This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.
Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169
This reverts commit aacfbb953eb705af2ecfeb95a6262818fa85dd92.
Revert "Fix lit test failures in CodeGenCoroutines"
This reverts commit 63fff0f5bffe20fa2c84a45a41161afa0043cb34.
Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.
Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169
[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default (2)
This patch updates test files after D105169.
Autogenerated test codes are changed by `utils/update_cc_test_checks.py,` and non-autogenerated test codes are changed as follows:
(1) I wrote a python script that (partially) updates the tests using regex: {F18594904} The script is not perfect, but I believe it gives hints about which patterns are updated to have `noundef` attached.
(2) The remaining tests are updated manually.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108453
Resolve lit failures in clang after 8ca4b3e's land
Fix lit test failures in clang-ppc* and clang-x64-windows-msvc
Fix missing failures in clang-ppc64be* and retry fixing clang-x64-windows-msvc
Fix internal_clone(aarch64) inline assembly
Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.
Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169
This reverts the following commits:
37ca7a795b277c20c02a218bf44052278c03344b
9aa6c72b92b6c89cc6d23b693257df9af7de2d15
705387c5074bcca36d626882462ebbc2bcc3bed4
8ca4b3ef19fe82d7ad6a6e1515317dcc01b41515
80dba72a669b5416e97a42fd2c2a7bc5a6d3f44a
This patch updates test files after D105169.
Autogenerated test codes are changed by `utils/update_cc_test_checks.py,` and non-autogenerated test codes are changed as follows:
(1) I wrote a python script that (partially) updates the tests using regex: {F18594904} The script is not perfect, but I believe it gives hints about which patterns are updated to have `noundef` attached.
(2) The remaining tests are updated manually.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108453
It's currently ambiguous in IR whether the source language explicitly
did not want a stack a stack protector (in C, via function attribute
no_stack_protector) or doesn't care for any given function.
It's common for code that manipulates the stack via inline assembly or
that has to set up its own stack canary (such as the Linux kernel) would
like to avoid stack protectors in certain functions. In this case, we've
been bitten by numerous bugs where a callee with a stack protector is
inlined into an __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__)) caller, which
generally breaks the caller's assumptions about not having a stack
protector. LTO exacerbates the issue.
While developers can avoid this by putting all no_stack_protector
functions in one translation unit together and compiling those with
-fno-stack-protector, it's generally not very ergonomic or as
ergonomic as a function attribute, and still doesn't work for LTO. See also:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200915172658.1432732-1-rkir@google.com/https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200918201436.2932360-30-samitolvanen@google.com/T/#u
Typically, when inlining a callee into a caller, the caller will be
upgraded in its level of stack protection (see adjustCallerSSPLevel()).
By adding an explicit attribute in the IR when the function attribute is
used in the source language, we can now identify such cases and prevent
inlining. Block inlining when the callee and caller differ in the case that one
contains `nossp` when the other has `ssp`, `sspstrong`, or `sspreq`.
Fixes pr/47479.
Reviewed By: void
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956
Summary:
This attribute tells clang to skip this function from stack protector
when -stack-protector option is passed.
GCC option for this is:
__attribute__((__optimize__("no-stack-protector"))) and the
equivalent clang syntax would be: __attribute__((no_stack_protector))
This is used in Linux kernel to selectively disable stack protector
in certain functions.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith, rnk, probinson
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: probinson, srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46300
llvm-svn: 331925
This is the clang part of http://reviews.llvm.org/D18846.
SafeStack instrumentation pass adds stack protector canaries if both
attributes are present on a function. StackProtector pass will step
back if the function has a safestack attribute.
llvm-svn: 266005
Several tests wouldn't pass when executed on an armv7a_pc_linux triple
due to the non-default arm_aapcs calling convention produced on the
function definitions in the IR output. Account for this with the
application of a little regex.
Patch by Ying Yi.
llvm-svn: 240971
This patch adds the -fsanitize=safe-stack command line argument for clang,
which enables the Safe Stack protection (see http://reviews.llvm.org/D6094
for the detailed description of the Safe Stack).
This patch is our implementation of the safe stack on top of Clang. The
patches make the following changes:
- Add -fsanitize=safe-stack and -fno-sanitize=safe-stack options to clang
to control safe stack usage (the safe stack is disabled by default).
- Add __attribute__((no_sanitize("safe-stack"))) attribute to clang that can be
used to disable the safe stack for individual functions even when enabled
globally.
Original patch by Volodymyr Kuznetsov and others at the Dependable Systems
Lab at EPFL; updates and upstreaming by myself.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6095
llvm-svn: 239762
This option has the following effects:
* It adds the sspstrong IR attribute to each function within the CU.
* It defines the macro __SSP_STRONG__ with the value of 2.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2717
llvm-svn: 201120
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
function attributes. There are predefined macros that are defined when stack
protectors are used: __SSP__=1 with -fstack-protector and __SSP_ALL__=2 with
-fstack-protector-all.
llvm-svn: 74405
