Update SIMemoryLegalizer and SIInsertWaitcnts to use separate wait
instructions per counter (e.g. S_WAIT_LOADCNT) and split VMCNT into
separate LOADCNT, SAMPLECNT and BVHCNT counters.
Similar to 806761a7629df268c8aed49657aeccffa6bca449.
For IR files without a target triple, -mtriple= specifies the full
target triple while -march= merely sets the architecture part of the
default target triple, leaving a target triple which may not make sense,
e.g. amdgpu-apple-darwin.
Therefore, -march= is error-prone and not recommended for tests without
a target triple. The issue has been benign as we recognize
$unknown-apple-darwin as ELF instead of rejecting it outrightly.
This patch changes AMDGPU tests to not rely on the default
OS/environment components. Tests that need fixes are not changed:
```
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fabs.f64.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fabs.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/floor.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fneg-fabs.f64.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fneg-fabs.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/r600-infinite-loop-bug-while-reorganizing-vector.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/schedule-if-2.ll
```
SIInsertWaitcnts inserts waitcnt instructions to resolve data
dependencies. The GFX10+ vscnt (VMEM store count) counter is never used
in this way. It is only used to resolve memory dependencies, and that is
handled by SIMemoryLegalizer. Hence there is no need to conservatively
wait for vscnt to be 0 on function entry and before returns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153537
Add GFX11 test coverage to a bunch of tests where it was easy to do so,
mostly because the checks are autogenerated and/or GFX11 can share the
same checks as GFX10.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129295
Support for XNACK and SRAMECC is not static on some GPUs. We must be able
to differentiate between different scenarios for these dynamic subtarget
features.
The possible settings are:
- Unsupported: The GPU has no support for XNACK/SRAMECC.
- Any: Preference is unspecified. Use conservative settings that can run anywhere.
- Off: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC Off
- On: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC On
GCNSubtarget will track the four options based on the following criteria. If
the subtarget does not support XNACK/SRAMECC we say the setting is
"Unsupported". If no subtarget features for XNACK/SRAMECC are requested we
must support "Any" mode. If the subtarget features XNACK/SRAMECC exist in the
feature string when initializing the subtarget, the settings are "On/Off".
The defaults are updated to be conservatively correct, meaning if no setting
for XNACK or SRAMECC is explicitly requested, defaults will be used which
generate code that can be run anywhere. This corresponds to the "Any" setting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85882
This reverts commit ca907bfb57d8ad3ec3bcc2cff2abab7b1b933af6.
According to michel.daenzer,
> This completely broke the Mesa radeonsi driver on Navi 14. Xorg +
> xterm come up with major corruption & psychedelic colours.
When memory operations are outstanding on function calls, either the
caller or the callee can insert a waitcnt to ensure that all reads are
finished.
Calls need some time to be executed, so if the callee inserts the
waitcnt, filling the instruction buffer and waiting for memory will be
interleaved, hiding some latency. This comes at the cost of having a
waitcnt inside functions that may not be needed as no memory operations
are outstanding.
For function calls, this is already implemented. The same principal
applies to returns: If the caller inserts a waitcnt after the call, the
callee does not have to wait and the return and memory operation can be
run in parallel.
This commit implements waiting in the caller after returning from a
function call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87674
As explained in the comment:
// For a FLAT instruction the hardware decides whether to access
// global/scratch/shared memory based on the high bits of vaddr,
// ignoring the offset field, so we have to ensure that when we add
// remainder to vaddr it still points into the same underlying object.
// The easiest way to do that is to make sure that we split the offset
// into two pieces that are both >= 0 or both <= 0.
In particular FLAT (as opposed to SCRATCH and GLOBAL) instructions have
an unsigned immediate offset field, so we can't use it to help split a
negative offset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83394
We handle it this way for some other address spaces.
Since r349196, SILoadStoreOptimizer has been trying to do this. This
is after SIFoldOperands runs, which can change the addressing
patterns. It's simpler to just split this earlier.
llvm-svn: 375366
