Summary:
This allows doing `memcmp(p, q, 7)` with 2 loads instead of a call to
memcmp.
This fixes part of PR45147.
Reviewers: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76133
First step toward making use of canLowerByDroppingEvenElements to match chains of PACKSS/PACKUS for compaction shuffles.
At the moment we still only match a single stage but the MatchPACK is now more general.
PTEST/TESTP sets EFLAGS as:
TESTZ: ZF = (Op0 & Op1) == 0
TESTC: CF = (~Op0 & Op1) == 0
TESTNZC: ZF == 0 && CF == 0
If we are inverting the 0'th operand of a PTEST/TESTP instruction we can adjust the comparisons to correct handle the inversion implicitly.
Additionally, for "TESTZ" (ZF) cases, the allones case, PTEST(X,-1) can be simplified to PTEST(X,X).
We can expand this for the TESTZ(X,~Y) pattern and also handle KTEST/KORTEST in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76984
Summary:
Make sure we do not assert on value types not being
simple in getFauxShuffleMask when analysing operations
such as "v8i16 = truncate v8i24".
Reviewers: RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77136
Summary: These were templated due to SelectionDAG using int masks for shuffles and IR using unsigned masks for shuffles. But now that D72467 has landed we have an int mask version of IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector. So just use int instead of a template
Reviewers: spatel, efriedma, RKSimon
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77183
Also add lowerShuffleWithPACK call to lowerV32I16Shuffle - shuffle combining was catching it but we avoid a lot of temporary shuffle creations if we catch it at lowering first.
Instead, represent the mask as out-of-line data in the instruction. This
should be more efficient in the places that currently use
getShuffleVector(), and paves the way for further changes to add new
shuffles for scalable vectors.
This doesn't change the syntax in textual IR. And I don't currently plan
to change the bitcode encoding in this patch, although we'll probably
need to do something once we extend shufflevector for scalable types.
I expect that once this is finished, we can then replace the raw "mask"
with something more appropriate for scalable vectors. Not sure exactly
what this looks like at the moment, but there are a few different ways
we could handle it. Maybe we could try to describe specific shuffles.
Or maybe we could define it in terms of a function to convert a fixed-length
array into an appropriate scalable vector, using a "step", or something
like that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72467
If canLowerByDroppingEvenElements indicates that the shuffle is a N:1 compaction pattern and the inputs are suitably sign/zero extended then we can use a chain of PACKSS/PACKUS to compact.
This helps avoid PSHUFB (and its mask load) for short shuffle chains, shuffle combining will still replace with a PSHUFB if we have enough shuffles as getFauxShuffleMask can recognise PACKSS/PACKUS chains.
Summary:
Otherwise PostRA list scheduler may reorder instruction, such as
schedule this
'''
pushq $0x8
pop %rbx
lea 0x2a0(%rsp),%r15
'''
to
'''
pushq $0x8
lea 0x2a0(%rsp),%r15
pop %rbx
'''
by mistake. The patch is to prevent this to happen by making sure POP has
implicit use of SP.
Reviewers: craig.topper
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77031
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: jyknight, sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, jfb, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77059
If we are lowering to X86ISD::SHUF128 we are going to lose track of individual 128-bit lanes that are UNDEF, so if we can widen these to guarantee that they are sequential with their neighbour we should. This helps with later shuffle combines.
As explained on PR40720, EXTRACTF128 is always as good/better than VPERM2F128, and we can use the implicit zeroing of the upper half.
I've added some extra tests to vector-shuffle-combining-avx2.ll to make sure we don't lose coverage.
This was an inner helper function for the real matchShuffleAsByteRotate function, but it is more generic and is used directly for VALIGN lowering which doesn't work at the byte level.
Replace the explicit isAtom() || isSLM() test with the more general (and more specific) slowTwoMemOps() check to avoid the use of the PUSHrmm push from memory case.
This is actually very tricky to test in anything but quite complex code, but the atomic-idempotent.ll tests seem to be the most straightforward to use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76239
Generalizes D62014 (R_386_NONE/R_X86_64_NONE).
Unlike ARM (D76746) and AArch64 (D76754), we cannot delete FK_NONE from
getFixupKindSize because FK_NONE is still used by R_386_TLS_DESC_CALL/R_X86_64_TLSDESC_CALL.
This will cause the operation to be repeated in both a mask and another masked
or unmasked form. This can a wasted of execution resources.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60940
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jfb, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76925
Summary:
There is a tiny logic error of D75300, making branch is not
correctly aligned with option -x86-pad-max-prefix-size
Reviewers: reames, MaskRay, craig.topper, LuoYuanke, jyknight
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, annita.zhang
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76285
These transforms rely on a vector reduction flag on the SDNode
set by SelectionDAGBuilder. This flag exists because SelectionDAG
can't see across basic blocks so SelectionDAGBuilder is looking
across and saving the info. X86 is the only target that uses this
flag currently. By removing the X86 code we can remove the flag
and the SelectionDAGBuilder code.
This pass adds a dedicated IR pass for X86 that looks across the
blocks and transforms the IR into a form that the X86 SelectionDAG
can finish.
An advantage of this new approach is that we can enhance it to
shrink the phi nodes and final reduction tree based on the zeroes
that we need to concatenate to bring the partially reduced
reduction back up to the original width.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76649
We can improve computeKnownBits results by avoiding excess bitcasts.
For this pattern we were doing:
(v16i8 PACKUS(v8i16 BITCAST(v16i8 AND(V1, MASK)), v8i16 BITCAST(v16i8 AND(V2, MASK))))
By performing the MASK/AND with a v8i16 type and bitcasting V1/V2 directly we can help computeKnownBits see that the mask is clearing the upper bits and allows shuffle combining to peek through later on.
This will be necessary to extend rG9d1721ce3926 to AVX2+ targets in a future patch.
As discussed on PR31443, we should be trying to use PACKUS for binary truncation patterns to reduce the number of shuffles.
The plan is to support AVX2+ targets once we've worked around PR45315 - we fail to peek through a VBROADCAST_LOAD mask to recognise zero upper bits in a PACKUS pattern.
We should also be able to add support for v8i16 and possibly 256/512-bit vectors as well.
```
// llvm-objdump -d output (before)
400000: e8 0b 00 00 00 callq 11
400005: e8 0b 00 00 00 callq 11
// llvm-objdump -d output (after)
400000: e8 0b 00 00 00 callq 0x400010
400005: e8 0b 00 00 00 callq 0x400015
// GNU objdump -d. The lack of 0x is not ideal because the result cannot be re-assembled
400000: e8 0b 00 00 00 callq 400010
400005: e8 0b 00 00 00 callq 400015
```
In llvm-objdump, we pass the address of the next MCInst. Ideally we
should just thread the address of the current address, unfortunately we
cannot call X86MCCodeEmitter::encodeInstruction (X86MCCodeEmitter
requires MCInstrInfo and MCContext) to get the length of the MCInst.
MCInstPrinter::printInst has other callers (e.g llvm-mc -filetype=asm, llvm-mca) which set Address to 0.
They leave MCInstPrinter::PrintBranchImmAsAddress as false and this change is a no-op for them.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76580
Follow-up of D72172 and D72180
This patch passes `uint64_t Address` to print methods of PC-relative
operands so that subsequent target specific patches can change
`*InstPrinter::print{Operand,PCRelImm,...}` to customize the output.
Add MCInstPrinter::PrintBranchImmAsAddress which is set to true by
llvm-objdump.
```
// Current llvm-objdump -d output
aarch64: 20000: bl #0
ppc: 20000: bl .+4
x86: 20000: callq 0
// Ideal output
aarch64: 20000: bl 0x20000
ppc: 20000: bl 0x20004
x86: 20000: callq 0x20005
// GNU objdump -d. The lack of 0x is not ideal because the result cannot be re-assembled
aarch64: 20000: bl 20000
ppc: 20000: bl 0x20004
x86: 20000: callq 20005
```
In `lib/Target/X86/X86GenAsmWriter1.inc` (generated by `llvm-tblgen -gen-asm-writer`):
```
case 12:
// CALL64pcrel32, CALLpcrel16, CALLpcrel32, EH_SjLj_Setup, JCXZ, JECXZ, J...
- printPCRelImm(MI, 0, O);
+ printPCRelImm(MI, Address, 0, O);
return;
```
Some targets have 2 `printOperand` overloads, one without `Address` and
one with `Address`. They should annotate derived `Operand` properly with
`let OperandType = "OPERAND_PCREL"`.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76574
As long we extract from a source vector with smaller elements and we zero-extend the element in the final shuffle mask then we can safely peek through truncations and any/zero-extensions to find the source extraction.
