Partially fixes PR24883.
The patch sets Reference bit while instantiating a typedef if it
previously was found referenced.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114382
This adds support for multiple attributes in `#pragma clang attribute push`, for example:
```
```
or
```
```
Related attributes can now be applied with a single pragma, which makes it harder for developers to make an accidental error later when editing the code.
rdar://78269653
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121283
This is the `ext_vector_type` alternative to D81083.
This patch extends Clang to allow 'bool' as a valid vector element type
(attribute ext_vector_type) in C/C++.
This is intended as the canonical type for SIMD masks and facilitates
clean vector intrinsic declarations. Vectors of i1 are supported on IR
level and below down to many SIMD ISAs, such as AVX512, ARM SVE (fixed
vector length) and the VE target (NEC SX-Aurora TSUBASA).
The RFC on cfe-dev: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-May/065434.html
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88905
WG14 adopted N2775 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2775.pdf)
at our Feb 2022 meeting. This paper adds a literal suffix for
bit-precise types that automatically sizes the bit-precise type to be
the smallest possible legal _BitInt type that can represent the literal
value. The suffix chosen is wb (for a signed bit-precise type) which
can be combined with the u suffix (for an unsigned bit-precise type).
The preprocessor continues to operate as-if all integer types were
intmax_t/uintmax_t, including bit-precise integer types. It is a
constraint violation if the bit-precise literal is too large to fit
within that type in the context of the preprocessor (when still using
a pp-number preprocessing token), but it is not a constraint violation
in other circumstances. This allows you to make bit-precise integer
literals that are wider than what the preprocessor currently supports
in order to initialize variables, etc.
The standard requires[0] member function constraints to be checked when
explicitly instantiating classes. This patch adds this constraints
check.
This issue is tracked as #46029 [1].
Note that there's an related open CWG issue (2421[2]) about what to do when
multiple candidates have satisfied constraints. This is particularly an
issue because mangling doesn't contain function constraints, and so the
following code still ICEs with definition with same mangled name
'_ZN1BIiE1fEv' as another definition:
template<class T>
struct B {
int f() requires std::same_as<T, int> {
return 0;
}
int f() requires (std::same_as<T, int> &&
!std::same_as<T, char>) {
return 1;
}
};
template struct B<int>;
Also note that the constraints checking while instantiating *functions*
is still not implemented. I started looking at it but It's a bit more
complicated. I believe in such a case we have to consider the partial
constraints order and potentially choose the best candidate out of the
set of multiple valid ones.
[0]: https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.explicit#10
[1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/46029
[2]: https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2421.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120255
Previously, we didin't build a DeclRefExpr which refers to an invalid declaration.
In this patch, we handle this case by building an empty RecoveryExpr,
which will preserve more broken code (AST parent nodes that contain the
RecoveryExpr is preserved in the AST).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120812
This patch adds -Wno-strict-prototypes to all of the test cases that
use functions without prototypes, but not as the primary concern of the
test. e.g., attributes testing whether they can/cannot be applied to a
function without a prototype, etc.
This is done in preparation for enabling -Wstrict-prototypes by
default.
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the final batch of tests being updated to add prototypes,
hopefully.
Otherwise callers of these functions have to check both the return value
for and the contents of the returned llvm::Optional.
Fixes#53742
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119525
This adds support for http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2764.pdf,
which was adopted at the Feb 2022 WG14 meeting. That paper adds
[[noreturn]] and [[_Noreturn]] to the list of supported attributes in
C2x. These attributes have the same semantics as the [[noreturn]]
attribute in C++.
The [[_Noreturn]] attribute was added as a deprecated feature so that
translation units which include <stdnoreturn.h> do not get an error on
use of [[noreturn]] because the macro expands to _Noreturn. Users can
use -Wno-deprecated-attributes to silence the diagnostic.
Use of <stdnotreturn.h> or the noreturn macro were both deprecated.
Users can define the _CLANG_DISABLE_CRT_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS macro to
suppress the deprecation diagnostics coming from the header file.
None of these tests are really intended to test the file offset as much
as to test the structure. Making the regex allows this test to work
even if the file is checked out with CRLF line endings.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119362
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the fifth batch of tests being updated (there are a significant
number of other tests left to be updated).
Note, the behavior of -ast-print is broken. It prints functions with a
prototype (void) as if they have no prototype () in C. Some tests need
to disable strict prototype checking when recompiling the results of an
-ast-print invocation.
The patch was reverted because it caused a crash during PCH build -- we
missed to update the RParenLoc in TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformAutoType.
This relands 55d96ac and 37ec65e with a test and fix.
This breaks a clang-tidy check, needs to investigate and fix. Revert
them to bring the buildbot back.
This reverts commit 55d96ac3dc56bdebea854952a724c2a50d96ce19 and
37ec65e1d705f56fe5551de1dfcbac1e071588a2
This allows the body to be parsed.
An special-case that would replace a missing if condition with OpaqueValueExpr
was removed as it's now redundant (unless recovery-expr is disabled).
For loops are not handled at this point, as the parsing is more complicated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113752
Mangled names are not meaningful for variables with local storage,
and may not be well defined (getting the mangled name for VLA
crashes the mangler). As such, do not include them in the JSON
dump.
This allows running update_cc_test_checks on some OpenMP tests again.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/49111.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116169
This reverts commit cc56c66f27e131b914082d3bd21180646e842e9a.
Fixed a bad assertion, the target of a UsingShadowDecl must not have
*local* qualifiers, but it can be a typedef whose underlying type is qualified.
Currently there's no way to find the UsingDecl that a typeloc found its
underlying type through. Compare to DeclRefExpr::getFoundDecl().
Design decisions:
- a sugar type, as there are many contexts this type of use may appear in
- UsingType is a leaf like TypedefType, the underlying type has no TypeLoc
- not unified with UnresolvedUsingType: a single name is appealing,
but being sometimes-sugar is often fiddly.
- not unified with TypedefType: the UsingShadowDecl is not a TypedefNameDecl or
even a TypeDecl, and users think of these differently.
- does not cover other rarer aliases like objc @compatibility_alias,
in order to be have a concrete API that's easy to understand.
- implicitly desugared by the hasDeclaration ASTMatcher, to avoid
breaking existing patterns and following the precedent of ElaboratedType.
Scope:
- This does not cover types associated with template names introduced by
using declarations. A future patch should introduce a sugar TemplateName
variant for this. (CTAD deduced types fall under this)
- There are enough AST matchers to fix the in-tree clang-tidy tests and
probably any other matchers, though more may be useful later.
Caveats:
- This changes a fairly common pattern in the AST people may depend on matching.
Previously, typeLoc(loc(recordType())) matched whether a struct was
referred to by its original scope or introduced via using-decl.
Now, the using-decl case is not matched, and needs a separate matcher.
This is similar to the case of typedefs but nevertheless both adds
complexity and breaks existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251
This change allows SwiftAttr to be used with #pragma clang attribute push
to add Swift attributes to large regions of header files.
We plan to use this to annotate headers with concurrency information.
Patch by: Becca Royal-Gordon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112773
Add coverage to demonstrate why including the type of template
parameters is necessary to disambiguate function template
specializations.
Test courtesy of Richard Smith
These should be all the commands from [1] except those that are marked
obsolete, and "link" / "endlink", as that conflicts with the existing
HeaderDoc pair "link / "/link". For some commands we don't have the
ideal category, but it should work good enough for most cases.
There seems to be no existing test for most commands (except the ones
interpreted by -Wdocumentation), and to some extent such a test wouldn't
look very interesting. But I added a test for the correct parsing of
formulas, as they're a bit special. And I had to adapt
comment-lots-of-unknown-commands.c because typo correction was kicking
in and recognizing some of the commands.
This should fix a couple of reported bugs: PR17437, PR19581, PR24062
(partially, no diagnostic for matching cond/endcond), PR32909, PR37813,
PR44243 (partially, email@domain.com must be addressed separately).
[1] https://www.doxygen.nl/manual/commands.html
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111190
Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are defined in
std::experimental namespace.
And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20. So in the working draft
like N4892, we could find the coroutine components is defined in std
namespace instead of std::experimental namespace.
And the coroutine support in clang seems to be relatively stable. So I
think it may be suitable to move the coroutine component into the
experiment namespace now.
This patch would make clang lookup coroutine_traits in std namespace
first. For the compatibility consideration, clang would lookup in
std::experimental namespace if it can't find definitions in std
namespace. So the existing codes wouldn't be break after update
compiler.
And in case the compiler found std::coroutine_traits and
std::experimental::coroutine_traits at the same time, it would emit an
error for it.
The support for looking up std::experimental::coroutine_traits would be
removed in Clang16.
Reviewed By: lxfind, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
Windows member functions have __attribute__((thiscall)) on their type,
so any machine running this that is 32 bit windows fails this test, add
a wildcard, plus an additional run line to explain why.
Back in the mists of time, the CXXRecordDecl for the injected-class-name was
a redecl of the outer class itself.
This got changed in 470c454a6176ef31474553e408c90f5ee630df89, but only for plain
classes: class template instantation was still detecting the injected-class-name
in the template body and marking its instantiation as a redecl.
This causes some subtle inconsistent behavior between the two, e.g.
hasDefinition() returns true for Foo<int>::Foo but false for Bar::Bar.
This is the root cause of PR51912.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112765
After rGa9db0a804a53, we correctly determined the end for pointer types
like `id` that are spelled without a `*`, but incorrectly determined the
end for pointer types spelled with a `*`.
A declare variant template is only compatible with a base when the
number of template arguments is equal, otherwise our instantiations will
produce nonsensical results.
Exposes as part of D109344.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109770
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd84938470bf2e337801faafb8a67710f46429d with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5a672d707390e2c3eaf30a9eb4b075c
Reverted in f9ad1d1c775a8e264bebc15d75e0c6e5c20eefc7 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
This patch remove the override in AIX target,
so the int128 is enabled in 64 bit mode or with ForceEnableInt128.
Reviewed By: lkail
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111078
Looks like lldb has some issues with this - somehow it causes lldb to
treat a "char[N]" type as an array of chars (prints them out
individually) but a "char [N]" is printed as a string. (even though the
DWARF doesn't have this string in it - it's something to do with the
string lldb generates for itself using clang)
This reverts commit 277623f4d5a672d707390e2c3eaf30a9eb4b075c.
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd84938470bf2e337801faafb8a67710f46429d with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
Without this, the combination of `-ast-dump=json` and `-ast-dump-filter FILTER` produces invalid JSON: the first line is a string that says `Dumping $SOME_DECL_NAME: `.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108441
This patch allows the use of __vector_quad and __vector_pair, PPC MMA builtin
types, on all PowerPC 64-bit compilation units. When these types are
made available the builtins that use them automatically become available
so semantic checking for mma and pair vector memop __builtins is also
expanded to ensure these builtin function call are only allowed on
Power10 and new architectures. All related test cases are updated to
ensure test coverage.
Reviewed By: #powerpc, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109599
Modify the IfStmt node to suppoort constant evaluated expressions.
Add a new ExpressionEvaluationContext::ImmediateFunctionContext to
keep track of immediate function contexts.
This proved easier/better/probably more efficient than walking the AST
backward as it allows diagnosing nested if consteval statements.
This improves diagnostic (& important to me, DWARF) accuracy - otherwise
there could be ambiguities between "std::nullptr_t" and some user-defined
type that's /actually/ "nullptr_t" defined in the global namespace.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110044
