SliceAnalysis originally was developed in the context of affine.for within mlfunc.
It predates the notion of region.
This revision updates it to not hardcode specific ops like scf::ForOp.
When rooted at an op, the behavior of the slice computation changes as it recurses into the regions of the op. This does not support gathering all values transitively depending on a loop induction variable anymore.
Additional variants rooted at a Value are added to also support the existing behavior.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96702
This revision adds a new `AliasAnalysis` class that represents the main alias analysis interface in MLIR. The purpose of this class is not to hold the aliasing logic itself, but to provide an interface into various different alias analysis implementations. As it evolves this should allow for users to plug in specialized alias analysis implementations for their own needs, and have them immediately usable by other analyses and transformations.
This revision also adds an initial simple generic alias, LocalAliasAnalysis, that provides support for performing stateless local alias queries between values. This class is similar in scope to LLVM's BasicAA.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92343
This makes ignoring a result explicit by the user, and helps to prevent accidental errors with dropped results. Marking LogicalResult as no discard was always the intention from the beginning, but got lost along the way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95841
This is the last revision to migrate using SimplePadOp to PadTensorOp, and the
SimplePadOp is removed in the patch. Update a bit in SliceAnalysis because the
PadTensorOp takes a region different from SimplePadOp. This is not covered by
LinalgOp because it is not a structured op.
Also, remove a duplicated comment from cpp file, which is already described in a
header file. And update the pseudo-mlir in the comment.
This is as same as D95615 but fixing one dep in CMakeLists.txt
Different from D95671, the fix was applied to run target.
Reviewed By: mravishankar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95785
This reverts commit d9b953d84b332a8c4751fcbf8178e32818dc718b.
This commit resulted in build bot failures and the author is away from a
computer, so I am reverting on their behalf until they have a chance to
look into this.
This is the last revision to migrate using SimplePadOp to PadTensorOp, and the
SimplePadOp is removed in the patch. Update a bit in SliceAnalysis because the
PadTensorOp takes a region different from SimplePadOp. This is not covered by
LinalgOp because it is not a structured op.
Also, remove a duplicated comment from cpp file, which is already described in a
header file. And update the pseudo-mlir in the comment.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95671
This is the last revision to migrate using SimplePadOp to PadTensorOp, and the
SimplePadOp is removed in the patch. Update a bit in SliceAnalysis because the
PadTensorOp takes a region different from SimplePadOp. This is not covered by
LinalgOp because it is not a structured op.
Also, remove a duplicated comment from cpp file, which is already described in a
header file. And update the pseudo-mlir in the comment.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95615
This patch adds support for producer-consumer fusion scenarios with
multiple producer stores to the AffineLoopFusion pass. The patch
introduces some changes to the producer-consumer algorithm, including:
* For a given consumer loop, producer-consumer fusion iterates over its
producer candidates until a fixed point is reached.
* Producer candidates are gathered beforehand for each iteration of the
consumer loop and visited in reverse program order (not strictly guaranteed)
to maximize the number of loops fused per iteration.
In general, these changes were needed to simplify the multi-store producer
support and remove some of the workarounds that were introduced in the past
to support more fusion cases under the single-store producer limitation.
This patch also preserves the existing functionality of AffineLoopFusion with
one minor change in behavior. Producer-consumer fusion didn't fuse scenarios
with escaping memrefs and multiple outgoing edges (from a single store).
Multi-store producer scenarios will usually (always?) have multiple outgoing
edges so we couldn't fuse any with escaping memrefs, which would greatly limit
the applicability of this new feature. Therefore, the patch enables fusion for
these scenarios. Please, see modified tests for specific details.
Reviewed By: andydavis1, bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92876
With this, we have complete support for finding integer sample points in FlatAffineConstraints.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95047
This patch adds support for producer-consumer fusion scenarios with
multiple producer stores to the AffineLoopFusion pass. The patch
introduces some changes to the producer-consumer algorithm, including:
* For a given consumer loop, producer-consumer fusion iterates over its
producer candidates until a fixed point is reached.
* Producer candidates are gathered beforehand for each iteration of the
consumer loop and visited in reverse program order (not strictly guaranteed)
to maximize the number of loops fused per iteration.
In general, these changes were needed to simplify the multi-store producer
support and remove some of the workarounds that were introduced in the past
to support more fusion cases under the single-store producer limitation.
This patch also preserves the existing functionality of AffineLoopFusion with
one minor change in behavior. Producer-consumer fusion didn't fuse scenarios
with escaping memrefs and multiple outgoing edges (from a single store).
Multi-store producer scenarios will usually (always?) have multiple outgoing
edges so we couldn't fuse any with escaping memrefs, which would greatly limit
the applicability of this new feature. Therefore, the patch enables fusion for
these scenarios. Please, see modified tests for specific details.
Reviewed By: andydavis1, bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92876
This patch adds support for checking if two PresburgerSets are equal. In particular, one can check if two FlatAffineConstraints are equal by constructing PrebsurgerSets from them and comparing these.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94915
With this, we have complete support for emptiness checks. This also paves the way for future support to check if two FlatAffineConstraints are equal.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94272
This patch fixes a bug that allowed vectorizing of loops with loads and
stores having indexing functions varying along different memory
dimensions.
Reviewed By: aartbik, dcaballe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92702
Given that OpState already implicit converts to Operator*, this seems reasonable.
The alternative would be to add more functions to OpState which forward to Operation.
Reviewed By: rriddle, ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92266
Refactoring/clean-up step needed to add support for producer-consumer fusion
with multi-store producer loops and, in general, to implement more general
loop fusion strategies in Affine. It introduces the following changes:
- AffineLoopFusion pass now uses loop fusion utilities more broadly to compute
fusion legality (canFuseLoops utility) and perform the fusion transformation
(fuseLoops utility).
- Loop fusion utilities have been extended to deal with AffineLoopFusion
requirements and assumptions while preserving both loop fusion utilities and
AffineLoopFusion current functionality within a unified implementation.
'FusionStrategy' has been introduced for this purpose and, in the future, it
will allow us to have a single loop fusion core implementation that will produce
different fusion outputs depending on the strategy used.
- Improve separation of concerns for legality and profitability analysis:
'isFusionProfitable' no longer filters out illegal scenarios that 'canFuse'
didn't detect, or the other way around. 'canFuse' now takes loop dependences
into account to determine the fusion loop depth (producer-consumer fusion only).
- As a result, maximal fusion now doesn't require any profitability analysis.
- Slices are now computed only once and reused across the legality, profitability
and fusion transformation steps (producer-consumer).
- Refactor some utilities and remove redundant copies of them.
This patch is NFCI and should preserve the existing functionality of both the
AffineLoopFusion pass and the affine fusion utilities.
Reviewed By: andydavis1, bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90798
These includes have been deprecated in favor of BuiltinDialect.h, which contains the definitions of ModuleOp and FuncOp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91572
Relands
- [MLIR] Support walks over regions and blocks
(dbae3d50f114a8ec0a7c3211e3b1b9fb6ef22dbd)
- [MLIR] Use llvm::is_one_of in walk templates
(56299b1e58bf3720dff2fe60163739ee1554a371)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90753
This transforms the symbol lookups to O(1) from O(NM), greatly speeding up both passes. For a large MLIR module this shaved seconds off of the compilation time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89522
Subtraction is a foundational arithmetic operation that is often used when computing, for example, data transfer sets or cache hits. Since the result of subtraction need not be a convex polytope, a new class `PresburgerSet` is introduced to represent unions of convex polytopes.
Reviewed By: ftynse, bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87068
`swapId` used to be a static function in `AffineStructures.cpp`. This diff makes it accessible from the external world by turning it into a member function of `FlatAffineConstraints`. This will be very helpful for other projects that need to manipulate the content of `FlatAffineConstraints`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87766
The prior diff that introduced `addAffineIfOpDomain` missed appending
constraints from the ifOp domain. This revision fixes this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86421
This patch adds the capability to perform constraint redundancy checks for `FlatAffineConstraints` using `Simplex`, via a new member function `FlatAffineConstraints::removeRedundantConstraints`. The pre-existing redundancy detection algorithm runs a full rational emptiness check for each inequality separately for checking redundancy. Leveraging the existing `Simplex` infrastructure, in this patch we have an algorithm for redundancy checks that can check each constraint by performing pivots on the tableau, which provides an alternative to running Fourier-Motzkin elimination for each constraint separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84935
This diff attempts to resolve the TODO in `getOpIndexSet` (formerly
known as `getInstIndexSet`), which states "Add support to handle IfInsts
surronding `op`".
Major changes in this diff:
1. Overload `getIndexSet`. The overloaded version considers both
`AffineForOp` and `AffineIfOp`.
2. The `getInstIndexSet` is updated accordingly: its name is changed to
`getOpIndexSet` and its implementation is based on a new API `getIVs`
instead of `getLoopIVs`.
3. Add `addAffineIfOpDomain` to `FlatAffineConstraints`, which extracts
new constraints from the integer set of `AffineIfOp` and merges it to
the current constraint system.
4. Update how a `Value` is determined as dim or symbol for
`ValuePositionMap` in `buildDimAndSymbolPositionMaps`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84698
This revision aims to provide a new API, `checkTilingLegality`, to
verify that the loop tiling result still satisifes the dependence
constraints of the original loop nest.
Previously, there was no check for the validity of tiling. For instance:
```
func @diagonal_dependence() {
%A = alloc() : memref<64x64xf32>
affine.for %i = 0 to 64 {
affine.for %j = 0 to 64 {
%0 = affine.load %A[%j, %i] : memref<64x64xf32>
%1 = affine.load %A[%i, %j - 1] : memref<64x64xf32>
%2 = addf %0, %1 : f32
affine.store %2, %A[%i, %j] : memref<64x64xf32>
}
}
return
}
```
You can find more information about this example from the Section 3.11
of [1].
In general, there are three types of dependences here: two flow
dependences, one in direction `(i, j) = (0, 1)` (notation that depicts a
vector in the 2D iteration space), one in `(i, j) = (1, -1)`; and one
anti dependence in the direction `(-1, 1)`.
Since two of them are along the diagonal in opposite directions, the
default tiling method in `affine`, which tiles the iteration space into
rectangles, will violate the legality condition proposed by Irigoin and
Triolet [2]. [2] implies two tiles cannot depend on each other, while in
the `affine` tiling case, two rectangles along the same diagonal are
indeed dependent, which simply violates the rule.
This diff attempts to put together a validator that checks whether the
rule from [2] is violated or not when applying the default tiling method
in `affine`.
The canonical way to perform such validation is by examining the effect
from adding the constraint from Irigoin and Triolet to the existing
dependence constraints.
Since we already have the prior knowlegde that `affine` tiles in a
hyper-rectangular way, and the resulting tiles will be scheduled in the
same order as their respective loop indices, we can simplify the
solution to just checking whether all dependence components are
non-negative along the tiling dimensions.
We put this algorithm into a new API called `checkTilingLegality` under
`LoopTiling.cpp`. This function iterates every `load`/`store` pair, and
if there is any dependence between them, we get the dependence component
and check whether it has any negative component. This function returns
`failure` if the legality condition is violated.
[1]. Bondhugula, Uday. Effective Automatic parallelization and locality optimization using the Polyhedral model. https://dl.acm.org/doi/book/10.5555/1559029
[2]. Irigoin, F. and Triolet, R. Supernode Partitioning. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/73560.73588
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84882
This patch adds the capability to perform exact integer emptiness checks for FlatAffineConstraints using the General Basis Reduction algorithm (GBR). Previously, only a heuristic was available for emptiness checks, which was not guaranteed to always give a conclusive result.
This patch adds a `Simplex` class, which can be constructed using a `FlatAffineConstraints`, and can find an integer sample point (if one exists) using the GBR algorithm. Additionally, it adds two classes `Matrix` and `Fraction`, which are used by `Simplex`.
The integer emptiness check functionality can be accessed through the new `FlatAffineConstraints::isIntegerEmpty()` function, which runs the existing heuristic first and, if that proves to be inconclusive, runs the GBR algorithm to produce a conclusive result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80860
Fix memref region compute for 0-d memref accesses in certain cases (when
there are loops surrounding such 0-d accesses).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81792
This revision adds a helper function to hoist vector.transfer_read /
vector.transfer_write pairs out of immediately enclosing scf::ForOp
iteratively, if the following conditions are true:
1. The 2 ops access the same memref with the same indices.
2. All operands are invariant under the enclosing scf::ForOp.
3. No uses of the memref either dominate the transfer_read or are
dominated by the transfer_write (i.e. no aliasing between the write and
the read across the loop)
To improve hoisting opportunities, call the `moveLoopInvariantCode` helper
function on the candidate loop above which to hoist. Hoisting the transfers
results in scf::ForOp yielding the value that originally transited through
memory.
This revision additionally exposes `moveLoopInvariantCode` as a helper in
LoopUtils.h and updates SliceAnalysis to support return scf::For values and
allow hoisting across multiple scf::ForOps.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81199
This patch introduces interfaces for read and write ops with affine
restrictions. I used `read`/`write` intead of `load`/`store` for the
interfaces so that they can also be implemented by dma ops.
For now, they are only implemented by affine.load, affine.store,
affine.vector_load and affine.vector_store.
For testing purposes, this patch also migrates affine loop fusion and
required analysis to use the new interfaces. No other changes are made
beyond that.
Co-authored-by: Alex Zinenko <zinenko@google.com>
Reviewed By: bondhugula, ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79829
cmake does not truly support dependencies on automatically generated files
which are not in the same directory as the targets which depend on them.
It works with ninja, but doesn't work with make
This patch adds an explicit dependence so that all dialects are built
before the analysis libraries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79805
