This commit fixes how metadata is handled in CloneModule to be sound,
and improves how it's handled in CloneFunctionInto (although the latter
is still awkward when called within a module).
Ruiling Song pointed out in PR48841 that CloneModule was changed to
unsoundly use the RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs flag (renamed in
fa35c1f80f0ea080a7cbc581416929b0a654f25c for clarity). This flag papered
over a crash caused by other various changes made to CloneFunctionInto
over the past few years that made it unsound to use cloning between
different modules.
(This commit partially addresses PR48841, fixing the repro from
preprocessed source but not textual IR. MDNodeMapper::mapDistinctNode
became unsound in df763188c9a1ecb1e7e5c4d4ea53a99fbb755903 and this
commit does not address that regression.)
RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs is designed for the IRMover to use,
avoiding unnecessary clones of all referenced metadata when linking
between modules (with IRMover, the source module is discarded after
linking). It never makes sense to use when you're not discarding the
source. This commit drops its incorrect use in CloneModule.
Sadly, the right thing to do with metadata when cloning a function is
complicated, and this patch doesn't totally fix it.
The first problem is that there are two different types of referenceable
metadata and it's not obvious what to with one of them when remapping.
- `!0 = !{!1}` is metadata's version of a constant. Programatically it's
called "uniqued" (probably a better term would be "constant") because,
like `ConstantArray`, it's stored in uniquing tables. Once it's
constructed, it's illegal to change its arguments.
- `!0 = distinct !{!1}` is a bit closer to a global variable. It's legal
to change the operands after construction.
What should be done with distinct metadata when cloning functions within
the same module?
- Should new, cloned nodes be created?
- Should all references point to the same, old nodes?
The answer depends on whether that metadata is effectively owned by a
function.
And that's the second problem. Referenceable metadata's ownership model
is not clear or explicit. Technically, it's all stored on an
LLVMContext. However, any metadata that is `distinct`, that transitively
references a `distinct` node, or that transitively references a
GlobalValue is specific to a Module and is effectively owned by it. More
specifically, some metadata is effectively owned by a specific Function
within a module.
Effectively function-local metadata was introduced somewhere around
c10d0e5ccd12f049bddb24dcf8bbb7fbbc6c68f2, which made it illegal for two
functions to share a DISubprogram attachment.
When cloning a function within a module, you need to clone the
function-local debug info and suppress cloning of global debug info (the
status quo suppresses cloning some global debug info but not all). When
cloning a function to a new/different module, you need to clone all of
the debug info.
Here's what I think we should do (eventually? soon? not this patch
though):
- Distinguish explicitly (somehow) between pure constant metadata owned
by the LLVMContext, global metadata owned by the Module, and local
metadata owned by a GlobalValue (such as a function).
- Update CloneFunctionInto to trigger cloning of all "local" metadata
(only), perhaps by adding a bit to RemapFlag. Alternatively, split
out a separate function CloneFunctionMetadataInto to prime the
metadata map that callers are updated to call ahead of time as
appropriate.
Here's the somewhat more isolated fix in this patch:
- Converted the `ModuleLevelChanges` parameter to `CloneFunctionInto` to
an enum called `CloneFunctionChangeType` that is one of
LocalChangesOnly, GlobalChanges, DifferentModule, and ClonedModule.
- The code maintaining the "functions uniquely own subprograms"
invariant is now only active in the first two cases, where a function
is being cloned within a single module. That's necessary because this
code inhibits cloning of (some) "global" metadata that's effectively
owned by the module.
- The code maintaining the "all compile units must be explicitly
referenced by !llvm.dbg.cu" invariant is now only active in the
DifferentModule case, where a function is being cloned into a new
module in isolation.
- CoroSplit.cpp's call to CloneFunctionInto in CoroCloner::create
uses LocalChangeOnly, since fa635d730f74f3285b77cc1537f1692184b8bf5b
only set `ModuleLevelChanges` to trigger cloning of local metadata.
- CloneModule drops its unsound use of RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs
and special handling of !llvm.dbg.cu.
- Fixed some outdated header docs and left a couple of FIXMEs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96531
Rename the `RF_MoveDistinctMDs` flag passed into `MapValue` and
`MapMetadata` to `RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs` in order to more
precisely describe its effect and clarify the header documentation.
Found this while helping to investigate PR48841, which pointed out an
unsound use of the flag in `CloneModule()`. For now I've just added a
FIXME there, but I'm hopeful that the new (more precise) name will
prevent other similar errors.
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.
Fixes DomTree preservation for a large number of tests,
all of which are marked as such so that they do not regress.
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
1. Removed #include "...AliasAnalysis.h" in other headers and modules.
2. Cleaned up includes in AliasAnalysis.h.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92489
Currently SCEVExpander creates inttoptr for non-integral pointers if the
base is a null constant for example. This results in invalid IR.
This patch changes InsertNoopCastOfTo to emit a GEP & bitcast to convert
to a non-integral pointer. First, a GEP of i8* null is generated and the
integral value is used as index. The GEP is then bitcasted to the target
type.
This was exposed by D71539.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87827
When trying to enable -debug-info-kind=constructor there was an assert
that occurs during debug info cloning ("mismatched subprogram between
llvm.dbg.value variable and !dbg attachment").
It appears that during llvm::CloneFunctionInto, a DISubprogram could be
duplicated when MapMetadata is called, and then added to the MD map again
when DIFinder gets a list of subprograms. This results in two different
versions of the DISubprogram.
This patch switches the order so that the DIFinder subprograms are
added before MapMetadata is called.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46784
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86185
This reverts the revert commit dc2867576886247cbe351e7c63618c09ab6af808.
It includes a fix for Polly, which uses SCEVExpander on IR that is not
in LCSSA form. Set PreserveLCSSA = false in that case, to ensure we do
not introduce LCSSA phis where there were none before.
This reverts commit 99166fd4fb422351f131fb1265cb85d5f6c5b8da, because it
breaks the polly builders.
polly/test/Isl/CodeGen/invariant_load_escaping_second_scop.ll fails
because a apparently unnecessary LCSSA phi node is introduced.
Make the bots green again, while I take a closer look.
This patch teaches SCEVExpander to directly preserve LCSSA.
As it is currently, SCEV does not look through PHI nodes in loops,
as it might break LCSSA form. Once SCEVExpander can preserve
LCSSA form, it should be safe for SCEV to look through PHIs.
To preserve LCSSA form, this patch uses formLCSSAForInstructions
on operands of newly created instructions, if the definition is inside
a different loop than the new instruction.
The final value we return from expandCodeFor may also need LCSSA
phis, depending on the insert point. As no user for it exists there yet,
create a temporary instruction at the insert point, which can be passed
to formLCSSAForInstructions. This temporary instruction is removed
after LCSSA construction.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71538
PassManager.h is one of the top headers in the ClangBuildAnalyzer frontend worst offenders list.
This exposes a large number of implicit dependencies on various forward declarations/includes in other headers that need addressing.
Summary: This patch adds more test case focusing on data dependency.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: Whitney
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83543
Summary: This patch makes code motion checks optional which are dependent on
specific analysis example, dominator tree, post dominator tree and dependence
info. The aim is to make the adoption of CodeMoverUtils easier for clients that
don't use analysis which were strictly required by CodeMoverUtils. This will
also help in diversifying code motion checks using other analysis example MSSA.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: Whitney
Subscribers: Prazek, hiraditya, george.burgess.iv, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82566
Move ScalarEvolution::forgetLoopDispositions implementation to ScalarEvolution.cpp to remove the dependency.
Add implicit header dependency to source files where necessary.
code motion
Summary: Currently isSafeToMoveBefore uses DFS numbering for determining
the relative position of instruction and insert point which is not
always correct. This PR proposes the use of Dominator Tree depth for the
same. If a node is at a higher level than the insert point then it is
safe to say that we want to move in the forward direction.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, nikic, bmahjour, etiotto, fhahn
Reviewed By: Whitney
Subscribers: fhahn, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80084
Hide the method that allows setting probability for particular edge
and introduce a public method that sets probabilities for all
outgoing edges at once.
Setting individual edge probability is error prone. More over it is
difficult to check that the total probability is 1.0 because there is
no easy way to know when the user finished setting all
the probabilities.
Related bug is fixed in BranchProbabilityInfo::calcMetadataWeights().
Changing unreachable branch probabilities to raw(1) and distributing
the rest (oldProbability - raw(1)) over the reachable branches could
introduce total probability inaccuracy bigger than 1/numOfBranches.
Reviewers: yamauchi, ebrevnov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79396
SCEVExpander modifies the underlying function so it is more suitable in
Transforms/Utils, rather than Analysis. This allows using other
transform utils in SCEVExpander.
This patch was originally committed as b8a3c34eee06, but broke the
modules build, as LoopAccessAnalysis was using the Expander.
The code-gen part of LAA was moved to lib/Transforms recently, so this
patch can be landed again.
Reviewers: sanjoy.google, efriedma, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy.google
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71537
Splitting critical edges for indirect branches
the SplitIndirectBrCriticalEdges() function may break branch
probabilities if target basic block happens to have unset
a probability for any of its successors. That is because in
such cases the getEdgeProbability(Target) function returns
probability 1/NumOfSuccessors and it is called after Target
was split (thus Target has a single successor). As the result
the correspondent successor of the split block gets
probability 100% but 1/NumOfSuccessors is expected (or better
be left unset).
Reviewers: yamauchi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78806
Summary:
Updated CallPromotionUtils and impacted sites. Parameters that are
expected to be non-null, and return values that are guranteed non-null,
were replaced with CallBase references rather than pointers.
Left FIXME in places where more changes are facilitated by CallBase, but
aren't CallSites: Instruction* parameters or return values, for example,
where the contract that they are actually CallBase values.
Reviewers: davidxl, dblaikie, wmi
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, eraman, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77930
Since intrinsics can now specify when an argument is required to be
constant, it is now OK to replace arguments with variables if they
aren't. This means intrinsics must now be accurately marked with
immarg.
Summary:
Assume bundles need to be usable by Analysis and Transforms/Utils isn't.
so this commit moves utilities to deal with asusme bundles to IR.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75618
Summary: Finding what information is know about a value from a use is generally useful and can be done quickly.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75616
Summary: This patch adds a new way to query operand bundles of an llvm.assume that is much better suited to some users like the Attributor that need to do many queries on the operand bundles of llvm.assume. Some modifications of the IR like replaceAllUsesWith can cause information in the map to be outdated, so this API is more suited to analysis passes and passes that don't make modification that could invalidate the map.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1, uenoku
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75020
Summary: This fixes the crash that led to the revert of D69591.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75307
Summary:
Future patches will make use of TTI to perform cost-model-driven `SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansionHelper()`
This is a fully NFC patch to make things reviewable.
Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev, wmi, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: hiraditya, zzheng, javed.absar, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73704
replaceDbgDeclare is used to update the descriptions of stack variables
when they are moved (e.g. by ASan or SafeStack). A side effect of
replaceDbgDeclare is that it moves dbg.declares around in the
instruction stream (typically by hoisting them into the entry block).
This behavior was introduced in llvm/r227544 to fix an assertion failure
(llvm.org/PR22386), but no longer appears to be necessary.
Hoisting a dbg.declare generally does not create problems. Usually,
dbg.declare either describes an argument or an alloca in the entry
block, and backends have special handling to emit locations for these.
In optimized builds, LowerDbgDeclare places dbg.values in the right
spots regardless of where the dbg.declare is. And no one uses
replaceDbgDeclare to handle things like VLAs.
However, there doesn't seem to be a positive case for moving
dbg.declares around anymore, and this reordering can get in the way of
understanding other bugs. I propose getting rid of it.
Testing: stage2 RelWithDebInfo sanitized build, check-llvm
rdar://59397340
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74517
Summary: It attempts to devirtualize a call on alloca through vtable loads.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: mgorny, Prazek, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71308
During extraction, stale llvm.assume handles may be retained in the
original function. The setup is:
1) CodeExtractor unregisters assumptions in the blocks that are to be
extracted.
2) Extraction happens. There are now two functions: f1 and f1.extracted.
3) Leftover assumptions in f1 (/not/ removed as they were not in the set of
blocks to be extracted) now have affected-value llvm.assume handles in
f1.extracted.
When assumptions for a value used in f1 are looked up, ValueTracking can assert
as some of the handles are in the wrong function. To fix this, simply erase the
llvm.assume calls in the extracted function.
Alternatives include flushing the assumption cache in the original function, or
walking all values used in the original function to prune stale affected-value
handles. Both seem more expensive.
Testing: check-llvm, LNT run with -mllvm -hot-cold-split enabled
rdar://58460728
Summary:
Currently IsControlFlowEquivalent determine if two blocks are control
flow equivalent by checking if A dominates B and B post dominates A.
There exists blocks that are control flow equivalent even if they don't
satisfy the A dominates B and B post dominates A condition.
For example,
if (cond)
A
if (cond)
B
In the PR, we determine if two blocks are control flow equivalent by
also checking if the two sets of conditions A and B depends on are
equivalent.
Reviewer: jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen, etiotto, bmahjour, fhahn,
hfinkel, kbarton
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71578
In case of loops with multiple exit where all-but-one exit are deoptimizing
it might happen that the first rotation will end up with latch having a deoptimizing
exit. This makes the loop unsuitable for trip-count analysis (say, getLoopEstimatedTripCount)
as well as for loop transformations that know how to handle multple deoptimizing exits.
It pretty much means that canonical form in multple-deoptimizing-exits case should be
with non-deoptimizing exit at latch.
Teach loop-rotation to reach this canonical form by repeating rotation.
-loop-rotate-multi option introduced to control this behavior, currently disabled by default.
Reviewers: skatkov, asbirlea, reames, fhahn
Reviewed By: skatkov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73058
