Adjust the XFAIL-ing tests to match consistent results from buildbot.
I'm going to work on differences between them and my local results
following this.
llvm-svn: 355774
Add a convenience 'expectedFailureNetBSD' decorator and mark all tests
currently failing on NetBSD with it. Also skip a few tests that hang
the test suite. This should establish a baseline for the test suite
and get us closer to enabling tests on buildbot. This will help us
catch regressions while we still have a lot of work to do to get tests
working.
It seems that there are also some flaky tests. I am going to address
them later on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58527
llvm-svn: 355320
Summary:
We were treating subprograms and inlined subroutines differently when
building the index. The difference was in which indexes were individual
tags inserted (subprograms went to all indexes, where as inlined
subroutines only into the basename and full name indexes).
This seems like an error, because an inlined subroutine can still
represent an C++ or an ObjC method. I don't see anything in the
subprogram branch which should not apply to an inlined subroutine, so I
propose to just treat them identically. This makes searching for an
inlined method behave the same way as for the apple index.
I write an assembly-based test because I did not want to depend on
particular clang inlining behavior (and because I wanted to see how hard
would it be).
Reviewers: clayborg, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: eraman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47368
llvm-svn: 333398
