We should always be calculating a byte-wise difference here.
Previously this calculated the pointer difference while taking
the pointer element type into account, which is incorrect.
I noticed we weren't propagating tail flags on calls when
FortifiedLibCallSimplifier.optimizeCall() was replacing calls to runtime
checked calls to the non-checked routines (when safe to do so). Make
sure to check this before replacing the original calls!
Also, avoid any libcall transforms when notail/musttail is present.
PR46734
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/46079
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107872
In TargetLibraryInfoImpl::isValidProtoForLibFunc we no longer
need the IsSizeTTy lambda function and the SizeTTy object. Instead
we just follow the regular structure of checking for integer types
given an exepected number of bits.
We could try harder to screen out libcalls by
function signature (and that would be a much larger
change than for sprintf alone), but that might make
the transition to type-less pointers more difficult.
https://llvm.org/PR51200
This fixes a bug at LibCallSimplifier::optimizeMemChr which does the following transformation:
```
// memchr("\r\n", C, 2) != nullptr -> (1 << C & ((1 << '\r') | (1 << '\n')))
// != 0
// after bounds check.
```
As written above, a bounds check on C (whether it is less than integer bitwidth) is done before doing `1 << C` otherwise 1 << C will overflow.
If the bounds check is false, the result of (1 << C & ...) must not be used at all, otherwise the result of shift (which is poison) will contaminate the whole results.
A correct way to encode this is `select i1 (bounds check), (1 << C & ...), false` because select does not allow the unused operand to contaminate the result.
However, this optimization was introducing `and (bounds check), (1 << C & ...)` which cannot do that.
The bug was found from compilation of this C++ code: https://reviews.llvm.org/rG2fd3037ac615#1007197
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104901
- When emitting libcalls, do not only pass the calling convention from the
function prototype but also the attributes.
- Do not pass attributes from e.g. libc memcpy to llvm.memcpy.
Review: Reid Kleckner, Eli Friedman, Arthur Eubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103992
This can be seen as a follow up to commit 0ee439b705e82a4fe20e2,
that changed the second argument of __powidf2, __powisf2 and
__powitf2 in compiler-rt from si_int to int. That was to align with
how those runtimes are defined in libgcc.
One thing that seem to have been missing in that patch was to make
sure that the rest of LLVM also handle that the argument now depends
on the size of int (not using the si_int machine mode for 32-bit).
When using __builtin_powi for a target with 16-bit int clang crashed.
And when emitting libcalls to those rtlib functions, typically when
lowering @llvm.powi), the backend would always prepare the exponent
argument as an i32 which caused miscompiles when the rtlib was
compiled with 16-bit int.
The solution used here is to use an overloaded type for the second
argument in @llvm.powi. This way clang can use the "correct" type
when lowering __builtin_powi, and then later when emitting the libcall
it is assumed that the type used in @llvm.powi matches the rtlib
function.
One thing that needed some extra attention was that when vectorizing
calls several passes did not support that several arguments could
be overloaded in the intrinsics. This patch allows overload of a
scalar operand by adding hasVectorInstrinsicOverloadedScalarOpd, with
an entry for powi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99439
When rewriting
powf(2.0, itofp(x)) -> ldexpf(1.0, x)
exp2(sitofp(x)) -> ldexp(1.0, sext(x))
exp2(uitofp(x)) -> ldexp(1.0, zext(x))
the wrong type was used for the second argument in the ldexp/ldexpf
libc call, for target architectures with 16 bit "int" type.
The transform incorrectly used a bitcasted function pointer with
a 32-bit argument when emitting the ldexp/ldexpf call for such
targets.
The fault is solved by using the correct function prototype
in the call, by asking TargetLibraryInfo about the size of "int".
TargetLibraryInfo by default derives the size of the int type by
assuming that it is 16 bits for 16-bit architectures, and
32 bits otherwise. If this isn't true for a target it should be
possible to override that default in the TargetLibraryInfo
initializer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99438
Before this change LLVM cannot simplify printf in following cases:
printf("%s", "") --> noop
printf("%s", str"\n") --> puts(str)
From the other hand GCC can perform such transformations for many years:
https://godbolt.org/z/7nnqbedfe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100724
Fix for PR49984
This was discovered during Attributor testing.
Memset was always created with alignment of 1
and in case when strncpy alignment was changed
it triggered an assertion in the AttrBuilder.
Memset will now be created with appropriate alignment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100875
This reverts commit a3fabc79ae9d7dd76545b2abc2a3bfb66c6d3175 (relands
f4d682d6ce6c5b3a41a0acf297507c82f5c21eef with fix for the compile-time
regression issue).
D24453 enabled libcalls simplication for ARM PCS. This may cause
caller/callee calling conventions mismatch in some situations such as
LTO. This patch makes instcombine aware that the compatible calling
conventions differences are benign (not emitting undef idom).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99773
See: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47613
There was an extra sqrt call because shrinking emitted a new powf and at the same time optimizePow replaces the previous pow with sqrt and as the result we have two instructions that will be in worklist of InstCombie despite the fact that %powf is not used by anyone (it is alive because of errno).
As the result we have two instructions:
%powf = call fast float @powf(float %x, float 5.000000e-01)
%sqrt = call fast double @sqrt(double %dx)
%powf will be converted to %sqrtf on a later iteration.
As a quick fix for that I moved shrinking to the end of optimizePow so that pow is replaced with sqrt at first that allows not to emit a new shrunk powf.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98235
I think we can use here same logic as for nonnull.
strlen(X) - X must be noundef => valid pointer.
for libcalls with size arg, we add noundef only if size is known and greater than 0 - so pointers must be noundef (valid ones)
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, aqjune
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95122
If the call result is unused, we should let it get DCEd rather
than replacing it. Also, don't try to replace an existing sincos
with another one (unless it's as part of combining sin and cos).
This avoids an infinite combine loop if the calls are not DCEd
as expected, which can happen with D94106 and lack of willreturn
annotation in hand-crafted IR.
In https://llvm.org/PR48810 , we are crashing while trying to
propagate attributes from mempcpy (returns void*) to memcpy
(returns nothing - void).
We can avoid the crash by removing known incompatible
attributes for the void return type.
I'm not sure if this goes far enough (should we just drop all
attributes since this isn't the same function?). We also need
to audit other transforms in LibCallSimplifier to make sure
there are no other cases that have the same problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95088
A conversion from `pow` to `sqrt` shall not call an `errno`-setting
`sqrt` with -//infinity//: the `sqrt` will set `EDOM` where the `pow`
call need not.
This patch avoids the erroneous (pun not intended) transformation by
applying the restrictions discussed in the thread for
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-September/145051.html.
The existing tests are updated (depending on emphasis in the checks for
library calls, avoidance of overlap, and overall coverage):
- to add `ninf`, retaining the intended library call,
- to use the intrinsic, retaining the use of `select`, or
- to expect the replacement to not occur.
The following is tested:
- The pow intrinsic folds to a `select` instruction to
handle -//infinity//.
- The pow library call folds, with `ninf`, to `sqrt` without the
`select` instruction associated with handling -//infinity//.
- The pow library call does not fold to `sqrt` without `ninf`.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87877
The current code for handling pow(x, y) where y is an integer plus 0.5
is not explicitly guarded against attempting to transform the case where
abs(y) is exactly 0.5.
The latter case is meant to be handled by `replacePowWithSqrt`. Indeed,
if the pow(x, integer+0.5) case proceeds past a certain point, it will
hit an assertion by attempting to form pow(x, 0) using `getPow`.
This patch adds an explicit check to prevent attempting the
pow(x, integer+0.5) transformation on pow(x, +/-0.5) as suggested during
the review of D87877. This has the effect of retaining the shrinking of
`pow` to `powf` when the `sqrt` libcall cannot be formed.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88066
Currently we bail out early for strlen calls with a GEP operand, if none
of the GEP specific optimizations fire. But there could be later
optimizations that still apply, which we currently miss out on.
An example is that we do not apply the following optimization
strlen(x) == 0 --> *x == 0
Unless I am missing something, there seems to be no reason for bailing
out early there.
Fixes PR47149.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, xbolva00
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85886
This reverts commit 6dbf0cfcf789365493f70ae69df8a7a59be41c75.
That commit caused failed assertions, e.g. like this:
$ cat sprintf-strcpy.c
char *ptr; void func(void) { ptr += sprintf(ptr, "%s", ""); }
$ clang -c sprintf-strcpy.c -O2 -target x86_64-linux-gnu
clang: ../lib/IR/Value.cpp:473: void llvm::Value::doRAUW(llvm::Value*,
llvm::Value::ReplaceMetadataUses): Assertion `New->getType() ==
getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new value of different
type!"' failed.
Transformation creates big strings for big C values, so bail out for C > 128.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86004
