6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sjoerd Meijer
e345d547a0 Recommit "[LV] Emit @llvm.get.active.lane.mask for tail-folded loops"
Fixed ARM regression test.

Please see the original commit message rG47650451738c for details.
2020-06-17 13:12:15 +01:00
Sjoerd Meijer
d4e183f686 Revert "[LV] Emit @llvm.get.active.mask for tail-folded loops"
This reverts commit 47650451738c821993c763356854b560a0f9f550
while I investigate the build bot failures.
2020-06-17 10:09:54 +01:00
Sjoerd Meijer
4765045173 [LV] Emit @llvm.get.active.mask for tail-folded loops
This emits new IR intrinsic @llvm.get.active.mask for tail-folded vectorised
loops if the intrinsic is supported by the backend, which is checked by
querying TargetTransform hook emitGetActiveLaneMask.

This intrinsic creates a mask representing active and inactive vector lanes,
which is used by the masked load/store instructions that are created for
tail-folded loops. The semantics of @llvm.get.active.mask are described here in
LangRef:

https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-get-active-lane-mask-intrinsics

This intrinsic is also used to provide a hint to the backend. That is, the
second argument of the intrinsic represents the back-edge taken count of the
loop. For MVE, for example, we use that to set up tail-predication, which is a
new form of predication in MVE for vector loops that implicitely predicates the
last vector loop iteration by implicitely setting active/inactive lanes, i.e.
the tail loop is predicated. In order to set up a tail-predicated vector loop,
we need to know the number of data elements processed by the vector loop, which
corresponds the the tripcount of the scalar loop, which we can now reconstruct
using @llvm.get.active.mask.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79100
2020-06-17 09:53:58 +01:00
David Green
b1aba0378e [ARM] Enable MVE masked loads and stores
With the extra optimisations we have done, these should now be fine to
enable by default. Which is what this patch does.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70968
2019-12-09 11:37:34 +00:00
Sjoerd Meijer
6c2a4f5ff9 [TTI][LV] preferPredicateOverEpilogue
We have two ways to steer creating a predicated vector body over creating a
scalar epilogue. To force this, we have 1) a command line option and 2) a
pragma available. This adds a third: a target hook to TargetTransformInfo that
can be queried whether predication is preferred or not, which allows the
vectoriser to make the decision without forcing it.

While this change behaves as a non-functional change for now, it shows the
required TTI plumbing, usage of this new hook in the vectoriser, and the
beginning of an ARM MVE implementation. I will follow up on this with:
- a complete MVE implementation, see D69845.
- a patch to disable this, i.e. we should respect "vector_predicate(disable)"
  and its corresponding loophint.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69040
2019-11-06 10:14:20 +00:00
Sjoerd Meijer
c2bafadd7a [LV] Add ARM MVE tail-folding tests
Now that the vectorizer can do tail-folding (rL367592), and the ARM backend
understands MVE masked loads/stores (rL371932), it's time to add the MVE
tail-folding equivalent of the X86 tests that I added.

llvm-svn: 371996
2019-09-16 14:56:26 +00:00