Since we can't change the destination of indirectbr, so when
encounter indirectbr as PredPredBB terminator, we should pass it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129193
After D129205, we support SplitBlockPredecessors() for predecessors
with callbr terminators. This means that it is now also safe to
invoke critical edge splitting for an edge coming from a callbr
terminator. Remove checks in various passes that were protecting
against that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129256
SplitBlockPredecessors currently asserts if one of the predecessor
terminators is a callbr. This limitation was originally necessary,
because just like with indirectbr, it was not possible to replace
successors of a callbr. However, this is no longer the case since
D67252. As the requirement nowadays is that callbr must reference
all blockaddrs directly in the call arguments, and these get
automatically updated when setSuccessor() is called, we no longer
need this limitation.
The only thing we need to do here is use replaceSuccessorWith()
instead of replaceUsesOfWith(), because only the former does the
necessary blockaddr updating magic.
I believe there's other similar limitations that can be removed,
e.g. related to critical edge splitting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129205
Use ConstantFoldBinaryOpOperands() instead, to handle the case
where not all binary ops have a constant expression variant.
This is a bit awkward because we only want to pop the element from
Ops once we're sure that it has folded.
Nowdays we have a generic constant folding API to load a type from
an offset. It should be able to do anything that VNCoercion can do.
This avoids the weird templating between IRBuilder and ConstantFolder
in one function, which is will stop working as the IRBuilderFolder
moves from CreateXYZ to FoldXYZ APIs.
Unfortunately, this doesn't eliminate this pattern from VNCoercion
entirely yet.
Currently, we only remove dead blocks and non-feasible edges in
IPSCCP, but not in SCCP. I'm not aware of any strong reason for
that difference, so this patch updates SCCP to perform the CFG
cleanup as well.
Compile-time impact seems to be pretty minimal, in the 0.05%
geomean range on CTMark.
For the test case from https://reviews.llvm.org/D126962#3611579
the result after -sccp now looks like this:
define void @test(i1 %c) {
entry:
br i1 %c, label %unreachable, label %next
next:
unreachable
unreachable:
call void @bar()
unreachable
}
-jump-threading does nothing on this, but -simplifycfg will produce
the optimal result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128796
This code requires the result to be an UndefValue/ConstantInt
anyway (checked by getKnownConstant), so we are only interested
in the case where this folds.
`commonAlignment` is a shortcut to pick the smallest of two `Align`
objects. As-is it doesn't bring much value compared to `std::min`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128345
This is another attempt to land this patch.
The patch proposed to use a new cost model for loop interchange,
which is obtained from loop cache analysis.
Given a loopnest, what loop cache analysis returns is a vector of
loops [loop0, loop1, loop2, ...] where loop0 should be replaced as
the outermost loop, loop1 should be placed one more level inside, and
loop2 one more level inside, etc. What loop cache analysis does is not
only more comprehensive than the current cost model, it is also a "one-shot"
query which means that we only need to query it once during the entire
loop interchange pass, which is better than the current cost model where
we query it every time we check whether it is profitable to interchange
two loops. Thus complexity is reduced, especially after D120386 where we
do more interchanges to get the globally optimal loop access pattern.
Updates made to test cases are mostly minor changes and some
corrections. One change that applies to all tests is that we added an option
`-cache-line-size=64` to the RUN lines. This is ensure that loop
cache analysis receives a valid number of cache line size for correct
analysis. Test coverage for loop interchange is not reduced.
Currently we did not completely remove the legacy cost model, but
keep it as fall-back in case the new cost model did not run successfully.
This is because currently we have some limitations in delinearization, which
sometimes makes loop cache analysis bail out. The longer term goal is to
enhance delinearization and eventually remove the legacy cost model
compeletely.
Reviewed By: bmahjour, #loopoptwg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124926
Drop the requirement that getInitialValueOfAllocation() must be
passed an allocator function, shifting the responsibility for
checking that into the function (which it does anyway). The
motivation is to avoid some calls to isAllocationFn(), which has
somewhat ill-defined semantics (given the number of
allocator-related attributes we have floating around...)
(For this function, all we eventually need is an allockind of
zeroed or uninitialized.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127274
llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopCacheAnalysis.cpp:702:30: runtime error: signed
integer overflow: 6148914691236517209 * 100 cannot be represented in
type 'long'
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/25185
This reverts commit 1b24fe34b06cd9f2337313f513a8b19f9a37c5de.
This is the second attempt to land this patch.
The patch proposed to use a new cost model for loop interchange,
which is obtained from loop cache analysis.
Given a loopnest, what loop cache analysis returns is a vector of
loops [loop0, loop1, loop2, ...] where loop0 should be replaced as the
outermost loop, loop1 should be placed one more level inside, and loop2
one more level inside, etc. What loop cache analysis does is not only more
comprehensive than the current cost model, it is also a "one-shot" query
which means that we only need to query it once during the entire loop
interchange pass, which is better than the current cost model where we
query it every time we check whether it is profitable to interchange two
loops. Thus complexity is reduced, especially after D120386 where we do
more interchanges to get the globally optimal loop access pattern.
Updates made to test cases are mostly minor changes and some corrections.
One change that applies to all tests is that we added an option
`-cache-line-size=64` to the RUN lines. This is ensure that loop cache
analysis receives a valid number of cache line size for correct analysis.
Test coverage for loop interchange is not reduced.
Currently we did not completely remove the legacy cost model, but keep it
as fall-back in case the new cost model did not run successfully. This is
because currently we have some limitations in delinearization, which sometimes
makes loop cache analysis bail out. The longer term goal is to enhance
delinearization and eventually remove the legacy cost model compeletely.
Reviewed By: bmahjour, #loopoptwg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124926
If there are multiple constraints in the same block, at the moment the
order they are processed may be different depending on the sort
implementation.
Use stable_sort to ensure consistent ordering.
Finding BDV for vector value does not handle freeze instruction.
Adding its handling as it is done for scalar case.
Reviewed By: apilipenko
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128254
StructurizeCFG linearizes the successors of branching basic block
by adding Flow blocks to record the true/false path for branches
and back edges. This patch reduces the number of Phi values needed
to capture the control flow path by improving the basic block
ordering.
Previously, StructurizeCFG adds loop exit blocks outside of the
loop. StructurizeCFG sets a boolean value to indicate the path
taken, and all exit block live values extend to after the loop.
For loops with a large number of exits blocks, this creates a
huge number of values that are maintained, which increases
compilation time and register pressure. This is problem
especially with ASAN, which adds early exits to blocks with
unreachable instructions for each instrumented check in the loop.
In specific cases, this patch reduces the number of values needed
after the loop by moving the exit block into the loop. This is
done for blocks that have a single predecessor and single successor
by moving the block to appear just after the predecessor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123231
Binary size of `clang` is trivial; namely, numerical value doesn't
change when measured in MiB, and `.data` section increases from 139Ki to
173 Ki.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128070
Scale reg should never be zero, so when the quotient is zero, we
cannot assign it there. Limit this transform to avoid this situation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128339
Reviewed By: eopXD
This patch adds a new transferToOtherSystem helper that tries to
transfer information from signed predicates to the unsigned system and
vice versa.
The initial version adds A >=u B for A >=s B && B >=s 0
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/8b6F9i
As branch on undef is immediate undefined behavior, there is no need
to mark one of the edges as feasible. We can leave all the edges
non-feasible. In IPSCCP, we can replace the branch with an unreachable
terminator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126962
NewGVN will find operator from other context. ValueTracking currently doesn't have a way to run completely without context instruction.
So it will use operator itself as conext instruction.
If the operator in another branch will never be executed but it has an assume, it may caused value tracking use the assume to do wrong simpilfy.
It would be better to make these simplification queries not use context at all, but that would require some API changes.
For now we just use the orignial instruction as context instruction to fix the issue.
Fix#56039
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127942
For non-mem-intrinsic and non-lifetime `CallBase`s, the current
`isRemovable` function only checks if the `CallBase` 1. has no uses 2.
will return 3. does not throw:
80fb782336/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/DeadStoreElimination.cpp (L1017)
But we should also exclude invokes even in case they don't throw,
because they are terminators and thus cannot be removed. While it
doesn't seem to make much sense for `invoke`s to have an `nounwind`
target, this kind of code can be generated and is also valid bitcode.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128224
ExtractElement does not produce a vector out of a vector, so there's no need to
call a gather once done.
Fix#54469
Credits to npopov@redhat.com for the original approach.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126012
