This commit relands the changes from "[LV]: Teach LV to recursively
(de)interleave. #89018"
Reason for revert:
- The patch exposed a bug in the IA pass, the bug is now fixed and landed by commit: #122643
InstrMaps is a helper data structure that maps scalars to vectors and
the reverse. This is used by the vectorizer to figure out which vectors
it can extract scalar values from.
VTypeAnalysis contains some assertions which can be useful for reasoning
that the types of various operands match.
This patch teaches VPlanVerifier to invoke VTypeAnalysis to check them,
and catches some issues with VPInstruction types that are also fixed
here:
* Handles the missing cases for CalculateTripCountMinusVF,
CanonicalIVIncrementForPart and AnyOf
* Fixes ICmp and ActiveLaneMask to return i1 (to align with `icmp` and
`@llvm.get.active.lane.mask` in the LangRef)
The VPlanVerifier unit tests also need to be fleshed out a bit more to
satisfy the stricter assertions
16d19aaed moved to manage block creation via VPlan directly, with VPlan
owning the created blocks. Follow up to make the VPBlock constructors
private, to require creation via VPlan helpers and thus preventing
issues due to manually constructing blocks.
This patch is split off #120567, adding asserts in
addScalarResumePhis and addExitUsersForFirstOrderRecurrences
that the loop does not contain an uncountable early exit,
since the code cannot yet handle them correctly.
Change the inheritance of class VPWidenSelectRecipe to class
VPRecipeWithIRFlags, which allows recipe of the select to pass the
fastmath flags.The patch of #119847 will add the fastmath flag to for
recipe
Currently we fail to detect the case where BTC + 1 wraps, i.e. the
vector trip count is 0, In those cases, the minimum iteration count
check will fail, and the vector code will never be executed.
Explicitly check for this condition in computeMaxVF and avoid trying to
vectorize alltogether.
Note that a number of tests needed to be updated, because the vector
loop would never be executed given the input IR.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/122558.
This fixes a miscompilation extracted from 525.x264_r, where we were
failing to update the runtime VF of a VPReverseVectorPointerRecipe.
We were removing a use of VF whilst iterating over the users() iterator,
which messed up the iterator in-flight and caused us to miss some
recipes. This fixes it by copying the users into a SmallVector first.
Fixes#122681Fixes#122682
Follow up on 4a0d53a (PatternMatch: migrate to CmpPredicate) to get rid
of one of the FIXMEs it introduced by replacing a predicate comparison
with CmpPredicate::getMatching.
Follow up on 4a0d53a (PatternMatch: migrate to CmpPredicate) to get rid
of the FIXME it introduced in SLPVectorizer: the FIXME is bad, and we'd
get no testable impact by using CmpPredicate::getMatching here.
foldPermuteOfBinops currently requires both binop operands to be oneuse shuffles to fold the shuffles across the binop, but there will be cases where its still profitable to fold across the binop with only one foldable shuffle.
I've been exploring verifying the VPlan before and after the EVL
transformation steps, and noticed that the VPlan comes out in an invalid
state between construction and optimisation.
In adjustRecipesForReductions, we leave behind some dead recipes which
are invalid:
1) When we replace a link with a reduction recipe, the old link ends up
becoming a use-before-def:
WIDEN ir<%l7> = add ir<%sum.02>, ir<%indvars.iv>.1
WIDEN ir<%l8> = add ir<%l7>.1, ir<%l3>
WIDEN ir<%l9> = add ir<%l8>.1, ir<%l5>
...
REDUCE ir<%l7>.1 = ir<%sum.02> + reduce.add (ir<%indvars.iv>.1)
REDUCE ir<%l8>.1 = ir<%l7>.1 + reduce.add (ir<%l3>)
REDUCE ir<%l9>.1 = ir<%l8>.1 + reduce.add (ir<%l5>)
2) When transforming an AnyOf reduction phi to a boolean, we leave
behind a select with mismatching operand types, which will trigger the
assertions in VTypeAnalysis after #122679
This adds an extra verification step and deletes the dead recipes
eagerly to keep the plan valid.
When we vectorize loads or stores we only keep the address of the first
lane. The rest may become dead. This patch adds the address operands of
vectorized loads or stores to the dead candidates set, such that they
get erased if dead.
Fix for the Coverity hit with CID1579964 in VPlan.cpp.
Coverity message with some context follows.
[Cov] var_compare_op: Comparing TermBr to null implies that TermBr might
be null.
434 } else if (TermBr && !TermBr->isConditional()) {
435 TermBr->setSuccessor(0, NewBB);
436 } else {
437 // Set each forward successor here when it is created, excluding
438 // backedges. A backward successor is set when the branch is
created.
439 unsigned idx = PredVPSuccessors.front() == this ? 0 : 1;
[Cov] CID 1579964: (#1 of 1): Dereference after null check
(FORWARD_NULL)
[Cov] var_deref_model: Passing null pointer TermBr to getSuccessor,
which dereferences it.
When extracts are vectorized and it has some poison values instead of
instructions, need to correctly set the vectorized operand not as
poison, but as a main vector operand of the main extract instruction.
Fixes#122583
If the buildvector node fully matched another node, need to exclude
subvectors, when building final shuffle, just a shuffle of the original
node must be emitted.
Fixes#122584
Following 0e528ac404e13ed2d952a2d83aaf8383293c851e, this patch adjusts
the resume value of VPReductionPHIRecipe for FindLastIV reductions.
Replacing the resume value with:
ResumeValue = ResumeValue == StartValue ? SentinelValue : ResumeValue;
This addressed the correctness issue when the start value might not be
less than the minimum value of a monotonically increasing induction
variable.
Thanks Florian Hahn for the help.
---------
Co-authored-by: Florian Hahn <flo@fhahn.com>
This relands the reverted #120721 with a fix for cases where neither
reduction operand are the reduction phi. Only
63114239cc8d26225a0ef9920baacfc7cc00fc58 and
63114239cc8d26225a0ef9920baacfc7cc00fc58 are new on top of the reverted
PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Guy <nicholas.guy@arm.com>
This patch simplifies select-based integer min/max reductions by
utilizing `llvm::getMinMaxReductionPredicate`, and generates
intrinsic-based min/max reductions by utilizing
`llvm::getMinMaxReductionIntrinsicOp`.
Use the existing VPlan-based analysis to identify recipes that only have
their first lane demanded and transform them to uniform recpliate
recipes. This simplifies the generated code in some places and prepares
for fixing https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/122496.
When estimating the cost of entries shuffles for buildvectors, need to
rebuild original mask, not a generated submask, used for subregisters
analysis.
Fixes#122430
Older version of msvc do not have great lambda support and are not able
to handle uses of class data or lambdas with implicit return types in
some cases. These minor changes improve the sources compatibility with
older msvc and don't hurt readability either.
When estimating the cost of entries shuffles for buildvectors, need to
rebuild original mask, not a generated submask, used for subregisters
analysis.
Fixes#122430
Add TreeEntry::hasState.
Add assert for getTreeEntry.
Remove the OpValue parameter from the canReuseExtract function.
Remove the Opcode parameter from the ComputeMaxBitWidth lambda function.
Add TreeEntry::hasState.
Add assert for getTreeEntry.
Remove the OpValue parameter from the canReuseExtract function.
Remove the Opcode parameter from the ComputeMaxBitWidth lambda function.
With this patch we switch from the temporary dummy seeds to actual seeds
provided by the seed collector.
The seeds get sliced and each slice is used as the starting point for
vectorization.
Currently we emit early-exit related debug messages/remarks even when
there is a single exit. Update to only check isVectorizableEarlyExitLoop
if there isn't a single exit block.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121994
This is a split-off from #109833 and only adds code relating to checking
if a struct-returning call can be vectorized.
This initial patch only allows the case where all users of the struct
return are `extractvalue` operations that can be widened.
```
%call = tail call { float, float } @foo(float %in_val)
%extract_a = extractvalue { float, float } %call, 0
%extract_b = extractvalue { float, float } %call, 1
```
Note: The tests require the VFABI changes from #119000 to pass.