I'm still getting linux CI bot failures for this test. It's not
critical, and it depends on a failure mode that is true on Darwin
but I was always gambling that it might fail in the same way on
other systems.
I hardcoded nearly a UINT64_MAX number in this test case,
and python is not able to convert it to a long on some
platforms. Use sys.maxsize instead; this also would have
failed if the testsuite was run on a 32-bit system.
Add a check for a null destination buffer in SBProcess::ReadMemory,
and return an error if that happens. If a Python SB API script
tries to allocate a huge amount of memory, the malloc done by the
intermediate layers will fail and will hand a null pointer to
ReadMemory. lldb will eventually crash trying to write in to that
buffer.
Also add a test that tries to allocate an impossibly large amount
of memory, and hopefully should result in a failed malloc and hitting
this error codepath.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143012
rdar://104846609
This patch introduces a new `GetScriptedImplementation` method to the
SBProcess class in the SBAPI. It will allow users of Scripted Processes to
fetch the scripted implementation object from to script interpreter to be
able to interact with it directly (without having to go through lldb).
This allows to user to perform action that are not specified in the
scripted process interface, like calling un-specified methods, but also
to enrich the implementation, by passing it complex objects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143236
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).
* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616
This change adds AllocateMemory and DeallocateMemory methods to the SBProcess
API, so that clients can allocate and deallocate memory blocks within the
process being debugged (for storing JIT-compiled code or other uses).
(I am developing a debugger + REPL using the API; it will need to store
JIT-compiled code within the target.)
Reviewed By: clayborg, jingham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105389
This is another step towards implementing the equivalent of
`platform process list` and related functionality.
`uint32_t` is used for the argument count and index despite the
underlying value being `size_t` to be consistent with other
index-based access to arguments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103675
This is present when doing a `platform process list` and is
tracked by the underlying code. To do something like the
process list via the SB API in the future, this must be
exposed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103375
There is a .categories file in the python_api directory that makes all nested tests
belong to the category "pyapi". The decorator is unnecessary for these tests.
Convert `assertTrue(a == b)` to `assertEqual(a, b)` to produce better failure messages.
These were mostly done via regex search & replace, with some manual fixes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95813
This skips some tests that pass with active replay (which doesn't check
the output) but fail with passive replay. Valid reasons for this
include:
- Checking the output of the process (which doesn't run during replay),
- Checking files that cannot be captured in the VFS (non-existing or
unreadable files or files that are removed during test),
Unfortunately there's no good way to mark a test as supported for active
replay but unsupported for passive replay because the number and order
of API calls needs to be identical during capture and replay. I don't
think this is a huge loss however.
Summary:
Around a third of our test sources have LLVM license headers. This patch removes those headers from all test
sources and also fixes any tests that depended on the length of the license header.
The reasons for this are:
* A few tests verify line numbers and will start failing if the number of lines in the LLVM license header changes. Once I landed my patch for valid SourceLocations in debug info we will probably have even more tests that verify line numbers.
* No other LLVM project is putting license headers in its test files to my knowledge.
* They make the test sources much more verbose than they have to be. Several tests have longer license headers than the actual test source.
For the record, the following tests had their line numbers changed to pass with the removal of the license header:
lldb-api :: functionalities/breakpoint/breakpoint_by_line_and_column/TestBreakpointByLineAndColumn.py
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestGDBRemoteRepro.test
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestMultipleTargets.test
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestReuseDirectory.test
lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook-threads.test
lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook.test
lldb-api :: lang/objc/exceptions/TestObjCExceptions.py
Reviewers: #lldb, espindola, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: emaste, aprantl, arphaman, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74839
Summary: Moves lldbsuite tests to lldb/test/API.
This is a largely mechanical change, moved with the following steps:
```
rm lldb/test/API/testcases
mkdir -p lldb/test/API/{test_runner/test,tools/lldb-{server,vscode}}
mv lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/test_runner/test lldb/test/API/test_runner
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/* -maxdepth 0 -type d | egrep -v "make|plugins|test_runner|tools"); do mv $d lldb/test/API; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-vscode -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | grep -v ".py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-vscode; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | egrep -v "gdbremote_testcase.py|lldbgdbserverutils.py|socket_packet_pump.py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server; done
```
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/__init__.py and lldb/test/API/lit.cfg.py were also updated with the new directory structure.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71151
