Assume that, ModelA has scheduling resource for InstA and ModelB has scheduling resource for InstB. This is what the llvm::MCSchedClassDesc looks like:
llvm::MCSchedClassDesc ModelASchedClasses[] = {
...
InstA, 0, ...
InstB, -1,...
};
llvm::MCSchedClassDesc ModelBSchedClasses[] = {
...
InstA, -1,...
InstB, 0,...
};
The -1 means invalid num of macro ops, while it is valid if it is >=0. This is what we look like now:
llvm::MCSchedClassDesc ModelASchedClasses[] = {
...
InstA, 0, ...
InstB, 0,...
};
llvm::MCSchedClassDesc ModelBSchedClasses[] = {
...
InstA, 0,...
InstB, 0,...
};
And compiler hit the assertion here because the SCDesc is valid now for both InstA and InstB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67950
llvm-svn: 374524
I wonder if we should split the v8i8 stores in order to form
two v4i8 saturating truncating stores. This would remove the
unpckl needed to concatenated the v4i8 results to make a
single store.
llvm-svn: 374519
The assertion is everzealous and fail tests like:
renamable $x3 = LI8 0
STD renamable $x3, 16, $x1
renamable $x3 = LI8 0
Remove the assertion since killed flag of $x3 is not mandentory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68344
llvm-svn: 374515
If we don't have VLX we won't end up selecting a saturating
truncate for 256-bit or smaller vectors so we should just use
the pack lowering.
llvm-svn: 374487
In GISel we have both G_CONSTANT and G_FCONSTANT, but because
in GISel we don't really have a concept of Float vs Int value
the only difference between the two is where the data originates
from.
What both G_CONSTANT and G_FCONSTANT return is just a bag of bits
with the constant representation in it.
By making getConstantVRegVal() return G_FCONSTANTs bit representation
as well we allow ConstantFold and other things to operate with
G_FCONSTANT.
Adding tests that show ConstantFolding to work on mixed G_CONSTANT
and G_FCONSTANT sources.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68739
llvm-svn: 374458
If we've disable zmm registers, the v16i32 will need to be split. This split will propagate through min/max the truncate. This creates two sequences that need to be concatenated back to v16i8. We can instead use packusdw to do part of the clamping, truncating, and concatenating all at once. Then we can use a vpmovuswb to finish off the clamp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68763
llvm-svn: 374431
This improves readability of Windows path string literals in LLVM IR.
The LLVM assembler has supported \\ in IR strings for a long time, but
the lexer doesn't tolerate escaped quotes, so they have to be printed as
\22 for now.
llvm-svn: 374415
This reverses the scalar canonicalization proposed in D63382.
Pre: isPowerOf2(C1)
%r = select i1 %cond, i32 C1, i32 0
=>
%z = zext i1 %cond to i32
%r = shl i32 %z, log2(C1)
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Z50
x86 already tries to fold this pattern, but it isn't done
uniformly, so we still see a diff. AArch64 probably should
enable the TLI hook to benefit too, but that's a follow-on.
llvm-svn: 374397
The default promotion for the add_sat/sub_sat nodes currently does:
1. ANY_EXTEND iN to iM
2. SHL by M-N
3. [US][ADD|SUB]SAT
4. L/ASHR by M-N
If the promoted add_sat or sub_sat node is not legal, this can produce code
that effectively does a lot of shifting (and requiring large constants to be
materialised) just to use the overflow flag. It is simpler to just do the
saturation manually, using the higher bitwidth addition and a min/max against
the saturating bounds. That is what this patch attempts to do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68643
llvm-svn: 374373
Previously, patchable extern relocations are introduced to patch
external variables used for multi versioning in
compile once, run everywhere use case. The load instruction
will be converted into a move with an patchable immediate
which can be changed by bpf loader on the host.
The kernel verifier has evolved and is able to load
and propagate constant values, so compiler relocation
becomes unnecessary. This patch removed codes related to this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68760
llvm-svn: 374367
Summary: It ensures that the bswap is generated even when a part of the subtree already matches a bswap transform.
Reviewers: craig.topper, efriedma, RKSimon, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68250
llvm-svn: 374340
This selects MVE VQADD from the vector llvm.sadd.sat or llvm.uadd.sat
intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68566
llvm-svn: 374336
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS build was failing on new test.
This is fixed by marking $ra register as undef.
Test now has -verify-machineinstrs to check for operand flags.
llvm-svn: 374320
Currently, the heuristics the if-conversion pass uses for diamond if-conversion
are based on execution time, with no consideration for code size. This adds a
new set of heuristics to be used when optimising for code size.
This is mostly target-independent, because the if-conversion pass can
see the code size of the instructions which it is removing. For thumb,
there are a few passes (insertion of IT instructions, selection of
narrow branches, and selection of CBZ instructions) which are run after
if conversion and affect these heuristics, so I've added target hooks to
better predict the code-size effect of a proposed if-conversion.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67350
llvm-svn: 374301
SGPR_128 only includes the real allocatable SGPRs, and SReg_128 adds
the additional non-allocatable TTMP registers. There's no point in
allocating SReg_128 vregs. This shrinks the size of the classes
regalloc needs to consider, which is usually good.
llvm-svn: 374284
In a future patch, this will help cleanup m0 handling.
The register coalescer handles copies from a register that
materializes an immediate, but doesn't handle move immediates
itself. The virtual register uses will often be allocated to the same
register, so there end up being no real copy.
llvm-svn: 374257
This was ignoring the register bank of the input pointer, and
isUniformMMO seems overly aggressive.
This will now conservatively assume a VGPR in cases where the incoming
bank hasn't been determined yet (i.e. is from a loop phi).
llvm-svn: 374255
If original instruction did not have source modifiers they were
not added to the new DPP instruction as well, even if needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68729
llvm-svn: 374241
Summary:
This is necessary and sufficient to get simple cases of multiple
return working with multivalue enabled. More complex cases will
require block and loop signatures to be generalized to potentially be
type indices as well.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68684
llvm-svn: 374235
Summary:
This clang builtin and corresponding LLVM intrinsic are necessary to
expose the exact semantics of the underlying WebAssembly instruction
to users. LLVM produces a poison value if the dynamic swizzle indices
are greater than the vector size, but the WebAssembly instruction sets
the corresponding output lane to zero. Users who depend on this
behavior can safely use this builtin.
Depends on D68527.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68531
llvm-svn: 374189
Summary:
Adds the new v8x16.swizzle SIMD instruction as specified at
https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/blob/master/proposals/simd/SIMD.md#swizzling-using-variable-indices.
In addition to adding swizzles as a candidate lowering in
LowerBUILD_VECTOR, also rewrites and simplifies the lowering to
minimize the number of replace_lanes necessary rather than trying to
minimize code size. This leads to more uses of v128.const instead of
splats, which is expected to increase performance.
The new code will be easier to tune once V8 implements all the vector
construction operations, and it will also be easier to add new
candidate instructions in the future if necessary.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68527
llvm-svn: 374188
stack
This patch makes sure that if we tag some memory, we untag that memory before
the function returns/throws via any exit, reachable from the tag operation. For
that we place the untag operation either at:
a) the lifetime end call for the alloca, if that call post-dominates the
lifetime start call (where the tag operation is placed), or it (the
lifetime end call) dominates all reachable exits, otherwise
b) at the reachable exits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68469
llvm-svn: 374182
There were 2 problems here. First, these patterns were duplicated to
handle the inverted shift operands instead of using the commuted
PatFrags.
Second, the point of the zext folding patterns don't apply to the
non-0ing high subtargets. They should be skipped instead of inserting
the extension. The zeroing high code would be emitted when necessary
anyway. This was also emitting unnecessary zexts in cases where the
high bits were undefined.
llvm-svn: 374092
Summary:
Without offsets on the MachineMemOperands (MMOs),
MachineInstr::mayAlias() will return true for all reads and writes to the
same resource descriptor. This leads to O(N^2) complexity in the MachineScheduler
when analyzing dependencies of buffer loads and stores. It also limits
the SILoadStoreOptimizer from merging more instructions.
This patch reduces the compile time of one pathological compute shader
from 12 seconds to 1 second.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65097
llvm-svn: 374087
Summary:
When searching for local expression tree created by stackified
registers, for 'block' placement, we start the search from the previous
instruction of a BB's terminator. But in 'try''s case, we should start
from the previous instruction of a call that can throw, or a EH_LABEL
that precedes the call, because the return values of the call's previous
instructions can be stackified and consumed by the throwing call.
For example,
```
i32.call @foo
call @bar ; may throw
br $label0
```
In this case, if we start the search from the previous instruction of
the terminator (`br` here), we end up stopping at `call @bar` and place
a 'try' between `i32.call @foo` and `call @bar`, because `call @bar`
does not have a return value so it is not a local expression tree of
`br`.
But in this case, unlike when placing 'block's, we should start the
search from `call @bar`, because the return value of `i32.call @foo` is
stackified and used by `call @bar`.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68619
llvm-svn: 374073
During the If-Converter optimization pay attention when copying or
deleting call instructions in order to keep call site information in
valid state.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, efriedma
Reviewed By: vsk, efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66955
llvm-svn: 374068
When -pg option is present than a call to _mcount is inserted into every
function. However since the proper ABI was not followed then the generated
gmon.out did not give proper results. By inserting needed instructions
before every _mcount we can fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68390
llvm-svn: 374055
Tim Northover remarked that the added patterns for fmls fp16
produce wrong code in case the fsub instruction has a
multiplication as its first operand, i.e., all the patterns FMLSv*_OP1:
> define <8 x half> @test_FMLSv8f16_OP1(<8 x half> %a, <8 x half> %b, <8 x half> %c) {
> ; CHECK-LABEL: test_FMLSv8f16_OP1:
> ; CHECK: fmls {{v[0-9]+}}.8h, {{v[0-9]+}}.8h, {{v[0-9]+}}.8h
> entry:
>
> %mul = fmul fast <8 x half> %c, %b
> %sub = fsub fast <8 x half> %mul, %a
> ret <8 x half> %sub
> }
>
> This doesn't look right to me. The exact instruction produced is "fmls
> v0.8h, v2.8h, v1.8h", which I think calculates "v0 - v2*v1", but the
> IR is calculating "v2*v1-v0". The equivalent <4 x float> code also
> doesn't emit an fmls.
This patch generates an fmla and negates the value of the operand2 of the fsub.
Inspecting the pattern match, I found that there was another mistake in the
opcode to be selected: matching FMULv4*16 should generate FMLSv4*16
and not FMLSv2*32.
Tested on aarch64-linux with make check-all.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67990
llvm-svn: 374044
