SROA does not correctly account for offsets in TBAA/TBAA struct metadata.
This patch creates functionality for generating new MD with the corresponding
offset and updates SROA to use this functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95826
As mentioned in D93793, there are quite a few places where unary `IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector(X, Mask)` can be used
instead of `IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector(X, Undef, Mask)`.
Let's update them.
Actually, it would have been more natural if the patches were made in this order:
(1) let them use unary CreateShuffleVector first
(2) update IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector to use poison as a placeholder value (D93793)
The order is swapped, but in terms of correctness it is still fine.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93923
This fixes the bug 47945. It is legal to have a PHI with values
from from the same block, but values must stay the same. In this
case it is illegal to merge different values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89978
And another step towards transformss not introducing inttoptr and/or
ptrtoint casts that weren't there already.
In this case, when load/store uses have conflicting types,
instead of falling back to the iN, we can try to use allocated sub-type.
As disscussed, this isn't the best idea overall (we shouldn't rely on
allocated type), but it works fine as a temporary measure.
I've measured, and @ `-O3` as of vanilla llvm test-suite + RawSpeed,
this results in +0.05% more bitcasts, -5.51% less inttoptr
and -1.05% less ptrtoint (at the end of middle-end opt pipeline)
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47592
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88788
This patch fixes this crash https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/Ps8d1e
And gives SROA the ability to remove assumes if it allows promoting an alloca to register
Without removing assumes when it can't promote to register.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86570
When visiting load and store instructions in SROA skip scalable vectors.
This is relevant in the implementation of the 'arm_sve_vector_bits'
attribute that is used to define VLS types, where an alloca of a
fixed-length vector could be bitcasted to scalable. See D85128 for more
information.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85725
It is technically legal for optimizations to create an alloca that is
used by more than one dbg.declare, if one or both of them are inlined
instances of aliasing variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85172
If an analysis is actually invalidated, there's already a log statement
for that: 'Invalidating analysis: FooAnalysis'.
Otherwise the statement is not very useful.
Reviewed By: asbirlea, ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84981
This is the second of two patches to address PR46753. We basically allow
SROA to promote allocas that are used in doppable instructions, for
now that means `llvm.assume`. The (transitive) uses are replaced by
`undef` in the droppable instructions.
See also D83976.
Reviewed By: Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83978
SROA knows that it can look through addrspacecast but
PromoteMemoryToRegister did not handle them. This caused an assertion
error for the test case, exposed while running
`Transforms/PhaseOrdering/inlining-alignment-assumptions.ll` with D83978
applied.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84085
Provided test case crashes otherwise.
If NewTy is already DL.getIntPtrType(NewTy),
CreateBitCast() won't actually create any bitcast,
so we are better off just doing the general thing.
Summary:
- When promoting a pointer from memory to register, SROA skips pointers
from different address spaces. However, as `ptrtoint` and `inttoptr`
are defined as no-op casts if that integer type has the same as the
pointer value, generate the pair of `ptrtoint`/`inttoptr` (no-op cast)
sequence to convert pointers from different address spaces if they
have the same size.
Reviewers: arsenm, chandlerc, lebedev.ri
Subscribers:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81943
Slice::operator<() has a non-deterministic behavior. If we have
identical slices comparison will depend on the order or operands.
Normally that does not result in unstable compilation results
because the order in which slices are inserted into the vector
is deterministic and llvm::sort() normally behaves as a stable
sort, although that is not guaranteed.
However, there is test option -sroa-random-shuffle-slices which
is used to check exactly this aspect. The vector is first randomly
shuffled and then sorted. The same shuffling happens without this
option under expensive llvm checks.
I have managed to write a test which has hit this problem.
There are no fields in the Slice class to resolve the instability.
We only have offsets, IsSplittable and Use, but neither Use nor
User have anything suitable for predictable comparison.
I have switched to stable_sort which has to be sufficient and
removed that randon shuffle option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81310
Along the lines of D77454 and D79968. Unlike loads and stores, the
default alignment is getPrefTypeAlign, to match the existing handling in
various places, including SelectionDAG and InstCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80044
For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the
datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR
later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the
datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default
datalayout.
The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow
overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this,
some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target.
Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new
machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the
datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information
from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools
to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time.
Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback.
(clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at
least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a
datalayout is not something frontends should generate.
This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen
regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with
a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the
overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the
default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one
AMDGPU test.
Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just
fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
This is equivalent in terms of LLVM IR semantics, but we want to
transition away from using MaybeAlign to represent the alignment of
these instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77984
Summary:
Aggregate types containing scalable vectors aren't supported and as far
as I can tell this pass is mostly concerned with optimisations on
aggregate types, so the majority of this pass isn't very useful for
scalable vectors.
This patch modifies SROA such that mem2reg is run on allocas with
scalable types that are promotable, but nothing else such as slicing is
done.
The use of TypeSize in this pass has also been updated to be explicitly
fixed size. When invoking the following methods in DataLayout:
* getTypeSizeInBits
* getTypeStoreSize
* getTypeStoreSizeInBits
* getTypeAllocSize
we now called getFixedSize on the resultant TypeSize. This is quite an
extensive change with around 50 calls to these functions, and also the
first change of this kind (being explicit about fixed vs scalable
size) as far as I'm aware, so feedback welcome.
A test is included containing IR with scalable vectors that this pass is
able to optimise.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76720
SROA will drop the explicit alignment on allocas when the ABI guarantees
enough alignment. Because the alignment on new load/store instructions
are set based on the alloca's alignment, that means SROA would end up
dropping the alignment from atomic loads and stores, which is not
allowed (see bug). For those, make sure to always carry over the
alignment from the previous instruction.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75266
Summary:
Make `AAMDNodes`' `getAAMetadata()` and `setAAMetadata()` to take `!tbaa.struct`
into account as well as `!tbaa`. This impacts llvm.org/pr42022.
This is a temprorary fix needed to keep `!tbaa.struct` tag by SROA pass.
New field `TBAAStruct` should be deleted when `!tbaa` tag replaces `!tbaa.struct`.
Merging two `!tbaa.struct`'s to one is conservatively considered to be `nullptr`
(giving `MayAlias`) -- this could be enhanced, but relying on the said future
replacement.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, vporpo
Subscribers: hiraditya, kosarev, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70924
Summary:
If the underlying alloca did not change, we do not necessarily need new
lifetime markers. This patch adds a check and reuses the old ones if
possible.
Reviewers: reames, ssarda, t.p.northover, hfinkel
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68900
llvm-svn: 374692
While Promoting alloca instruction of Vector Type,
Check total size in bits of its slices too.
If they don't match, don't promote the alloca instruction.
Bug : https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42585
llvm-svn: 372480
The code we had isSafeToLoadUnconditionally was blatantly wrong. This function takes a "Size" argument which is supposed to describe the span loaded from. Instead, the code use the size of the pointer passed (which may be unrelated!) and only checks that span. For any Size > LoadSize, this can and does lead to miscompiles.
Worse, the generic code just a few lines above correctly handles the cases which *are* valid. So, let's delete said code.
Removing this code revealed two issues:
1) As noted by jdoerfert the removed code incorrectly handled external globals. The test update in SROA is to stop testing incorrect behavior.
2) SROA was confusing bytes and bits, but this wasn't obvious as the Size parameter was being essentially ignored anyway. Fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66778
llvm-svn: 370102
[SROA] Enhance SROA to handle `addrspacecast`ed allocas
- Fix typo in original change
- Add additional handling to ensure all return pointers are properly
casted.
Summary:
- After `addrspacecast` is allowed to be eliminated in SROA, the
adjusting of storage pointer (from `alloca) needs to handle the
potential different address spaces between the storage pointer (from
alloca) and the pointer being used.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63501
llvm-svn: 363743
Summary:
- After `addrspacecast` is allowed to be eliminated in SROA, the
adjusting of storage pointer (from `alloca) needs to handle the
potential different address spaces between the storage pointer (from
alloca) and the pointer being used.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63501
llvm-svn: 363711
There is a circular dependency between SROA and InferAddressSpaces
today that requires running both multiple times in order to be able to
eliminate all simple allocas and addrspacecasts. InferAddressSpaces
can't remove addrspacecasts when written to memory, and SROA helps
move pointers out of memory.
This should avoid inserting new commuting addrspacecasts with GEPs,
since there are unresolved questions about pointer wrapping between
different address spaces.
For now, don't replace volatile operations that don't match the alloca
addrspace, as it would change the address space of the access. It may
be still OK to insert an addrspacecast from the new alloca, but be
more conservative for now.
llvm-svn: 363462
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
These now verify that a given instruction has a specific source
location, rather than any old location. We want to make sure we
propagate the correct locations from one instruction to another.
llvm-svn: 356217
The included test case currently crashes on tip of tree. Rather than adding a bailout, I chose to restructure the code so that the existing helper function could be used. Given that, the majority of the diff is NFC-ish, but the key difference is that canConvertValue returns false when only one side is a non-integral pointer.
Thanks to Cherry Zhang for the test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59000
llvm-svn: 355962
A volatile operation cannot be used to prove an address points to normal
memory. (LangRef was recently updated to state it explicitly.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57040
llvm-svn: 352109
For the given test SROA detects possible replacement and creates a correct alloca. After that SROA is adding lifetime markers for this new alloca. The function getNewAllocaSlicePtr is trying to deduce the pointer type based on the original alloca, which is split, to use it later in lifetime intrinsic.
For the test we ended up with such code (rA is initial alloca [10 x float], which is split, and rA.sroa.0.0 is a new split allocation)
```
%rA.sroa.0.0.rA.sroa_cast = bitcast i32* %rA.sroa.0 to [10 x float]* <----- this one causing the assertion and is an extra bitcast
%5 = bitcast [10 x float]* %rA.sroa.0.0.rA.sroa_cast to i8*
call void @llvm.lifetime.start.p0i8(i64 4, i8* %5)
```
isAllocaPromotable code assumes that a user of alloca may go into lifetime marker through bitcast but it must be the only one bitcast to i8* type. In the test it's not a i8* type, return false and throw the assertion.
As we are creating a pointer, which will be used in lifetime markers only, the proposed fix is to create a bitcast to i8* immediately to avoid extra bitcast creation.
The test is a greatly simplified to just reproduce the assertion.
Author: Igor Tsimbalist <igor.v.tsimbalist@intel.com>
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55934
llvm-svn: 351325
The current llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata has a problem in that
it uses LoopIDs. LoopID unfortunately is not loop identifier. It is
neither unique (there's even a regression test assigning the some LoopID
to multiple loops; can otherwise happen if passes such as LoopVersioning
make copies of entire loops) nor persistent (every time a property is
removed/added from a LoopID's MDNode, it will also receive a new LoopID;
this happens e.g. when calling Loop::setLoopAlreadyUnrolled()).
Since most loop transformation passes change the loop attributes (even
if it just to mark that a loop should not be processed again as
llvm.loop.isvectorized does, for the versioned and unversioned loop),
the parallel access information is lost for any subsequent pass.
This patch unlinks LoopIDs and parallel accesses.
llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata on instruction is replaced by
llvm.access.group metadata. llvm.access.group points to a distinct
MDNode with no operands (avoiding the problem to ever need to add/remove
operands), called "access group". Alternatively, it can point to a list
of access groups. The LoopID then has an attribute
llvm.loop.parallel_accesses with all the access groups that are parallel
(no dependencies carries by this loop).
This intentionally avoid any kind of "ID". Loops that are clones/have
their attributes modifies retain the llvm.loop.parallel_accesses
attribute. Access instructions that a cloned point to the same access
group. It is not necessary for each access to have it's own "ID" MDNode,
but those memory access instructions with the same behavior can be
grouped together.
The behavior of llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access is not changed by this
patch, but should be considered deprecated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52116
llvm-svn: 349725
