support, and enable the optimization for more chips.

More background here: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21385

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6175

llvm-svn: 221706
2014-11-11 20:51:00 +00:00