This is a re-land of https://reviews.llvm.org/D86171 with fix.
Fuchsia's system libraries are instrumented and use the lsan
allocator for internal purposes. So leak checking needs to run
after all atexit hooks and after the system libraries' internal
exit-time hooks. The <zircon/sanitizer.h> hook API calls the
__sanitizer_process_exit_hook function at exactly the right time.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88248
If sanitizer cannot determine name of the module it
will use "<unknown module>". Then it can be suppressed
if needed.
Reviewed By: kda
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121674
For ppc64 PIE, it seems that [0xa00000000000,0xc00000000000) may be occupied
which will lead to a segfault in certain kernel configurations
(clang-ppc64le-rhel). Use the `!kUsingConstantSpaceBeg` code path like Fuchsia.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121257
This is a follow up to 4f3f4d672254
("sanitizer_common: fix __sanitizer_get_module_and_offset_for_pc signature mismatch")
which fixes a similar problem for msan build.
I am getting the following error compiling a unit test for code that
uses sanitizer_common headers and googletest transitively includes
sanitizer interface headers:
In file included from third_party/gwp_sanitizers/singlestep_test.cpp:3:
In file included from sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h:19:
sanitizer_interface_internal.h:41:5: error: typedef redefinition with different types
('struct __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments' vs 'struct __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments')
} __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments;
common_interface_defs.h:39:3: note: previous definition is here
} __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments;
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119546
Currently we use very common names for macros like ACQUIRE/RELEASE,
which cause conflicts with system headers.
Prefix all macros with SANITIZER_ to avoid conflicts.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116652
This removes the last use of StackDepot from StopTheWorld.
Depends on D115284.
Reviewed By: morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115319
StackDepot locks some stuff. As is there is small probability to
deadlock if we stop thread which locked the Depot.
We need either Lock/Unlock StackDepot for StopTheWorld, or don't
interact with StackDepot from there.
This patch does not run LeakReport under StopTheWorld. LeakReport
contains most of StackDepot access.
As a bonus this patch will help to resolve kMaxLeaksConsidered FIXME.
Depends on D114498.
Reviewed By: morehouse, kstoimenov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115284
kIgnored didn't exist when the code was added, but it should be
equivalent to kReachable.
The goal is to refactor MarkInvalidPCCb to avoid StackDepotGet
in StopTheWorld.
It is required for the [Leak Sanitizer port to Windows](https://reviews.llvm.org/D115103).
The currently used `unsigned long` type is 64 bits wide on UNIX like systems but only 32 bits wide on Windows.
Because of that, the literal `8UL << 30` causes an integer overflow on Windows.
By changing the type of the literals to `unsigned long long`, we have consistent behavior and no overflows on all Platforms.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115186
It should be NFC, as they already intercept pthread_create.
This will let us to fix BackgroundThread for these sanitizerts.
In in followup patches I will fix MaybeStartBackgroudThread for them
and corresponding tests.
Reviewed By: kstoimenov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114935
They don't seem to do anything useful in lsan.
They are needed only if a tools needs to execute
some custom logic during detach/join, or if it uses
thread registry quarantine. Lsan does none of this.
And if a tool cares then it would also need to intercept
pthread_tryjoin_np and pthread_timedjoin_np, otherwise
it will mess thread states.
Fwiw, asan does not intercept these functions either.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113920
Since glibc 2.34, dlsym does
1. malloc 1
2. malloc 2
3. free pointer from malloc 1
4. free pointer from malloc 2
These sequence was not handled by trivial dlsym hack.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52278
Reviewed By: eugenis, morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112588
Currently, SANITIZER_COMMON_SUPPORTED_OS is being used to enable many libraries.
Unfortunately this makes it impossible to selectively disable a library based on the OS.
This patch removes this limitation by adding a separate list of supported OSs for the lsan, ubsan, ubsan_minimal, and stats libraries.
Reviewed By: delcypher
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113444
Enable -Wformat in sanitizer_common now that it's
cleaned up from existing warnings.
But disable it in all sanitizers for now since
they are not cleaned up yet, but inherit sanitizer_common CFLAGS.
Depends on D107980.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107981
Mutex does not support LINKER_INITIALIZED support.
As preparation to switching BlockingMutex to Mutex,
proactively replace all BlockingMutex(LINKER_INITIALIZED) to Mutex.
All of these are objects with static storage duration and Mutex ctor
is constexpr, so it should be equivalent.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106944
The current (default) line length is 80 columns.
That's based on old hardware and historical conventions.
There are no existent reasons to keep line length that small,
especially provided that our coding style uses quite lengthy
identifiers. The Linux kernel recently switched to 100,
let's start with 100 as well.
This change intentionally does not re-format code.
Re-formatting is intended to happen incrementally,
or on dir-by-dir basis separately.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, melver, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106436
Currently ThreadRegistry is overcomplicated because of tsan,
it needs tid quarantine and reuse counters. Other sanitizers
don't need that. It also seems that no other sanitizer now
needs max number of threads. Asan used to need 2^24 limit,
but it does not seem to be needed now. Other sanitizers blindly
copy-pasted that without reasons. Lsan also uses quarantine,
but I don't see why that may be potentially needed.
Add a ThreadRegistry ctor that does not require any sizes
and use it in all sanitizers except for tsan.
In preparation for new tsan runtime, which won't need
any of these parameters as well.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105713
Enable clang Thread Safety Analysis for sanitizers:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThreadSafetyAnalysis.html
Thread Safety Analysis can detect inconsistent locking,
deadlocks and data races. Without GUARDED_BY annotations
it has limited value. But this does all the heavy lifting
to enable analysis and allows to add GUARDED_BY incrementally.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105716
Currently ThreadRegistry is overcomplicated because of tsan,
it needs tid quarantine and reuse counters. Other sanitizers
don't need that. It also seems that no other sanitizer now
needs max number of threads. Asan used to need 2^24 limit,
but it does not seem to be needed now. Other sanitizers blindly
copy-pasted that without reasons. Lsan also uses quarantine,
but I don't see why that may be potentially needed.
Add a ThreadRegistry ctor that does not require any sizes
and use it in all sanitizers except for tsan.
In preparation for new tsan runtime, which won't need
any of these parameters as well.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105713
Code patterns like this are common, `#` at the line beginning
(https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Preprocessor_Directives),
one space indentation for if/elif/else directives.
```
#if SANITIZER_LINUX
# if defined(__aarch64__)
# endif
#endif
```
However, currently clang-format wants to reformat the code to
```
#if SANITIZER_LINUX
#if defined(__aarch64__)
#endif
#endif
```
This significantly harms readability in my review. Use `IndentPPDirectives:
AfterHash` to defeat the diagnostic. clang-format will now suggest:
```
#if SANITIZER_LINUX
# if defined(__aarch64__)
# endif
#endif
```
Unfortunately there is no clang-format option using indent with 1 for
just preprocessor directives. However, this is still one step forward
from the current behavior.
Reviewed By: #sanitizers, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100238
Currently we have a bit of a mess related to tids:
- sanitizers re-declare kInvalidTid multiple times
- some call it kUnknownTid
- implicit assumptions that main tid is 0
- asan/memprof claim their tids need to fit into 24 bits,
but this does not seem to be true anymore
- inconsistent use of u32/int to store tids
Introduce kInvalidTid/kMainTid in sanitizer_common
and use them consistently.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101428
This was reverted by f176803ef1f4050a350e01868d64fe09a674d3bf due to
Ubuntu 16.04 x86-64 glibc 2.23 problems.
This commit additionally calls `__tls_get_addr({modid,0})` to work around the
dlpi_tls_data==NULL issues for glibc<2.25
(https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19826)
GetTls is the range of
* thread control block and optional TLS_PRE_TCB_SIZE
* static TLS blocks plus static TLS surplus
On glibc, lsan requires the range to include
`pthread::{specific_1stblock,specific}` so that allocations only referenced by
`pthread_setspecific` can be scanned.
This patch uses `dl_iterate_phdr` to collect TLS blocks. Find the one
with `dlpi_tls_modid==1` as one of the initially loaded module, then find
consecutive ranges. The boundaries give us addr and size.
This allows us to drop the glibc internal `_dl_get_tls_static_info` and
`InitTlsSize` entirely. Use the simplified method with non-Android Linux for
now, but in theory this can be used with *BSD and potentially other ELF OSes.
This simplification enables D99566 for TLS Variant I architectures.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D93972#2480556 for analysis on GetTls usage
across various sanitizers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98926
GetTls is the range of
* thread control block and optional TLS_PRE_TCB_SIZE
* static TLS blocks plus static TLS surplus
On glibc, lsan requires the range to include
`pthread::{specific_1stblock,specific}` so that allocations only referenced by
`pthread_setspecific` can be scanned.
This patch uses `dl_iterate_phdr` to collect TLS ranges. Find the one
with `dlpi_tls_modid==1` as one of the initially loaded module, then find
consecutive ranges. The boundaries give us addr and size.
This allows us to drop the glibc internal `_dl_get_tls_static_info` and
`InitTlsSize` entirely. Use the simplified method with non-Android Linux for
now, but in theory this can be used with *BSD and potentially other ELF OSes.
In the future, we can move `ThreadDescriptorSize` code to lsan (and consider
intercepting `pthread_setspecific`) to avoid hacks in generic code.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D93972#2480556 for analysis on GetTls usage
across various sanitizers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98926
InternalScopedString uses InternalMmapVector internally
so it can be resized dynamically as needed.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98751
This mechanism is intended to provide a way to treat the `arg` pointer
of a created (but not yet started) thread as reachable. In future
patches this will be implemented in `GetAdditionalThreadContextPtrs`.
A separate implementation of `GetAdditionalThreadContextPtrs` exists
for ASan and LSan runtimes because they need to be implemented
differently in future patches.
rdar://problem/63537240
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95183
This makes suppression list to work similar to __lsan_ignore_object.
Existing behavior was inconsistent and very inconvenient for complex
data structures.
Example:
struct B;
struct A { B* ptr; };
A* t = makeA();
t->ptr = makeB();
Before the patch: if makeA suppressed by suppression file, lsan will
still report the makeB() leak, so we need two suppressions.
After the patch: a single makeA suppression is enough (the same as a
single __lsan_ignore_object(t)).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93884
