Profile merging is not supported when using debug info profile
correlation because the data section won't be in the binary at runtime.
Change the default profile name in this mode to `default_%p.proflite` so
we don't use profile merging.
Reviewed By: kyulee
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115979
Add the llvm flag `-debug-info-correlate` to attach debug info to instrumentation counters so we can correlate raw profile data to their functions. Raw profiles are dumped as `.proflite` files. The next diff enables `llvm-profdata` to consume `.proflite` and debug info files to produce a normal `.profdata` profile.
Part of the "lightweight instrumentation" work: https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/r03Z6JoN7d4
The original diff https://reviews.llvm.org/D114565 was reverted because of the `Instrumentation/InstrProfiling/debug-info-correlate.ll` test, which is fixed in this commit.
Reviewed By: kyulee
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115693
This reverts commit 800bf8ed29fbcaa9436540e83bc119ec92e7d40f.
The `Instrumentation/InstrProfiling/debug-info-correlate.ll` test was
failing because I forgot the `llc` commands are architecture specific.
I'll follow up with a fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115689
Add the llvm flag `-debug-info-correlate` to attach debug info to instrumentation counters so we can correlate raw profile data to their functions. Raw profiles are dumped as `.proflite` files. The next diff enables `llvm-profdata` to consume `.proflite` and debug info files to produce a normal `.profdata` profile.
Part of the "lightweight instrumentation" work: https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/r03Z6JoN7d4
Reviewed By: kyulee
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114565
If clang's output is set to bitcode and LTO is enabled, clang would
unconditionally add the flag to the module. Unfortunately, if the input were a
bitcode or IR file and had the flag set, this would result in two copies of the
flag, which is illegal IR. Guard the setting of the flag by checking whether it
already exists. This follows existing practice for the related "ThinLTO" module
flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112177
add tracing for loads and stores.
The primary goal is to have more options for data-flow-guided fuzzing,
i.e. use data flow insights to perform better mutations or more agressive corpus expansion.
But the feature is general puspose, could be used for other things too.
Pipe the flag though clang and clang driver, same as for the other SanitizerCoverage flags.
While at it, change some plain arrays into std::array.
Tests: clang flags test, LLVM IR test, compiler-rt executable test.
Reviewed By: morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113447
Previously, the Backend_Emit{Nothing,BC,LL} modes did
not run the LLVM verifier since it is usually added via
the TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile method according
to the DisableVerify parameter. This is called from
EmitAssemblyHelper::AddEmitPasses, which is only relevant
for BackendAction-s that require CodeGen.
Note:
* In these particular situations the verifier is added
to the optimization pipeline rather than the codegen
pipeline so that it runs prior to the BC/LL emission
pass.
* This change applies to both the old and the new PMs.
* Because the clang tests use -emit-llvm ubiquitously,
this change will enable the verifier for them.
* A small bug is fixed in emitIFuncDefinition so that
the clang/test/CodeGen/ifunc.c test would pass:
the emitIFuncDefinition incorrectly passed the
GlobalDecl of the IFunc itself to the call to
GetOrCreateLLVMFunction for creating the resolver.
Signed-off-by: Itay Bookstein <ibookstein@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113352
We almost always want to use the default AA pipeline. It's very easy for
users of PassBuilder to forget to customize the AAManager to use the
default AA pipeline (for example, the NewPM C API forgets to do this).
If somebody wants a custom AA pipeline, similar to what is being done
now with the default AA pipeline registration, they can
FAM.registerPass([&] { return std::move(MyAA); });
before calling
PB.registerFunctionAnalyses(FAM);
For example, LTOBackend.cpp and NewPMDriver.cpp do this.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113210
This diff makes several amendments to the local file caching mechanism
which was migrated from ThinLTO to Support in
rGe678c51177102845c93529d457b020f969125373 in response to follow-up
discussion on that commit.
Patch By: noajshu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113080
We would like to move ThinLTO’s battle-tested file caching mechanism to
the LLVM Support library so that we can use it elsewhere in LLVM.
Patch By: noajshu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111371
We would like to move ThinLTO’s battle-tested file caching mechanism to
the LLVM Support library so that we can use it elsewhere in LLVM.
Patch By: noajshu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111371
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
Currenlty PseudoProbeInserter is a pass conditioned on a target switch. It works well with a single clang invocation. It doesn't work so well when the backend is called separately (i.e, through the linker or llc), where user has always to pass -pseudo-probe-for-profiling explictly. I'm making the pass a default pass that requires no command line arg to trigger, but will be actually run depending on whether the CU comes with `llvm.pseudo_probe_desc` metadata.
Reviewed By: wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110209
Summary:
Introduce a new frontend flag `-fswift-async-fp={auto|always|never}`
that controls how code generation sets the Swift extended async frame
info bit. There are three possibilities:
* `auto`: which determines how to set the bit based on deployment target, either
statically or dynamically via `swift_async_extendedFramePointerFlags`.
* `always`: default, always set the bit statically, regardless of deployment
target.
* `never`: never set the bit, regardless of deployment target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109451
Split ThreadSanitizerPass into ThreadSanitizerPass (as a function
pass) and ModuleThreadSanitizerPass (as a module pass).
Main reason is to make sure that we have a unique mapping from
ClassName to PassName in the new passmanager framework, making it
possible to correctly identify the passes when dealing with options
such as -print-after and -print-pipeline-passes.
This is a follow-up to D105006 and D105007.
Split MemorySanitizerPass into MemorySanitizerPass (as a function
pass) and ModuleMemorySanitizerPass (as a module pass).
Main reason is to make sure that we have a unique mapping from
ClassName to PassName in the new passmanager framework, making it
possible to correctly identify the passes when dealing with options
such as -print-after and -print-pipeline-passes.
This is a follow-up to D105006 and D105007.
Refactored implementation of AddressSanitizerPass and
HWAddressSanitizerPass to use pass options similar to passes like
MemorySanitizerPass. This makes sure that there is a single mapping
from class name to pass name (needed by D108298), and options like
-debug-only and -print-after makes a bit more sense when (despite
that it is the unparameterized pass name that should be used in those
options).
A result of the above is that some pass names are removed in favor
of the parameterized versions:
- "khwasan" is now "hwasan<kernel;recover>"
- "kasan" is now "asan<kernel>"
- "kmsan" is now "msan<kernel>"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105007
This patch implements Flow Sensitive Sample FDO (FSAFDO) profile
loader. We have two profile loaders for FS profile,
one before RegAlloc and one before BlockPlacement.
To enable it, when -fprofile-sample-use=<profile> is specified,
add "-enable-fs-discriminator=true \
-disable-ra-fsprofile-loader=false \
-disable-layout-fsprofile-loader=false"
to turn on the FS profile loaders.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107878
GCC supports multiple forms of -falign-loops=.
-falign-loops= is currently ignored in Clang.
This patch implements the simplest but the most useful form where N is a
power of 2.
The underlying implementation uses a `llvm::TargetOptions` option for now.
Bitcode generation ignores this option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106701
Pulled out the OptimizationLevel class from PassBuilder in order to be able to access it from within the PassManager and avoid include conflicts.
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107025
This patch make coroutine passes run by default in LLVM pipeline. Now
the clang and opt could handle IR inputs containing coroutine intrinsics
without special options.
It should be fine. On the one hand, the coroutine passes seems to be stable
since there are already many projects using coroutine feature.
On the other hand, the coroutine passes should do nothing for IR who doesn't
contain coroutine intrinsic.
Test Plan: check-llvm
Reviewed by: lxfind, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105877
Also:
- add driver test (fsanitize-use-after-return.c)
- add basic IR test (asan-use-after-return.cpp)
- (NFC) cleaned up logic for generating table of __asan_stack_malloc
depending on flag.
for issue: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/1394
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104076
D88631 added initial support for:
- -mstack-protector-guard=
- -mstack-protector-guard-reg=
- -mstack-protector-guard-offset=
flags, and D100919 extended these to AArch64. Unfortunately, these flags
aren't retained for LTO. Make them module attributes rather than
TargetOptions.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1378
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102742
To bring D99599's implementation in line with the existing
PrintPassInstrumentation, and to fix a FIXME, add more customizability
to PrintPassInstrumentation.
Introduce three new options. The first takes over the existing
"-debug-pass-manager-verbose" cl::opt.
The second and third option are specific to -fdebug-pass-structure. They
allow indentation, and also don't print analysis queries.
To avoid more golden file tests than necessary, prune down the
-fdebug-pass-structure tests.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102196
Follow up to D88631 but for aarch64; the Linux kernel uses the command
line flags:
1. -mstack-protector-guard=sysreg
2. -mstack-protector-guard-reg=sp_el0
3. -mstack-protector-guard-offset=0
to use the system register sp_el0 for the stack canary, enabling the
kernel to have a unique stack canary per task (like a thread, but not
limited to userspace as the kernel can preempt itself).
Address pr/47341 for aarch64.
Fixes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/289
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed By: xiangzhangllvm, DavidSpickett, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100919
This patch adds support for GCC's -fstack-usage flag. With this flag, a stack
usage file (i.e., .su file) is generated for each input source file. The format
of the stack usage file is also similar to what is used by GCC. For each
function defined in the source file, a line with the following information is
produced in the .su file.
<source_file>:<line_number>:<function_name> <size_in_byte> <static/dynamic>
"Static" means that the function's frame size is static and the size info is an
accurate reflection of the frame size. While "dynamic" means the function's
frame size can only be determined at run-time because the function manipulates
the stack dynamically (e.g., due to variable size objects). The size info only
reflects the size of the fixed size frame objects in this case and therefore is
not a reliable measure of the total frame size.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100509
