This caused compiler assertions, see comment on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D150107.
This also reverts the dependent follow-up change:
> [X86] Remove patterns for ADD/AND/OR/SUB/XOR/CMP with immediate 8 and optimize during MC lowering, NFCI
>
> This is follow-up of D150107.
>
> In addition, the function `X86::optimizeToFixedRegisterOrShortImmediateForm` can be
> shared with project bolt and eliminates the code in X86InstrRelaxTables.cpp.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150949
This reverts commit 2ef8ae134828876ab3ebda4a81bb2df7b095d030 and
5586bc539acb26cb94e461438de01a5080513401.
This is follow-up of D150107.
In addition, the function `X86::optimizeToFixedRegisterOrShortImmediateForm` can be
shared with project bolt and eliminates the code in X86InstrRelaxTables.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150949
Reapply rG5ed56a821c06 (after reverted by rG7aa89c4a22fd) - don't take reference from struct that will be erased in X86FrameLowering::eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr
Summary:
Propagate memory operands when folding load instructions into instructions that directly operate on memory.
The original revision has been split. See D80140 for the other part of the changes.
Reviewers: craig.topper, rnk, lebedev.ri, efriedma
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80062
Replace the explicit isAtom() || isSLM() test with the more general (and more specific) slowTwoMemOps() check to avoid the use of the PUSHrmm push from memory case.
This is actually very tricky to test in anything but quite complex code, but the atomic-idempotent.ll tests seem to be the most straightforward to use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76239
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76551
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
This a recommit of 39f50da2a357a8f685b3540246c5d762734e035f with proper LiveIn
declaration, better option handling and more portable testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
This a recommit of 39f50da2a357a8f685b3540246c5d762734e035f with proper LiveIn
declaration, better option handling and more portable testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
This a recommit of 39f50da2a357a8f685b3540246c5d762734e035f with better option
handling and more portable testing
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
This a recommit of 39f50da2a357a8f685b3540246c5d762734e035f with correct option
flags set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
This reverts commit 39f50da2a357a8f685b3540246c5d762734e035f.
The -fstack-clash-protection is being passed to the linker too, which
is not intended.
Reverting and fixing that in a later commit.
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
Summary:
On windows if the frame size exceed 4096 bytes, compiler need to
generate a call to _alloca_probe. X86CallFrameOptimization pass
changes the reserved stack size and cause of stack probe function
not be inserted. This patch fix the issue by detecting the call
frame size, if the size exceed 4096 bytes, drop X86CallFrameOptimization.
Reviewers: craig.topper, wxiao3, annita.zhang, rnk, RKSimon
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65923
llvm-svn: 368503
Summary:
- Remove redundant initializations from pass constructors that were
already being initialized by LLVMInitializeX86Target().
- Add initialization function for the FPS pass.
Reviewers: craig.topper
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63218
llvm-svn: 363221
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.
This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331844
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
Summary:
r264440 added or/and patterns for storing -1 or 0 with the intention of decreasing code size. However,
X86CallFrameOptimization does not recognize these memory accesses so it will not replace them with push's when profitable.
This patch fixes this problem by teaching X86CallFrameOptimization these store 0/-1 idioms.
An alternative fix would be to prevent the 'store 0/1 idioms' patterns from firing when accessing the stack. This would save
the need to teach the pass about these idioms. However, because X86CallFrameOptimization does not always fire we may result
in cases where neither X86CallFrameOptimization not the patterns for 'store 0/1 idioms' fire.
Fixes pr34863
Reviewers: DavidKreitzer, guyblank, aymanmus
Reviewed By: aymanmus
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38738
llvm-svn: 316431
SelectionDAG inserts a copy of ESP into a virtual register.
X86CallFrameOptimization assumed that the COPY, if present, is always
right after the call-frame setup instruction (ADJCALLSTACKDOWN). This was a
wrong assumption as the COPY can be located anywhere between the call-frame setup
instruction and its first use. If the COPY happened to be located in a different
location than what X86CallFrameOptimization assumed, visiting it while
processing the call chain would lead to a conservative bail-out.
The fix is quite straightfoward, scan ahead for the stack-pointer copy and make note
of it so it can be ignored while processing the call chain.
Fixes pr34903
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38730
llvm-svn: 316416
Summary:
The motivation of this change is to enable .mir testing for this pass.
Added one test case to cover the functionality, this same case will be improved by
a future patch.
Reviewers: igorb, guyblank, DavidKreitzer
Reviewed By: guyblank, DavidKreitzer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38729
llvm-svn: 316412
CFI instructions that set appropriate cfa offset and cfa register are now
inserted in emitEpilogue() in X86FrameLowering.
Majority of the changes in this patch:
1. Ensure that CFI instructions do not affect code generation.
2. Enable maintaining correct information about cfa offset and cfa register
in a function when basic blocks are reordered, merged, split, duplicated.
These changes are target independent and described below.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
1. are duplicable
2. are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
3. can be compared as equal
Add information to each MachineBasicBlock about cfa offset and cfa register
that are valid at its entry and exit (incoming and outgoing CFI info). Add
support for updating this information when basic blocks are merged, split,
duplicated, created. Add a verification pass (CFIInfoVerifier) that checks
that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match incoming
values of their successors.
Incoming and outgoing CFI information is used by a late pass
(CFIInstrInserter) that corrects CFA calculation rule for a basic block if
needed. That means that additional CFI instructions get inserted at basic
block beginning to correct the rule for calculating CFA. Having CFI
instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA calculation rule
for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic block reordering,
or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the blocks have wrong
cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block above them.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18046
llvm-svn: 306529
Instructions CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END and their target dependent
counterparts keep data like frame size, stack adjustment etc. These
data are accessed by getOperand using hard coded indices. It is
error prone way. This change implements the access by special methods,
which improve readability and allow changing data representation without
massive changes of index values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31953
llvm-svn: 300196
Rename from addOperand to just add, to match the other method that has been
added to MachineInstrBuilder for adding more than just 1 operand.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D28057 for the whole discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28556
llvm-svn: 291891
If we don't skip over DEBUG_VALUEs, we get differences between -g and non-g
code.
This fixes PR31242.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27485
llvm-svn: 288965
Recommitting r288293 with some extra fixes for GlobalISel code.
Most of the exception handling members in MachineModuleInfo is actually
per function data (talks about the "current function") so it is better
to keep it at the function instead of the module.
This is a necessary step to have machine module passes work properly.
Also:
- Rename TidyLandingPads() to tidyLandingPads()
- Use doxygen member groups instead of "//===- EH ---"... so it is clear
where a group ends.
- I had to add an ugly const_cast at two places in the AsmPrinter
because the available MachineFunction pointers are const, but the code
wants to call tidyLandingPads() in between
(markFunctionEnd()/endFunction()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27227
llvm-svn: 288405
Most of the exception handling members in MachineModuleInfo is actually
per function data (talks about the "current function") so it is better
to keep it at the function instead of the module.
This is a necessary step to have machine module passes work properly.
Also:
- Rename TidyLandingPads() to tidyLandingPads()
- Use doxygen member groups instead of "//===- EH ---"... so it is clear
where a group ends.
- I had to add an ugly const_cast at two places in the AsmPrinter
because the available MachineFunction pointers are const, but the code
wants to call tidyLandingPads() in between
(markFunctionEnd()/endFunction()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27227
llvm-svn: 288293
