In AVRFrameLowering::spillCalleeSavedRegisters(), when a 16-bit
livein register is spilled, two PUSH instructions are generated
for the higher and lower 8-bit registers. But these two 8-bit
registers are marked as killed in the two PUSH instructions, so
any future use of them will cause a crash.
This patch fixes the above issue by adding the two sub 8-bit
registers to the livein list.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56423
Reviewed By: jacquesguan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144720
The attiny4/attiny5/attiny9/attiny10 have a slightly modified
instruction set that drops a number of useful instructions. This patch
makes sure to not emit them on these "reduced tiny" cores.
The affected instructions are:
* lds and sts (load/store directly from data)
* ldd and std (load/store with displacement)
* adiw and sbiw (add/sub register pairs)
* various other instructions that were emitted without checking
whether the chip actually supports them (movw, adiw, etc)
There is a variant on lds and sts on these chips, but it can only
address a limited portion of the address space and is mainly useful to
load/store I/O registers (as an extension to the in and out
instructions). I have not implemented it here, implementing it can be
done in a separate patch.
This patch is not optimal. I'm sure it can be improved a lot. For
example, we could teach the instruction selector to not select lddw/stdw
instructions so that the weird pointer adjustments are not necessary.
But for now I've focused just on correctness, not on code quality.
Updates: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53459
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131867
This patch makes sure the compiler uses R16/R17 on avrtiny (attiny10
etc) instead of R0/R1.
Some notes:
* For the NEGW and ROLB instructions, it adds an explicit zero
register. This is necessary because the zero register is different
on avrtiny (and InstrInfo Uses lines need a fixed register).
* Not entirely sure about putting all tests in features/avr-tiny.ll,
but it doesn't seem like the "target-cpu"="attiny10" attribute
works.
Updates: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53459
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138582
R1 is a reserved register, but LLVM gives the APIs to know when it is
used or not. So this patch uses these APIs to only save/clear/restore R1
in interrupts when necessary.
The main issue here was getting inline assembly to work. One could argue
that this is the job of Clang, but for consistency I've made sure that
R1 is always usable in inline assembly even if that means clearing it
when it might not be needed.
Information on inline assembly in AVR can be found here:
https://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/inline_asm.html#asm_code
Essentially, this seems to suggest that r1 can be freely used in avr-gcc
inline assembly, even without specifying it as an input operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117426
Currently, STDSPQRr and STDWSPQRr are expanded only during
AVRFrameLowering - this means that if any of those instructions happen
to appear _outside_ of the typical FrameSetup / FrameDestroy
context, they wouldn't get substituted, eventually leading to a crash:
```
LLVM ERROR: Not supported instr: <MCInst XXX <MCOperand Reg:1>
<MCOperand Imm:15> <MCOperand Reg:53>>
```
This commit fixes this issue by moving expansion of those two opcodes
into AVRExpandPseudo.
This bug was originally discovered due to the Rust compiler_builtins
library. Its 0.1.37 release contained a 128-bit software
division/remainder routine that exercised this buggy branch in the code.
Reviewed By: benshi001
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123528
Apparently GCC 5.4 (a supported compiler) has a bug where it will
use the "MachineInstr &MI" defined by the range-based for loop
to evaluate the for loop expression. Pick a different variable
name to avoid this.
This patch fixes the atomicrmw result value to be the value before the
operation instead of the value after the operation. This was a bug, left
as a FIXME in the code (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D97127).
From the LangRef:
> The contents of memory at the location specified by the <pointer>
> operand are atomically read, modified, and written back. The original
> value at the location is returned.
Doing this expansion early allows the register allocator to arrange
registers in such a way that commutable operations are simply swapped
around as needed, which results in shorter code while still being
correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117725
There is no reason to do this: it's a scratch register and can therefore
hold any arbitrary value. And because it is in an interrupt, this code
is performance critical so it should be as short as possible.
I believe r0 was cleared because of the following:
1. There used to be a bug that the cleared register was r0, not r1 as
it should have been.
2. This was fixed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D99467, but left the code
to clear r0.
This patch completes D99467 by removing the `clr r0` instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116756
I think this pass was previously used under the assumption that most
functions would not need a frame pointer and it would be more efficient
to store the old stack pointer in a regular register pair.
Unfortunately, right now we're forced to always reserve the Y register
as a frame pointer: whether or not this is needed is only known after
regsiter allocation at which point it doesn't make sense anymore to mark
it as non-reserved. Therefore, it makes sense to use the Y register to
store the old stack pointer in functions with dynamic allocas (with a
variable size or not in the entry block). Knowing this can make the code
around dynamic allocas a lot simpler: simply save/restore the frame
pointer.
This is especially relevant in functions that have a frame pointer
anyway (for example, because they have stack spills). The stack restore
in the epilogue will implicitly restore the old stack pointer, so there
is no need to store the old stack pointer separately. It even reduces
register pressure as a side effect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97815
The current inconsistency confuse contributors which coding guidlines to follow.
It would be better to have it consistent using clang-format tool.
Reviewed By: mhjacobson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109270
The r1 register should be cleared in prologue of ISR as it is used
as constant zero.
Reviewed By: dylanmckay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99467
This patch is a large number of small changes that should hopefully not
affect the generated machine code but are still important to get right
so that the machine verifier won't complain about them.
The llvm/test/CodeGen/AVR/pseudo/*.mir changes are also necessary
because without the liveins the used registers are considered undefined
by the machine verifier and it will complain about them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97172
This patch fixes a corruption of the stack pointer and several registers in any AVR interrupt with non-empty stack frame. Previously, the callee-saved registers were popped before restoring the stack pointer, causing the pointer math to use the wrong base value while also corrupting the caller's register. This change fixes the code to restore the stack pointer last before exiting the interrupt service routine.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47253
Reviewed By: dylanmckay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87735
Patch by Andrew Dona-Couch.
This fixes warnings raised by Clang's new -Wsuggest-override, in preparation for enabling that warning in the LLVM build. This patch also removes the virtual keyword where redundant, but only in places where doing so improves consistency within a given file. It also removes a couple unnecessary virtual destructor declarations in derived classes where the destructor inherited from the base class is already virtual.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83709
An instruction like this will need to allocate some stack space for the
last parameter:
%x = call addrspace(1) i16 @bar(i64 undef, i64 undef, i16 undef, i16 0)
This worked fine when passing an actual value (in this case 0). However,
when passing undef, no value was pushed to the stack and therefore no
push instructions were created. This caused an unbalanced stack leading
to interesting results.
This commit fixes that by replacing the push logic with a regular stack
adjustment and stack-relative load/stores. This is less efficient but at
least it correctly compiles the code.
I can think of a few improvements in the future:
* The stack should have been adjusted in the function prologue when
there are no allocas in the function.
* Many (if not most) stack adjustments can be replaced by
pushing/popping the values directly. Exactly like the previous code
attempted but didn't do correctly.
* Small stack adjustments can be done more efficiently with a few
push/pop instructions (pushing/popping bogus values), both for code
size and for speed.
All in all, as long as there are no allocas in the function I think that
it is almost always more efficient to emit regular push/pop
instructions. This is however left for future optimizations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78581
This patch fixes a bug in stack save/restore code. Because the frame
pointer was saved/restored manually (not by marking it as clobbered) the
StackSize variable was not updated accordingly. Most code still worked,
but code that tried to load a parameter passed on the stack did not.
This commit fixes this by marking the frame pointer as a
callee-clobbered register. This will let it be saved without any effort
in prolog/epilog code and will make sure the correct address is
calculated for loading parameters that are passed on the stack.
This approach is used by most other targets (such as X86, AArch64 and
RISC-V).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78579
In the past, AVR functions were only lowered with interrupt-specific
machine code if the function was defined with the "avr-interrupt" or
"avr-signal" calling conventions.
This patch modifies the backend so that if the function does not have a
special calling convention, but does have an "interrupt" attribute,
that function is interpreted as a function with interrupts.
This also extracts the "is this function an interrupt" logic from
several disparate places in the backend into one AVRMachineFunctionInfo
attribute.
Bug found by Wilhelm Meier.
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76551
Summary:
This is a follow up on https://reviews.llvm.org/D71473#inline-647262.
There's a caveat here that `Align(1)` relies on the compiler understanding of `Log2_64` implementation to produce good code. One could use `Align()` as a replacement but I believe it is less clear that the alignment is one in that case.
Reviewers: xbolva00, courbet, bollu
Subscribers: arsenm, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, Jim, kerbowa, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73099
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68993
llvm-svn: 375084
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The liveness-tracking code assumes that the registers that were saved
in the function's prolog are live outside of the function. Specifically,
that registers that were saved are also live-on-exit from the function.
This isn't always the case as illustrated by the LR register on ARM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36160
llvm-svn: 310619
Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification
of machine representation. This attribute instructs the backend that the
argument is prepared in stack prior to CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END
sequence (see http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.htm for details). Frame size
stored in CALLSEQ_START in this case does not count the size of this
argument. However CALLSEQ_END still keeps total frame size, as caller can
be responsible for cleanup of entire frame. So CALLSEQ_START and
CALLSEQ_END keep different frame size and the difference is treated by
MachineVerifier as stack error. Currently there is no way to distinguish
this case from actual errors.
This patch adds additional argument to CALLSEQ_START and its
target-specific counterparts to keep size of stack that is set up prior to
the call frame sequence. This argument allows MachineVerifier to calculate
actual frame size associated with frame setup instruction and correctly
process the case of inalloca arguments.
The changes made by the patch are:
- Frame setup instructions get the second mandatory argument. It
affects all targets that use frame pseudo instructions and touched many
files although the changes are uniform.
- Access to frame properties are implemented using special instructions
rather than calls getOperand(N).getImm(). For X86 and ARM such
replacement was made previously.
- Changes that reflect appearance of additional argument of frame setup
instruction. These involve proper instruction initialization and
methods that access instruction arguments.
- MachineVerifier retrieves frame size using method, which reports sum of
frame parts initialized inside frame instruction pair and outside it.
The patch implements approach proposed by Quentin Colombet in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27481#c1.
It fixes 9 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed
in PR27481.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32394
llvm-svn: 302527
Because it was a callee-saved register, we automatically generated code
to spill and unspill its original value so that it is restored after the
function returns.
The problem is that this code was being generated before the epilogue.
The epilogue itself uses the Y register, which could be prematurely
restored by the CSR restoration process.
This removes R29R28 from the CSR list and changes the prologue/epilogue
code to handle it explicitly.
llvm-svn: 301887
1. RegisterClass::getSize() is split into two functions:
- TargetRegisterInfo::getRegSizeInBits(const TargetRegisterClass &RC) const;
- TargetRegisterInfo::getSpillSize(const TargetRegisterClass &RC) const;
2. RegisterClass::getAlignment() is replaced by:
- TargetRegisterInfo::getSpillAlignment(const TargetRegisterClass &RC) const;
This will allow making those values depend on subtarget features in the
future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31783
llvm-svn: 301221
Summary:
This pass will be used to relax instructions which use out of bounds
memory accesses to equivalent operations that can work with the
addresses.
The pass currently implements relaxation for the STDWPtrQRr instruction.
Without this pass, an assertion error would be hit in the pseudo expansion pass.
In the future, we will need to add more instructions to this pass. We can do
that on a case-by-case basic.
Reviewers: arsenm, kparzysz
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27650
llvm-svn: 289517
