13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Zinenko
b2b7efb96d [mlir] NFC: rename XDataFlowAnalysis to XForwardDataFlowAnalysis
This makes naming consisnt with XBackwardDataFlowAnalysis.

Reviewed By: Mogball, phisiart

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155930
2023-07-27 11:11:40 +00:00
Tres Popp
68f58812e3 [mlir] Move casting calls from methods to function calls
The MLIR classes Type/Attribute/Operation/Op/Value support
cast/dyn_cast/isa/dyn_cast_or_null functionality through llvm's doCast
functionality in addition to defining methods with the same name.
This change begins the migration of uses of the method to the
corresponding function call as has been decided as more consistent.

Note that there still exist classes that only define methods directly,
such as AffineExpr, and this does not include work currently to support
a functional cast/isa call.

Context:
- https://mlir.llvm.org/deprecation/ at "Use the free function variants
  for dyn_cast/cast/isa/…"
- Original discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/preferred-casting-style-going-forward/68443

Implementation:
This patch updates all remaining uses of the deprecated functionality in
mlir/. This was done with clang-tidy as described below and further
modifications to GPUBase.td and OpenMPOpsInterfaces.td.

Steps are described per line, as comments are removed by git:
0. Retrieve the change from the following to build clang-tidy with an
   additional check:
   main...tpopp:llvm-project:tidy-cast-check
1. Build clang-tidy
2. Run clang-tidy over your entire codebase while disabling all checks
   and enabling the one relevant one. Run on all header files also.
3. Delete .inc files that were also modified, so the next build rebuilds
   them to a pure state.

```
ninja -C $BUILD_DIR clang-tidy

run-clang-tidy -clang-tidy-binary=$BUILD_DIR/bin/clang-tidy -checks='-*,misc-cast-functions'\
               -header-filter=mlir/ mlir/* -fix

rm -rf $BUILD_DIR/tools/mlir/**/*.inc
```

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151542
2023-05-26 10:29:55 +02:00
Tres Popp
5550c82189 [mlir] Move casting calls from methods to function calls
The MLIR classes Type/Attribute/Operation/Op/Value support
cast/dyn_cast/isa/dyn_cast_or_null functionality through llvm's doCast
functionality in addition to defining methods with the same name.
This change begins the migration of uses of the method to the
corresponding function call as has been decided as more consistent.

Note that there still exist classes that only define methods directly,
such as AffineExpr, and this does not include work currently to support
a functional cast/isa call.

Caveats include:
- This clang-tidy script probably has more problems.
- This only touches C++ code, so nothing that is being generated.

Context:
- https://mlir.llvm.org/deprecation/ at "Use the free function variants
  for dyn_cast/cast/isa/…"
- Original discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/preferred-casting-style-going-forward/68443

Implementation:
This first patch was created with the following steps. The intention is
to only do automated changes at first, so I waste less time if it's
reverted, and so the first mass change is more clear as an example to
other teams that will need to follow similar steps.

Steps are described per line, as comments are removed by git:
0. Retrieve the change from the following to build clang-tidy with an
   additional check:
   https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare/main...tpopp:llvm-project:tidy-cast-check
1. Build clang-tidy
2. Run clang-tidy over your entire codebase while disabling all checks
   and enabling the one relevant one. Run on all header files also.
3. Delete .inc files that were also modified, so the next build rebuilds
   them to a pure state.
4. Some changes have been deleted for the following reasons:
   - Some files had a variable also named cast
   - Some files had not included a header file that defines the cast
     functions
   - Some files are definitions of the classes that have the casting
     methods, so the code still refers to the method instead of the
     function without adding a prefix or removing the method declaration
     at the same time.

```
ninja -C $BUILD_DIR clang-tidy

run-clang-tidy -clang-tidy-binary=$BUILD_DIR/bin/clang-tidy -checks='-*,misc-cast-functions'\
               -header-filter=mlir/ mlir/* -fix

rm -rf $BUILD_DIR/tools/mlir/**/*.inc

git restore mlir/lib/IR mlir/lib/Dialect/DLTI/DLTI.cpp\
            mlir/lib/Dialect/Complex/IR/ComplexDialect.cpp\
            mlir/lib/**/IR/\
            mlir/lib/Dialect/SparseTensor/Transforms/SparseVectorization.cpp\
            mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/Transforms/LowerVectorMultiReduction.cpp\
            mlir/test/lib/Dialect/Test/TestTypes.cpp\
            mlir/test/lib/Dialect/Transform/TestTransformDialectExtension.cpp\
            mlir/test/lib/Dialect/Test/TestAttributes.cpp\
            mlir/unittests/TableGen/EnumsGenTest.cpp\
            mlir/test/python/lib/PythonTestCAPI.cpp\
            mlir/include/mlir/IR/
```

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150123
2023-05-12 11:21:25 +02:00
jacquesguan
86c8ea9ac9 [mlir] Add check for value that might be null.
Because we are generating uninitialized value for no integer type and use `isUninitialized()` to judge if it is valid after https://reviews.llvm.org/rG93f081c896536112e1ca8133991d23cb1134793a, we should check the value before use `getValue` to get it.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59984.

Reviewed By: Mogball

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141661
2023-02-16 16:02:35 +08:00
Kazu Hirata
0a81ace004 [mlir] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)
This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<.  I'll post
a separate patch to remove #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-14 01:25:58 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
a1fe1f5f77 [mlir] Add #include <optional> (NFC)
This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-13 21:05:06 -08:00
jacquesguan
93f081c896 [mlir] Avoid crash of UnsignedWhenEquivalent for no integer type.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59617.

Reviewed By: Mogball

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141038
2023-01-10 10:05:02 +08:00
Ramkumar Ramachandra
22426110c5 mlir/tblgen: use std::optional in generation
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional. This patch changes the way mlir-tblgen generates .inc
files, and modifies tests and documentation appropriately. It is a "no
compromises" patch, and doesn't leave the user with an unpleasant mix of
llvm::Optional and std::optional.

A non-trivial change has been made to ControlFlowInterfaces to split one
constructor into two, relating to a build failure on Windows.

See also: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <r@artagnon.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138934
2022-12-17 11:13:26 +01:00
Zhixun Tan
47bf3e3812 [mlir][dataflow] Remove Lattice::isUninitialized().
Currently, for sparse analyses, we always store a `Optional<ValueT>` in each lattice element. When it's `None`, we consider the lattice element as `uninitialized`.

However:

* Not all lattices have an `uninitialized` state. For example, `Executable` and `PredecessorState` have default values so they are always initialized.

* In dense analyses, we don't have the concept of an `uninitialized` state.

Given these inconsistencies, this patch removes `Lattice::isUninitialized()`. Individual analysis states are now default-constructed. If the default state of an analysis can be considered as "uninitialized" then this analysis should implement the following logic:

* Special join rule: `join(uninitialized, any) == any`.

* Special bail out logic: if any of the input states is uninitialized, exit the transfer function early.

Depends On D132086

Reviewed By: Mogball

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132800
2022-09-08 08:46:22 -07:00
Zhixun Tan
de0ebc5263 [mlir][dataflow] Consolidate AbstractSparseLattice::markPessimisticFixpoint() and AbstractDenseLattice::reset() into Abstract{Sparse,Dense}DataFlowAnalysis::setToEntryState().
### Rationale

For a program point where we cannot reason about incoming dataflow (e.g. an argument of an entry block), the framework needs to initialize the state.

Currently, `AbstractSparseDataFlowAnalysis` initializes such state to the "pessimistic fixpoint", and `AbstractDenseDataFlowAnalysis` calls the state's `reset()` function.

However, entry states aren't necessarily the pessimistic fixpoint. Example: in reaching definition, the pessimistic fixpoint is `{all definitions}`, but the entry state is `{}`.

This awkwardness might be why the dense analysis API currently uses `reset()` instead of `markPessimisticFixpoint()`.

This patch consolidates entry point initialization into a single function `setToEntryState()`.

### API Location

Note that `setToEntryState()` is defined in the analysis rather than the lattice, so that we allow different analyses to use the same lattice but different entry states.

### Removal of the concept of optimistic/known value

The concept of optimistic/known value is too specific to SCCP.

Furthermore, the known value is not really used: In the current SCCP implementation, the known value (pessimistic fixpoint) is always `Attribute{}` (non-constant). This means there's no point storing a `knownValue` in each state.

If we do need to re-introduce optimistic/known value, we should put it in the SCCP analysis, not the sparse analysis API.

### Terminology

Please let me know if "entry state" is a good terminology.

I chose "entry" from Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data-flow_analysis#Basic_principles).

Another term I can think of is "boundary" (https://suif.stanford.edu/~courses/cs243/lectures/L3-DFA2-revised.pdf) which might be better since it also makes sense for backward analysis.

Reviewed By: Mogball

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132086
2022-08-29 09:00:55 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
360c1111e3 Use llvm::is_contained (NFC) 2022-07-20 09:09:19 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
491d27013d [mlir] Use has_value instead of hasValue (NFC) 2022-07-13 00:57:02 -07:00
Mogball
ab701975e7 [mlir] Swap integer range inference to the new framework
Integer range inference has been swapped to the new framework. The integer value range lattices automatically updates the corresponding constant value on update.

Depends on D127173

Reviewed By: krzysz00, rriddle

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128866
2022-07-07 20:28:13 -07:00