These two instructions are VOP3P and have op_sel_hi bits,
however do not use op_sel_hi. That is recommended to set
unused op_sel_hi bits to 1. However, we cannot decode
both representations with 1 and 0 if bits are set to
default value 1. If bits are set to be ignored with '?'
initializer then encoding defaults them to 0.
The patch is a hack to force ignored '?' bits to 1 on
encoding for these instructions.
There is still canonicalization happens on disasm print
if incoming values are non-default, so that disasm output
does not match binary input, but this is pre-existing
problem for all instructions with '?' bits.
Fixes: SWDEV-272540
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96543
Add mimgopc object to represent the opcode allowing different
opcodes for different hardware variants.
This enables image_atomic_fcmpswap, image_atomic_fmin, and
image_atomic_fmax on GFX10
Reviewed By: foad, rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96309
With tfe on there can be a vgpr write to vdata+1.
Add tablegen support for 5 register vdata store.
This is required for 4 register vdata store with tfe.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94960
I think the global_load/store_dword_addtid instructions support
switching off the scalar address.
Add assembler and disassembler support for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93288
These are opsel opcodes with op_sel actually being ignored.
As a such op_sel_hi needs to be set to default 1 even though
these bits are ignored. This is compatibility change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91202
By setting up the AsmStrings correctly we can remove some special cases
from AMDGPUInstPrinter::printOffset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90307
GFX10 enables third addressing mode for flat scratch instructions,
an ST mode. In that mode both register operands are omitted and
only swizzled offset is used in addition to flat_scratch base.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89501
This instruction was introduced in GFX10.3, reusing the opcode of
v_mac_legacy_f32 from GFX10.1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89247
The VGPR component is a 32-bit offset, not 64-bits.
I'm not sure what the correct syntax is for this. This maintains the
vaddr position and leaves saddr in the end "off" position. This is
particularly terrible for stores, since the operand order is now <vgpr
offset>, <data>, <sgpr base>, splitting the pointer operands. I
suppose this is a logical consequence from the mistake of not putting
the data operand first. I'm not sure what sp3 does.
Currently supported LLVM MTBUF syntax is shown below. It is not compatible with SP3.
op dst, addr, rsrc, FORMAT, soffset
This change adds support for SP3 syntax:
op dst, addr, rsrc, soffset SP3FORMAT
In addition to being compatible with SP3, this syntax allows using symbolic names for data, numeric and unified formats. Below is a list of added syntax variants.
format:<expression>
format:[<numeric-format-name>,<data-format-name>]
format:[<data-format-name>,<numeric-format-name>]
format:[<data-format-name>]
format:[<numeric-format-name>]
format:[<unified-format-name>]
The last syntax variant is supported for GFX10 only.
See llvm bug 37738
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, vpykhtin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84026
16-bit literals are encoded as 32-bit values. If high 16-bits of the value is 0xFFFF, the decoded instruction cannot be reassembled.
For example, the following code
0xff,0x04,0x04,0x52,0xcd,0xab,0xff,0xff
was decoded as
v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v2, 0xffffabcd, v2
However this literal is actually a 64-bit constant 0x00000000ffffabcd which violates requirements described in the documentation - the truncation is not safe.
This change corrects decoding to make reassembly possible.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84098
MTBUF implementation has many issues and this change addresses most of these:
- refactored duplicated code;
- hardcoded constants moved out of high-level code;
- fixed a decoding error when nfmt or dfmt are zero (bug 36932);
- corrected parsing of operand separators (bug 46403);
- corrected handling of missing operands (bug 46404);
- corrected handling of out-of-range modifiers (bug 46421);
- corrected default value (bug 46467).
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, vpykhtin, artem.tamazov, kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83760
It seems to be a hardware defect that the half inline constants do not
work as expected for the 16-bit integer operations (the inverse does
work correctly). Experimentation seems to show these are really
reading the 32-bit inline constants, which can be observed by writing
inline asm using op_sel to see what's in the high half of the
constant. Theoretically we could fold the high halves of the 32-bit
constants using op_sel.
The *_asm_all.s MC tests are broken, and I don't know where the script
to autogenerate these are. I started manually fixing it, but there's
just too many cases to fix. This also does break the
assembler/disassembler support for these values, and I'm not sure what
to do about it. These are still valid encodings, so it seems like you
should be able to use them in some way. If you wrote assembly using
them, you could have really meant it (perhaps to read the high bits
with op_sel?). The disassembler will print the invalid literal
constant which will fail to re-assemble. The behavior is also
different depending on the use context. Consider this example, which
was previously accepted and encoded using the inline constant:
v_mad_i16 v5, v1, -4.0, v3
; encoding: [0x05,0x00,0xec,0xd1,0x01,0xef,0x0d,0x04]
In contexts where an inline immediate is required (such as on gfx8/9),
this will now be rejected. For gfx10, this will produce the literal
encoding and change the printed format:
v_mad_i16 v5, v1, 0xc400, v3
; encoding: [0x05,0x00,0x5e,0xd7,0x01,0xff,0x0d,0x04,0x00,0xc4,0x00,0x00]
This is just another variation of the issue that we don't perfectly
handle round trip assembly/disassembly due to not tracking how
immediates were encoded. This doesn't matter much in practice, since
compilers don't emit the suboptimal encoding. I doubt any users are
relying on this behavior (although I did make use of the old behavior
to figure out what was wrong).
Fixes bug 46302.
This reverts commit 80a34ae31125aa46dcad47162ba45b152aed968d with fixes.
Previously, since bots turning on EXPENSIVE_CHECKS are essentially turning on
MachineVerifierPass by default on X86 and the fact that
inline-asm-avx-v-constraint-32bit.ll and inline-asm-avx512vl-v-constraint-32bit.ll
are not expected to generate functioning machine code, this would go
down to `report_fatal_error` in MachineVerifierPass. Here passing
`-verify-machineinstrs=0` to make the intent explicit.
This reverts commit 80a34ae31125aa46dcad47162ba45b152aed968d with fixes.
On bots llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-ubuntu and
llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian only,
llc returns 0 for these two tests unexpectedly. I tweaked the RUN line a little
bit in the hope that LIT is the culprit since this change is not in the
codepath these tests are testing.
llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\inline-asm-avx-v-constraint-32bit.ll
llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\inline-asm-avx512vl-v-constraint-32bit.ll
This reverts commit rGcd5b308b828e, rGcd5b308b828e, rG8cedf0e2994c.
There are issues to be investigated for polly bots and bots turning on
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS.
Summary:
This patch could be treated as a rebase of D33960. It also fixes PR35547.
A fix for `llvm/test/Other/close-stderr.ll` is proposed in D68164. Seems
the consensus is that the test is passing by chance and I'm not
sure how important it is for us. So it is removed like in D33960 for now.
The rest of the test fixes are just adding `--crash` flag to `not` tool.
** The reason it fixes PR35547 is
`exit` does cleanup including calling class destructor whereas `abort`
does not do any cleanup. In multithreading environment such as ThinLTO or JIT,
threads may share states which mostly are ManagedStatic<>. If faulting thread
tearing down a class when another thread is using it, there are chances of
memory corruption. This is bad 1. It will stop error reporting like pretty
stack printer; 2. The memory corruption is distracting and nondeterministic in
terms of error message, and corruption type (depending one the timing, it
could be double free, heap free after use, etc.).
Reviewers: rnk, chandlerc, zturner, sepavloff, MaskRay, espindola
Reviewed By: rnk, MaskRay
Subscribers: wuzish, jholewinski, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, arichardson, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits, MaskRay, filcab, davide, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, rupprecht, seiya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67847
Summary:
This adds assembler tests for cases that were previously only in the
disassembler tests, and vice versa.
Reviewers: rampitec, arsenm, nhaehnle
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72592
Summary:
This adds assembler tests for cases that were previously only in the
disassembler tests, and vice versa.
Reviewers: rampitec, arsenm, nhaehnle
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72561
addOperand() method of AMDGPU disassembler returns SoftFail
on error. All instances which may lead to that place are
an impossible encdoing, not something which is possible to
encode, but semantically incorrect as described for SoftFail.
Then tablegen generates a check of the following form:
if (Decode...(..) == MCDisassembler::Fail) { return MCDisassembler::Fail; }
Since we can only return Success and SoftFail that is dead
code as detected by the static code analyzer.
Solution: return Fail as it should be.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43886
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69819
