Revert "InstSimplify: Add baseline tests for reported regression"
Revert "InstSimplify: Start cleaning up simplifyFCmpInst"
This reverts commit 0637b00041c7d6a191d51d9966c4f5f41fb97ab5.
This reverts commit 239fb206de35935416e652b89725d5f3193f78f5.
This reverts commit ddb3f12c428bc4bd5a98913d74dfd7f2402bdfd8.
These commits causes crashes when compiling chromium code, attached reduced ir at: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151887#4634914
Also picks up a few improvements (Some of the fcmp.ll
test names imply they aren't quite testing what was intended.
Checking the sign bit can't be performed with a compare to a 0).
Much of the logic in here is the same as the class detection
logic of fcmpToClassTest. We could unify more with a weaker
version of fcmpToClassTest which returns implied classes rather
than exact class-like compares. Also could unify more with detection
of possible classes in non-splat vectors.
One problem here is we now only perform folds that used
to always work now require a context instruction. This is
because fcmpToClassTest requires the parent function.
Either fcmpToClassTest could tolerate a missing context
function, or we could require passing in one to simplifyFCmpInst.
Without this it's possible to hit the !isNan assert (which feels like
an unnecessary assert). In any case, these cases don't appear in
any tests.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151887
This reverts commit 0012b94a4e8e0c757ef0adcd68fb61bb0318b26c.
Reverting due to test failures introduced by 73925ef8b0eacc6792f0e3ea21a3e6d51f5ee8b0
Updated floating-point-compare.ll to keep the assume declaration.
This fixes an annoying assymmetry in the test organization. We have
known-never-nan.ll for dedicated isKnownNeverNaN handling tests, but
the isKnownNeverInfinity were in floating-point-compare.ll. Move the
more targeted tests into a separate file to match.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/oShzr3
This was noted as a missing fold in D134876 (with additional
examples based on issue #58046).
I'm assuming that fmul with a zero operand is rare enough
that the use of ValueTracking will not noticeably increase
compile-time.
This adjusts a PowerPC codegen test that was added with D88388
because it would get folded away and no longer provide coverage
for the bug fix.
This can be seen as a follow up to commit 0ee439b705e82a4fe20e2,
that changed the second argument of __powidf2, __powisf2 and
__powitf2 in compiler-rt from si_int to int. That was to align with
how those runtimes are defined in libgcc.
One thing that seem to have been missing in that patch was to make
sure that the rest of LLVM also handle that the argument now depends
on the size of int (not using the si_int machine mode for 32-bit).
When using __builtin_powi for a target with 16-bit int clang crashed.
And when emitting libcalls to those rtlib functions, typically when
lowering @llvm.powi), the backend would always prepare the exponent
argument as an i32 which caused miscompiles when the rtlib was
compiled with 16-bit int.
The solution used here is to use an overloaded type for the second
argument in @llvm.powi. This way clang can use the "correct" type
when lowering __builtin_powi, and then later when emitting the libcall
it is assumed that the type used in @llvm.powi matches the rtlib
function.
One thing that needed some extra attention was that when vectorizing
calls several passes did not support that several arguments could
be overloaded in the intrinsics. This patch allows overload of a
scalar operand by adding hasVectorInstrinsicOverloadedScalarOpd, with
an entry for powi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99439
As discussed in D87877, instcombine already has this fold,
but it was missing from the more general ValueTracking logic.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/PumYZP
This is a step towards trying to remove unnecessary FP compares
with infinity when compiling with -ffinite-math-only or similar.
I'm intentionally not checking FMF on the fcmp itself because
I'm assuming that will go away eventually.
The analysis part of this was added with rGcd481136 for use with
isKnownNeverNaN. Similarly, that could be an enhancement here to
get predicates like 'one' and 'ueq'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84035
