This reverts commit 6905394d153960ded3a7b884a9747ed2d4a6e8d8. The
changed test is failing on Debian/x86_64, possibly because lldb is
subtracting an offset from the DW_AT_call_pc address used for the
artificial frame:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian/builds/7171/steps/test/logs/stdio
/home/worker/lldb-x86_64-debian/lldb-x86_64-debian/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/tail_call_frames/unambiguous_sequence/main.cpp:6:17: error: CHECK-NEXT: expected string not found in input
// CHECK-NEXT: frame #1: 0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} a.out`func3() at main.cpp:14:3 [opt] [artificial]
^
<stdin>:3:2: note: scanning from here
frame #1: 0x0000000000401127 a.out`func3() at main.cpp:13:4 [opt] [artificial]
lldb currently guesses the address to use when creating an artificial
frame (i.e., a frame constructed by determining the sequence of (tail)
calls which must have happened).
Guessing the address creates problems -- use the actual address provided
by the DW_AT_call_pc attribute instead.
Depends on D76336.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76337
Summary:
Detection of C strings does not work well for pointers. If the value object holding a (char*) pointer does not have an address (e.g., if it is a temp), the value is not considered a C string and its formatting is left to DumpDataExtractor rather than the special handling in ValueObject::DumpPrintableRepresentation. This leads to inconsistent outputs, e.g., in escaping non-ASCII characters. See the test for an example; the second test expectation is not met (without this patch). With this patch, the C string detection only insists that the pointer value is valid. The patch makes the code consistent with how the pointer is obtained in ValueObject::ReadPointedString.
Reviewers: teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76650
There an option: EvaluateExpressionOptions::SetResultIsInternal to indicate
whether the result number should be returned to the pool or not. It
got broken when the PersistentExpressionState was refactored.
This fixes the issue and provides a test of the behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76532
This adds a formatter for libc++ std::unique_ptr.
I also refactored GetValueOfCompressedPair(...) out of LibCxxList.cpp since I need the same functionality and it made sense to share it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76476
The newly introduced tests for unsetting environment variables
is failing on Windows. Skip the test there to allow investigation.
It seems like setting inherit-env to false was never tested
before. Could it be that the Windows process launcher doesn't
honor this setting?
Summary:
The interactions between the environment settings (`target.env-vars`,
`target.inherit-env`) and the inferior life-cycle are non-obvious
today. For example, if `target.inherit-env` is set, the `target.env-vars`
setting will be augmented with the contents of the host environment
the first time the launch environment is queried (usually at
launch). After that point, toggling `target.inherit-env` will have no
effect as there's no tracking of what comes from the host and what is
a user setting.
This patch computes the environment every time it is queried rather
than updating the contents of the `target.env-vars` property. This
means that toggling the `target.inherit-env` property later will now
have the intended effect.
This patch also adds a `target.unset-env-vars` settings that one can
use to remove variables from the launch environment. Using this, you
can inherit all but a few of the host environment.
The way the launch environment is constructed is:
1/ if `target.inherit-env` is set, then read the host environment
into the launch environment.
2/ Remove for the environment the variables listed in
`target.unset-env`.
3/ Augment the launch environment with the contents of
`target.env-vars`. This overrides any common values with the host
environment.
The one functional difference here that could be seen as a regression
is that `target.env-vars` will not contain the inferior environment
after launch. The patch implements a better alternative in the
`target show-launch-environment` command which will return the
environment computed through the above rules.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76470
Summary:
When no arguments or environment is provided to SBTarget::LaunchSimple,
make it use the values surrently set in the target properties. You can
get the current behavior back by passing an empty array instead.
It seems like using the target defaults is a much more intuitive
behavior for those APIs. It's unllikely that anyone passed NULL/None to
this API after having set properties in order to explicitely ignore them.
One direct application of this change is within the testsuite. We have
plenty of tests calling LaunchSimple and passing None as environment.
If you passed --inferior-env to dotest.py to, for example, set
(DY)LD_LIBRARY_PATH, it wouldn't be taken into account.
Reviewers: jingham, labath, #libc_abi!
Subscribers: libcxx-commits, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb, #libc_abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76045
Summary:
The TargetProperties constructor invokes a series of callbacks to
prime the properties from the default ones. The one callback in
charge of updating the inferior environment was commented out
because it crashed.
The reason for the crash is that TargetProperties is a parent class
of Target and the callbacks were invoked using a Target that was
not fully initialized. This patch moves the initial callback
invocations to a separate function that can be called at the end
the Target constructor, thus preventing the crash.
One existing test had to be modified, because the initialization of
the environment properties now take place at the time the target is
created, not at the first use of the environment (usually launch
time).
The added test checks that the LaunchInfo object returned by
the target has been primed with the values from the settings.
Reviewers: jingham, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76009
Summary:
LLDB keeps statistics of how many expression evaluations are 'successful' and 'failed'
which are updated after each expression evaluation (assuming statistics are enabled).
From what I understand the idea is that this could be used to define how well LLDB's
expression evaluator is working.
Currently all expressions are considered successful unless the user passes an explicit
positive element counting to the expression command (with the `-Z` flag) and then passes
an expression that successfully evaluates to a type that doesn't support element counting.
Expressions that fail to parse, execute or any other outcome are considered successful
at the moment which means we nearly always have a 100% expression evaluation
success rate.
This patch makes that expressions that fail to parse or execute to count as failed
expressions.
We can't know whether the expression failed because of an user error
of because LLDB couldn't correctly parse/compile it, but I would argue that this is
still an improvement. Assuming that the percentage of valid user expressions stays
mostly constant over time (which seems like a reasonable assumption), then this
way we can still see if we are doing relatively better/worse from release to release.
Reviewers: davide, aprantl, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76280
Summary: Inspired by https://reviews.llvm.org/D74636, I'm introducing a basic version of Environment in the API. More functionalities can be added as needed.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits, diazhector98
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76111
Summary:
If no custom launching is used, lldb-vscode launches a program with an empty environment by default. In some scenarios, the user might want to simply use the same environment as the IDE to have a set of working environment variables (e.g. PATH wouldn't be empty). In fact, most DAPs in VSCode have this behavior by default. In other cases the user definitely needs to set their custom environment, which is already supported. To make the first case easier for the user (e.g. not having to copy the PATH to the launch.json every time they want to debug simple programs that rely on PATH), a new option is now offered. inheritEnvironment will launch the program copying its own environment, and it's just a boolean flag.
{F11347695}
Reviewers: clayborg, aadsm, diazhector98, kusmour
Subscribers: labath, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74636
Summary: Inspired by https://reviews.llvm.org/D74636, I'm introducing a basic version of Environment in the API. More functionalities can be added as needed.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits, diazhector98
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76111
Summary:
On Linux, when executing lldb-vscode on a remote machine, lldb-vscode doesn't die after the debug session ends. It keeps trying to read JSON input to no avail.
This diff indicates lldb-vscode to stop reading after a termination event has been processed.
Reviewers: clayborg, aadsm, kusmour
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76314
(This is D68010 but I also set the new parameter in LibStdcpp.cpp to fix
the Debian tests).
Summary:
Printing a summary for an empty NSPathStore2 string currently prints random bytes behind the empty string pointer from memory (rdar://55575888).
It seems the reason for this is that the SourceSize parameter in the `ReadStringAndDumpToStreamOptions` - which is supposed to contain the string
length - actually uses the length 0 as a magic value for saying "read as much as possible from the buffer" which is clearly wrong for empty strings.
This patch adds another flag that indicates if we have know the string length or not and makes this behaviour dependent on that (which seemingly
was the original purpose of this magic value).
Reviewers: aprantl, JDevlieghere, shafik
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: christof, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68010
Summary:
TestInlineStepping tests LLDB's ability to step in the presence of
inline frames. The testcase source has a number of functions and some
of them are marked `always_inline`.
The test is built around the assumption that the inline function will
be fully represented once inlined, but this is not true with the
current arm64 code generation. For example:
void caller() {
always_inline_function(); // Step here
}
When stppeing into `caller()` above, you might immediatly end up in
the inlines frame for `always_inline_function()`, because there might
literally be no code associated with `caller()` itself.
This patch hacks around the issue by adding an `asm volatile("nop")`
on some lines with inlined calls where we expect to be able to
step. Like so:
void caller() {
asm volatile("nop"); always_inline_function(); // Step here
}
This guarantees there is always going to be one instruction for this
line in the caller.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, danielkiss, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76406
Summary:
TestBuiltinTrap fail on darwin embedded because the `__builin_trap`
builtin doesn't get any line info attached to it by clang when
building for arm64.
The test was already XFailed for linux arm(64), I presume for the same
reasons. This patch just XFails it independently of the platform.
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, danielkiss, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76408
This reverts commit 939ca455e72e822450013eff37c9ea7746850350.
This failed on the debian bot for some reason:
File "/home/worker/lldb-x86_64-debian/lldb-x86_64-debian/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-stl/libstdcpp/string/TestDataFormatterStdString.py", line 67, in test_with_run_command
"s summary wrong")
AssertionError: 'L"hello world! מזל טוב!\\0!\\0!!!!\\0\\0A\\0\\U0000fffd\\U0000fffd\\U0000fffd\\ [truncated]... != 'L"hello world! מזל טוב!"'
Diff is 2156 characters long. Set self.maxDiff to None to see it. : s summary wrong
Summary:
Printing a summary for an empty NSPathStore2 string currently prints random bytes behind the empty string pointer from memory (rdar://55575888).
It seems the reason for this is that the SourceSize parameter in the `ReadStringAndDumpToStreamOptions` - which is supposed to contain the string
length - actually uses the length 0 as a magic value for saying "read as much as possible from the buffer" which is clearly wrong for empty strings.
This patch adds another flag that indicates if we have know the string length or not and makes this behaviour dependent on that (which seemingly
was the original purpose of this magic value).
Reviewers: aprantl, JDevlieghere, shafik
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: christof, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68010
This test was stripping a binary generated by Makefile.rules which is
potentially codesigned. Stripping invalidates the code signature, so
we might need to re-sign after stripping.
The test was stripping the binaries from the Python
code. Unfortunately, if running on darwin embedded in a context that
requires code signing, the stripping was invalidating the signature,
thus breaking the test.
This patch moves the stripping to the Makefile and resigns the
stripped binaries if required.
It was an inline test before. Clang stopped emitting line information
for the TLS initialization and the inline test didn't have a way to
break before it anymore.
This rewrites the test as a full-fldeged python test and improves the
checking of the error case to verify that the failure we are looking
for is related to the TLS setup not being complete.
The test checks that we correctly set the right number of breakpoints
when breaking into an `always_inline` function. The line of this
funstion selected for this test was the return statement, but with
recent compiler, this return statement doesn't necessarily exist after
inlining, even at O0.
Switch the breakpoint to a different line of the inline function.
This patch changes the way the StackFrame Recognizers match a certain
frame.
Until now, recognizers could be registered with a function
name but also an alternate symbol.
This change is motivated by a test failure for the Assert frame
recognizer on Linux. Depending the version of the libc, the abort
function (triggered by an assertion), could have more than two
signatures (i.e. `raise`, `__GI_raise` and `gsignal`).
Instead of only checking the default symbol name and the alternate one,
lldb will iterate over a list of symbols to match against.
rdar://60386577
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76188
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Fix to get the AST we generate for function templates closer to what clang generates and expects.
We fix which FuntionDecl we are passing to CreateFunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo and we strip
template parameters from the name when creating the FunctionDecl and FunctionTemplateDecl.
These two fixes together fix asserts and ambiguous lookup issues for several cases which are added to the already existing small function template test.
This fixes issues with overloads, overloads and ADL, variadic function templates and templated operator overloads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75761
This was previously crashing due to a missing nullptr check (see
e2d8aa6bf774ef29e134c40f886c55557bb5f970 ). This just adds a test that should
make sure this doesn't crash in case a user ends up in this strange setup.
The GDB replay server sanity-checks that every packet it receives
matches what it expects from the serialized packet log. This mechanism
tripped for TestReproducerAttach.py on Linux, because one of the packets
(jModulesInfo) uses run-length encoding. The replay server was comparing
the expanded incoming packet with the unexpanded packet in the log. As a
result, it claimed to have received an unexpected packet, which caused
the test to fail.
This patch addresses that issue by expanding the run-length encoding
before comparing the packets.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76163
Fix to code from https://reviews.llvm.org/D64993.
Field StackFrame::m_behaves_like_zeroth_frame was introduced in commit
[1], however that commit hasn't added a copying of the field to
UpdatePreviousFrameFromCurrentFrame, therefore the value wouldn't change
when updating frames to reflect the current situation.
The particular scenario, where this matters is following. Assume we have
function main that invokes function func1. We set breakpoint at
func1 entry and in main after the func1 call, and do not stop at
the main entry. Therefore, when debugger stops for the first time,
func1 is frame#0, while main is frame#1, thus
m_behaves_like_zeroth_frame is set to 0 for main frame. Execution is
resumed, and stops now in main, where it is now frame#0. However while
updating the frame object, m_behaves_like_zeroth_frame remains false.
This field plays an important role when calculating line information for
backtrace: for frame#0, PC is the current line, therefore line
information is retrieved for PC, however for all other frames this is
not the case - calculated PC is a return-PC, i.e. instruction after the
function call line, therefore for those frames LLDB needs to step back
by one instruction. Initial implementation did this strictly for frames
that have index != 0 (and index is updated properly in
UpdatePreviousFrameFromCurrentFrame), but m_behaves_like_zeroth_frame
added a capability for middle-of-stack frames to behave in a similar
manner. But because current code now doesn't check frame idx,
m_behaves_like_zeroth_frame must be set to true for frames with 0 index,
not only for frame that behave like one. In the described test case,
after stopping in main, LLDB would still consider frame#0 as
non-zeroth, and would subtract instruction from the PC, and would report
previous like as current line.
The error doesn't manifest itself in LLDB interpreter though - it can be
reproduced through LLDB-MI and when using SB API, but not when we
interpreter command "continue" is executed. Honestly, I didn't fully
understand why it works in interpreter, I did found that bug "fixes"
itself if I enable DEBUG_STACK_FRAMES in StackFrameList.cpp, because
that calls StackFrame::Dump and that calls
GetSymbolContext(eSymbolContextEverything), which fills the context of
frame on the first breakpoint, therefore it doesn't have to be
recalculated (improperly) on a second frame. However, on first
breakpoint symbol context is calculated for the "call" line, not the
next one, therefore it should be recalculated anyway on a second
breakpoint, and it is done correctly, even though
m_behaves_like_zeroth_frame is still incorrect, as long as
GetSymbolContext(eSymbolContextEverything) has been called.
[1] 31e6dbe1c6a6 Fix PC adjustment in StackFrame::GetSymbolContext
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75975
Patch by Anton Kolesov <Anton.Kolesov@synopsys.com>
This patch extends the reproducers to intercept calls to FindProcesses.
During capture it serializes the ProcessInstanceInfoList returned by the
API. During replay, it returns the serialized data instead of querying
the host.
The motivation for this patch is supporting the process attach workflow
during replay. Without this change it would incorrectly look for the
inferior on the host during replay and failing if no matching process
was found.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75877
Global properties are shared between debugger instances and
if a test doesn't clear changes in settings it made,
this leads to side effects in other tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75537
