constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
Based on a patch by Vassil Vassilev, which was based on a patch by Bernd
Schmidt, which was based on a patch by Reid Kleckner!
This is a re-commit of r310401, which was reverted in r310464 due to ARM
failures (which should now be fixed).
llvm-svn: 310983
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
llvm-svn: 310401
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
CurrentDir was set as the path of the current module, but that can change as
part of a chain of loaded modules.
When we try to locate a file mentioned in a module that does not exist, we use
a heuristic to look at the relative path between the original location of the
module and the file we look for, and use that relatively to the CurrentDir.
This only works if CurrentDir is the same as the (current) path of the module
file the file was mentioned in; if it is not, we look at the path relatively to
the wrong directory, and can end up reading random unrelated files that happen
to have the same name.
This patch fixes this by using the BaseDirectory of the module file the file
we look for was mentioned in instead of the CurrentDir heuristic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35828
llvm-svn: 308962
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
- Extracted the reading of the tokens out into a separate function.
- Replace 'Argument' with 'Parameter' when referring to the identifiers of the macro definition (as opposed to the supplied arguments - MacroArgs - during the macro invocation).
This is in preparation for submitting patches for review to implement __VA_OPT__ which will otherwise just keep lengthening the HandleDefineDirective function and making it less comprehensible.
I will also directly update some extra clang tooling that is broken by the change from Argument to Parameter.
Hopefully the bots will stay appeased.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 308190
- Extracted the reading of the tokens out into a separate function.
- Replace 'Argument' with 'Parameter' when referring to the identifiers of the macro definition (as opposed to the supplied arguments - MacroArgs - during the macro invocation).
This is in preparation for submitting patches for review to implement __VA_OPT__ which will otherwise just keep lengthening the HandleDefineDirective function and making it less comprehensible.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 308157
These cases occur frequently for declarations in the global module (above the
module-declaration) in a Modules TS module interface. When we merge a
definition from another module into such a module-private definition, ensure
that we transitively make everything lexically within that definition visible
to that translation unit.
llvm-svn: 307129
It was reverted in r305460 but the issue appears to only break our self-host
libcxx modules bot. Reapplying it will give us a chance to get a reproducer and
fix the issue.
llvm-svn: 306903
We use this when running a preprocessor-only action on an AST file in order to
avoid paying the runtime cost of loading the extra information.
llvm-svn: 306760
Summary:
In change 2ba19793512, the ASTReader logic for ObjC interfaces was modified to
preserve the first definition-data read, "merging" later definitions into it
rather than overwriting it (though this "merging" is, in practice, a no-op that
discards the later definition-data).
Unfortunately this change was only made to ObjC interfaces, not protocols; this
means that when (for example) loading a protocol that references an interface,
if both the protocol and interface are multiply defined (as can easily happen
if the same header is read from multiple contexts), an _inconsistent_ pair of
definitions is loaded: first-read for the interface and last-read for the
protocol.
This in turn causes very subtle downstream bugs in the Swift ClangImporter,
which filters the results of name lookups based on the owning module of a
definition; inconsistency between a pair of related definitions causes name
lookup failures at various stages of compilation.
To fix these downstream issues, this change replicates the logic applied to
interfaces in change 2ba19793512, but for ObjC protocols.
rdar://30851899
Reviewers: doug.gregor, rsmith
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
Subscribers: jordan_rose, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34741
llvm-svn: 306583
declarations that are owned but unconditionally visible.
This allows us to set declarations as visible even if they have a local owning
module, without losing information. In turn, that means that our Objective-C
support can keep on incorrectly assuming the "hidden" bit on the declaration is
the whole story with regard to name visibility. This will also be useful once
we support the C++ Modules TS export semantics.
Objective-C name visibility is still incorrect in any case where the "hidden"
bit is not the complete story: for instance, in Objective-C++ the set of
visible categories will be wrong during template instantiation, and with local
submodule visibility enabled it will be wrong when building modules. Fixing that
will require a major overhaul of how visibility is handled for Objective-C (and
particularly for categories).
llvm-svn: 306075
These VarDecl's are static data members of classes. Since the initializers are
also hashed, this also provides checking for default arguments to methods.
llvm-svn: 305543
Currently, we load all template specialization if we have more than one module
attached and we touch anything around the template definition.
This patch registers the template specializations as lazily-loadable entities.
In some TUs it reduces the amount of deserializations by 1%.
llvm-svn: 305120
Summary:
If the first parameter of the function is the ImplicitParamDecl, codegen
automatically marks it as an implicit argument with `this` or `self`
pointer. Added internal kind of the ImplicitParamDecl to separate
'this', 'self', 'vtt' and other implicit parameters from other kind of
parameters.
Reviewers: rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33735
llvm-svn: 305075
replay the steps taken to create the AST file with the preprocessor-only action
installed to produce preprocessed output.
This can be used to produce the preprocessed text for an existing .pch or .pcm
file.
llvm-svn: 304726
when saving a module timestamp file
This commit doesn't include a test as it requires a test that reproduces
a file write/close error that couldn't really be constructed artificially.
rdar://31860650
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33357
llvm-svn: 304538
This patch adds support for a `header` declaration in a module map to specify
certain `stat` information (currently, size and mtime) about that header file.
This has two purposes:
- It removes the need to eagerly `stat` every file referenced by a module map.
Instead, we track a list of unresolved header files with each size / mtime
(actually, for simplicity, we track submodules with such headers), and when
attempting to look up a header file based on a `FileEntry`, we check if there
are any unresolved header directives with that `FileEntry`'s size / mtime and
perform deferred `stat`s if so.
- It permits a preprocessed module to be compiled without the original files
being present on disk. The only reason we used to need those files was to get
the `stat` information in order to do header -> module lookups when using the
module. If we're provided with the `stat` information in the preprocessed
module, we can avoid requiring the files to exist.
Unlike most `header` directives, if a `header` directive with `stat`
information has no corresponding on-disk file the enclosing module is *not*
marked unavailable (so that behavior is consistent regardless of whether we've
resolved a header directive, and so that preprocessed modules don't get marked
unavailable). We could actually do this for all `header` directives: the only
reason we mark the module unavailable if headers are missing is to give a
diagnostic slightly earlier (rather than waiting until we actually try to build
the module / load and validate its .pcm file).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33703
llvm-svn: 304515
This patch makes it an error to have a mismatch between the enabled
sanitizers in a CU, and in any module being imported into the CU. Only
mismatches between non-modular sanitizers are treated as errors.
This patch also includes non-modular sanitizers in module hashes, in
order to ensure module rebuilds occur when -fsanitize=X is toggled on
and off for non-modular sanitizers, and to cut down on module rebuilds
when the option is toggled for modular sanitizers.
This fixes a longstanding issue with implicit modules and sanitizers,
which Duncan originally diagnosed.
When building with implicit modules it's possible to hit a scenario
where modules are built without -fsanitize=address, and are subsequently
imported into CUs with -fsanitize=address enabled. This causes strange
failures at runtime. The case Duncan found affects libcxx, since its
vector implementation behaves differently when ASan is enabled.
Implicit module builds should "just work" when -fsanitize=X is toggled
on and off across multiple compiler invocations, which is what this
patch does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32724
llvm-svn: 304463
to the original module map.
Also use the path and name of the original module map when emitting that
information into the .pcm file. The upshot of this is that the produced .pcm
file will track information for headers in their original locations (where the
module was preprocessed), not relative to whatever directory the preprocessed
module map was in when it was built.
llvm-svn: 304346
Previously, a preamble only included #if blocks (and friends like
ifdef) if there was a corresponding #endif before any declaration or
definition. The problem is that any header file that uses include guards
will not have a preamble generated, which can make code-completion very
slow.
To prevent errors about unbalanced preprocessor conditionals in the
preamble, and unbalanced preprocessor conditionals after a preamble
containing unfinished conditionals, the conditional stack is stored
in the pch file.
This fixes PR26045.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15994
llvm-svn: 304207
