This patch adds limited modeling of the `value_or` method. Specifically, when
used in a particular idiom in a comparison to implicitly check whether the
optional holds a value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122231
This patch provides the user with the ability to disable all checked of accesses
to optionals that are the pointees of smart pointers. Since smart pointers are
not modeled (yet), the system cannot distinguish safe from unsafe accesses to
optionals through smart pointers. This results in false positives whenever
optionals are used through smart pointers. The patch gives the user the choice
of ignoring all positivess in these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122143
Chromium's implementation of assertions (`CHECK`, `DCHECK`, etc.) are not
annotated with "noreturn", by default. This patch adds a model of the logical
implications of successfully executing one of these assertions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121797
This commit reverts e0cc28dfdc67105974924cce42bb8c85bd44925a and moves
UncheckedOptionalAccessModelTest.cpp into clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive,
to avoid build failures. The test will be moved back into a Models subdir
in a follow up patch that will address the build configuration issues.
Original description:
Adds a dataflow analysis that detects unsafe accesses to values of type
`std::optional`, `absl::optional`, or `base::Optional`.
Reviewed-by: ymandel, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121197
Adds a dataflow analysis that detects unsafe accesses to values of type
`std::optional`, `absl::optional`, or `base::Optional`.
Reviewed-by: ymandel, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121197
