Summary:
Our python version of the SB API has (the python equivalent of)
operator bool, but the C++ version doesn't.
This is because our python operators are added by modify-python-lldb.py,
which performs postprocessing on the swig-generated interface files.
In this patch, I add the "operator bool" to all SB classes which have an
IsValid method (which is the same logic used by modify-python-lldb.py).
This way, we make the two interfaces more constent, and it allows us to
rely on swig's automatic syntesis of python __nonzero__ methods instead
of doing manual fixups.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, clayborg, jfb, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58792
llvm-svn: 355824
As discussed on the mailing list, default serialization for thread ids
is not correct, even if they're represented as basic types. I'm
purposely leaving the corresponding record macros in place so that we
don't break the API boundary detection.
llvm-svn: 355610
Summary:
If LLDB_DISABLE_PYTHON is set, some functions are unavailable but
SBReproducer assumes they are. Let's conditionally register those functions
since they are conditionally declared.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59056
llvm-svn: 355575
On Windows, lldb::thread_t is just a void*, so the we will try to
allocate an object of type void when deserializing. Undef this for now
until we support void* arguments.
llvm-svn: 355519
Now that the LLDB instrumentation macros are in place, we should use
that to test reproducer replay.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58565
llvm-svn: 355470
This patch adds the SBReproducer macros needed to capture and reply the
corresponding calls. This patch was generated by running the lldb-instr
tool on the API source files.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57475
llvm-svn: 355459
As per the discussion on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190218/048007.html
This commit implements option (3):
> Go back to initializing the reproducer before the rest of the debugger.
> The method wouldn't be instrumented and guarantee no other SB methods are
> called or SB objects are constructed. The initialization then becomes part
> of the replay.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58410
llvm-svn: 354631
