As it is pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D63992,
before we get to pick canonical variant in middle-end
we should ensure best codegen in backend.
llvm-svn: 364930
The register bank for the destination of the sample argument copy was
wrong. We shouldn't be constraining each source to the result register
bank. Allow constraining the original register to the right size.
llvm-svn: 364928
Passing a vector type over the soft-float ABI involves it being split
into four GPRs, so the first thing that has to happen at the start of
the function is to recombine those into a vector register. The ABI
types all vectors as v2f64, so we need to support BUILD_VECTOR for
that type, which I do in this patch by allowing it to be expanded in
terms of INSERT_VECTOR_ELT, and writing an ISel pattern for that in
turn. Similarly, I provide a rule for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT so that a
returned vector can be marshalled back into GPRs.
While I'm here, I've also added ISD::UNDEF to the list of operations
we turn back on in `setAllExpand`, because I noticed that otherwise it
gets expanded into a BUILD_VECTOR with explicit zero inputs, leading
to pointless machine instructions to zero out a vector register that's
about to have every lane overwritten of in any case.
Reviewers: dmgreen, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63937
llvm-svn: 364910
If you compile with `-mattr=+mve` (enabling integer MVE instructions
but not floating-point ones), then the scalar FP //registers// exist
and it's legal to move things in and out of them, load and store them,
but it's not legal to do arithmetic on them.
In D60708, the calls to `addRegisterClass` in ARMISelLowering that
enable use of the scalar FP registers became conditionalised on
`Subtarget->hasFPRegs()` instead of `Subtarget->hasVFP2Base()`, so
that loads, stores and moves of those registers would work. But I
didn't realise that that would also enable all the operations on those
types by default.
Now, if the target doesn't have basic VFP, we follow up those
`addRegisterClass` calls by turning back off all the nontrivial
operations you can perform on f32 and f64. That causes several
knock-on failures, which are fixed by allowing the `VMOVDcc` and
`VMOVScc` instructions to be selected even if all you have is
`HasFPRegs`, and adjusting several checks for 'is this a double in a
single-precision-only world?' to the more general 'is this any FP type
we can't do arithmetic on?'. Between those, the whole of the
`float-ops.ll` and `fp16-instructions.ll` tests can now run in
MVE-without-FP mode and generate correct-looking code.
One odd side effect is that I had to relax the check lines in that
test so that they permit test functions like `add_f` to be generated
as tailcalls to software FP library functions, instead of ordinary
calls. Doing that is entirely legal, but the mystery is why this is
the first RUN line that's needed the relaxation: on the usual kind of
non-FP target, no tailcalls ever seem to be generated. Going by the
llc messages, I think `SoftenFloatResult` must be perturbing the code
generation in some way, but that's as much as I can guess.
Reviewers: dmgreen, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63938
llvm-svn: 364909
The code for duplicating instructions could sometimes try to emit copies
intended to deal with unconstrainable register classes to the tail block of the
original instruction, rather than before the newly cloned instruction in the
predecessor block.
This was exposed by GlobalISel on arm64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64049
llvm-svn: 364888
After implemented this hook, we will model the memory dependency in the scheduling dependency graph more precise,
and will have more opportunity to reorder the load/stores, as they didn't have the dependency at some condition
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63804
llvm-svn: 364886
For a given floating point load / store pair, if the load value isn't used by any other operations,
then consider transforming the pair to integer load / store operations if the target deems the transformation profitable.
And we can exploiting much more when there are other operation nodes with chain operand between the load/store pair
so long as we keep the chain ordering original. We only replace the register used to load/store from float to integer.
I only add testcase in ARM because the TLI.isDesirableToTransformToIntegerOp hook is only enabled in ARM target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60601
llvm-svn: 364883
If the requested source type an be used as a merge source type, create
a merge of merges. This avoids creating large, illegal extensions and
bit-ops directly to the result type.
llvm-svn: 364841
These instructions only read 64-bits of memory so we shouldn't
allow a full vector width load to be pattern matched in case it
is marked volatile.
Instead allow vzload or scalar_to_vector+load.
Also add a DAG combine to turn full vector loads into vzload when
used by one of these instructions if the load isn't volatile.
This fixes another case for PR42079
llvm-svn: 364838
Tests don't cover the masked input path since non-kernel arguments
aren't lowered yet.
Test is copied directly from the existing test, with 2 additions.
llvm-svn: 364833
Replace the brcond for the 2 cases that act as branches. For now
follow how the current system works, although I think we can
eventually get rid of the pseudos.
llvm-svn: 364832
This needs to be extended to s32, and expanded into cmp+select. This
is relying on the fact that widenScalar happens to leave the
instruction in place, but this isn't a guaranteed property of
LegalizerHelper.
llvm-svn: 364831
The function findPotentialBlockers may consider debug info instructions as
potential blockers and may stop searching for a store-load pair prematurely.
This patch corrects this and tests the cases where the store is separated
from the load by more than InspectionLimit debug instructions.
Patch by Chris Dawson.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62408
llvm-svn: 364829
The condition register bank must be scc or vcc so that a copy will be
inserted, which will be lowered to a compare.
Currently greedy unnecessarily forces using a VCC select.
llvm-svn: 364825
Summary:
ds_ordered_count can now simultaneously operate on up to 4 dwords
in a single instruction, which are taken from (and returned to)
lanes 0..3 of a single VGPR.
Change-Id: I19b6e7b0732b617c10a779a7f9c0303eec7dd276
Reviewers: mareko, arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63716
llvm-svn: 364815
Also works around tablegen defect in selecting add with unused carry,
but if we have to manually select GEP, might as well handle add
manually.
llvm-svn: 364806
There are several things broken, but at least emit the right thing for
gfx9.
The import of the pattern with the unused carry out seems to not
work. Needs a special class for clamp, because OperandWithDefaultOps
doesn't really work.
llvm-svn: 364804
Summary:
The stride should depend on the wave size, not the hardware generation.
Also, the 32_FLOAT format is 0x16, not 16; though that shouldn't be
relevant.
Change-Id: I088f93bf6708974d085d1c50967f119061da6dc6
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, mareko
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63808
llvm-svn: 364788
Summary:
SCRUB_LOOP_COMMENT_RE was introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D31285
This works for some loops.
However, we may generate lines with loop comments only.
And since we don't scrub leading white spaces, this will leave an empty
line there, and FileCheck will complain it.
eg: llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/PR35812-neg-cmpxchg.ll:27:15:
error: found empty check string with prefix 'CHECK:'
; CHECK-NEXT:
This prevented us from using the `update_llc_test_checks.py` for quite some cases.
We should still keep the comment token there, so that we can safely
scrub the loop comment without breaking FileCheck.
Reviewers: timshen, hfinkel, lebedev.ri, RKSimon
Subscribers: nemanjai, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63957
llvm-svn: 364775
