This fixes a miscompile which was introduced in r356510 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D57372).
The problem is that the original patch removed pointer operands where the load results we're demanded, but without considering the legality of the load itself. If the masked.gather had active, but undemanded, lanes, then we could end up creating a load which loaded from an undef address. The result could be a segfault, or, in theory, an arbitrary read from a random memory location into an used register.
llvm-svn: 358299
If the ObjectSizeOffsetEvaluator fails to fold the object size call, then it may
litter some unused instructions in the function. When done repeatably in
InstCombine, this results in an infinite loop. Fix this by tracking the set of
instructions that were inserted, then removing them on failure.
rdar://49172227
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60298
llvm-svn: 358146
Following D60483 and D60497, this adds support for AlwaysOverflows
handling for ssubo. This is the last case we can handle right now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60518
llvm-svn: 358100
ssubo X, C is equivalent to saddo X, -C. Make the transformation in
InstCombine and allow the logic implemented for saddo to fold prior
usages of add nsw or sub nsw with constants.
Patch by Dan Robertson.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60061
llvm-svn: 358099
Check AlwaysOverflow condition for usubo. The implementation is the
same as the existing handling for uaddo and umulo. Handling for saddo
and ssubo will follow (smulo doesn't have the necessary ValueTracking
support).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60483
llvm-svn: 358052
The uadd and umul cases are currently handled, the usub, sadd, ssub
and smul cases are not. usub, sadd and ssub already have the
necessary ValueTracking support, smul doesn't.
llvm-svn: 358031
This reverts commit 1383a9168948aabfd827220c9445ce0ce5765800.
sdiv-canonicalize.ll fails after this revision. The fold needs to be
moved outside the branch handling constant operands. However when this
is done there are further test changes, so I'm reverting this in the
meantime.
llvm-svn: 358026
This is the same change as D60420 but for signed sub rather than
signed add: Range information is intersected into the known bits
result, allows to detect more no/always overflow conditions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60469
llvm-svn: 358020
This is D59386 for the signed add case. The computeConstantRange()
result is now intersected into the existing known bits information,
allowing to detect additional no-overflow/always-overflow conditions
(though the latter isn't used yet).
This (finally...) covers the motivating case from D59071.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60420
llvm-svn: 358014
Similar to:
rL358005
Forego folding arbitrary vector constants to fix a possible miscompile bug.
We can enhance the transform if we do want to handle the more complicated
vector case.
llvm-svn: 358013
// 0 - (X sdiv C) -> (X sdiv -C) provided the negation doesn't overflow.
This fold has been around for many years and nobody noticed the potential
vector miscompile from overflow until recently...
So it seems unlikely that there's much demand for a vector sdiv optimization
on arbitrary vector constants, so just limit the matching to splat constants
to avoid the possible bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60426
llvm-svn: 358005
A more general canonicalization between fdiv and fmul would not
handle this case because that would have to be limited by uses
to prevent 2 values from becoming 3 values:
(x/y) * (x/y) --> (x*x) / (y*y)
(But we probably should still have that limited -- but more general --
canonicalization independently of this change.)
llvm-svn: 357943
First step towards removing the MOVMSK intrinsics completely - this patch expands MOVMSK to the pattern:
e.g. PMOVMSKB(v16i8 x):
%cmp = icmp slt <16 x i8> %x, zeroinitializer
%int = bitcast <16 x i8> %cmp to i16
%res = zext i16 %int to i32
Which is correctly handled by ISel and FastIsel (give or take an annoying movzx move....): https://godbolt.org/z/rkrSFW
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60256
llvm-svn: 357909
Add support for min/max flavor selects in computeConstantRange(),
which allows us to fold comparisons of a min/max against a constant
in InstSimplify. This fixes an infinite InstCombine loop, with the
test case taken from D59378.
Relative to the previous iteration, this contains some adjustments for
AMDGPU med3 tests: The AMDGPU target runs InstSimplify prior to codegen,
which ends up constant folding some existing med3 tests after this
change. To preserve these tests a hidden -amdgpu-scalar-ir-passes option
is added, which allows disabling scalar IR passes (that use InstSimplify)
for testing purposes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59506
llvm-svn: 357870
Summary:
This fixes PR41270.
The recursive function evaluateInDifferentElementOrder expects to be called
on a vector Value, so when we call it on a vector GEP's arguments, we must
first check that the argument is indeed a vector.
Reviewers: reames, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60058
llvm-svn: 357389
This reverts commit 75216a6dbcfe5fb55039ef06a07e419fa875f4a5.
I'll recommit with a better commit message with reference to the
phabricator review.
llvm-svn: 357387
This fixes PR41270.
The recursive function evaluateInDifferentElementOrder expects to be called
on a vector Value, so when we call it on a vector GEP's arguments, we must
first check that the argument is indeed a vector.
llvm-svn: 357385
If we have a commutable vector binop with inverted select-shuffles,
we don't care about the order of the operands in each vector lane:
LHS = shuffle V1, V2, <0, 5, 6, 3>
RHS = shuffle V2, V1, <0, 5, 6, 3>
LHS + RHS --> <V1[0]+V2[0], V2[1]+V1[1], V2[2]+V1[2], V1[3]+V2[3]> --> V1 + V2
PR41304:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41304
...is currently titled as an SLP enhancement, but at least for the
given example, we can reduce that in instcombine because we are just
eliminating shuffles.
As noted in the TODO, this could be generalized, but I haven't thought
through those patterns completely, so this is limited to what appears
to be always safe.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60048
llvm-svn: 357382
In PR41304:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41304
...we have a case where we want to fold a binop of select-shuffle (blended) values.
Rather than try to match commuted variants of the pattern, we can canonicalize the
shuffles and check for mask equality with commuted operands.
We don't produce arbitrary shuffle masks in instcombine, but select-shuffles are a
special case that the backend is required to handle because we already canonicalize
vector select to this shuffle form.
So there should be no codegen difference from this change. It's possible that this
improves CSE in IR though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60016
llvm-svn: 357366
