With #70253 landed, selects for reduction results are explicitly used by
ComputeReductionResult and Selects can be marked as not having
side-effects again.
This reverts the revert commit 173032902c960d4d0d67b521d8c149553d8e8ba3.
This reverts commit 19918ac34dc5d304ec6ad413ceae1d4394abe28f.
Fixes#75298. There is still a case where we miss the correct users
outside the main vector loop for reductions, and that is tail-folded
loops with reductions where the final value is stored after the loop.
This should be handled explicitly in #70253
This reverts commit e4ea0997486000b460c4875a00301b73b3c0d6a7.
The recommit fixes a reported crash by adding a missing check to make
sure the cast recipes are only introduced when vectorizing.
Test coverage added in 3cac608fbd0811b2f5c59c6e13148162ccd8543e.
Original commit message:
Update the code to create Trunc/Ext recipes directly in
adjustRecipesForReductions instead of fixing it up later in
fixReductions.
This explicitly models the required conversions and also makes sure they
are generated at the right place (instead of after the exit condition),
hence the changes in a few tests.
Update the code to create Trunc/Ext recipes directly in
adjustRecipesForReductions instead of fixing it up later in
fixReductions.
This explicitly models the required conversions and also makes sure they
are generated at the right place (instead of after the exit condition),
hence the changes in a few tests.
Instcombine prefers this canonical form (see getPreferredVectorIndex),
as does IRBuilder when passing the index as an integer so we may as
well use the prefered form from creation.
NOTE: All test changes are mechanical with nothing else expected
beyond a change of index type from i32 to i64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140983
This extends the safe-divisor widening scheme recently added for scalable vectors to handle fixed vectors as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132591
Update a bunch of loop-vectorize regression tests to use the new PM
syntax (opt -passes=loop-vectorize) instead of the deprecated legacy
PM syntax (opt -loop-vectorize).
At the moment, computeRecurrenceType does not include any sign bits in
the maximum bit width. If the value can be negative, this means the sign
bit will be missing and the sext won't properly extend the value.
If the value can be negative, increment the bitwidth by one to make sure
there is at least one sign bit in the result value.
Note that the increment is also needed *if* the value is *known* to be
negative, as a sign bit needs to be preserved for the sext to work.
Note that this at the moment prevents vectorization, because the
analysis computes i1 as type for the recurrence when looking through the
AND in lookThroughAnd.
Fixes PR51794, PR52485.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113056
This patch marks the induction increment of the main induction variable
of the vector loop as NUW when not folding the tail.
If the tail is not folded, we know that End - Start >= Step (either
statically or through the minimum iteration checks). We also know that both
Start % Step == 0 and End % Step == 0. We exit the vector loop if %IV +
%Step == %End. Hence we must exit the loop before %IV + %Step unsigned
overflows and we can mark the induction increment as NUW.
This should make SCEV return more precise bounds for the created vector
loops, used by later optimizations, like late unrolling.
At the moment quite a few tests still need to be updated, but before
doing so I'd like to get initial feedback to make sure I am not missing
anything.
Note that this could probably be further improved by using information
from the original IV.
Attempt of modeling of the assumption in Alive2:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/H_DL_g
Part of a set of fixes required for PR50412.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103255
A sequence of additions or multiplications that is known not to wrap, may wrap
if it's order is changed (i.e., reassociated). Therefore when vectorizing
integer sum or product reductions, their no-wrap flags need to be removed.
Fixes PR43828
Patch by Denis Antrushin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69563
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
The type-shrinking logic in reduction detection, although narrow in scope, is
also rather ad-hoc, which has led to bugs (e.g., PR35734). This patch modifies
the approach to rely on the demanded bits and value tracking analyses, if
available. We currently perform type-shrinking separately for reductions and
other instructions in the loop. Long-term, we should probably think about
computing minimal bit widths in a more complete way for the loops we want to
vectorize.
PR35734
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42309
llvm-svn: 324195
When type shrinking reductions, we should insert the truncations and extends at
the end of the loop latch block. Previously, these instructions were inserted
at the end of the loop header block. The difference is only a problem for loops
with predicated instructions (e.g., conditional stores and instructions that
may divide by zero). For these instructions, we create new basic blocks inside
the vectorized loop, which cause the loop header and latch to no longer be the
same block. This should fix PR34687.
Reference: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34687
llvm-svn: 314542
Unlike scalar operations, we can perform vector operations on element types that
are smaller than the native integer types. We type-promote scalar operations if
they are smaller than a native type (e.g., i8 arithmetic is promoted to i32
arithmetic on Arm targets). This patch detects and removes type-promotions
within the reduction detection framework, enabling the vectorization of small
size reductions.
In the legality phase, we look through the ANDs and extensions that InstCombine
creates during promotion, keeping track of the smaller type. In the
profitability phase, we use the smaller type and ignore the ANDs and extensions
in the cost model. Finally, in the code generation phase, we truncate the result
of the reduction to allow InstCombine to rewrite the entire expression in the
smaller type.
This fixes PR21369.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12202
Patch by Matt Simpson <mssimpso@codeaurora.org>!
llvm-svn: 246149
