This fixes instantiation of definition for friend function templates,
when the declaration found and the one containing the definition
have different template contexts.
In these cases, the the function declaration corresponding to the
definition is not available; it may not even be instantiated at all.
So this patch adds a bit which tracks which function template
declaration was instantiated from the member template.
It's used to find which primary template serves as a context
for the purpose of obtaining the template arguments needed
to instantiate the definition.
Fixes#55509
Reapplies #106585, fixing an issue where non-dependent names of member
templates appearing prior to that member template being explicitly
specialized for an implicitly instantiated class template specialization
would incorrectly use the definition of the explicitly specialized
member template.
This improves the existing workaround for a core issue introduced in
CWG1770.
When performing template argument deduction for an NTTP which the
parameter side is a reference, instead of dropping the references for
both sides, just make the argument be same reference typed as the
parameter, in case the argument is not already a reference type.
Fixes#73460
This finishes the clang implementation of P0522, getting rid of the
fallback to the old, pre-P0522 rules.
Before this patch, when partial ordering template template parameters,
we would perform, in order:
* If the old rules would match, we would accept it. Otherwise, don't
generate diagnostics yet.
* If the new rules would match, just accept it. Otherwise, don't
generate any diagnostics yet again.
* Apply the old rules again, this time with diagnostics.
This situation was far from ideal, as we would sometimes:
* Accept some things we shouldn't.
* Reject some things we shouldn't.
* Only diagnose rejection in terms of the old rules.
With this patch, we apply the P0522 rules throughout.
This needed to extend template argument deduction in order to accept the
historial rule for TTP matching pack parameter to non-pack arguments.
This change also makes us accept some combinations of historical and
P0522 allowances we wouldn't before.
It also fixes a bunch of bugs that were documented in the test suite,
which I am not sure there are issues already created for them.
This causes a lot of changes to the way these failures are diagnosed,
with related test suite churn.
The problem here is that the old rules were very simple and
non-recursive, making it easy to provide customized diagnostics, and to
keep them consistent with each other.
The new rules are a lot more complex and rely on template argument
deduction, substitutions, and they are recursive.
The approach taken here is to mostly rely on existing diagnostics, and
create a new instantiation context that keeps track of things.
So for example when a substitution failure occurs, we use the error
produced there unmodified, and just attach notes to it explaining that
it occurred in the context of partial ordering this template argument
against that template parameter.
This diverges from the old diagnostics, which would lead with an error
pointing to the template argument, explain the problem in subsequent
notes, and produce a final note pointing to the parameter.
Currently, clang rejects the following explicit specialization of `f`
due to the constraints not being equivalent:
```
template<typename T>
struct A
{
template<bool B>
void f() requires B;
};
template<>
template<bool B>
void A<int>::f() requires B { }
```
This happens because, in most cases, we do not set the flag indicating
whether a `RedeclarableTemplate` is an explicit specialization of a
member of an implicitly instantiated class template specialization until
_after_ we compare constraints for equivalence. This patch addresses the
issue (and a number of other issues) by:
- storing the flag indicating whether a declaration is a member
specialization on a per declaration basis, and
- significantly refactoring `Sema::getTemplateInstantiationArgs` so we
collect the right set of template argument in all cases.
Many of our declaration matching & constraint evaluation woes can be
traced back to bugs in `Sema::getTemplateInstantiationArgs`. This
change/refactor should fix a lot of them. It also paves the way for
fixing #101330 and #105462 per my suggestion in #102267 (which I have
implemented on top of this patch but will merge in a subsequent PR).
When checking deduction consistency, a substitution can be incomplete
such that only sugar parts refer to non-deduced template parameters.
This would not otherwise lead to an inconsistent deduction, so this
patch makes it so we canonicalize the types before substitution in order
to avoid that possibility, for now.
When we are able to produce substitution failure diagnostics for partial
ordering, we might want to improve the TemplateInstantiator so that it
does not fail in that case.
This fixes a regression on top of #100692, which was reported on the PR.
This was never released, so there are no release notes.
This extends default argument deduction to cover class templates as
well, applying only to partial ordering, adding to the provisional
wording introduced in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807.
This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template
template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the
negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by
default.
Given the following example:
```C++
template <class T1, class T2 = float> struct A;
template <class T3> struct B;
template <template <class T4> class TT1, class T5> struct B<TT1<T5>>; // #1
template <class T6, class T7> struct B<A<T6, T7>>; // #2
template struct B<A<int>>;
```
Prior to P0522, `#2` was picked. Afterwards, this became ambiguous. This
patch restores the pre-P0522 behavior, `#2` is picked again.
This applies to function template non-call partial ordering the same
provisional wording change applied in the call context: Don't perform
the consistency check on return type and parameters which didn't have
any template parameters deduced from.
Fixes regression introduced in #100692, which was reported on the PR.
When various `Sema*.h` and `Sema*.cpp` files were created, cleanup of
`Sema.h` includes and forward declarations was left for the later.
Now's the time. This commit touches `Sema.h` and Sema components:
1. Unused includes are removed.
2. Unused forward declarations are removed.
3. Missing includes are added (those files are largely IWYU-clean now).
4. Includes were converted into forward declarations where possible.
As this commit focuses on headers, all changes to `.cpp` files were
minimal, and were aiming at keeping everything buildable.
When clang is built with assertions, an otherwise silent (and seemingly
innocuous) assertion failure from `SemaConcept.cpp` is triggered by the
following program:
```cpp
struct S {
operator int();
template <typename T> operator T();
};
constexpr auto r = &S::operator int;
```
The function in question compares the "constrained-ness" of `S::operator
int` and `S::operator T<int>`; the template kind of the former is
`TK_NonTemplate`, whereas the template kind of the later is
`TK_FunctionTemplateSpecialization`. The later kind is not "expected" by
the function, thus the assertion-failure.
This is mostly a cleanups patch, with some hard to observe sugar
preservation improvements.
Except for the function template deduction changes which improve some
pre-existing diagnostics a little bit.
This patch avoids accessing an unset `std::optional<>`, which is a part
of the manifestation of #100095. The other part is an assertion failure
that is not addressed here. This is not a proper fix, but enables Clang
to continue working with more libc++ runtime checks enabled
(specifically, `-D_LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE=_LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE_FAST`,
which checks access to unset optionals among other things). A proper fix
is being discussed on #100095.
This patch moves documentation of `Sema` functions from `.cpp` files to `Sema.h` when there was no documentation in the latter, or it can be trivially subsumed. More complicated cases when there's less trivial divergence between documentation attached to declaration and the one attached to implementation are left for a later PR that would require review.
It appears that doxygen can find the documentation for a function defined out-of-line even if it's attached to an implementation, and not declaration. But other tools, e.g. clangd, are not as powerful. So this patch significantly improves autocompletion experience for (at least) clangd-based IDEs.
This patch improves the preservation of qualifiers and loss of type
sugar in TemplateNames.
This problem is analogous to https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374 and this
patch takes a very similar approach to that patch, except the impact
here is much lesser.
When a TemplateName was written bare, without qualifications, we
wouldn't produce a QualifiedTemplate which could be used to disambiguate
it from a Canonical TemplateName. This had effects in the TemplateName
printer, which had workarounds to deal with this, and wouldn't print the
TemplateName as-written in most situations.
There are also some related fixes to help preserve this type sugar along
the way into diagnostics, so that this patch can be properly tested.
- Fix dropping the template keyword.
- Fix type deduction to preserve sugar in TST TemplateNames.
This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template
template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the
negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by
default.
When performing template argument deduction, we extend the provisional
wording introduced in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807 so
it also covers deduction of class templates.
Given the following example:
```C++
template <class T1, class T2 = float> struct A;
template <class T3> struct B;
template <template <class T4> class TT1, class T5> struct B<TT1<T5>>; // #1
template <class T6, class T7> struct B<A<T6, T7>>; // #2
template struct B<A<int>>;
```
Prior to P0522, `#2` was picked. Afterwards, this became ambiguous. This
patch restores the pre-P0522 behavior, `#2` is picked again.
This has the beneficial side effect of making the following code valid:
```C++
template<class T, class U> struct A {};
A<int, float> v;
template<template<class> class TT> void f(TT<int>);
// OK: TT picks 'float' as the default argument for the second parameter.
void g() { f(v); }
```
---
Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not
been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't
provide a changelog entry here.
This is an enabler for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92855
This allows an NTTP default argument to be set as an arbitrary
TemplateArgument, not just an expression.
This allows template parameter packs to have default arguments in the
AST, even though the language proper doesn't support the syntax for it.
This allows NTTP default arguments to be other kinds of arguments, like
packs, integral constants, and such.
This is an enabler for a future patch.
This allows an type-parameter default argument to be set as an arbitrary
TemplateArgument, not just a type.
This allows template parameter packs to have default arguments in the
AST, even though the language proper doesn't support the syntax for it.
This will be used in a later patch which synthesizes template parameter
lists with arbitrary default arguments taken from template
specializations.
There are a few places we used SubsType, because we only had a type, now
we use SubstTemplateArgument.
SubstTemplateArgument was missing arguments for setting Instantiation
location and entity names.
Adding those is needed so we don't regress in diagnostics.
This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how
template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce
the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args`
by default.
When performing template argument deduction, a template template
parameter
containing no packs should be more specialized than one that does.
Given the following example:
```C++
template<class T2> struct A;
template<template<class ...T3s> class TT1, class T4> struct A<TT1<T4>>; // #1
template<template<class T5 > class TT2, class T6> struct A<TT2<T6>>; // #2
template<class T1> struct B;
template struct A<B<char>>;
```
Prior to P0522, candidate `#2` would be more specialized.
After P0522, neither is more specialized, so this becomes ambiguous.
With this change, `#2` becomes more specialized again,
maintaining compatibility with pre-P0522 implementations.
The problem is that in P0522, candidates are at least as specialized
when matching packs to fixed-size lists both ways, whereas before,
a fixed-size list is more specialized.
This patch keeps the original behavior when checking template arguments
outside deduction, but restores this aspect of pre-P0522 matching
during deduction.
---
Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has
not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry,
we don't provide a changelog entry here.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85192
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/84492
This patch implements the "IsDeducible" constraint where the template
arguments of the alias template can be deduced from the returned type of
the synthesized deduction guide, per C++ [over.match.class.deduct]p4. In
the implementation, we perform the deduction directly, which is more
efficient than the way specified in the standard.
Also update relevant CTAD tests which were incorrectly compiled due to
the missing constraint.
We do not deduce template arguments from the exception specification
when determining the primary template of a function template
specialization or when taking the address of a function template.
Therefore, this patch changes `isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs` such that we do
not mark template parameters in the exception specification as 'used'
during partial ordering (per [temp.deduct.partial]
p12) to prevent the following from being ambiguous:
```
template<typename T, typename U>
void f(U) noexcept(noexcept(T())); // #1
template<typename T>
void f(T*) noexcept; // #2
template<>
void f<int>(int*) noexcept; // currently ambiguous, selects #2 with this patch applied
```
Although there is no corresponding wording in the standard (see core issue filed here
https://github.com/cplusplus/CWG/issues/537), this seems
to be the intended behavior given the definition of _deduction
substitution loci_ in [temp.deduct.general] p7 (and EDG does the same thing).
When partial ordering alias templates against template template
parameters, allow pack expansions when the alias has a fixed-size
parameter list.
These expansions were generally disallowed by proposed resolution for
CWG1430.
By previously diagnosing these when checking template template
parameters, we would be too strict in trying to prevent any potential
invalid use.
This flows against the more general idea that template template
parameters are weakly typed, that we would rather allow an argument that
might be possibly misused, and only diagnose the actual misuses during
instantiation.
Since this interaction between P0522R0 and CWG1430 is also a
backwards-compat breaking change, we implement provisional wording to
allow these.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62529
Consider the following snippet from the discussion of CWG2847 on the core reflector:
```
template<typename T>
concept C = sizeof(T) <= sizeof(long);
template<typename T>
struct A
{
template<typename U>
void f(U) requires C<U>; // #1, declares a function template
void g() requires C<T>; // #2, declares a function
template<>
void f(char); // #3, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function
};
template<>
template<typename U>
void A<short>::f(U) requires C<U>; // #4, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template
template<>
template<>
void A<int>::f(int); // #5, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function
template<>
void A<long>::g(); // #6, an explicit specialization of a function that declares a function
```
A number of problems exist:
- Clang rejects `#4` because the trailing _requires-clause_ has `U`
substituted with the wrong template parameter depth when
`Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is called to determine whether it
matches the trailing _requires-clause_ of the implicitly instantiated
function template.
- Clang rejects `#5` because the function template specialization
instantiated from `A<int>::f` has a trailing _requires-clause_, but `#5`
does not (nor can it have one as it isn't a templated function).
- Clang rejects `#6` for the same reasons it rejects `#5`.
This patch resolves these issues by making the following changes:
- To fix `#4`, `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is passed
`FunctionTemplateDecl`s when comparing the trailing _requires-clauses_
of `#4` and the function template instantiated from `#1`.
- To fix `#5` and `#6`, the trailing _requires-clauses_ are not compared
for explicit specializations that declare functions.
In addition to these changes, `CheckMemberSpecialization` now considers
constraint satisfaction/constraint partial ordering when determining
which member function is specialized by an explicit specialization of a
member function for an implicit instantiation of a class template (we
previously would select the first function that has the same type as the
explicit specialization). With constraints taken under consideration, we
match EDG's behavior for these declarations.
[temp.deduct.general] p6 states:
> At certain points in the template argument deduction process it is
necessary to take a function type that makes use of template parameters
and replace those template parameters with the corresponding template
arguments.
This is done at the beginning of template argument deduction when any
explicitly specified template arguments are substituted into the
function type, and again at the end of template argument deduction when
any template arguments that were deduced or obtained from default
arguments are substituted.
[temp.deduct.general] p7 goes on to say:
> The _deduction substitution loci_ are
> - the function type outside of the _noexcept-specifier_,
> - the explicit-specifier,
> - the template parameter declarations, and
> - the template argument list of a partial specialization
>
> The substitution occurs in all types and expressions that are used in
the deduction substitution loci. [...]
Consider the following:
```cpp
struct A
{
static constexpr bool x = true;
};
template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U) noexcept(T::x); // #1
template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::y); // #2
template<>
void f<A>(A, int*) noexcept; // clang currently accepts, GCC and EDG reject
```
Currently, `Sema::SubstituteExplicitTemplateArguments` will substitute
into the _noexcept-specifier_ when deducing template arguments from a
function declaration or when deducing template arguments for taking the
address of a function template (and the substitution is treated as a
SFINAE context). In the above example, `#1` is selected as the primary
template because substitution of the explicit template arguments into
the _noexcept-specifier_ of `#2` failed, which resulted in the candidate
being ignored.
This behavior is incorrect ([temp.deduct.general] note 4 says as much), and
this patch corrects it by deferring all substitution into the
_noexcept-specifier_ until it is instantiated.
As part of the necessary changes to make this patch work, the
instantiation of the exception specification of a function template
specialization when taking the address of a function template is changed
to only occur for the function selected by overload resolution per
[except.spec] p13.1 (as opposed to being instantiated for every candidate).
This patch will finally allow us to mark C++17 support in clang as
complete.
In order to implement this as a DR and avoid breaking reasonable code
that worked before P0522, this patch implements a provisional resolution
for CWG2398: When deducing template template parameters against each other,
and the argument side names a template specialization, instead of just
deducing A, we deduce a synthesized template template parameter based
on A, but with it's parameters using the template specialization's arguments
as defaults.
The driver flag is deprecated with a warning.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/36505
Fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/68885
When build expression from a deduced argument whose kind is
`Declaration` and `NTTPType`(which declared as `decltype(auto)`) is
deduced as a reference type, `BuildExpressionFromDeclTemplateArgument`
just create a `DeclRef`. This is incorrect while we get type from the
expression since we can't get the original reference type from
`DeclRef`. Creating a `SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr` expression and make
the deduction correct. `Replacement` expression of
`SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr` just helps the deduction and may not be
same with the original expression.
Co-authored-by: huqizhi <836744285@qq.com>
We have two identical "DeduceTemplateArguments" implementations for
class and variable partial template specializations, this patch removes
the duplicated code.
HLSL constant sized array function parameters do not decay to pointers.
Instead constant sized array types are preserved as unique types for
overload resolution, template instantiation and name mangling.
This implements the change by adding a new `ArrayParameterType` which
represents a non-decaying `ConstantArrayType`. The new type behaves the
same as `ConstantArrayType` except that it does not decay to a pointer.
Values of `ConstantArrayType` in HLSL decay during overload resolution
via a new `HLSLArrayRValue` cast to `ArrayParameterType`.
`ArrayParamterType` values are passed indirectly by-value to functions
in IR generation resulting in callee generated memcpy instructions.
The behavior of HLSL function calls is documented in the [draft language
specification](https://microsoft.github.io/hlsl-specs/specs/hlsl.pdf)
under the Expr.Post.Call heading.
Additionally the design of this implementation approach is documented in
[Clang's
documentation](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/HLSL/FunctionCalls.html)
Resolves#70123
This patch replaces getAs<> with castAs<> to resolve potential static
analyzer bugs for
1. Dereferencing Proto1->param_type_begin(), which is known to be
nullptr
2. Dereferencing Proto2->param_type_begin(), which is known to be
nullptr
3. Dereferencing a pointer issue with nullptr Proto1 when calling
param_type_end()
4. Dereferencing a pointer issue with nullptr Proto2 when calling
param_type_end()
in clang::Sema::getMoreSpecializedTemplate().
Fixes#54051
This patch implements the C++20 feature -- CTAD for alias templates (P1814R0, specified in https://eel.is/c++draft/over.match.class.deduct#3). It is an initial patch:
- it cover major pieces, thus it works for most cases;
- the big missing piece is to implement the associated constraints (over.match.class.deduct#3.3) for the synthesized deduction guides, see the FIXME in code and tests;
- Some enhancements on the TreeTransform&TemplateInstantiator to allow performing instantiation on `BuildingDeductionGuides` mode;
There was a bug in Clang where it couldn't choose which overload
candidate was more specialized if it was comparing a member-function to
a non-member function. Previously, this was detected as an ambiguity,
now Clang chooses correctly.
This patch fixes the bug by fully implementing CWG2445 and moving the
template transformation described in `[temp.func.order]` paragraph 3
from `isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs()` to
`Sema::getMoreSpecializedTemplate()` so we have the transformed
parameter list during the whole comparison. Also, to be able to add the
correct type for the implicit object parameter
`Sema::getMoreSpecializedTemplate()` has new parameters for the object
type.
Fixes#74494, fixes#82509
Consider the following:
```
struct A {
static constexpr bool x = true;
};
template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U) noexcept(T::y); // #1, error: no member named 'y' in 'A'
template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::x); // #2
template<>
void f(A, int*) noexcept; // explicit specialization of #2
```
We currently instantiate the exception specification of all candidate
function template specializations when deducting template arguments for
an explicit specialization, which results in a error despite `#1` not
being selected by partial ordering as the most specialized template.
According to [except.spec] p13:
> An exception specification is considered to be needed when:
> - [...]
> - the exception specification is compared to that of another
declaration (e.g., an explicit specialization or an overriding virtual
function);
Assuming that "comparing declarations" means "determining whether the
declarations correspond and declare the same entity" (per [basic.scope.scope] p4 and
[basic.link] p11.1, respectively), the exception specification does _not_ need to be
instantiated until _after_ partial ordering, at which point we determine
whether the implicitly instantiated specialization and the explicit
specialization declare the same entity (the determination of whether two
functions/function templates correspond does not consider the exception
specifications).
This patch defers the instantiation of the exception specification until
a single function template specialization is selected via partial
ordering, matching the behavior of GCC, EDG, and
MSVC: see https://godbolt.org/z/Ebb6GTcWE.
