Instead of popping them and then immediately throwing them away, we can
just filter out globals and items in different scopes before adding them
to WorkList. Shouldn't change anything but keep the queue smaller.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113864
It was being used occasionally already, and using it on the constructor
and getDbgEntityID has obvious type safety benefits.
Also use llvm_unreachable in the switch as usual, but since only these
two values are used in constructor calls I think it's still NFC.
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113862
There are multiple possible ways to represent the X - urem X, Y pattern. SCEV was not canonicalizing, and thus, depending on which you analyzed, you could get different results. The sub representation appears to produce strictly inferior results in practice, so I decided to canonicalize to the Y * X/Y version.
The motivation here is that runtime unroll produces the sub X - (and X, Y-1) pattern when Y is a power of two. SCEV is thus unable to recognize that an unrolled loop exits because we don't figure out that the new unrolled step evenly divides the trip count of the unrolled loop. After instcombine runs, we convert the the andn form which SCEV recognizes, so essentially, this is just fixing a nasty pass ordering dependency.
The ARM loop hardware interaction in the test diff is opague to me, but the comments in the review from others knowledge of the infrastructure appear to indicate these are improvements in loop recognition, not regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114018
This patch adds PPC back end optimization to analyze the arguments of a
conditional trap instruction to execute one of the following:
1. Delete it if never trap
2. Replace it if always trap
3. Otherwise keep it
Reviewed By: nemanjai, amyk, PowerPC
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111434
std::hash returns a 64bit hash code while previously we were using only lower 32 bits which caused hash collision for large workloads.
Reviewed By: wenlei, wlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113688
This allows for using SFINAE partial specialization for DenseMapInfo.
In MLIR, this is particularly useful as it will allow for defining partial
specializations that support all Attribute, Op, and Type classes without
needing to specialize DenseMapInfo for each individual class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113641
3d1d8c767be5537eb5510ee0522e2f3475fe7c04 made
DWARFExpression::iterator's Operation member `mutable`. After a few prep
commits, the iterator can instead be made a `const` iterator since no
caller can change the Operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113958
The only caller of Operation::verify() is DWARFExpression::verify(),
which iterates past the (ephemeral) Operation immediately after.
- Stop setting Operation::Error because the mutation will never be
observed.
- Change verify() to a static function to be sure all callers are
updated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113957
For now I've just changed the code to only return true from
AArch64ISelLowering::hasAndNot if the vector is fixed-length.
Once we have the right patterns or DAG combines to use bic/bif
we can also enable this for SVE.
Test added here:
CodeGen/AArch64/vselect-constants.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113994
Global ctor/dtor can be an empty array, which is a Constant not a
ConstantArray. The cast<ConstantArray> therefore asserts / crashes.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113800
No need to count the final shuffle cost for the constants, gathering of
the constants is just a constant vector + extra inserts, if required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113770
Need to adjust the types of GEPs indices when building the tree
entries/operands. Otherwise some of the nodes might differ and
vectorizer is unable to correctly find them and count their cost.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113792
rGf39978b84f1d3a1da6c32db48f64c8daae64b3ad led to and/or exposed
an issue with IndVarSimplification for a loop where a i32 phi node is
no longer replaced by a widened (i64) phi node, because the SCEVs of a
sign-extend no longer folded the same way. I'm unsure how to properly
explain this because it's all rather complicated, but in short: SCEVs
don't fold as nicely as they used to and this caused a difference.
While investigating this, I found that IndVarSimplify can actually
optimise the case in the way we want to if it chooses the widened IV to
be 'signed' (the i32 IV is both sign and zero-extended). Oddly enough,
there is some level of indeterminism in the way the algorithm works,
it just picks the sign of the 'first' zext/sext user, where the order of
the users-iterator is not guaranteed to be the same on each invocation
of the pass (e.g. shown by first running loop-rotate, which puts the
users in a different order).
While I think the fix is valid in the sense that consistently picking
_any_ order is better than having an nondeterministic order, I can
use a bit of advice from people more familiar in this area of the
code-base.
For example, I'm not sure if this fix is hiding another issue where the
IndVarSimplify pass could actually draw the same conclusions (i.e. that
it only needs an i64 phi node) if it does a bit more work, regardless
of whether it chooses the induction variable to be signed or unsigned.
I'm also not sure if choosing signed is better than unsigned, or whether
that just happens to be beneficial only in this individual case.
Any feedback would be much appreciated!
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112573
So far, applying loop guard information has been restricted to
SCEVUnknown. In a few cases, like PR40961 and PR52464, this leads to
SCEV failing to determine tight upper bounds for the backedge taken
count.
This patch adjusts SCEVLoopGuardRewriter and applyLoopGuards to support
re-writing ZExt expressions.
This is a first step towards fixing PR40961 and PR52464.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113577
InstCombine AArch64 LD1/ST1 to llvm.masked.load/llvm.masked.store
and LD1/ST1 to load/store when a ptrue all predicate pattern operand
is present.
This allows existing IR optimizations such as dead-load removal to
occur.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113489
Simplify rvv instructions that use eew in their mnemonic and encoding with foreach. And fix a scheduling bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113453
STATEPOINT instruction behavior is similar to call instruction.
In aarch64 BL instruction implicitly define lr register, so
STATEPOINT instruction should do the same.
However STATEPOINT is a general pseudo instruction and I could not find
a way to override list of implicit defs for specific target.
So this patch post processes inserting STATEPOINT instruction by
adding implisit dead def for lr.
Reviewers: reames, loicottet, ostannard
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: danilaml, hiraditya, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, yrouban
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111114
This is a first attempt at a constant value consecutive store merging pass,
a counterpart to the DAGCombiner's store merging optimization.
The high level goals of this pass:
* Have a simple and efficient algorithm. As close to linear time as we can get.
Thus, prioritizing scalability of the algorithm over merging every corner case
we can find. The DAGCombiner's store merging code has been the source of
compile time and complexity issues in the past and I wanted to avoid that.
* Don't introduce any new data structures for ordering memory operations. In MIR,
we don't have the concept of chains like we do in the DAG, and the instruction
order is stricter than enforcing ordering with graph edges. Although I
considered adding something similar, I couldn't justify the overhead.
The pass is current split into 3 main parts. The main store merging code focuses
on identifying candidate stores and managing the candidate group that's under
consideration for merging. Analyzing addressing of stores is a potentially
complex part and for now there's just a basic implementation to identify easy
cases. Finally, the other main bit of complexity is the alias analysis, which
tries to follow the same logic as the DAG's AA.
Currently this implementation only supports merging of constant stores. Stores
of arbitrary variables are technically possible with a very small change, but
the DAG chooses not to do this. Doing so here makes most code worse since
there's extra overhead in merging values into wider registers.
On AArch64 -Os, this optimization results in very minor savings on CTMark.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109131
Fixes PR#48678. `X86TargetLowering::getRegForInlineAsmConstraint()` can adjust the register class to match the type, e.g. change `VR128X` to `VR256X` if the type needs 256 bits. However, the function currently returns the unadjusted register and the adjusted register class, e.g. `xmm15` and `VR256X`, which then causes an assertion failure later because the register class does not contain that register. This patch fixes this behavior.
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113834
A future change will add SCC liveness checks. Since we are still
relying on forward register scavenging, add dead flags to avoid
spuriously detecting SCC as live.
Add `const` to DWARFExpression::Operation's accessors and make
Operation::extract() private, since it's only used by the friend class
DWARFExpression::iterator.
It's possible that the mask is already a NOT. At least if InstCombine
hasn't canonicalized the input. In that case we will form an ANDN with
X instead of with Y. So we don't need to worry about Y being a constant.
We might need to check that X isn't a constant instead, but we don't
have a test case for that yet.
This fixes a size regression found when trying to enable this combine
for RISCV in D113937.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113948
Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all
analyses for all functions in the SCC to be invalidated. With this
change, we now manually invalidate analyses for functions we modify,
then let the pass manager know that all function analyses should be
preserved since we've already handled function analysis invalidation.
So far this only touches the inliner, argpromotion, function-attrs, and
updateCGAndAnalysisManager(), since they are the most used.
This is part of an effort to investigate running the function
simplification pipeline less on functions we visit multiple times in the
inliner pipeline.
However, this causes major memory regressions especially on larger IR.
To counteract this, turn on the option to eagerly invalidate function
analyses. This invalidates analyses on functions immediately after
they're processed in a module or scc to function adaptor for specific
parts of the pipeline.
Within an SCC, if a pass only modifies one function, other functions in
the SCC do not have their analyses invalidated, so in later function
passes in the SCC pass manager the analyses may still be cached. It is
only after the function passes that the eager invalidation takes effect.
For the default pipelines this makes sense because the inliner pipeline
runs the function simplification pipeline after all other SCC passes
(except CoroSplit which doesn't request any analyses).
Overall this has mostly positive effects on compile time and positive effects on memory usage.
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=instructionshttps://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=max-rss
D113196 shows that we slightly regressed compile times in exchange for
some memory improvements when turning on eager invalidation. D100917
shows that we slightly improved compile times in exchange for major
memory regressions in some cases when invalidating less in SCC passes.
Turning these on at the same time keeps the memory improvements while
keeping compile times neutral/slightly positive.
Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304
Fix `splitBlock` so that it can handle the case when the block being
split has symbols span across the split boundary. This is an error
case in general but for EHFrame splitting on macho platforms, there is an
anonymous symbol that marks the entire block. Current implementation
will leave a symbol that is out of bound of the underlying block. Fix
the problem by dropping such symbols when the block is split.
Reviewed By: lhames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113912
This patch adds support for symbolic displacements, e.g. like 'lg %r0,
sym(%r1)', which is done using relocations. This is needed to compile the
kernel without disabling the integrated assembler.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113341
This change is mostly about getting rid of some "uninteresting" cases in a follow on deeper heuristic change. If anyone sees actually interesting code differences out of this, please let me know. I'm not expecting this to have much impact at all.
Case 1 - With the single deoptimize non-latch exit, we can't have two exiting blocks sharing an exit block. We can only hit this with a poorly documented debug flag.
Case 2 - Why should we treat epilog cases differently from prolog cases? Or to say it differently, why should starting with a constant control whether a multiple exit loop gets unrolled?
Sorry for the lack of tests here. These are both *exceedingly* narrow cases in practice, and after a while trying, I couldn't come up with a test which did anything "useful" as opposed to simply exercise a random combination of force flags. Note that the legality cases for each are already exercised with force flags.
