These `M` parameters shadow the `M` member in `VerifierSupport`, and
both always refer to the same module. Eliminate the redundant parameters
and always use the member.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106474
The patch in D112349 added a previously nonexistant restriction on ifunc
resolvers that they MUST be defintions. However, the function
multiversioning depends on being able to resolve these resolvers at
link-time, so this additional restriction was breaking.
Verify that the resolver exists, that it is a defined
Function, and that its return type matches the ifunc's
type. Add corresponding check to BitcodeReader, change
clang to emit the correct type, and fix tests to comply.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112349
Otherwise, ODRUniquing would map some member method/variable MDNodes
to have enum type DIScope, resulting in invalid debug info and bad
DWARF.
- Add a Verifier check that when a 'scope:' operand is an ODR type that is not an enum.
- Makes ODRUniquing apply to only ODR types with the same tag so that the debuginfo/DWARF is well-formed.
Reviewed By: probinson, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111770
Stop using APInt constructors and methods that were soft-deprecated in
D109483. This fixes all the uses I found in llvm, except for the APInt
unit tests which should still test the deprecated methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110807
ParameterABIAttributes functions work with unsigned integers as the index, so having the getter be signed makes no sense. Additionally, for this reason, the loop vars that were signed were changed to unsigned too.
Reviewed By: jeroen.dobbelaere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110344
This patch emits DW_TAG_namelist and DW_TAG_namelist_item for fortran
namelist variables. DICompositeType is extended to support this fortran
feature.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108553
Some buildbots fail with:
> C:\a\llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win\llvm-project\llvm\lib\IR\Verifier.cpp(4352): error C2678: binary '==': no operator found which takes a left-hand operand of type 'const llvm::MDOperand' (or there is no acceptable conversion)
Possibly the explicit MDOperand to Metadata* conversion will help?
integer 0/1 for the operand of bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall"
https://reviews.llvm.org/D102996 changes the operand of bundle
"clang.arc.attachedcall". This patch makes changes to llvm that are
needed to handle the new IR.
This should make it easier to understand what the IR is doing and also
simplify some of the passes as they no longer have to translate the
integer values to the runtime functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103000
This patch emits DW_TAG_namelist and DW_TAG_namelist_item for fortran
namelist variables. DICompositeType is extended to support this fortran
feature.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108553
The COFF specific `DataReferencedByCode` complexity (D103372 D103717) is due to
a link.exe limitation: an external symbol in IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ASSOCIATIVE is
not really dropped, so it can cause duplicate definition error.
SwitchInst should have a void result type.
Add a check to the verifier to catch this error.
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108084
For musttail calls, ABI attributes between the function and the
musttail call must match. The current check discards the type of
type attributes like byval, which means that it will consider
byval(i32) and byval(i64) (or similar) as compatible.
I assume this is a leftover from before these attributes had a
type argument. Ran into this while trying to tighten an assertion
in AttrBuilder.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105841
Use the elementtype attribute introduced in D105407 for the
llvm.preserve.array/struct.index intrinsics. It carries the
element type of the GEP these intrinsics effectively encode.
This patch:
* Adds a verifier check that the attribute is required.
* Adds it in the IRBuilder methods for these intrinsics.
* Autoupgrades old bitcode without the attribute.
* Updates the lowering code to use the attribute rather than
the pointer element type.
* Updates lots of tests to specify the attribute.
* Adds -force-opaque-pointers to the intrinsic-array.ll test
to demonstrate they work now.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D106184
As suggested on D105733, this adds a verifier rule that calls to
intrinsics must match the signature of the intrinsic.
Without opaque pointers this is automatically enforced for all
calls, because the pointer types need to match. If the signatures
don't match, a pointer bitcast has to be inserted. For intrinsics
in particular, such bitcasts are not legal, because the address of
intrinsics cannot be taken.
With opaque pointers, there are no more pointer bitcasts, so it's
generally possible for the call and the callee signature to differ.
However, for intrinsics we still want to enforce that the signatures
must match, the same as was done before through the address taken
check.
We can't enforce this more generally for non-intrinsics, because
calls with mismatched signatures at the very least can legally
occur in unreachable code, and might also be valid in some other
cases, depending on how exactly the signatures differ.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106013
Intrinsics can only be called directly, taking their address is not
legal. This is currently only enforced for intrinsics that have an
ID, rather than all intrinsics. Adjust the check to cover all
intrinsics.
This came up in D106013.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106095
This implements the elementtype attribute specified in D105407. It
just adds the attribute and the specified verifier rules, but
doesn't yet make use of it anywhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106008
A couple of attributes had explicit checks for incompatibility
with pointer types. However, this is already handled generically
by the typeIncompatible() check. We can drop these after adding
SwiftError to typeIncompatible().
However, the previous implementation of the check prints out all
attributes that are incompatible with a given type, even though
those attributes aren't actually used. This has the annoying
result that the error message changes every time a new attribute
is added to the list. Improve this by explicitly finding which
attribute isn't compatible and printing just that.
Continuing from D105763, this allows placing certain properties
about attributes in the TableGen definition. In particular, we
store whether an attribute applies to fn/param/ret (or a combination
thereof). This information is used by the Verifier, as well as the
ForceFunctionAttrs pass. I also plan to use this in LLParser,
which also duplicates info on which attributes are valid where.
This keeps metadata about attributes in one place, and makes it
more likely that it stays in sync, rather than in various
functions spread across the codebase.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105780
This is now the same as isIntAttrKind(), so use that instead, as
it does not require manual maintenance. The naming is also more
accurate in that both int and type attributes have an argument,
but this method was only targeting int attributes.
I initially wanted to tighten the AttrBuilder assertion, but we
have some in-tree uses that would violate it.
the call's return type is void
Instead of trying hard to prevent global optimization passes such as
deadargelim from changing the return type to void, just ignore the
bundle if the return type is void. clang currently emits calls to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which consumes the function call result,
immediately after the function call to prevent changes to the return
type, but optimization passes can delete the call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use if the function call doesn't return, which
enables deadargelim to change the return type.
rdar://76671438
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103062
Add support for call of opaque pointer, currently only possible for
indirect calls.
This requires a bit of special casing in LLParser, as calls do not
specify the callee operand type explicitly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104740
With regards to overrunning, the langref (llvm/docs/LangRef.rst)
specifies:
(llvm.experimental.vector.insert)
Elements ``idx`` through (``idx`` + num_elements(``subvec``) - 1)
must be valid ``vec`` indices. If this condition cannot be determined
statically but is false at runtime, then the result vector is
undefined.
(llvm.experimental.vector.extract)
Elements ``idx`` through (``idx`` + num_elements(result_type) - 1)
must be valid vector indices. If this condition cannot be determined
statically but is false at runtime, then the result vector is
undefined.
For the non-mixed cases (e.g. inserting/extracting a scalable into/from
another scalable, or inserting/extracting a fixed into/from another
fixed), it is possible to statically check whether or not the above
conditions are met. This was previously missing from the verifier, and
if the conditions were found to be false, the result of the
insertion/extraction would be replaced with an undef.
With regards to invalid indices, the langref (llvm/docs/LangRef.rst)
specifies:
(llvm.experimental.vector.insert)
``idx`` represents the starting element number at which ``subvec``
will be inserted. ``idx`` must be a constant multiple of
``subvec``'s known minimum vector length.
(llvm.experimental.vector.extract)
The ``idx`` specifies the starting element number within ``vec``
from which a subvector is extracted. ``idx`` must be a constant
multiple of the known-minimum vector length of the result type.
Similarly, these conditions were not previously enforced in the
verifier. In some circumstances, invalid indices were permitted
silently, and in other circumstances, an undef was spawned where a
verifier error would have been preferred.
This commit adds verifier checks to enforce the constraints above.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104468
Verifying opaque pointer as function parameter when using with `byval`, `byref`,
`inalloca`, `preallocated`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104309
I don't like landing this change, but it's an acknowledgement of a practical reality. Despite not having well specified semantics for inttoptr and ptrtoint involving non-integral pointer types, they are used in practice. Here's a quick summary of the current pragmatic reality:
* I happen to know that the main external user of non-integral pointers has effectively disabled the verifier rules.
* RS4GC (the lowering pass for abstract GC machine model which is the key motivation for non-integral pointers), even supports them. We just have all the tests using an integral pointer space to let the verifier run.
* Certain idioms (such as alignment checks for alignment N, where any relocation is guaranteed to be N byte aligned) are fine in practice.
* As implemented, inttoptr/ptrtoint are CSEd and are not control dependent. This means that any code which is intending to check a particular bit pattern at site of use must be wrapped in an intrinsic or external function call.
This change allows them in the Verifier, and updates the LangRef to specific them as implementation dependent. This allows us to acknowledge current reality while still leaving ourselves room to punt on figuring out "good" semantics until the future.
SwiftTailCC has a different set of requirements than the C calling convention
for a tail call. The exact argument sequence doesn't have to match, but fewer
ABI-affecting attributes are allowed.
Also make sure the musttail diagnostic triggers if a musttail call isn't
actually a tail call.
There can be a need for some optimizations to get (base, offset)
for any GC pointer. The base can be calculated by generating
needed instructions as it is done by the
RewriteStatepointsForGC::findBasePointer() function. The offset
can be calculated in the same way. Though to not expose the base
calculation and to make the offset calculation as simple as
ptrtoint(derived_ptr) - ptrtoint(base_ptr), which is illegal
outside RS4GC, this patch introduces 2 intrinsics:
@llvm.experimental.gc.get.pointer.base(%derived_ptr)
@llvm.experimental.gc.get.pointer.offset(%derived_ptr)
These intrinsics are inlined by RS4GC along with generation of
statepoint sequences.
With these new intrinsics the GC parseable lowering for atomic
memcpy intrinsics (6ec2c5e402a724ba99bce82a9cac7a3006d660f4)
could be implemented as a separate pass.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100445
We really ought to support no_sanitize("coverage") in line with other
sanitizers. This came up again in discussions on the Linux-kernel
mailing lists, because we currently do workarounds using objtool to
remove coverage instrumentation. Since that support is only on x86, to
continue support coverage instrumentation on other architectures, we
must support selectively disabling coverage instrumentation via function
attributes.
Unfortunately, for SanitizeCoverage, it has not been implemented as a
sanitizer via fsanitize= and associated options in Sanitizers.def, but
rolls its own option fsanitize-coverage. This meant that we never got
"automatic" no_sanitize attribute support.
Implement no_sanitize attribute support by special-casing the string
"coverage" in the NoSanitizeAttr implementation. To keep the feature as
unintrusive to existing IR generation as possible, define a new negative
function attribute NoSanitizeCoverage to propagate the information
through to the instrumentation pass.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49035
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102772
These checks already exist as asserts when creating the corresponding
instruction. Anybody creating these instructions already need to take
care to not break these checks.
Move the checks for success/failure ordering in cmpxchg from the
verifier to the LLParser and BitcodeReader plus an assert.
Add some tests for cmpxchg ordering. The .bc files are created from the
.ll files with an llvm-as with these checks disabled.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102803
In the WebAssembly target, we would like to allow alloca in two address
spaces. The alloca instruction already has an address space argument,
but the verifier asserts that the address space of an alloca is the
default alloca address space from the datalayout. This patch removes
this restriction. Targets that would like to impose additional
restrictions should do so via target-specific verification passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101045
FullTy is only necessary when we need to figure out what type an
instruction works with given a pointer's pointee type. However, we just
end up using the value operand's type, so FullTy isn't necessary.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102788
Don't check that types match when the pointer operand is an opaque
pointer.
I would separate the Assembler and Verifier changes, but
verify-uselistorder in the Assembler test ends up running the verifier.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102450
