When the source has a series of assignments, users reasonably want to
have the debugger step through each one individually. Turn off the combine
for adjacent stores so we get this behavior at -O0.
Similar to D7181.
Reviewed By: spatel, xgupta
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115808
When the source has a series of assignments, users reasonably want to
have the debugger step through each one individually. Turn off the combine
for adjacent stores so we get this behavior at -O0.
Similar to D7181.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115808
Merge the node combines into a common DAGCombiner::visitFMinMax (like we do for IMINMAX).
Move the constant folding into SelectionDAG::foldConstantFPMath.
This allows us to fold the vecreduce-propagate-sd-flags.ll test as it reduces constants - so I've refactored it to take variables instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115952
We were using a function attribute to indicate a non-standard FP mode,
but now we can use intrinsics for that job as shown in the new tests.
Presumably the x86 asm could be improved for that IR with intrinsics,
but I have not worked out exactly how to do that. Note that the
transform to FTRUNC still requires a hacky check for "nsz" (because
FMF are not applied to FP casts).
This is a cleanup based on the clang change in D115804 / 8c7f2a4f87192 .
This is effectively a revert of 5a90285bd98d2 + D46237 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115885
Replace custom constant scalar/splat folding with FoldConstantArithmetic call and canonicalize commutative constant ops to the RHS before the SimplifyVBinOp call
This extends the custom lowering for truncating stores on
fixed length vectors in SVE to support masked truncating stores.
It also adds a DAG combine for truncates followed by masked
stores.
Reviewed By: peterwaller-arm, paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108115
SimplifyVBinOp still has a FoldConstantArithmetic call, which now it isn't vector specific we should be able to remove (once fp binops are tidied up); but we can at least clean up the integer opcodes to perform the basic constant/undef handling in common code first.
After D113888 / 32b6c17b29079e7d the MMO size of a masked loads/store is
unknown. When we are converting back to a standard load/store because
the mask is known all ones, we can refine that to the correct size from
the size of the vector being loaded/stored.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114582
As an extension to D111976, this converts clamp fptosi, clamped between
0 and (2^n)-1 to a fptoui.sat. This can greatly help on targets with
conversions that naturally saturate, such as Arm.
X86 disables the transform as some of the test cases increases in size.
A fptoui.sat necessitates a fp clamp without native support, so there is
little use in converting if the instruction is just going to be
expanded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112428
combinePMULH currently only truncates vXi32/vXi64 multiplies to PMULHW/PMULUW if the source operands are SEXT/ZEXT instructions for a 'free' truncation.
But we can generalize this to any source operand with sufficient leading sign/zero bits that would allow PACKS/PACKUS to be used as a 'cheap' truncation.
This helps us avoid the wider multiplies, in exchange for truncation on both source operands instead of the result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113371
The REM DAG combine uses the visitDivLike functions to try and get an
optimized DIV node to provide better codegen, however in some cases this
visitDivLike call ends up in the BuildSDIVPow2 target hook, which in
turn sometimes will return the same node passed in to indicate not to
change it. The REM DAG combine does not anticipate this and creates a
cycle in the DAG because of it.
Fix this by ensuring any such optimized div node returned is distinct
from the node being combined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114716
This adds a fold in DAGCombine to create fptosi_sat from sequences for
smin(smax(fptosi(x))) nodes, where the min/max saturate the output of
the fp convert to a specific bitwidth (say INT_MIN and INT_MAX). Because
it is dealing with smin(/smax) in DAG they may currently be ISD::SMIN,
ISD::SETCC/ISD::SELECT, ISD::VSELECT or ISD::SELECT_CC nodes which need
to be handled similarly.
A shouldConvertFpToSat method was added to control when converting may
be profitable. The original fptosi will have a less strict semantics
than the fptosisat, with less values that need to produce defined
behaviour.
This especially helps on ARM/AArch64 where the vcvt instructions
naturally saturate the result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111976
It causes builds to fail with this assert:
llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:990:
bool llvm::APInt::operator==(const llvm::APInt &) const:
Assertion `BitWidth == RHS.BitWidth && "Comparison requires equal bit widths"' failed.
See comment on the code review.
> This adds a fold in DAGCombine to create fptosi_sat from sequences for
> smin(smax(fptosi(x))) nodes, where the min/max saturate the output of
> the fp convert to a specific bitwidth (say INT_MIN and INT_MAX). Because
> it is dealing with smin(/smax) in DAG they may currently be ISD::SMIN,
> ISD::SETCC/ISD::SELECT, ISD::VSELECT or ISD::SELECT_CC nodes which need
> to be handled similarly.
>
> A shouldConvertFpToSat method was added to control when converting may
> be profitable. The original fptosi will have a less strict semantics
> than the fptosisat, with less values that need to produce defined
> behaviour.
>
> This especially helps on ARM/AArch64 where the vcvt instructions
> naturally saturate the result.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111976
This reverts commit 52ff3b009388f1bef4854f1b6470b4ec19d10b0e.
This adds a fold in DAGCombine to create fptosi_sat from sequences for
smin(smax(fptosi(x))) nodes, where the min/max saturate the output of
the fp convert to a specific bitwidth (say INT_MIN and INT_MAX). Because
it is dealing with smin(/smax) in DAG they may currently be ISD::SMIN,
ISD::SETCC/ISD::SELECT, ISD::VSELECT or ISD::SELECT_CC nodes which need
to be handled similarly.
A shouldConvertFpToSat method was added to control when converting may
be profitable. The original fptosi will have a less strict semantics
than the fptosisat, with less values that need to produce defined
behaviour.
This especially helps on ARM/AArch64 where the vcvt instructions
naturally saturate the result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111976
This allows the generic DAG combine to fold fp_extend/fp_trunc into
loads/stores which we can then lower into a integer extending
load/truncating store plus an FP_EXTEND/FP_ROUND.
The nuance here is that fixed-type FP_EXTEND/FP_ROUND require unpacked
types hence lowering them introduces an unpack/zip. By allowing these
nodes to be combined with loads/store we make it much easier to have
this unpack/zip combined into the load/store by our custom lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114580
Patch to fix some of the regressions in D77804.
By folding to rotate/funnel-shift by constant amounts for illegal types, we prevent SimplifyDemandedBits from destroying the patterns prematurely, allowing us to use the rotate/funnel-shift legalization that was added in D112443.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113192
It's possible that the mask is already a NOT. At least if InstCombine
hasn't canonicalized the input. In that case we will form an ANDN with
X instead of with Y. So we don't need to worry about Y being a constant.
We might need to check that X isn't a constant instead, but we don't
have a test case for that yet.
This fixes a size regression found when trying to enable this combine
for RISCV in D113937.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113948
This was noted as a follow-up to D113212 / D113426:
4fc1fc4005f7
7e30404c3b6c
11522cfcad6b
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/e4o96b
The canonicalization rules for these IR patterns are complicated,
and we were not matching the expected forms in 2 out of the 3
cases. We can make codegen more robust by matching the swapped
forms (and that will also work if these patterns are created late).
(Cond0 s> -1) ? N1 : 0 --> ~(Cond0 s>> BW-1) & N1
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/mGCBrd
This was suggested as a potential enhancement in D113212 (also 7e30404c3b6c ).
There's an improvement for AArch that could be generalized ( X > -1 --> X >= 0 ).
For x86, we have a counter-acting fold for most cases that turns the shift+not
back into a setcc, so that needs a work-around to get more cases to use "pandn":
D113603
Note that this pattern (and a previous one) are not currently canonical forms
in IR:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/e4o96b
Adding swapped variants is left as a TODO item here, but is planned as
a near-term follow-up patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113426
As suggested on D113371, this adds a wrapper to SelectionDAG::ComputeNumSignBits, similar to the llvm::ComputeMinSignedBits wrapper.
I've included some usage, its not exhaustive, just the more obvious cases where the intention is obvious.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113396
We have several places where we need to extract the raw bits data from a BUILD_VECTOR node, so consolidate this to a single helper function that handles Undefs and Integer/FP constants, including implicit truncation.
This should make it easier to extend D113202 to handle more constant folding of bitcasted constant data.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113351
Currently FoldConstantArithmetic only handles binops, so replacing other uses of FoldConstantVectorArithmetic (in particular for SETCC nodes), still require more work.
This is the 'or' sibling for the fold added with:
D113212
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/tgnp7K
Note that neither of these transforms is poison-safe,
but it does not seem to matter at this level. We have
had the scalar version of D113212 for a long time, so
this is just making optimizer behavior consistent.
We do not have the scalar version of *this* fold,
however, so that is another follow-up.
Another minor step towards merging FoldConstantVectorArithmetic into FoldConstantArithmetic.
We don't use SDNodeFlags in any constant folding inside DAG, so passing the Flags argument is a waste of time - an alternative would be to wire up FoldConstantArithmetic to take SDNodeFlags just-in-case we someday start using it, but we don't have any way to test it and I'd prefer to avoid dead code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113276
(X s< 0) ? Y : 0 --> (X s>> BW-1) & Y
We canonicalize to the icmp+select form in IR, and we already have this fold
for scalar select in SDAG, so I think it's an oversight that we don't have
the fold for vectors. It seems neutral for AArch64 and saves some instructions
on x86.
Whether we should also have the sibling folds for the inverse condition or
all-ones true value may depend on target-specific factors such as whether
there's an "and-not" instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113212
Fold (srl (mul (zext i32:$a to i64), i64:c), 32) -> (mulhu $a, $b),
if c can truncate to i32 without loss.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, craig.topper, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108129
Rely on the hasOperation() instead - as commented on D77804, the mid-term intention is to recognise rotate/funnel-by-constant pre-legalization to help avoid SimplifyDemandedBits regressions.
(i8 X ^ 128) & (i8 X s>> 7) --> usubsat X, 128
As suggested in D112085, we can substitute 'xor' with 'add'
in this pattern, and it is logically equivalent:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/eJtWWC
We canonicalize to 'xor' in IR, but SDAG does not do that
(and it probably should not - https://llvm.org/PR52267 ), so
it is possible to see either pattern in codegen. Note that
'sub' is a another potential pattern, but that is
canonicalized to 'add' in DAGCombiner, so we don't need to
worry about that variation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112377
EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR indices are always constant, we don't need to check for ConstantSDNode, we should just use getConstantOperandVal which will assert for the constant.
Instead of returning a bool to indicate success and a separate
SDValue, return the SDValue and have the callers check if it is
null.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112331
(i8 X ^ 128) & (i8 X s>> 7) --> usubsat X, 128
I haven't found a generalization of this identity:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/_sriEQ
Note: I was actually looking at the first form of the pattern in that link,
but that's part of a long chain of potential missed transforms in codegen
and IR....that I hope ends here!
The predicates for when this is profitable are a bit tricky. This version of
the patch excludes multi-use but includes custom lowering (as opposed to
legal only).
On x86 for example, we have custom lowering for some vector types, and that
uses umax and sub. So to enable that fold, we need add use checks to avoid
regressions. Even with legal-only lowering, we could see code with extra
reg move instructions for extra uses, so that constraint would have to be
eased very carefully to avoid penalties.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112085
With unoptimized code, we may see lots of stores and spend too much time in mergeTruncStores.
Fixes PR51827.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111596
Inspired by D111968, provide a isNegatedPowerOf2() wrapper instead of obfuscating code with (-Value).isPowerOf2() patterns, which I'm sure are likely avenues for typos.....
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111998
This is NFC-intended for the callers. Posting in case there are
other potential users that I missed.
I would also use this from VectorCombine in a patch for:
https://llvm.org/PR52178 ( D111901 )
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111891
